Cyperus difformis (small-flowered nutsedge)
Datasheet Types: Pest, Invasive species, Host plant
Abstract
This datasheet on Cyperus difformis covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Hosts/Species Affected, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Prevention/Control, Further Information.
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Cyperus difformis L.
- Preferred Common Name
- small-flowered nutsedge
- Other Scientific Names
- Cyperus goeringii Steud
- Cyperus holoschoenoides Jan ex Schult
- Cyperus oryzetorum Steud.
- Cyperus subrotundus Llanos
- International Common Names
- Englishdirty-Doraone-arm sedgerice sedgesmallflower flat sedgesmall-flower umbrella plantvariable flatsedge
- Spanishcortaderaestoquillo (Colombia)juncia de agualleivuntiñavarita de San Jose (Bolivia)
- Frenchsouchet à petites fleurssouchet difforme
- Portuguesenegrinha
- Local Common Names
- jinquillojunco de agua
- AlbaniaTruska dyformash
- AustraliaDirty Doravariable flat sedge
- Braziljunquinho
- Czechoslovakia (former)Sachorec nepravidelny
- HungaryRizspalka
- IndonesiaJebunganJukut pendulRamon brendelan
- Italycipero globoso
- JapanTamagayatsuri
- Korea, DPRAlbang dong sani
- MalaysiaRumput air
- NepalChowGuchenMotheyOchumani
- NigeriaImeremere
- PhilippinesBaki-bakiBallayangBankoanBaong-baongGilhamonSirau-sirauUbod-ubod
- RomaniaParul porcului de balta
- Saint Luciaumbrella sedge
- Sierra LeoneA-kek-a-pot
- TaiwanChyou-hwa-hau-tsau
- ThailandKok ka-nargKok khanaak
- USASmall-flowered umbrella plant
- EPPO code
- CYPDI (Cyperus difformis)
Pictures

Growth habit
Growth habit: 6-80 cm in height, stems smooth, triangular, slightly winged, 0.7-3.0 mm thick. Leaves smooth, flat, linear, 5-25 cm long or often two-thirds of plant height, 2-6 mm wide, sometimes reduced to sheaths.
NOVARTIS

Inflorescence
Close-up of C. difformis plant with inflorescences. The inflorescence consists of dense, globose, umbellate heads, simple or compound, 5-15 mm in diameter, with 10-60 stellately spreading spikelets.
Tomas Marquez/DuPont-Spain

Young plants
Young C. difformis plants.
Tomas Marquez/DuPont-Spain

Young plants
Young C. difformis plants.
Tomas Marquez/DuPont-Spain

Seedlings
C. difformis seedlings.
Tomas Marquez/DuPont-Spain

Seeds
C. difformis seeds. The achenes are 0.6-0.8 mm long and 0.3-0.4 mm wide, triangular, obovate-elliptic, yellowish-brown or pale-brown, and minutely papillose.
Tomas Marquez/DuPont-Spain
Summary of Invasiveness
C. difformis is a sedge which is listed in Holm's list of the world's worst weeds, being a problem especially in rice, sugarcane, tea and maize. It is a dominant weed in direct-seeded rice when it occurs in high plant densities; forms dense mats of vegetation in the young crop and can cause rice yield losses of 12-50%. It is native to the tropics of the Old World, but is spreading well outside its native range. It has a relatively short generation period of as little as 4 to 6 weeks from seed to seed. It can spread along waterways and grow in disturbed sites, lake margins and on river banks.
Taxonomic Tree
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Cyperaceae (the sedge family) has a cosmopolitan distribution and plays a dominant role in wetland vegetation. Based on recent molecular phylogenetic studies, the family Cyperaceae consists of two main clades, corresponding to the subfamilies Cyperoideae and Mapanioideae (Simpson et al., 2003; Muasya et al., 2009). In the Cyperoideae, two clades stand out because of their extraordinary species diversity: (1) the clade corresponding to the predominantly temperate tribe Cariceae (approximately 1950 species); and (2) the clade corresponding to the mainly tropical tribe Cypereae (approximately 1120 species). Together, they cover nearly three-fifths of the species diversity in Cyperaceae (Larridon et al., 2013). Cyperus difformis was first described by Linnaeus (1756). It originated in the Old World tropics and is one of approximately 950 species in the genus Cyperus (Stevens, 2012).
Plant Type
Annual
Grass / sedge
Perennial
Description
C. difformis varies in height from 6 to 80 cm. The stems are smooth, triangular, slightly winged and 0.7-3.0 mm thick. The roots are numerous, fibrous and reddish. The leaves are smooth (or slightly scabrid on the midrib and margin), flat, linear, 5-25 cm long or often two-thirds of the plant height, 2-6 mm wide, sometimes reduced to sheaths. Sheaths are tubular, united, green to reddish-brown and without leaf blades at the base.
