Skip the header
Open access
Datasheet
Enhanced
5 June 2009

Cuscuta japonica (Japanese dodder)

Datasheet Type: Invasive species

Abstract

This datasheet on Cuscuta japonica covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Hosts/Species Affected, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Further Information.

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Cuscuta japonica Choisy, 1854
Preferred Common Name
Japanese dodder
Other Scientific Names
Cuscuta formosana Hay (1972)
Cuscuta systyla Maxim. (1859)
Cuscuta upcraftii H. Pearson (1906)
Mongynella japonica (Choisy) Hadac & Chrtek. (1970)
Local Common Names
China
jin deng teng
tu si
Japan
nenashikazura
USA
giant Asian dodder
EPPO code
CVCJA (Cuscuta japonica)

Summary of Invasiveness

C. japonica is native to eastern Asia (USDA-ARS, 2009) and is recorded as a significant weed of fruit and ornamental trees in Japan, China and neighbouring countries, but has now been repeatedly introduced to USA, apparently deliberately as a medicinal plant. It was first recognised in SE USA in the 1940s and was believed to be eradicated but there have been further occurrences in Texas (since 2001), and, since 2004, in California (USDA-NPAG, 2001; Hrusa and Kelch, 2006; Texas Invasives, 2007). It has proved locally invasive and damaging to fruit and ornamental trees and is the subject of intensive eradication efforts. Eradication has been achieved at many sites but there is continued introduction.

Taxonomic Tree

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

While many botanists have adopted the APG III system of classification for the orders and families of flowering plants which places

Cuscuta

in the family Convolvulaceae, the CAB Thesaurus continues to use the Cronquist system which places it under Cuscutaceae.    Cuscuta japonica, with a single style falls in section Monogyna of the genus, which also includes the weedy species C. reflexa, C. monogyna and C. lupuliformis (Yuncker, 1932).
Flora of China (2009) lists two varieties var. formosana (Hayata) Yuncker, and var. japonica. It also refers to some possible confusion with C. engelmannii Krock in some localities in China. Otherwise C. japonica appears to be a well-recognised and well-defined species, free of nomenclatural uncertainties.

Plant Type

Annual
Herbaceous
Parasitic
Vine / climber
Perennial
Seed propagated
Vegetatively propagated

Description

C. japonica is usually an annual but in California it is observed to over-winter and behave as a perennial (Tidwell, 2008). It is a typical parasitic dodder with yellowish vines 1-2 mm in diameter, almost devoid of chlorophyll, much branched. The vines twine anti-clockwise around the host stems and foliage. Leaves are absent, represented only by small hooded bracts, the same colour as the stems. The inflorescence is a loose spike about 3 cm long, of 5-10 sub-sessile flowers, each supported by 2 mm ovate bracts or bracteoles. Calyx are cup-shaped about 2 mm across, and deeply divided. Sepals are whitish, colourless or occasionally purplish, almost circular, sub-equal, and tuberculate on the lower sides. The corolla is white, campanulate/tubular, 3-7 mm long with 5 shallow lobes erect or deflexed, ovate-triangular, and much shorter than the tube. Stamens are inserted at the throat, anthers yellow on very short or no filament. Scales are oblong, fimbriate, and half as long as the tube. The ovary is spherical and smooth. The single style is about equal to the ovary, with two stigmas, much shorter than the style. The mature capsule is ovoid about 5 mm in diameter. The seeds brown, 2-2.5 mm, 1-3 per capsule. (Based on Flora of China, 2009 and other sources.)
C. japonica var. japonica has tongue-shaped stigma lobes, while in var. formosana they are quadrangular. In Taiwan, var. formosana also has larger flowers 4-7 mm long v. 3-5 mm long in var. japonica (Liao et al., 2000). The pollen morphology of both these varieties is described by Liao et al. (2005). The ultrastructure of the embryo has been described by Lee (2007a). The form observed in USA corresponds to var. japonica.

Distribution

C. japonica is native to eastern temperate Asia, mainly in Japan, China,Taiwan and South Korea, with distribution extending to more tropical conditions in southern China and Vietnam (Flora of China, 2009; USDA-ARS, 2009). It has been introduced to USA, apparently many times, over the past 30-40 years. USDA-NRCS (2009) still records it as occurring in Florida and South Carolina, though another USDA source suggests that it was eradicated from both Florida and South Carolina (USDA-NPAG, 2001). Both sources confirm continuing occurrence in Texas, while further introductions have now been recorded in California (Hrusa and Kelch, 2006).
Liao and Tsai (1990) refer to C. japonica being newly recorded in Taiwan, but Kuoh and Chiang (1989) had already recorded C. japonica var. formosa occurring on at least 36 host species in Taiwan a year earlier. Hence the status of C. japonica in Taiwan is not completely clear but it is assumed to be native there.

Distribution Map

This content is currently unavailable.

Distribution Table

This content is currently unavailable.