The inflorescence consists of dense, globose, umbellate heads, simple or compound, 5-15 mm in diameter, with 10-60 stellately spreading spikelets. The inflorescence is rather loose, simple or compound, subtended by 1-4 leaf-like bracts, one of which can be up to 25 cm long. The umbel rays are 1-5 cm long, some long and some long peduncled.
Spikelets are linear to oblong-linear, compressed but slightly swollen, obtuse, 2.5-8 mm long, 0.8-1.25 mm wide, 6-30 flowered. Glumes are 0.6-0.8 mm long, obovate, pale-yellowish to dark reddish-brown with yellow or white margins and a green midrib ending in a short mucro. Stamens 1-2. Style 3-branched. Achenes are 0.6-0.8 mm long and 0.3-0.4 mm wide, triangular, obovate-elliptic, yellowish-brown or pale-brown, minutely papillose. These descriptions are based on Haines and Lye (1983) and Holm et al. (1977).
The inflorescence consists of dense, globose, umbellate heads, simple or compound, 5-15 mm in diameter, with 10-60 stellately spreading spikelets. The inflorescence is rather loose, simple or compound, subtended by 1-4 leaf-like bracts, one of which can be up to 25 cm long. The umbel rays are 1-5 cm long, some long and some long peduncled.
Spikelets are linear to oblong-linear, compressed but slightly swollen, obtuse, 2.5-8 mm long, 0.8-1.25 mm wide, 6-30 flowered. Glumes are 0.6-0.8 mm long, obovate, pale-yellowish to dark reddish-brown with yellow or white margins and a green midrib ending in a short mucro. Stamens 1-2. Style 3-branched. Achenes are 0.6-0.8 mm long and 0.3-0.4 mm wide, triangular, obovate-elliptic, yellowish-brown or pale-brown, minutely papillose. These descriptions are based on Haines and Lye (1983) and Holm et al. (1977).
Distribution
C. difformis is native to the Old World (subtropical and tropical areas). Currently it is widespread throughout southern Europe, Asia, Central America, North America, South America, Africa and the islands of the Indian and Pacific oceans. It is mainly a weed of the tropics and subtropics but can be found from latitudes 45°N to 35°S (Holm et al., 1977).
Distribution Map
Distribution Table
History of Introduction and Spread
The history of introduction of C. difformis in the New World is not well known. Because this species behaves as an agricultural weed, it is highly probable that it was introduced as a contaminant of crop seeds (Holm et al., 1979; USDA-ARS, 2014). In the Caribbean, it was collected in the 1960s in Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic (US National Herbarium).
Risk of Introduction
The risk of introduction of C. difformis is high. This species has been listed as one of the world's worst weeds, being a problem especially in rice, sugarcane, tea and maize (Holm et al., 1979). It can grow in swamps, lake margins, and along the edges of rivers and canals. Because the species spreads along major waterways and in rice production areas, its likelihood to invade new habitats remains high.
Pathway Causes
Pathway cause | Notes | Long distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crop production (pathway cause) | As a contaminant | Yes | Yes | |
Disturbance (pathway cause) | Grows as a weed in disturbed areas | Yes | Yes |
Pathway Vectors
Pathway vector | Notes | Long distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Debris and waste associated with human activities (pathway vector) | Yes | Yes | ||
Machinery and equipment (pathway vector) | As a contaminant | Yes | Yes | |
Soil, sand and gravel (pathway vector) | As a contaminant of soils | Yes | Yes | |
Water (pathway vector) | Seeds | Yes | Yes |
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Family | Host status | References |
---|---|---|---|
Camellia sinensis (tea) | Theaceae | Main | |
Musa x paradisiaca (plantain) | Musaceae | Main | |
Oryza sativa (rice) | Poaceae | Main | |
Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane) | Poaceae | Main | |
Theobroma cacao (cocoa) | Malvaceae | Unknown | |
Zea mays (maize) | Poaceae | Main |
Growth Stages
Vegetative growing stage
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
C. difformis is readily distinguished by its dense, globose heads composed of many radiating spikelets. However, as a seedling or non-flowering plant, it closely resembles many immature, annual Cyperus spp. In a key to seedling Cyperaceae, Kostermans et al. (1987) use the coleoptile, seed, first leaf blade and first leaf sheath as diagnostic characters. Unlike C. iria, C. difformis releases no aroma when crushed.
Habitat
C. difformis is usually found on flooded or very wet soils, open soggy grasslands, pools (but not in deep water) and riverbanks, often associated with C. halpan and C. iria, where it is usually scattered but often becoming dominant. It prefers fertile soils but can also grow on poor sandy or clay soils (Kostermans et al., 1987). It is one of the commonest weeds of paddy or flooded rice but it has also been reported as a weed of upland rice and crops such as bananas, sugarcane, tea and maize (Holm et al., 1977). In general, C. difformis can be found growing in grasslands on mountain slopes, in shallow water, water margins, lake margins, riversides, swamps, wet places in grasslands, along trails, and in rice paddy fields.