History of Introduction and Spread

According to USDA-NPAG (2001), C. japonica was introduced to a number of sites in USA, in Texas, Florida and South Carolina from 1940s onward but was apparently eradicated. It was subsequently re-introduced to Texas about 2001 and continues to persist there, while also now occurring quite widely in California, as a result of deliberate introduction as a medicinal herb and by subsequent accidental or (mainly) deliberate spread in the field (Hrusa and Kelch, 2006).

Introductions

Introduced toIntroduced fromYearReasonsIntroduced byEstablished in wild throughReferencesNotes
Natural reproductionContinuous restocking
CaliforniaChina2004 YesNoMany introductions across the state
FloridaChina1943 YesNoBelieved eradicated
South CarolinaChina1971 YesNoBelieved eradicated
TexasChina1941 & 2001 YesNoNew introductions persisting in Houston
USAChina1941 YesNo 

Risk of Introduction

The risks of introduction are apparently high to judge from the large number of sites where it has been detected in California. Some of these (over 200) sites may be the result of local re-distribution, but many are believed to be the result of deliberate importation of living shoots of the plant as a herbal medicinal material.

Means of Movement and Dispersal

While some other Cuscuta species have been found to enter USA in medicinal herb preparations, which are supposed to be crushed and should not contain viable seeds but do so, it appears that most if not all introduction of C. japonica occurs as vegetative material, deliberately introduced by passengers from Asia (Fred Hrusa, California Department of Food and Agriculture, USA, personal communication, 2009).
At the local level there can be a steady spread of established infestations by vegetative growth, or via discarded garden waste, or by birds using it for nesting material, but again there is suspicion that most spread is due to deliberate transfer of Cuscuta stems by those interested in growing and using the material for medicinal purposes.

Natural Dispersal (Non-Biotic)

Cuscuta species have no specialized dispersal mechanism and movement is assumed to occur by wind and water.

Vector Transmission (Biotic)

The main biotic dispersal agent of C. japonica, both locally and internationally, is man, as seeds and vines are transported for use in medicinal herb products.

Accidental Introduction

At the local level there may be accidental movement as a result of soil movement, and disposal of garden waste. At the international level, it has been suggested that some of the introductions to USA may have resulted from contamination of kudzu vine (Pueraria lobata) (Yuncker, 1965; O’Driscoll, 2003).

Intentional Introduction

While some introductions into USA may have arisen from deliberate introduction of herbal products accidentally contaminated with whole viable seeds, most are thought to be the result of deliberate smuggling of vegetative material for medicinal purposes (Fred Hrusa, California Department of Food and Agriculture, USA, personal communication, 2009).

Pathway Causes

Pathway Vectors

Pathway vectorNotesLong distanceLocalReferences
Aircraft (pathway vector) Yes  
Land vehicles (pathway vector)  Yes 
Mail (pathway vector) Yes  
Plants or parts of plants (pathway vector) YesYes 

Plant Trade

Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transportPest stagesBorne internallyBorne externallyVisibility of pest or symptoms
Growing medium accompanying plants
weeds/seeds
Yes Pest or symptoms usually invisible
Leaves
weeds/stems
 YesPest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches
weeds/stems
 YesPest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
True seeds (inc. grain)
weeds/seeds
 YesPest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope

Hosts/Species Affected

C. japonica has a relatively wide host range which includes herbs, woody plants and ferns. Liao et al. (2000) record 36 host species in Taiwan: Zaroug and Ito (1988) record 32 hosts in 16 different families in Japan. The latter authors also note that while C. japonica grew very well on aubergine and potato, it showed limited vigour on pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata), was relatively weak on soyabean and did not persist on maize, tomato or Trifolium pratense, apparently due to a hypersensitive response. Pea, cucumber and Brassica campestris were immune. Euphorbia pulcherrima is described by Christensen et al. (2003) as ‘partially incompatible’, developing abnormal ‘coral-like’ growth, before apparently normal shoot growth, but the latter die before flowering. Hu et al. (2005) describe somewhat different virulence on a range of hosts including Wedelia chinensis, Broussonetia papyrifera, Ipomoea cairica and Lantana camara. Tree crops affected include several commercial fruit species (apple, citrus, grape) and also ornamental trees which are apparently the main hosts in USA. In Texas, 20 hosts have been recorded (Camilli, 2003).

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

HostFamilyHost statusReferences
Allium cepa (onion)LiliaceaeOther 
Asparagus officinalis (asparagus)LiliaceaeOther 
Broussonetia papyrifera (paper mulberry)MoraceaeWild host 
CitrusRutaceaeOther 
Citrus maxima (pummelo)RutaceaeOther 
Dimocarpus longan (longan tree)SapindaceaeOther 
Diospyros kaki (persimmon)EbenaceaeOther 
Impatiens balsamina (garden balsam)BalsaminaceaeWild host 
Ipomoea cairica (five-fingered morning glory)ConvolvulaceaeWild host 
Lantana camara (lantana)VerbenaceaeWild host 
Malus sylvestris (crab-apple tree)RosaceaeMain 
Medicago sativa (lucerne)FabaceaeOther 
Mimosa diplotricha (giant sensitive plant)FabaceaeWild host 
Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)SolanaceaeOther 
Panax ginseng (Asiatic ginseng)AraliaceaeOther 
Pelargonium zonale hybridsGeraniaceaeOther 
Prunus (stone fruit)RosaceaeMain 
Pueraria montana var. lobata (kudzu)FabaceaeWild host 
Quercus (oaks)FagaceaeWild host 
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)SolanaceaeOther 
Solidago canadensis (Canadian goldenrod)AsteraceaeWild host 
Sphagneticola calendulaceaAsteraceaeWild host 
Vitis vinifera (grapevine)VitaceaeOther 

Growth Stages

Flowering stage
Fruiting stage
Vegetative growing stage

Diagnosis

Identification of C. japonica from seed morphology is difficult. In the field, flowering specimens are not difficult to distinguish from other species, while the hooded leaf-bracts distinguish it from all the native American species. This is now also achieved by the use of RFLP techniques which have been developed to help distinguish C. japonica tissue from native American species in the vegetative stage (Woods et al., 2008). It is not clear whether this latter technique allows discrimination of seed (or crushed seed) samples. C. chinensis and C. australis were not included in the work by Woods et al. but would presumably not be confused as their profiles would be more comparable to other members of the Grammica section of the genus.

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

C. japonica is distinct from other weedy Cuscuta species in having a single style, longer than the stamens, with two short but distinct stigmas. In C. lupuliformis the single style is shorter and the stigmas are little more than lobes. In C. reflexa and C. monogyna also there is only a single style but it is extremely short or non-existent. The seeds of C. japonica can be distinguished from those of C. monogyna by the exposed hilum, and scar area square and flush with the surface (hilum hidden and scar area narrow-rectangular and hidden in C. monogyna).
As most infestations of C. japonica in California do not flower, a means of successfully distinguishing it from native North American Cuscuta species in the vegetative stage has been developed by Woods et al. (2008), using RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism). C. australis and C. chinensis were not included in that study but as they fall in section Grammica of the genus rather than section Monogyna, they are also unlikely to be confused. Hu et al. (1997) had previously shown that preparations from seed of C. japonica, C. chinensis and C. australis could be distinguished on the basis of HPCE (high performance capillary electrophoresis).

Habitat

C. japonica is mainly a plant of warm temperate conditions. In Japan, it is described as a plant of roadsides and waste places (Morita, 1997). In Taiwan it occurs mainly in a zone between 1000 and 2000 m above sea level. In USA it occurs to some extent in fruit orchards but primarily in amenity trees and shrubs in urban situations.

Habitat List

CategorySub categoryHabitatPresenceStatus
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural landSecondary/tolerated habitatHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedProtected agriculture (e.g. glasshouse production)Secondary/tolerated habitatHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedManaged forests, plantations and orchardsSecondary/tolerated habitatHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedDisturbed areasSecondary/tolerated habitatProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedRail / roadsidesSecondary/tolerated habitatProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedUrban / peri-urban areasSecondary/tolerated habitatHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural forestsPrincipal habitatProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalScrub / shrublandsPrincipal habitatProductive/non-natural

Biology and Ecology

Genetics

  Information on chromosome numbers has not been found, although it is probably a multiple of 14. C. lupulina has 2n = 28 (Flora of China, 2009).   Two varieties - var. formosana and var. japonica - are recognised in China and in Taiwan (Guo and Li, 2000a; Liao et al., 2000; Flora of China, 2009). Guo and Li (2000b) refer to ‘rich genetic variation’ in C. japonica in China. Hybrids are apparently rare or non-existent.  

Reproductive Biology

  C. japonica reproduces both by seed and vegetatively. The flowering of Cuscuta species has been linked in different studies either to the flowering of the host, or, in C. reflexa particularly, to short days. In China, flowering occurs in August and fruiting in September, while in California it occurs very late in the season in the north of the state, suggesting that it is reacting to the shorter days of the autumn, but no specific study has been reported. Fortunately whether because of the late flowering or for lack of fertilization, seed set has not so far occurred in California (Tidwell, 2008). It has been confirmed that C. japonica is self-sterile (Tidwell, 2008) and the populations in California may be largely clonal. The presence of extra floral nectarines supports the assumption of insect pollination (Schaffner, 1980). Seed set does apparently occur in Texas and there is comment that a single plant can yield over 2000 seeds (Texas Invasives, 2007) with viability for 20 years (GBEP, 2006).   Vegetative spread occurs via the stems either naturally or deliberately by transfer of lengths of detached stem.   C. japonica can behave as an annual or, at least in California, as a perennial, readily surviving mild winters.  