Habitat List
Category | Sub category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | ||||
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Wetlands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Wetlands | Present, no further details | Natural |
Littoral | Mangroves | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Littoral | Mangroves | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Littoral | Mud flats | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Littoral | Mud flats | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | ||||
Freshwater | Irrigation channels | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Irrigation channels | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | Lakes | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Lakes | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | Rivers / streams | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Rivers / streams | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | Ponds | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Ponds | Present, no further details | Natural |
Biology and Ecology
C. difformis is an annual sedge, sometimes behaving as a perennial. It propagates from seeds (achenes or nutlets) which are produced in large quantities. In Italy, Jacometi (1912) reported that one plant could produce 50,000 seeds, with about 60% germination. Such fecundity enables C. difformis seedlings to become established at high densities, enabling it to rapidly cover the ground and become the dominant vegetation. In tropical climates, the plant can flower and produce seeds throughout the year, provided that sufficient moisture is present.
C. difformis is a weed of flooded rice, even where there is good water control, being capable of germinating under water. Civico and Moody (1979) note that this species has exceptional tolerance of flooding, greater than that of C. iria.
Studies in India have shown that chromosome numbers in C. difformis (n=16) do not vary but the plant exhibits marked phenotypic plasticity which is characteristic of individuals belonging to different populations/clones (Bir et al., 1992).
The ability of C. difformis to complete its vegetative and reproductive life cycle within one month makes it a very competitive weed. It is a not a particularly tall plant but it can have a high biomass per hectare. It competes with crops mostly for nutrients and water, rather than for light.
Like rice, C. difformis has the C3 photosynthetic pathway, a condition which favours growth in submerged soils.
C. difformis is a weed of flooded rice, even where there is good water control, being capable of germinating under water. Civico and Moody (1979) note that this species has exceptional tolerance of flooding, greater than that of C. iria.
Studies in India have shown that chromosome numbers in C. difformis (n=16) do not vary but the plant exhibits marked phenotypic plasticity which is characteristic of individuals belonging to different populations/clones (Bir et al., 1992).
The ability of C. difformis to complete its vegetative and reproductive life cycle within one month makes it a very competitive weed. It is a not a particularly tall plant but it can have a high biomass per hectare. It competes with crops mostly for nutrients and water, rather than for light.
Like rice, C. difformis has the C3 photosynthetic pathway, a condition which favours growth in submerged soils.
Climate
Climate type | Description | Preferred or tolerated | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
Af - Tropical rainforest climate | > 60mm precipitation per month | Preferred | |
Am - Tropical monsoon climate | Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25])) | Preferred | |
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | Preferred | |
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | Preferred | |
BS - Steppe climate | > 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitation | Tolerated | |
BW - Desert climate | < 430mm annual precipitation | Tolerated | |
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year | Preferred | |
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers | Preferred | |
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter | Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters) | Preferred |
Soil Tolerances
Soil texture > light
Soil texture > medium
Soil texture > heavy
Soil reaction > acid
Soil reaction > neutral
Soil drainage > seasonally waterlogged
List of Pests
Notes on Natural Enemies
There are no known natural enemies of C. difformis other than those pests and diseases of rice for which it is an alternative host. For further information, see Economic Impact.
Impact Summary
Category | Impact |
---|---|
Economic/livelihood | Negative |
Environment (generally) | Negative |
Impact: Economic
C. difformis is rated by Holm et al. (1977) to be a serious weed of rice in the United States, Australia, Italy, Japan, Madagascar, Taiwan and the Philippines, and a principal weed of rice in several European and African countries. In California, this plant has become resistant to rice-field herbicides. In Asian rice production, where herbicides are not used, this weed may account for 60-70% of the total biomass of the rice field. It is difficult to separate the competitive effects of C. difformis from those of other components of the weed flora, but 12-50% reductions in rice grain yields have been caused by this weed (Ampong-Nyarko and DeDatta, 1991). The rate of appearance of C. difformis and tiller number are the main factors causing yield loss in early rice (Yu, 1992). The costs of controlling C. difformis, whether manual, mechanical or chemical, are significant.
C. difformis is a host for several pests of rice. Meloidogyne incognita, a major root-knot nematode in southern Nigeria, can grow and reproduce on C. difformis (Atu et al., 1988). Eggs of the rice stem borer, Diopsis macrophthalma, have also been found on this weed in southern Nigeria (Alghali, 1979). The node-feeding black bug, Scotinophara latiuscula, an occasional pest of wetland rice fields in the Philippines, can develop on C. difformis (Barrion and Litsinger, 1987). The brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens can use C. difformis as a temporary food plant (Chu and Yang, 1984). Larvae of the rice leaf-folder, Marasmia patnalis, can survive for a short period on C. difformis before migrating to the rice crop (Joshi et al., 1985). Pathogens of rice that have been reported on C. difformis include Puccinia conclusa (Dube et al., 1979), Sarocladium oryzae (cause of sheath rot) (Balakrishnan and Nair, 1981) and Thanatephorus sasakii (cause of sheath blight) (Bandara and Nadaraja, 1979).