Physiology and Phenology

  Cuscuta species are obligate parasites with negligible chlorophyll, totally dependent on attachment to a host plant within a short period after germination. Germination does not depend on the presence of host plants but occurs over a prolonged period as a proportion of hard-coated seeds gradually become permeable and allow absorption of water. This ensures that not too many seeds germinate at one time in the possible absence of a potential host plant. In many species, there is also an innate dormancy which is broken by chilling over the winter. There is a scarcity of information on the germination behaviour of C. japonica, but Lee (2007b) in his studies of the ultra-structure and development of the seedlings, used the standard procedure, for Cuscuta spp., of scarification by concentrated sulphuric acid to obtain germination for his studies, and it is assumed it is similar in its behaviour to other Cuscuta spp. On germination a very short root is formed which provides anchorage only, while the plumule elongates rapidly and, in the light, circumnutates widely anticlockwise until contact is made with a stem or other solid object. The length of the seedling rarely exceeds 10 cm and if a host is not located, the seedling dies. In most species the seedlings are not expected to survive more than a few days, but according to Camilli (2003) seedlings of C. japonica may survive for several weeks in the absence of a host. Once contact with a stem or other object is made, the shoot will twine around it, whether living or inanimate and the root and shoot base below this point will soon die. The anticlockwise coiling action requires blue or far-red light (Furuhashi et al., 1995) and is suppressed under red light or darkness. If a suitable host stem is found, several coils will develop, with pre-haustorial swellings on the inner face of the coiled stem, from which full haustoria develop in the presence of cytokinins, which derive partly from the parasite and partly from the host. Haustorial initiation may also involve calmodulin (Huang and Li, 1991). It also depends on blue or far-red light, with far-red being the much more effective (Furuhashi et al., 1995, 1997; Tada et al., 1996). Intrusive organs develop from the haustorium and searching hyphae penetrate the host tissues by a combination of separation and penetration of cells (these processes reviewed by Parker and Riches, 1993). Connections are then formed by a bridge of tracheids with the host xylem, while connection with the phloem via plasmodesmata between searching hyphae and host parenchyma cells has also been confirmed in C. odorata by Dorr (1987). Development of the tracheids and sieve tubes in C. japonica is described by Huang and Li (1987).Structure and development of the upper haustorium of C. japonica are also described by Lee (2007c). Once the haustorial connection is complete, new shoot buds develop close by, leading to the outgrowth of shoots which can elongate at a rate of 15 cm per day.   Although C. japonica stems normally show little sign of green-ness, there are well-developed chloroplasts: Lee KyuBae (2007d) and van der Kooij et al. (2005) have shown that there is a significant level of photosynthesis, comparable to, or greater than, that of C. reflexa. Chlorophyll content and photosynthetic activity are greatest in starved plants, e.g. in seedlings before attachment to the host, although the green colour is generally masked by the high levels of yellow carotenoids. This photosynthetic capacity clearly contributes to the unusual ability of seedlings (and stem fragments) of this species to survive for several weeks before attaching to a host.   Vegetative growth may continue for some time before any flowers are formed, or flowering may occur very rapidly. Flowering is thought by some authors to be linked to the flowering of the host plant but this is not apparently consistent.
The physiological effects of C. japonica on its hosts are discussed under Impacts.

Climate

Climate typeDescriptionPreferred or toleratedRemarks
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all yearWarm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all yearPreferred 
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summerWarm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summersPreferred 
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winterWarm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters)Tolerated 
Ds - Continental climate with dry summerContinental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers)Tolerated 
Dw - Continental climate with dry winterContinental climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry winters)Preferred 

Latitude/Altitude Ranges

Latitude North (°N)Latitude South (°S)Altitude lower (m)Altitude upper (m)
45-10   

Air Temperature

ParameterLower limit (°C)Upper limit (°C)
Mean annual temperature025
Mean maximum temperature of hottest month 30
Mean minimum temperature of coldest month-15 

Rainfall

ParameterLower limitUpper limitDescription
Dry season duration07number of consecutive months with <40 mm rainfall
Mean annual rainfall5002000mm; lower/upper limits

Soil Tolerances

Soil texture > light
Soil texture > medium
Soil texture > heavy
Soil reaction > acid
Soil reaction > neutral
Soil reaction > alkaline
Soil drainage > free

Notes on Natural Enemies

Guo and Li (2000b) recorded Alternaria tenuis [A. alternata], Fusarium semitectium [Fusarium pallidoroseum] and Pestalotiopsis guepini [Pestalotia guepinii] as fungi occurring on C. japonica. Guo et al. (1998) had previously shown that Fusarium solani from Cuscuta reflexa was also pathogenic on C. japonica in China, though it is not clear whether this species occurs naturally on C. japonica.

Natural enemies

Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Alternaria alternata (alternaria leaf spot)Pathogen
Stems
   
Fusarium polyphialidicumPathogen
Stems
   
Pestalotia guepinii (brown blight of tea)Pathogen
Stems
   

Impact Summary

CategoryImpact
Cultural/amenityNegative
Economic/livelihoodPositive and negative

Impact: Economic

Cuscuta spp. are known to be powerful sinks for metabolites, causing a severe drain on host resources and often completely preventing normal fruit development, as shown by Wolswinkel (1979) for C. europaea on faba bean. This powerful metabolic sink effect was studied and described in detail by Wolswinkel and Ammerlaan (1983). Wang et al. (2007) also record reductions in the photosynthesis of hosts parasitized by C. japonica.   The damage from Cuscuta spp. to infected hosts can be severe, to the extent of total crop loss and a number cause significant economic loss, especially C. campestris, on lucerne and a range of horticultural and agricultural crops. Woods et al. (2008) note that trees infested by C. japonica can be completely smothered and killed but it has not been recorded as a major threat to crops in its native area, and the damage to fruit and ornamental trees in USA is extremely localized and limited as it is routinely subject to eradication. However, economic loss can occur due to the direct cost of eradication programmes and the damage sustained to host plants in the course of eradication measures. Loss could also occur when the possible contamination by the parasite leads to quarantine restrictions on sale or movement of produce.
Cuscuta
species can act as bridges for the transmission of viruses and mycoplasma-like organisms, and C. japonica has been shown to transmit the causal agent of witches’ broom from one host to another (Zhang et al., 1991). Such transmissions are usually deliberate for research purposes but it is possible that they could occur accidentally and cause additional impact in that way.

Impact: Environmental

There is considerable potential for a damaging effect of C. japonica on biodiversity if it were allowed to flourish. The parasite has a limited and fairly specific host range which could result in a change in the flora of a habitat due to selective parasitization. However, so far it has not been allowed to realise this potential in the USA.

Risk and Impact Factors

Invasiveness

Proved invasive outside its native range
Has a broad native range
Is a habitat generalist
Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
Fast growing
Gregarious
Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
Reproduces asexually
Has high genetic variability

Impact outcomes

Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
Host damage
Modification of successional patterns
Negatively impacts agriculture
Negatively impacts forestry
Reduced amenity values
Negatively impacts trade/international relations

Impact mechanisms

Allelopathic
Competition - monopolizing resources
Competition - smothering
Competition - strangling
Pest and disease transmission
Parasitism (incl. parasitoid)
Rapid growth

Likelihood of entry/control

Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
Highly likely to be transported internationally illegally
Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
Difficult to identify/detect in the field
Difficult/costly to control

Uses

Economic Value

  Most of the concern over this species as an invasive weed arises from its economic value as a herbal medicine and the deliberate introduction and propagation that this has encouraged in USA. Several Cuscuta species are used in Chinese herbal remedies under the term ‘Semen Cuscutae’ (or ‘tu si zi’ in Chinese). Li et al. (2000) state that Semen Cuscutae is originally specified as the dry ripe seed of C. chinensis in China Pharmacopoeia. However, a survey of the herb market showed that C. australis was the main source and C. japonica was also a source in some areas. Their paper further shows that the content of sesamin (a lignan with dietary fat-reduction potential) is highest in C. chinensis and not detectable in C. japonica. Content of sesamin was higher in stems than in seeds, and it appears that stems are frequently used as a source material as well as seeds. According to Du et al. (1998), the preferred species is C. chinensis but C. australis and C. japonica are now often used because of the ‘decline in the production capacity of C. chinensis’. Ye Min et al. (2002) however show that C. australis has a much higher flavonoid content than either C. chinensis or C. japonica and comment that ‘the quality of Semen Cuscutae can be evaluated according to the content of flavonoids’. The properties attributed to these ingredients include ‘replenishing the kidney essence or ‘jing’ in order to support healthy sexual and reproductive functioning’; ‘nourishing the liver and brightening the eyes’; indications include ‘Impotence, seminal emission, dripping of urine after urination, enuresis, frequent urination, aching and weakness of the loins and knees, blurred vision and tinnitus; threatened abortion due to deficiency of the kidney; diarrhea due to hypofunction of the spleen and the kidney; external use for vitiligo’. There is evidence to support claims for some of these effects. Qin et al. (2000) confirm that extracts from seeds of C. chinensis ‘invigorate the reproductive system and reproductive endocrine function in male rats’. Oh Hyuncheol et al. (2002) confirm that derivatives of a caffeoylquinic acid from C. japonica have activity in keeping with reputed antihypertensive action of ‘Cuscuta Semen’. Yang et al. (2006) show that an extract of C. japonica can significantly protect the human sperm from damage caused by reactive oxygen species. Many other studies involve treatment with a combination of Cuscuta extracts with other herbs, making it difficult to judge the value of the Cuscuta itself.   Extracts of C. japonica have shown anti-fungal activity against Alternaria mali (Kim et al., 1993).

Social Benefit

C. japonica is widely valued in Asia for its medicinal benefits, and is likewise valued by some communities of Asian extraction in USA.           