C. difformis is a host for several pests of rice. Meloidogyne incognita, a major root-knot nematode in southern Nigeria, can grow and reproduce on C. difformis (Atu et al., 1988). Eggs of the rice stem borer, Diopsis macrophthalma, have also been found on this weed in southern Nigeria (Alghali, 1979). The node-feeding black bug, Scotinophara latiuscula, an occasional pest of wetland rice fields in the Philippines, can develop on C. difformis (Barrion and Litsinger, 1987). The brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens can use C. difformis as a temporary food plant (Chu and Yang, 1984). Larvae of the rice leaf-folder, Marasmia patnalis, can survive for a short period on C. difformis before migrating to the rice crop (Joshi et al., 1985). Pathogens of rice that have been reported on C. difformis include Puccinia conclusa (Dube et al., 1979), Sarocladium oryzae (cause of sheath rot) (Balakrishnan and Nair, 1981) and Thanatephorus sasakii (cause of sheath blight) (Bandara and Nadaraja, 1979).
Impact: Environmental
C. difformis can impact natural wetlands and native vegetation swamps and flooded areas. Having heavy seed production and massive seedling densities, this rapid growing weed can quickly form dense colonies smothering native vegetation (Holm et al., 1979; USDA-NRCS, 2014).
Risk and Impact Factors
Invasiveness
Invasive in its native range
Proved invasive outside its native range
Has a broad native range
Abundant in its native range
Highly adaptable to different environments
Is a habitat generalist
Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
Pioneering in disturbed areas
Highly mobile locally
Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
Fast growing
Has high reproductive potential
Impact outcomes
Damaged ecosystem services
Monoculture formation
Negatively impacts agriculture
Negatively impacts livelihoods
Reduced amenity values
Reduced native biodiversity
Threat to/ loss of native species
Transportation disruption
Impact mechanisms
Competition - monopolizing resources
Competition - smothering
Rapid growth
Likelihood of entry/control
Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
Difficult to identify/detect in the field
Difficult/costly to control
Detection and Inspection
The experienced eye can detect the seeds of C. difformis as a contaminant of crop seed
Prevention and Control
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
The principles of good weed management in rice, such as those advocated by Ampong-Nyarko and DeDatta (1992), are applicable to C. difformis in rice and in other crops. These include the need to prepare clean seedbeds, prevent seed production, establish a healthy and vigorous crop and avoid contamination of crop seed at harvest.
C. difformis is susceptible to many of the usual methods of weed control in rice and other crops. These include hand-pulling, manual and mechanical tillage and trampling in puddled fields. Flooding of rice fields to a depth of 20 cm strongly suppresses the growth of C. difformis (Williams et al., 1990) but with the continuous use of the more usual shallower flooding, C3 weeds, including C. difformis, become dominant (Ampong-Nyarko and DeDatta, 1992).
Biological Control
At present there appears to be little scope for biological control of C. difformis, but good suppression of growth is possible where a thick mat of Azolla pinnata is established on the water surface of irrigated ricefields (Janiya and Moody, 1984).
Chemical Control
Many herbicides are approved for use in rice but their use is dictated by the conditions used to grow the crop, e.g. irrigated, rainfed lowland, upland and deepwater. C. difformis is susceptible to the following herbicides commonly used in rice: bensulfuron, bentazon, bifenox + 2,4-D, butachlor, butralin, 2,4-D, MCPA, oxyfluorfen, pendimethalin, piperophos + dimethametryn, pretilachlor + safener (e.g. fenclorim), propanil, thiobencarb and thiobencarb + 2,4-D.
Other rice herbicides active against C. difformis are cinmethylin and chlomethoxyfen (Ampong-Nyarko and DeDatta, 1991). Pyributicarb is reported to have excellent activity against C. difformis (Tsuzuki, 1990). Paraquat and glyphosate can both be used as non-selective, post-emergence herbicides against C. difformis, such as for land preparation using zero tillage. Resistance to bensulfuron has been reported in the USA and Australia (Heap, 1997).
Integrated Weed Management
Integrated weed management is recommended for cost-effective weed control.
C. difformis is susceptible to many of the usual methods of weed control in rice and other crops. These include hand-pulling, manual and mechanical tillage and trampling in puddled fields. Flooding of rice fields to a depth of 20 cm strongly suppresses the growth of C. difformis (Williams et al., 1990) but with the continuous use of the more usual shallower flooding, C3 weeds, including C. difformis, become dominant (Ampong-Nyarko and DeDatta, 1992).
Biological Control
At present there appears to be little scope for biological control of C. difformis, but good suppression of growth is possible where a thick mat of Azolla pinnata is established on the water surface of irrigated ricefields (Janiya and Moody, 1984).