Environmental Services

It is doubtful that C. japonica can be said to provide any environmental service.

Uses List

Medicinal, pharmaceutical > Traditional/folklore

Detection and Inspection

Detection of C. japonica in USA has involved visual inspection of imported herbal products and germination studies to check for viable seed. In the field it has been detected by surveys of residential neighbourhoods, concentrating on those known to have Asian immigrant populations. Aerial surveys are being considered (Tidwell, 2008).

Prevention and Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.

Prevention

 

SPS measures

  Many countries include all Cuscuta species in their official lists of prohibited, quarantine species. Holm et al. (1997) indicate that 25 countries have declared Cuscuta spp. as noxious, and that the movement of Cuscuta-infested material is prohibited in every state of the USA.   Dry heat at 100°C for 15 minutes has been shown to selectively kill seeds of Cuscuta spp. in nigerseed (Guizotia abyssinica) (Strasser, 1988) providing a means of de-contaminating contaminated imports but this has not had to be applied to the problem of C. japonica.  

Eradication

Successful eradication of C. japonica has been reported from some sites in USA. It is recorded that C. japonica was identified on the Clemson University site in South Carolina in 1971 (Invasive Plants of the Eastern United States, 2003). In 1991 it was decided to eradicate the infestation starting with removal of all C. japonica mats, then using herbicides glyphosate and dacthal to kill all host and parasitic vegetation within the infested site, followed by a controlled burn to fully destroy the vegetation and any seeds on the soil surface, fumigation with methyl bromide and sterilization with Vapam and Basamid granules.


Control

 

Cultural control and sanitary measures

  Methods for Cuscuta spp. in general include the use of clean seed.  

Physical/mechanical control

  Control of an established Cuscuta infestation may start with manual removal of the vegetative mass of the parasite from a woody host plant, or by mowing where it occurs on a herbaceous host. This may be followed by fire, before or after use of a herbicide. If there is evidence of germination from seed, the seedlings my need to be destroyed by repeated tillage.  

Movement control

  Movement of Cuscuta material must be minimized by cleaning equipment leaving an infested site and by controlling the movement of domestic animals.  

Biological control

 Melanagromyza cuscutae and the gall-forming weevils Smicronyx spp. have been tested for control of other Cuscuta spp. Similarly the fungi Alternaria cuscutacidae and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides have shown promise in some situations but none have proved reliable enough for use in practice. On C. japonica, a number of fungi have been studied for their potential as biocontrol agents, including Fusarium solani, F. semitectum, Pestalotiopsis guepini [Pestalotia guepinii] and Alternaria tenuis, but they have not yet been fully developed for use (Guo et al., 1998; Guo and Li, 2000).  

Chemical control

  Literature on C. japonica in USA refers to the use of pre- and post-emergence herbicides but few specific compounds are named. In the case of pre-emergence herbicides, trifluralin is mentioned by GBEP (2006) and others could include pendimethalin which is used successfully in legume crops for control of other Cuscuta spp. including C. campestris; and perhaps imidazolinone herbicides including imazaquin. Post-emergence, glyphosate, glufosinate and dacthal have all been used effectively. Herbicides may also be injected into the trunks of infested trees, to kill both parasite and host to prevent spread when trees are felled and utilized (Texas Invasives, 2007).  

Host Resistance

  There is no evidence for host varietal resistance to C. japonica.  

Monitoring and Surveillance

Detection of C. japonica in USA has involved visual inspection of imported herbal products and germination studies to check for viable seed. In the field it has been detected by surveys of residential neighbourhoods, concentrating on those known to have Asian immigrant populations. Aerial surveys are being considered (Tidwell, 2008).

References

Camilli K, 2003. Giant Asian dodder: a new invasive plant detected in Texas. Giant Asian dodder: a new invasive plant detected in Texas. Invasive Plants of the Eastern United States, unpaginated. http://www.invasive.org/eastern/other/texas.html
Christensen NM, Dörr I, Hansen M, Kooij TAWvan der, Schulz A, 2003. Development of Cuscuta species on a partially incompatible host: induction of xylem transfer cells. Protoplasma, 220(3/4):131-142.
Dorr I, 1987. The haustorium of Cuscuta <dash> new structural results. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on parasitic flowering plants Marburg, German Federal Republic, 163-170
Du XM, Kohinata K, Kawasak T, Guo YT, Mihayara K, 1998. Components of the ether - insoluble glycoside-like fraction from Cuscuta chinensis. Phytochemistry, 48:843-850.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Flora of China, 2009. Cuscuta japonica Choisy. Cuscuta japonica Choisy. unpaginated. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200018817
Furuhashi K, Kanno M, Morita T, 1995. Photocontrol of parasitism in a parasitic flowering plant, Cuscuta japonica Chois, cultured in vitro. Plant and Cell Physiology, 36(3):533-536.
Furuhashi K, Tada Y, Okamoto K, Sugai M, Kubota M, Watanabe M, 1997. Phytochrome participation in induction of haustoria in Cuscuta japonica, a holoparasitic flowering plant. Plant and Cell Physiology, 38(8):935-940.
GBEP, 2006. Japanese dodder. Cuscuta japonica. The Quiet Invasion: A Guide to Invasive Plants of the Galveston Bay Area The Galveston Bay Estuary Program. Japanese dodder. Cuscuta japonica. The Quiet Invasion: A Guide to Invasive Plants of the Galveston Bay Area The Galveston Bay Estuary Program. unpaginated. http://www.galvbayinvasives.org/Guide/Species/CuscutaJaponica
Guo FengGen, Li YangHan, 2000. Effect of spore germination and pathogenicity of parasitic fungi on dodders by solvent and temperature. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 16(2):81-83.
Guo FengGen, Li YangHan, 2000. Numerical taxonomy of three dodders. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 22(3):263-267.
Guo FengGen, Li YangHan, Deng FuZhen, 1998. Screening biological control fungi for dodders on woody hosts. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 14(4):159-162.
Holm L, Doll J, Holm E, Pancho J, Herberger J, 1997. World Weeds. Natural Histories and Distribution. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Holm LG, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, Plucknett DL, 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 391 pp.
Hrusa GF, Kelch D, 2006. Giant dodders 2004-2006. In: Plant Pest Diagnostics Center [ed. by Kodira, U. C.]. Sacamento, USA: California Department of Food and Agriculture, 9-19 and 41. [2006 Annual Report.]
Hu F, Kong C, Zhang C, Liang W, Wang P, 2005. Selection behavior of Cuscuta japonica on their hosts. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao, 16(2):323-327.
Hu P, Luo GA, Wang RJ, Guo HZ, Li JS, 1997. Identification of Semen Cuscutae by HPCE. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 32(7):549-552.
Huang JH, Li YH, 1987. A study of the developmental anatomy of haustoria of dodder (Cuscuta japonica Choisy). Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, No. 2:1-8.
Huang JZ, Li YH, 1991. Calmodulin and mechanism of haustorial formation induced by exogenous cytokinin application. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium of parasitic weeds, Nairobi, Kenya, 24-30 June 1991 [ed. by Ransom, J. K.\Musselman, L. J.\Worsham, A. D.\Parker, C.]. Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center)., 14-16.
Invasive Plants of the Eastern United States, 2003. Japanese dodder. Japanese dodder. unpaginated. http://www.invasive.org/eastern/other/clemson.html
Kim CJ, Kang BH, Lee IK, Ryoo IJ, Park DJ, Lee KH, Lee HS, Yoo ID, 1993. Screening of biologically active compounds from weeds. Korean Journal of Weed Science, 14(1):16-22
Kuoh CS, Chiang SHT, 1989. Host plants and the haustorium of Cuscuta japonica Choisy var. formosa (Hay.) Yunker (Convolvulaceae). Taiwania, 34(1):11-27.
Lee KB, 2007. Ultrastructure and development of seedlings of the parasitic weed Cuscuta japonicas. Journal of Plant Biology, 50:213-219.
Lee KB, 2007. Ultrastructure of crystalline inclusions in the thylakoids of dodder (Cuscuta japonica) plastids. Journal of Plant Biology, 50:325-330.
Lee KB, 2007. Ultrastructure of mature embryos in the parasitic flowering plant Cuscuta japonica. Journal of Plant Biology, 49:384-391.
Lee KyuBae, 2007. Structure and development of the upper haustorium in the parasitic flowering plant Cuscuta japonica (Convolvulaceae). American Journal of Botany, 94(5):737-745. http://www.amjbot.org/
Li Y, Ye M, Liu HW, Ji XH, Yan YN, 2000. Identification and determination of (+)-sesamin in Semen Cuscutae by capillary GC and GC-MS. Chinese Chemical Letters, 11(12):1073-1076.
Liao GI, Tsai JL, 1990. A newly recorded species in Taiwan, Cuscuta japonica Choisy. Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry, 23(3):23-25.
Liao GwoIng, Chen MingYih, Kuoh ChangSheng, 2000. Cuscuta L. (Convolvulaceae) in Taiwan. Taiwania, 45(3):226-234.
Liao GwoIng, Chen MingYih, Kuoh ChangSheng, 2005. Pollen morphology of Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae) in Taiwan. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 46(1):75-82.