Chemical Control
Many herbicides are approved for use in rice but their use is dictated by the conditions used to grow the crop, e.g. irrigated, rainfed lowland, upland and deepwater. C. difformis is susceptible to the following herbicides commonly used in rice: bensulfuron, bentazon, bifenox + 2,4-D, butachlor, butralin, 2,4-D, MCPA, oxyfluorfen, pendimethalin, piperophos + dimethametryn, pretilachlor + safener (e.g. fenclorim), propanil, thiobencarb and thiobencarb + 2,4-D.
Other rice herbicides active against C. difformis are cinmethylin and chlomethoxyfen (Ampong-Nyarko and DeDatta, 1991). Pyributicarb is reported to have excellent activity against C. difformis (Tsuzuki, 1990). Paraquat and glyphosate can both be used as non-selective, post-emergence herbicides against C. difformis, such as for land preparation using zero tillage. Resistance to bensulfuron has been reported in the USA and Australia (Heap, 1997).
Integrated Weed Management
Integrated weed management is recommended for cost-effective weed control.
Links to Websites
Name | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6 | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) | http://griis.org/ | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
References
Abud JK, 1986. Effects of herbicides on control of red rice (Oryza sativa L.), (Echinochloa crus-galli L.) Beauv. and (Cyperus difformis L.) in irrigated rice. Lavoura Arrozeira, 39(363):8-10
Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT, 2012. Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 98:1192 pp. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm
Alghali AM, 1979. Weed hosts of Diopsid (Diptera) rice stem borers in southern Nigeria. International Rice Research Newsletter, 4(4):21
Ampong-Nyarko K, DeDatta SK, 1991. A Handbook for Weed Control in Rice. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
Atu UG, Enyinnia T, Chinaka CC, 1988. Grass and sedge weed hosts of Meloidogyne incognita. Nigerian Journal of Weed Science, 1(1):17-20
Auld BA, Medd RW, 1987. Weeds. An illustrated botanical guide to the weeds of Australia. Melbourne, Australia; Inkata Press, 255 pp.
Balakrishnan B, Nair MC, 1981. Weed hosts of Acrocylindrium oryzae Saw., a sheath rot pathogen of rice. International Rice Research Newsletter, 6(6):13
Balogh L, Dancza I, Kiraly G, 2004. Actual list of neophytes in Hungary and their classification according to their success. In: Biological invasions in Hungary - Invasive plants [ed. by Mihaly, B. \Botta-Dukat, Z.]. 61-92.
Bandara JMRS, Nadaraja V, 1979. Reaction of some common weeds in Sri Lankan rice fields to Corticium sasakii. International Rice Research Newsletter, 4(3):15-16
Barnes DE, Chan LG, 1990. Common Wees of Malaysia and their Control. Malaysia: Ancom Berhad.
Barrett SCH, Seaman DE, 1980. The weed flora of Californian rice fields. Aquatic Botany, 9(4):351-376
Barrion AT, Litsinger JA, 1987. The bionomics, karyology and chemical control of the node-feeding black bug, Scotinophara latiuscula Breddin (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in the Philippines. Journal of Plant Protection in the Tropics, 4(1):37-54
Belov M, 2013. ChileFlora. http://www.chileflora.com/index.html
Binns B, 1968. A First Check List of the Herbaceous Flora of Malawi. Zomba, Malawi: The Government Printer.
Bir SS, Chatha GS, Sidhu M, 1992. Intraspecific variation in Cyperaceae from Punjab Plain, India. Willdenowia, 22(1-2):133-142
Boulos L, El-Hadidi MN, 1984. The Weed Flora of Egypt. Cairo, Egypt: The American University in Cairo Press.
Chandra SK, 2012. Invasive Alien Plants of Indian Himalayan Region- Diversity and Implication. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 3:177-184.
Chandrakar BL, Tripathi RS, Tuteja SS, Taunk, 1993. Effect of application timings and formulations of anilofos in broadcast seeded semi dry rice (Oryza sativa). Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of an Indian Society of Weed Science International Symposium, Hisar, India, 18-20 November 1993 Hisar, Haryana, India; Indian Society of Weed Science, Vol. III:13-15
Chu YI, Yang PS, 1984. Ecology of the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)) during the winter season in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Entomology, 4(2):23-34
Civico RSA, Moody K, 1979. The effect of the time and depth of submergence on growth and development of some weed species. Philippine Journal of Weed Science, 6:41-49
Clayton WD, 1972. Gramineae. In: Hutchinson J, Dalziel JM, Hepper FN, 1972. Flora of West Tropical Africa. Vol 3. Part 2. London, UK: Crown Agents, 349-512.
DAISIE, 2014. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. www.europe-aliens.org/default.do
Dastgheib F, Beigi M, 1988. Weed flora and their effect on rice in Fars Province, Iran. Iran Agricultural Research, 7(2):135-142
Deuse JPL, Birie-Habas J, Jeutong F, Nguimatsa M, 1983. Chemical weed control in irrigated rice in West Cameroon. Proceedings of the Second Biannual Conference, West African Weed Science Society [edited by Deat, M.; Marnotte, P.] Abidjan, Ivory Coast; West African Weed Science Society, 167-171
Diaz CA, 1976. Identificacion y analisis cuantitativo de malezas en arroz, cana de azucar, algodon y garbanzo. Trabajos y Resumenes, III Congreso Asociacion Latinoamericana de Malezas "ALAM" y VIII Reunion Argentina de Malezas y su Control, "ASAM", Mar de Plata. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1:15-30.
Drummond RB, 1984. Arable Weeds of Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: Agricultural Research Trust of Zimbabwe.
Dube VP, Tyagi S, Singhal VP, Charaya MU, 1979. Additions to the host range of Puccinia conclusa and Uromyces viciae-fabae. National Academy Science Letters, 2(12):432
Elliot PC, Clarisse RN, Beby R, Josue HR, 1993. Weeds in rice in Madagascar. International Rice Research Notes, 18(1):53-54.
Fang ZY, Wang SX, 1990. Preliminary study on weed control in dry seeded rice (DSR) after winter wheat. International Rice Research Newsletter, 15(6):26-27
Farrukh Hussain, Nigar MM, Jabeen Akhtar, Najma Abidi, 1984. Distribution of weeds in the fields of Virginia tobacco at Yar Hussain and its out-skirts. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(4):227-235
Fischer AJ, Lozano J, Ramirez A, Sanint LR, 1993. Yield loss prediction for integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice. International Journal of Pest Management, 39(2):175-180
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2014. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Florence J, Chevillotte H, Ollier C, Meyer J-Y, 2013. Base de données botaniques Nadeaud de l'Herbier de la Polynésie Française (PAP) (Botanical database of the Nadeaud Herbarium of French Polynesia). http://www.herbier-tahiti.pf
Fosberg FR, Sachet M-H, Oliver R, 1987. A geographical checklist of the Micronesian monocotyledonae. Micronesia 20: 1-2, 19-129.
Gómez-Laurito J, 2003. Cyperaceae. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 92:458-551. [Manual de Plantas de Costa Rica.]
Gonzales G, Webb ME, 1989. Manual para la Identicacion y Control de Malezas. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: CIAT.
Govaerts R, 2014. World Checklist of Cyperaceae. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
Graveson R, 2012. Plants of Saint Lucia. http://www.saintlucianplants.com
Graveson R, 2012. The Plants of Saint Lucia (in the Lesser Antilles of the Caribbean). The Plants of Saint Lucia (in the Lesser Antilles of the Caribbean). http://www.saintlucianplants.com
Haines RW, Lye KA, 1983. The Sedges and Rushes of East Africa. Nairobi, Kenya: East African Natural History Society.
Hancock IR, Henderson CP, 1988. Flora of the Solomon Islands. Research Bulletin No. 7. Honiara, Solomon Islands: Dodo Creek Research Station.
Heap IM, 1997. The occurrence of herbicide-resistant weeds worldwide. Pesticide Science, 51:235-243.
Holm LG, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, Plucknett DL, 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 391 pp.
Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University Press of Hawaii.
Horng RT, 1976. Investigation of weed flora on paddy fields in the Taichung District. Plant Protection Bulletin, Taiwan, 18(3):268-275
Imeokparia PO, 1989. Weeds of lowland rice in north-western Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Weed Science, 2(1-2):9-14
Jacometti G, 1912. Le erbe che infestano le risaie italiane. Atti del Congresso Risicolo Internazionale, Vercelli, 4:57-91.
Janiya JD, Moody K, 1984. Use of azolla to suppress weeds in transplanted rice. Tropical Pest Management, 30(1):1-6
Jauzein P, 1991. Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. a weed of rice fields in the Camargue. Monde des Plantes, 86(440):15-16
Jena SN, Patro GK, 1990. Weed composition in dry seeded wetland rice. International Rice Research Newsletter, 15(3):34
Joseph PA, 1986. Influence of different ecological situations on weed emergence in wetland rice. International Rice Research Newsletter, 11(4):38-39
Joshi RC, Medina EB, Heinrichs EA, 1985. Host plants of rice leaffolder (LF) Marasmia patnalis Bradley. International Rice Research Newsletter, 10(3):29-30
Khanna KK, 2009. Invasive alien angiosperms of Uttar Pradesh. Biological Forum, 1(2):34-39. http://www.researchtrend.net
Kim SC, Lee SK, Park RK, 1982. Ecological aspects and effective control of weeds in rice seedbeds. Research Reports of the Office of Rural Development, Crop, 24:107-113
Kurmi K, Das GR, 1993. Effect of herbicides on weed control in transplanted rice. Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of an Indian Society of Weed Science International Symposium, Hisar, India, 18-20 November 1993 Hisar, Haryana, India; Indian Society of Weed Science, 3:27-29
Larridon I, Bauters K, Reynders M, Huygh W, Muasya AM, Simpson DA, Goetghebeur P, 2013. Towards a new classification of the giant paraphyletic genus Cyperus (Cyperaceae): phylogenetic relationships and generic delimitation in C<sub></sub>4</sub)> Cyperus. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society [Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Comparative Biology of Monocotyledons (Monocots V), New York, USA, 7-13 July 2013.], 172(1):106-126. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8339
Li D, 1987. An investigation on paddy field weeds in Fujian. Journal of Fujian Agricultural College, 16(4):267-277
Linnaeus C, 1756. Centuria II Plantarum. Uppsaliae.
Lye KA, 1981. Studies in African Cyperaceae 18. Two new subgenera of Cyperus. Nordic Journal of Botany, 1:57-61.
Mangoensoekardjo S, Pancho JV, 1975. Weed inventory in plantations in North Sumatra. Biotrop Newsletter, No. 12:12
McCormack G, 2013. Cook Islands Biodiversity Database, Version 2007. Cook Islands Biodiversity Database. Rarotonga, Cook Islands: Cook Islands Natural Heritage Trust. http://cookislands.bishopmuseum.org/search.asp
McIntyre S, Finlayson CM, Ladiges PY, Mitchell DS, 1991. Weed community composition and rice husbandry practices in New South Wales, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 35(1):27-45
Merlier H, 1975. Weed flora in "upland" rice in the Ivory Coast. 2e Symposium sur le Desherbage des Cultures Tropicales, Montpellier, 1974; organise par ... COLUMA avec la participation des Instituts membres du ... GERDAT. Comite Francais de Lutte contre les Mauvaises Herbes. 8, av. du President Wilson, 75116 Paris, 127-141
Minh-Si H, 1969. Weeds in South Vietnam. Saigon, Vietnam: Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Land Reform and Development of Agriculture and Fisheries.
Moody K, 1989. Weeds reported in Rice in South and Southeast Asia. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
Moody K, Munroe CE, Lubigan RT, Paller EC Jr, 1984. Major Weeds of the Philippines. Los Baños, Philippines: Weed Science Society of the Philippines, University of the Philippines at Los Baños.
Muasya AM, Simpson DA, Verboom GA, Goetghebeur P, Naczi RFC, Chase MW, Smets E, 2009. Phylogeny of Cyperaceae based on DNA sequence data: current progress and future prospects. Botanical Review, 75:2-21.
Noda K, Teerawatsakul M, Prakongvongs C, Chaiwiratnukul L, 1985. Major Weeds in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Department of Agriculture.
Numata M, Yoshizawa N, 1975. Weed flora of Japan. Japan Association for the Advancement of Phyto-Regulators. Tokyo, Japan: Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai.
Ormeno N J, 1983. Survey of the principal weeds associated with the cultivation of rice (Oriza sativa L.). Agricultura Tecnica, 43(3):285-287
Pamplona PP, Evangelista CC, 1981. Comparative evaluation of Arosin, Rogue and butachlor for weed control in transplanted dapog and wet-bed raised rice field. SMARC Monitor, 2(4):18
Parham JW, 1958. The Weeds of Fiji. Bulletin Fiji Department of Agriculture, 35. Suava, Fiji: Government Press.
Parker C, 1992. Weeds of Bhutan. Weeds of Bhutan., vi + 236 pp.
Patel CL, Patel ZG, Patel RB, Patel HR, 1985. Herbicides for weed control in rice nurseries. International Rice Research Newsletter, 10(5):26
Raju RA, Reddy KA, 1992. Comparison of application methods for chemical weed control in rice. Plant Protection Quarterly, 7(1): 26-27.
Ranjit JD, Bhattarai AN, 1988. Crop Weeds and their Control in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Winrock International/USAID.
Raulerson L, 2006. Checklist of Plants of the Mariana Islands. University of Guam Herbarium Contribution, 37. 1-69.
Reddy CS, 2008. Catalogue of invasive alien flora of India. Life Science Journal, 5:84-89.
Rejmanek M, 1987. Systematics and distribution of California Cyperus weedy species. Proceedings, 39th annual California weed conference El Macero, California, USA, 83-86
Robertson SA, 1989. Flowering Plants of Seychelles. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens.
Sastry KSK, Boraiah G, Govindu HC, Khaleel TF, 1980. Weeds of Karnataka. Weeds of Karnataka. University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore India, 360pp.
Simpson DA, Furness CA, Hodkinson TR, Muasya AM, Chase MW, 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in Cyperaceae subfamily Mapanioideae inferred from pollen and plastid DNA sequence data. American Journal of Botany, 90:1071-1086.
Singh D, Gangwar B, 1987. Ricefield weeds in South Andaman, India. International Rice Research Newsletter, 12(4):47
Singh G, Singh JN, Tiwari S, Chauhan VS, Singh MP, 1989. Weed control efficacy of fluroxypyr and tridiphane in transplanted rice. Proceedings, 12th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference Taipei, Taiwan; Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society, No. 1:303-307
Singh SK, 1993. Economics of weed control in transplanted rainfed lowland rice in West Bengal, India. Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of an Indian Society of Weed Science International Symposium, Hisar, India, 18-20 November 1993 Hisar, Haryana, India; Indian Society of Weed Science, Vol. III:51-53
Smith AC, 1979. Flora Vitiensis nova: A new flora of Fiji. Volume I. Lawai, Kauai, Hawaii, USA: National Tropical Botanical Garden, 494 pp.
Soerjani M, Kostermans AJGH, Tjitrosoepomo G, 1987. Weeds of Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka, 716 pp.
Space JC, Waterhouse B, Denslow J, Nelson D, Waguk EE, 2000. Invasive plant species on Kosrae, Federated States of Micronesia. Honolulu, USA: USDA Forest Service, 43 pp.
Srinivasan G, Subbian P, 1991. Study on weed management in rice pulse cropping system. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 16(3):376-378
Stevens PF, 2012. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
Tanji A, Taleb A, 1997. New weed species recently introduced into Morocco. Weed Research (Oxford), 37(1):27-31; 35 ref.
Terry PJ, 1978. Sedge weeds of East Africa - II.Distribution. Technical Report ARC Weed Research Organization, No. 50:26 pp.
Terry PJ, 1981. Weeds and their control in the Gambia. Tropical Pest Management, 27(1):44-52.
Tsuzuki K, 1990. Pyributicarb (TSH-888). A new herbicide for rice. Japan Pesticide Information, No. 57:30.
Ul'yanova TN, 1988. Weeds of the Korea Democratic People's Republic. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskii Byulleten' Vsesoyuznogo Ordena Lenina i Ordena Druzhby Narodov Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Instituta Rastenievodstva Imeni N. I. Vavilova, No. 181:21-25
USDA-ARS, 2014. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2014. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
Vander N, 2003. The vascular plants of Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Smithsonian Institution, Atoll Research Bulletin, 503:1-141.
Villaseñor JL, Espinosa-Garcia FJ, 2004. The alien flowering plants of Mexico. Diversity and Distributions, 10(2):113-123.
Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH, 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii. Revised edition. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University of Hawaii Press/Bishop Museum Press. [Bernice P. Bishop Museum special publication.]
Wang Z, Xin M, Ma D, 1990. Farmland Weeds in China. Agricultural Publishing House, 506 pp.
Waterhouse DF, 1993. The Major Arthropod Pests and Weeds of Agriculture in Southeast Asia. ACIAR Monograph No. 21. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 141 pp.
Waterhouse DF, 1993. The Major Arthropod Pests and Weeds of Agriculture in South-East Asia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
Whistler WA, 1996. Botanical survey of Diego Garcia, Chagos Archipelago, British Indian Ocean Territory. Isle Botanica (online), 49 pp. http://www.zianet.com/tedmorris/dg/2005NRMP-Appendixe-botanicalsurvey.pdf
Williams G, Hunyadi K(Compilers), 1987. Dictionary of weeds of Eastern Europe. Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elsevier Science Publishers, 479<thin>pp.
Williams JF, Roberts SR, Hill JE, Scardaci SC, Tibbits G, 1990. Managing water for weed control in rice. California Agriculture, 44(5):7-10
Yu R, 1992. A study, using a calculation model, of the effect of small-flower umbrella plant (Cyperus difformis L.) on yield losses of early rice. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 8(1):58-62
Zhang RJ, Li ZF, He JH, 1989. Efficiency of delachlor-simetryne granule for the control of weeds in paddy fields and techniques for its application. Zhejiang Agricultural Science, No. 3:131-136; [5 tables].
Hakim, M. A., Juraimi, A. S., Ismail, M. R., Hanafi, M. M., Selamat, A., 2013. A survey on weed diversity in coastal rice fields of Sebarang Perak in Peninsular Malaysia.JAPS, Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23(2) 534-542. http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-23-2/33.pdf
Kiran, G. G. R., Rao, A. S., 2013. Survey of weed flora in transplanted rice in Krishna agroclimatic zone of Andhra Pradesh, India.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 19(1) 45-51. http://www.wssp.org.pk/4-19-1-45-51.pdf
Duary, B., Mukherjee, A., 2013. Distribution pattern of predominant weeds in wet season and their management in West Bengal, India. In: The role of weed science in supporting food security by 2020. Proceedings of the 24th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Bandung, Indonesia, October 22-25, 2013 [The role of weed science in supporting food security by 2020. Proceedings of the 24th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Bandung, Indonesia, October 22-25, 2013.], [ed. by Bakar, B. H., Kurniadie, D., Tjitrosoedirdjo, S.]. Bandung, Indonesia: Weed Science Society of Indonesia. 191-199.
Carvalho, V. C. de, Andrade, T. C. G. R. de, Silva, M. C. de C., Santos, R. de S., Pereira, D. L., 2018. Phytosociological survey of weeds in cacao plantation.Amazonian Journal of Plant Research, 2(2) 189-194.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 22 April 2014
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.