Morita H, 1997. Handbook of arable weeds in Japan. Kumiai Chemical Industry Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. 128 pp.
O'Driscoll CW, 2003. Preliminary review of the genus Cuscuta in North America prepared for the NAPPO PRA Panel - July / August 2003. Pest risk assessment unit, Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Preliminary review of the genus Cuscuta in North America prepared for the NAPPO PRA Panel - July / August 2003. Pest risk assessment unit, Canadian Food Inspection Agency. unpaginated. http://www.nappo.org/PRA-sheets/CuscutaTable2003.pdf
Oh Hyuncheol, Kang DaeGill, Lee Sunyoung, Lee HoSub, 2002. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors from Cuscuta japonica Choisy. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 83(1/2):105-108.
Parasitic Plant Connection, 2009. Parasitic plant connection. Parasitic plant connection. unpaginated. http://www.parasiticplants.siu.edu/
Parker C, 2007. Cuscuta japonica in California. Haustorium, 51:6.
Parker C, Riches CR, 1993. Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Parker C, Riches CR, 1993. Parasitic weeds of the world: biology and control. Wallingford, UK; CAB International, xx + 332 pp.
Qin DaNian, She BaiRong, She YunChu, Wang JianHong, 2000. Effects of flavonoids from Semen Cuscutae on the reproductive system in male rats. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2(2):99-102.
Schaffner G, 1980. Extrafloral nectaries of Cuscuta. (Extraflorale Nektarien bei Cuscuta.) Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, 92(2/3):721-729.
Stefanovic S, Krueger L, Olmstead RG, 2002. Monophily of the Convolvulaceae and circumscription of their major lineages based on DNA sequences of multiple chloroplast loci. American Journal of Botany, 89:1510-1522.
Strasser EG, 1988. Studies on the use of dry heat to decontaminate niger seed (Guizotia abyssinica) infested with dodder seed (Cuscuta sp. Seed Science and Technology (Switzerland), 16(2):501-505.
Tada Y, Sugai M, Furuhashi K, 1996. Haustoria of Cuscuta japonica, a holoparasitic flowering plant, are induced by the cooperative effects of far-red light and tactile stimuli. Plant and Cell Physiology, 37(8):1049-1053.
Texas Invasives, 2007. Cuscuta japonica choisy. Cuscuta japonica choisy. unpaginated. http://www.texasinvasives.org/invasives_database/detail.php?symbol=CUJA
Tidwell T, 2008. Japanese dodder, a new phanerogamic pathogen in California. NPDN News (National Plant Diagnostic Network), 3(6):7-10.
USDA-ARS, 2009. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NPAG, 2001. NPAG data: Cuscuta japonica Japanese dodder. NPAG data: Cuscuta japonica Japanese dodder. USDA - APHIS - Plant Health, Plant Protection and Quarantine, New Pest Advisory Group (NPAG), unpaginated. http://www.invasive.org/eastern/other/DicCusCjO01.pdf
USDA-NPAG, 2009. NPAG data: Cuscuta japonica Japanese dodder. NPAG data: Cuscuta japonica Japanese dodder. USDA - APHIS - Plant Health, Plant Protection and Quarantine, New Pest Advisory Group (NPAG), unpaginated. http://www.invasive.org/eastern/other/DicCusCjO01.pdf
USDA-NRCS, 2009. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
Wang D, Hu F, Chen YF, Yang J, Kong CH, 2007. Photosynthetic characteristics of Cuscuta japonica and its hosts during parasitization and after detachment. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao, 18(8):1715-1721.
Wolswinkel P, 1979. Transport of assimilates and mineral elements at the site of attachment of Cuscuta. The role of phloem unloading in the parasitic relationship. Proceedings, Second International Symposium on Parasitic Weeds, North Carolina, 1979., 156-164
Wolswinkel P, Ammerlaan A, 1983. Sucrose and hexose release by excised stem segments of Vicia faba L. The sucrose-specific stimulating influence of Cuscuta on sugar release and the activity of acid invertase. Journal of Experimental Botany, 34(148):1516-1527
Woods P, Kelch D, Hrusa F, 2008. Molecular determination of immature and sterile specimens of Cuscuta japonica (Convolvulaceaer) using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. 13-19. [Plant Pest Diagnostic Center 2008 Annual Report.] http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/PHPPS/PPD/publications/annual reports.html
Yang X, Ding CF, Zhang YH, Yan ZZ, Du J, 2006. Protection of extract from Cuscuta japonica on human sperm acrosome and ultrastructure. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, 31(5):422-425.
Ye Min, Li Yan, Yan YuNing, Liu HuWei, Ji XiuHong, 2002. Determination of flavonoids in Semen Cuscutae by RP-HPLC. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 28(3/4):621-628.
Yuncker TG, 1932. The genus Cuscuta. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club, 18:113-331.
Yuncker TG, 1965. Cuscuta Linnaeus. In: North American Flora, Series II, Part 4. 1-40.
Zaroug MS, Ito K, 1988. Host range and susceptibility of some cultivated plants to dodder (Cuscuta japonica CHOISY) in Hokkaido. Weed Research, Japan, 33(2):129-135.
Zhang X, Chen Z, Chen Z, Sun S, Zhang F, Tian X, 1991. Study on the infection of MLO of jujube witches' broom disease to periwinkle (Vinca rosea. International Journal of Tropical Plant Diseases, 9(2):251-256.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 5 June 2009

Language

English

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation