Skip the header
Open access
Datasheet
Enhanced
24 July 2013

Syzygium jambos (rose apple)

Datasheet Types: Invasive species, Tree, Host plant

Abstract

This datasheet on Syzygium jambos covers Identity, Overview, Associated Diseases, Pests or Pathogens, Distribution, Dispersal, Hosts/Species Affected, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Management, Genetics and Breeding, Economics, Further Information.

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Syzygium jambos (L.) Alston
Preferred Common Name
rose apple
Other Scientific Names
Caryophyllus jambos (L.) Stokes
Eugenia decora Salisb.
Eugenia jamboides Wender
Eugenia jambos L.
Eugenia jambosa Crantz
Eugenia malaccaensis f. cericarpa (O. Deg.) H. St. John
Eugenia monantha Merr.
Eugenia vulgaris Baill.
Jambos jambos (L.) Millsp.
Jambosa jambos Millsp.
Jambosa malaccensis f. cericarpa O. Deg.
Jambosa palembanica Blume
Jambosa vulgaris DC.
Myrtus jambos (L.) Kunth
Plinia jambos (L.) M. Gómez
Syzygium jambos var. linearilimbum H.T. Chang & R.H. Miao
Syzygium monanthum (Merr.) Meer & L.M. Perry
International Common Names
English
jambos
Malabar plum
plum rose
roseapple
rose-apple
Spanish
manzana
manzana de cuba
manzana rosa
manzanita de rosa
manzanita rosa
poma
poma rosa
pomarosa
pomarrosa
pomo
yambo
French
jambo
jambosier
jambrosade
jamerosier
jamrose
pomme de rose
pomme rose
pommier rose
Chinese
pu tao
Local Common Names
Brazil
jambeiro
jambo amarelo
jambo branco
jambos amarello
maçâ rosa
Cambodia
chem'-puu
Caribbean
malabar plum
Colombia
manzanita de rosa
Cook Islands
ka'ika
ka'ika papa'a
ka'ika takataka
ka'ika varani
Dominican Republic
pomo
Fiji
kavika
kavika ni india
kavika ni vavalangi
French Polynesia
ahi'a papa'a
ahi'a popa'a
Germany
Rosenapfelbaum
Guinea-Bissau
crioulo jambô
India
jaman
Indonesia
jambu air mawar
jambu kraton
jambu mawar
Italy
giambo
pomo rosa
Japan/Ryukyu Archipelago
futo
futo-momo
Laos
chièng
kièng
Madagascar
zamborozano
Malaysia
jambu kelampok
jambu mawer
Martinique
pòm wòz
Mauritius
jambrosade
jamrosa
Mayotte
goyavier parfum
pouéra marachi
Micronesia, Federated states of
apel en wai
iouen wai
youenwai
Netherlands
jambol
Philippines
balobar
bunlauan
bunlaun
tampoi
tampoy
tanpul
yambo
yampoi
Portugal/Madeira
jambo-rosa
Samoa
seasea palagisam
seasea papalagi
Sao Tome and Principe
jamboeiro
Sierra Leone
krio roz-apul
Sri Lanka
nir-nawal
seenijambu
veli jambu
Suriname
appelroos
pommeroos
Thailand
chomphu-namdokmai
manomhom
yamu-panawa
Tonga
fekika papalangi
USA
Malabar plum
USA/Hawaii
'ohi'a loke
Venezuela
pumagas
Vietnam
bô dào
lye
roi
EPPO code
SYZJA (Syzygium jambos)

Pictures

Upper part of Pitcairn Island (alt. 250 m) with a mosaic ofnative and S. jambos woodland (partly defoliated grey stands). NB Although S. jambos is often described as wind resistant, trees at the edge of the woodland do suffer from exposure.
Habit
Upper part of Pitcairn Island (alt. 250 m) with a mosaic ofnative and S. jambos woodland (partly defoliated grey stands). NB Although S. jambos is often described as wind resistant, trees at the edge of the woodland do suffer from exposure.
©Pierre Binggeli
S. jambos: the tree produces a dense mat of horizontal roots. The lack of rootlets allow for rapid soil erosion (scale = 30 cm).
Habit
S. jambos: the tree produces a dense mat of horizontal roots. The lack of rootlets allow for rapid soil erosion (scale = 30 cm).
©Pierre Binggeli
S. jambos: natural layering occurs when branches come into contact with the ground.
Habit
S. jambos: natural layering occurs when branches come into contact with the ground.
©Pierre Binggeli
S. jambos: coppice stand on Pitcairn Island where no management has taken place for many years. Note the lack of ground and shrub layer.
Habit
S. jambos: coppice stand on Pitcairn Island where no management has taken place for many years. Note the lack of ground and shrub layer.
©Pierre Binggeli
Dense S. jambos stand that contains three age groups. Sparse large trees, a dominant pole layer and a scarce sapling layer. Note that even relatively young stems start arching (right of photo).
Habit
Dense S. jambos stand that contains three age groups. Sparse large trees, a dominant pole layer and a scarce sapling layer. Note that even relatively young stems start arching (right of photo).
©Pierre Binggeli
S. jambos dominated stand on Pitcairn Island with a relictdying Metrosideros collina laying on the ground. Apart from a few native ferns all native species are absent from this stand.
Habit
S. jambos dominated stand on Pitcairn Island with a relictdying Metrosideros collina laying on the ground. Apart from a few native ferns all native species are absent from this stand.
©Pierre Binggeli
S. jambos, flowering and fruiting branch.Reproduced from the series 'Plant Resources of South-East Asia', by kind permission of the PROSEA Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia.
Line drawing of plant
S. jambos, flowering and fruiting branch.Reproduced from the series 'Plant Resources of South-East Asia', by kind permission of the PROSEA Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia.
©PROSEA Foundation

Overview

Importance

S. jambos is considered one of the best, if not the best, Syzygium fruit; however, low yield, susceptibility to bruising and short shelf life are serious handicaps. Therefore, it is to be expected that it will remain a home garden tree, appreciated for its ornamental value as much as for its fruit. There is scope for the rose apple as an agroforestry species in denuded areas where soil conservation is important. In addition to producing timber, the stand could be used for the essential oil in the leaves, the pectin in the fruit, or as forage for bees. S. jambos is widely distributed pantropically, but is often rare where introduced and has now only limited economic value. S. jambos has been spreading on oceanic islands where it is viewed with concern because of its perceived high impact on biodiversity. S. jambos casts a heavy shade, is able to regenerate under forest canopy, and is often found in monotypic stands. It is poorly dispersed and as a result it does not spread rapidly further afield. Once established it reduces plant species richness but tends to favour some native species and produces a habitat conducive to some endemic bird species.

Summary of Invasiveness

S . jambos is widely distributed pantropically, but is often rare where introduced and now has limited economic value. It has been spreading on oceanic islands where it is viewed with concern because of its perceived high impact on biodiversity. S. jambos casts a heavy shade, is able to regenerate under forest canopy, and is often found in monospecific stands. It is poorly dispersed and as a result it does not spread rapidly further afield. Once established it reduces plant species richness but tends to favour some native species and produces a habitat conducive to some endemic bird species. As it also suppresses light-demanding species, such as the invasive Lantana camara, in some instances S. jambos should not be eradicated but instead contained and managed to produce habitats favouring endemic species.

Taxonomic Tree

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

In most of the earlier literature the tree is referred to as Eugenia jambos L. or Jambosa vulgaris DC. There are over 500 species in the genus, and S. jambos may be confused with several of them, notably another weedy species, S. cumini. However, the rosewater smell of S. jambos fruit is distinctive for the species.

 

Plant Type

Perennial
Seed propagated
Tree
Woody

Description

S. jambos is an evergreen small tree reaching a height of 7-12 m, with a generally short bole, to 50 cm diameter. Stems are terete, sometimes quadrangular when young, generally twisted at the base, with brown, furrowed, smooth bark. When young, it has an erect main stem but as it matures, it tends to produce arching branches resulting in a widespread crown with a diameter of over 20 m in multi-stemmed individuals. The leaves are opposite, lanceolate or narrow-elliptic, thinly coriaceous, cuneate at base, acuminate at apex, 10-22 cm long and 2.5-6 cm wide. They are somewhat leathery, glossy, dark-green above when mature but reddish when young, lighter green and obscurely glandular punctate beneath, petiole 5-6(-13) mm. Inflorescences short terminal or axillary corymbs, 5-10 cm long, 4-5(-10)-flowered; flowers large, 5-10 cm wide, white to greenish-white; calyx lobes 4, suborbicular, up to 10 x 7 mm; petals 4, suborbicular, 15-18 mm diameter, white to greenish-white; stamens about 400, up to 4 cm long; style up to 4 cm long; pedicel up to 1.5 cm long. The fruit is a drupe, up to 4-5 cm long, nearly round, oval, or slightly pear-shaped, and is capped with a prominent, green, tough calyx and style. The skin is smooth, thin, green at first, then pale yellow or whitish, sometimes pinkish, and covers a crisp, mealy, dry to juicy layer of yellowish flesh, that is sweet with a distinct scent of rose. Each fruit contains in its hollow centre one to four brown, rough-coated, medium-hard, polyembryonic, more or less rounded seeds, 1-1.5 cm in diameter. When they mature, they loosen from the inner wall and rattle when the fruit is shaken.

Botanical Features

S. jambos is an evergreen small tree reaching a height of 7-12 m, with a generally short bole, to 50 cm diameter. Stems are terete, sometimes quadrangular when young, generally twisted at the base, with brown, furrowed, smooth bark. When young, it has an erect main stem but as it matures, it tends to produce arching branches resulting in a widespread crown with a diameter of over 20 m in multi-stemmed individuals. The leaves are opposite, lanceolate or narrow-elliptic, thinly coriaceous, cuneate at base, acuminate at apex, 10-22 cm long and 2.5-6 cm wide. They are somewhat leathery, glossy, dark-green above when mature but reddish when young, lighter green and obscurely glandular punctate beneath, petiole 5-6(-13) mm. Inflorescences short terminal or axillary corymbs, 5-10 cm long, 4-5(-10)-flowered; flowers large, 5-10 cm wide, white to greenish-white; calyx lobes 4, suborbicular, up to 10 x 7 mm; petals 4, suborbicular, 15-18 mm diameter, white to greenish-white; stamens about 400, up to 4 cm long; style up to 4 cm long; pedicel up to 1.5 cm long. The fruit is a drupe, up to 4-5 cm long, nearly round, oval, or slightly pear-shaped, and is capped with a prominent, green, tough calyx and style. The skin is smooth, thin, green at first, then pale yellow or whitish, sometimes pinkish, and covers a crisp, mealy, dry to juicy layer of yellowish flesh, that is sweet with a distinct scent of rose. Each fruit contains in its hollow centre one to four brown, rough-coated, medium-hard, polyembryonic, more or less rounded seeds, 1-1.5 cm in diameter. When they mature, they loosen from the inner wall and rattle when the fruit is shaken.

Distribution

The native range of S. jambos is uncertain due to prehistorical introductions. It is thought to be native to South-East Asia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Malaysia, and its natural distribution probably did not extend to India where the tree is thought to have been introduced. Morton (1987) suggested that it was also introduced to the former Indochina region. It is likely that the species is now present in the majority of countries in the humid tropics, although generally very locally and often in low numbers.

Review of Natural Distribution

The native range of S. jambos is uncertain due to prehistorical introductions. It is thought to be native to South-East Asia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Malaysia, and its natural distribution probably did not extend to India where the tree is thought to have been introduced. Morton (1987) suggested that it was also introduced to the former Indochina region.

Location of Introductions

It is likely that S. jambos is now present in the majority of countries in the humid tropics, although generally very locally and often in low numbers. In South-East Asia, indigenous people must have spread S. jambos beyond its native range, including to many of the offshore islands long ago, but no records exist. S. jambos was introduced into Jamaica in 1762 and subsequently to much of the neotropics from Mexico to Peru and to most of the Caribbean islands as a fruit tree. In Guatemala the tree has been planted as a living fencepost or in hedgerows around coffee plantations (Morton, 1987) and in many parts of the neotropics it forms dense stands and thickets. In Puerto Rico it is particularly common in secondary forest and riparian vegetation (Heartsill-Scalley and Aide, 2003) and it is spreading in Costa Rica (Di Stefano et al., 1998). It was recorded in Florida, at Jacksonville, prior to 1877 and in California it was planted as far north as San Francisco as an ornamental. In 1825, eight saplings were taken from Rio de Janeiro to Hawaii by ship and in 1853 a United States warship delivered trees from Central America to the island of Hilo. It is thought to have been first planted in Queensland, Australia, in the 1890s (Morton, 1987). In the Pacific, S. jambos has become invasive on the islands of Kauai, Molokai, Oahu, Maui and Hawaii (Smith, 1985). On the island of Pitcairn it is often reported as a major invasive (Diamond, 1994), but is more a feature of a largely abandoned agroforestry system rather than highly invasive of natural vegetation. In West Africa, it was reported as already cultivated in Ghana in 1893 and it is 'semi-naturalized' in some areas of tropical West Africa (Morton, 1987). It is now a major environmental weed on Indian Ocean Islands and is locally regenerating freely in the East Usambara forests and the islands of Zanzibar and Pemba, Tanzania. It was also introduced to the coastal plain of Israel where it is an ornamental (Morton, 1987).

Distribution Map

This content is currently unavailable.

Distribution Table

This content is currently unavailable.

History of Introduction and Spread

In South-East Asia, indigenous people must have spread S. jambos beyond its native range, including to many of the offshore islands long ago, but no records exist. S. jambos was introduced into Jamaica in 1762 and subsequently to much of the neotropics from Mexico to Peru and to most of the Caribbean islands as a fruit tree. By 1821 S. jambos was introduced to tropical botanical gardens throughout the West Indies, including Puerto Rico (Wadsworth 1943). In Puerto Rico, it was originally planted for fuelwood and posts, but its sweet, fleshy fruits made it a horticultural favorite (Wadsworth 1943; Brown et al. 2006). In Puerto Rico it is now particularly common in secondary forest and riparian vegetation (Heartsill-Scalley and Aide, 2003) and it is spreading in Costa Rica (Di Stefano et al., 1998).
In Guatemala the tree has been planted as a living fencepost or in hedgerows around coffee plantations (Morton, 1987) and in many parts of the neotropics it forms dense stands and thickets. It was recorded in Florida, at Jacksonville, prior to 1877 and in California it was planted as far north as San Francisco as an ornamental. In 1825, eight saplings were taken from Rio de Janeiro to Hawaii by ship and in 1853 a United States warship delivered trees from Central America to the island of Hilo. It is thought to have been first planted in Queensland, Australia, in the 1890s (Morton, 1987).
In the Pacific, S. jambos has become invasive on the islands of Kauai, Molokai, Oahu, Maui and Hawaii (Smith, 1985). On the island of Pitcairn it is often reported as a major invasive (Diamond, 1994), but is more a feature of a largely abandoned agroforestry system rather than highly invasive of natural vegetation. In West Africa, it was reported as already cultivated in Ghana in 1893 and it is 'semi-naturalized' in some areas of tropical West Africa (Morton, 1987). It is now a major environmental weed on Indian Ocean Islands and is locally regenerating freely in the East Usambara forests and the islands of Zanzibar and Pemba, Tanzania. It was also introduced to the coastal plain of Israel where it is an ornamental (Morton, 1987).

Risk of Introduction

Concern with this species has only arisen in countries where the awareness of biological invasion is high. In Dade County, Florida, USA, homeowners are encouraged not to plant S. jambos close to native plant communities (Anon., 2000). In Durban, South Africa, it is an escaped ornamental that has been listed as a Category 3 plant 'which have amenity value and which may be grown, but not planted, propagated, imported or traded', and cannot be grown within 30 m of a watercourse (Anon., 2001).

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Natural Dispersal (Non-Biotic)

In areas with steep topography fruits can be locally dispersed by gravity down slopes. As the tree is common along some riparian forests, dispersal by water probably occurs. In Hong Kong, it is reported to be invading along some streamsides without anthropogenic disturbance (Leung et al., 2009).

Vector Transmission (Biotic)

It is thought to be dispersed by animals as clumps of naturally regenerated saplings are often found some distance from a seed source. Wadsworth (1943) suggested that bats and rodents may be involved, and on Pitcairn Island Polynesian rats are probably the principal disseminators.

Accidental Introduction

Seeds are dispersed by people, and children in particular, who eat the fruit more readily than adults. When the fruits are consumed during walks in the countryside, viable seeds are discarded mainly along paths.

Intentional Introduction

In recent decades there appears to have been only limited interest in the food or ornamental value of this species, or even no interest in other uses, such as a component of agroforestry systems, therefore very few intentional introductions must have occurred.

Hosts/Species Affected

A variety of tropical crops are affected by the tree's shallow rooting or the heavy shade produced by spreading branches.

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

There are over 500 species in the genus, and S. jambos may be confused with several of them, notably another weedy species, S. cumini. However, the rosewater smell of S. jambos fruit is distinctive for the species.

Habitat

It is unclear what was its original habitat in its native range, but it is now commonly found around homesteads and forms large stands, often pure, in many parts of the tropics. It has been used as an agroforestry tree to form field boundaries and provide shelter, is also known to occur under the canopy of mature disturbed forest, and is also found in pastures and waste places. In El Rodeo, Costa Rica, it has colonized old secondary forests and most preserved forests.

Habitat List

CategorySub categoryHabitatPresenceStatus
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural landPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural landPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedManaged forests, plantations and orchardsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedManaged forests, plantations and orchardsPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedDisturbed areasPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedDisturbed areasPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedUrban / peri-urban areasPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedUrban / peri-urban areasPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural forestsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural forestsPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanksPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanksPresent, no further detailsNatural

Biology and Ecology

Genetics

The chromosome number is variable, 2n=28, 33, ~44, 46, ~54 and 66 having all been recorded by van Lingen (1991). As the quality and quantity of the fruit produced is variable, Burkill (1997) considered that there is scope for selection. Young seedlings have also been noted as being highly variable (Morton, 1987). Breeding of the tree for the production of essential oils or to enhance its ornamental value has also been suggested, but to-date no such programme has been initiated.

Physiology and Phenology

The tree grows in more or less synchronous flushes, one of which brings on flowering. Flowering occurs after a quiescent period, e.g. in spring in the subtropics, late in the dry season in East Java. The fruit ripens 3 months after bloom. In Puerto Rico and Jamaica, flowering and fruiting occurs nearly throughout the year, though infrequently in the summer (Little and Wadsworth, 1964; Morton, 1987). In the Bahamas and Florida, USA, the main reproductive season is from May through to July. In India, fruiting time varies according to regions; in the south flowering usually occurs in January, with fruit ripening in March and April, whereas elsewhere, fruit ripening takes place in April and May or in July and August. Some varieties produce fruit in February and March (Morton, 1987). In the East Usambara mountains of Tanzania there are two flowering seasons, December to January and September to October and fruits take a few weeks to ripen (Voigt, 1914). Van Lingen (1991) stated that fruits take 3 months to mature.

Reproductive Biology

Little is known about the reproductive biology of S. jambos. Sexual reproduction may start from as early as 4 years old and at higher altitude trees fail to flower and fruit. It is probably solely or mostly bee pollinated and produces a limited amount of fruits per tree, with mature trees yielding 2 kg of fruit each season (Morton, 1987), which probably reflects the low number of large fruit produced rather than pollination failure or fruit abortion. Chantaranothai and Parnell (1994) found that in cultivation, 73% of flowers set fruit and that apomixis and self-fertilization occur freely. The seeds are polyembryonic (producing 1 to 4 sprouts), germination requires 10 to 25 days to start and continues for up to 120 days (Voigt, 1914; Wadsworth, 1943; Schmitt and Riviere, 2002). After one week of drying, seed viability remains high (Schmitt and Riviere, 2002) but there is no seed bank. Trees coppice freely when cut and vegetative propagation can occur via layering. Various propagation techniques are described by Morton (1987). Establishment normally takes place in established vegetation where there is some shade and plenty of moisture.

Environmental Requirements

S. jambos flourishes in tropical and near-tropical climates only. It is found from sea level to around 900-1300 m in Jamaica, Hawaii and India but it is reported to reach an altitude of 2300 m in Ecuador. At its upper altitudinal limit the tree grows vigorously but does not bear fruit (Morton, 1987). It withstands temperatures down to freezing and is tolerant of wind and salt (van Lingen, 1991). Being commonly associated with riparian zones, it does best in damper habitats, yet Morton (1987) reported that it tolerates semi-arid conditions, although dry spells are detrimental. It copes with poor drainage as well as flooding and grows on various soil types, including sand and limestone. However, it is considered that a deep loamy soil with a pH of 5.5-7.0 is ideal (Smith, 1985; Morton, 1987). It tolerates shade but its growth rate tends to be small, about 10 cm per year in height increment in seedlings and saplings (Di Stefano et al. 1998).

Climate

S. jambos flourishes in tropical and near-tropical climates only. It withstands temperatures down to freezing and is tolerant of wind and salt (van Lingen, 1991). Being commonly associated with riparian zones, it does best in damper habitats, yet Morton (1987) reported that it tolerates semi-arid conditions, although dry spells are detrimental.

Soil and Physiography

S. jambos copes with poor drainage as well as flooding and grows on various soil types, including sand and limestone. However, it is considered that a deep loamy soil with a pH of 5.5-7.0 is ideal (Smith, 1985; Morton, 1987). It tolerates shade but its growth rate tends to be small, about 10 cm per year in height increment in seedlings and saplings (Di Stefano et al. 1998). It is found from sea level to around 900-1300 m in Jamaica, Hawaii and India but it is reported to reach an altitude of 2300 m in Ecuador. At its upper altitudinal limit the tree grows vigorously but does not bear fruit (Morton, 1987).

Vegetation Types

broadleaved evergreen forests
grasslands
rain forests
riparian forests

Latitude/Altitude Ranges

Latitude North (°N)Latitude South (°S)Altitude lower (m)Altitude upper (m)
20-1002300

Air Temperature

ParameterLower limit (°C)Upper limit (°C)
Absolute minimum temperature0 

Rainfall

ParameterLower limitUpper limitDescription
Dry season duration04number of consecutive months with <40 mm rainfall
Mean annual rainfall10004000mm; lower/upper limits

Rainfall Regime

Bimodal
Uniform

Soil Tolerances

Soil texture > light
Soil texture > medium
Soil texture > heavy
Soil reaction > acid
Soil reaction > neutral
Soil drainage > free
Soil drainage > seasonally waterlogged
Special soil tolerances > shallow
Special soil tolerances > saline

Soil Types

acid soils
alluvial soils
calcareous soils
clay soils
saline soils
sandy soils
tropical soils

Notes on Pests

S. jambos has few insect enemies, though the fruits are highly susceptible to fruit fly infestations (Leblanc and Putoa, 2000). In humid climates, the leaves are often coated with sooty mould growing on the honeydew excreted by aphids. The tree is also prone to various fungal diseases such as leaf spot caused by Cercospora sp., Gloeosporium sp., and Phyllosticta eugeniae; algal leaf spot (Cephaleuros virescens); black leaf spot (Asterinella puiggarii); and anthracnose (Glomerella cingulata). It is susceptible to root rot caused by Fusarium sp., and mushroom root rot (Armillariella (Clitocybe) tabescens) (Morton, 1987). In Brazil, where it is an ornamental and fruit tree, it is severely damaged by the neotropical rust fungus Puccinia psidii, and this causes premature defoliation, destructive dieback, and loss of flowers and fruits every year around Brasilia (Tessmann et al., 2001).

S. jambos has an indirect economic impact being a species highly susceptible to a number of fruit fly species. It is one of the preferred hosts of the Caribbean fruit fly (Anastrepha suspensa) that attacks several species of tropical and sub-tropical fruit trees. In some Pacific islands it is the host of Bactrocera spp. including Queensland fruit fly (Bactrocera tryoni) introduced in the late 1960s and known to be the most damaging fruit fly pest in Australia (Leblanc and Putoa, 2000). Similarly in Brazil, urediniospores of the rust fungus Puccinia psidii produced on S. jambos may serve as inoculum for other Myrtaceae, including some economically important species such as Eucalyptus spp. and Psidium guajava (Tessmann et al., 2001).

List of Pests

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Natural Enemies

S. jambos has few insect enemies, though the fruits are highly susceptible to fruit fly infestations (Leblanc and Putoa, 2000). In humid climates, the leaves are often coated with sooty mould growing on the honeydew excreted by aphids. The tree is also prone to various fungal diseases such as leaf spot caused by Cercospora sp., Gloeosporium sp., and Phyllosticta eugeniae; algal leaf spot (Cephaleuros virescens); black leaf spot (Asterinella puiggarii); and anthracnose (Glomerella cingulata). It is susceptible to root rot caused by Fusarium sp., and mushroom root rot (Armillariella (Clitocybe) tabescens) (Morton, 1987). In Brazil, where it is an ornamental and fruit tree, it is severely damaged by the neotropical rust fungus Puccinia psidii, and this causes premature defoliation, destructive dieback, and loss of flowers and fruits every year around Brasilia (Tessmann et al., 2001).

Impact Summary

CategoryImpact
Animal/plant collectionsNone
Animal/plant productsNone
Biodiversity (generally)None
Crop productionNegative
Environment (generally)Negative
Fisheries / aquacultureNone
Forestry productionNone
Human healthNone
Livestock productionNone
Native faunaNegative
Native floraNone
Rare/protected speciesNone
TourismNone
Trade/international relationsNone
Transport/travelNone

Impact: Economic

S. jambos has an indirect economic impact, being a species which is highly susceptible to a number of fruit fly species. It is one of the preferred hosts of the Caribbean fruit fly (Anastrepha suspensa) that attacks several species of tropical and sub-tropical fruit trees. In some Pacific islands it is the host of Bactrocera spp. including Queensland fruit fly (Bactrocera tryoni) introduced in the late 1960s and known to be the most damaging fruit fly pest in Australia (Leblanc and Putoa, 2000). Similarly in Brazil, urediniospores of the rust fungus Puccinia psidii produced on S. jambos may serve as inoculum for other Myrtaceae, including some economically important species such as Eucalyptus spp. and Psidium guajava (Tessmann et al., 2001). On Pitcairn Island, the spreading, shallow and dense rooting system makes cultivation of gardens next to trees an arduous task and its heavy shading is deleterious to crop growth (Binggeli, 2001). In the Dominican Republic it became a serious weed in Pinus occidentalis forests, preventing the regeneration of the pine (Wadsworth, 1943).

Impact: Environmental

On a number of oceanic tropical islands the presence and perceived spread of S. jambos has been viewed with some concern in recent years. A set of attributes (production of monotypic stands, ability to cast dense shade, and establishment of seedlings under shade) have been viewed as serious threats to native vegetation and associated fauna. On some small islands S. jambos now constitutes a high proportion of the woodland resource. By the 1990s, S. jambos covered a large area of Pitcairn Island and the species was viewed as a major threat to the biodiversity of the island because of its rapid spread into various native plant communities (Diamond, 1994). However, spread into semi-natural vegetation is limited and slow (Binggeli, 2001). It clearly impacts on native vegetation and monotypic stands generally have a very limited number of native species. It outcompetes native trees but also suppresses other invasive species such as Lantana camara. In doing so it allows some native species such as tree ferns (Cyathea medullaris) to regenerate under a S. jambos canopy. However, this regeneration will die unless the canopy opens up.
Once S. jambos produces mature monotypic stands, soil erosion becomes prevalent. The lack of ground vegetation and the near absence of small rootlets allow soil to be washed away even on moderately sloping hillsides. In extreme cases all soil may be washed away from surface roots. On Pitcairn Island, streams originating from unmanaged S. jambos stands have produced deep gullies down to the bedrock.

It is reported as one of the main invasive plant species in Kartala forest, Comoros islands (Yahaya Ibrahim and Mauremootoo, 2003). In the upland landscape of Hong Kong, where it is invading along some streamsides, it is reported by Leung et al. (2009) as the only species of possible current conservation concern. Environmental degradation caused by S. jambos in the Galapagos Islands is assessed by Watson et al. (2010).

The heavy shade cast by S. jambos stands reduces species richness, but does allow some native species to regenerate. It also appears to be an important substrate for some epiphytes. In Puerto Rico, it is the most important phorophyte for a species of orchid (Rodriguez-Robles et al., 1990). It also appears to be a favoured habit for some endemic species. In the Seychelles S. jambos is not listed, like other invaders, as a threat to orthopteroids, a group of large striking insects, instead it is given as one of the host species (Matyot, 1998). The endangered Rodrigues Warbler Acrocephalus rodericanus was mostly found in S. jambos-dominated woodland (Showler et al., 2002). 

Impact: Social

Both the seeds and the roots are said to be poisonous. A hydrocyanic acid has been reported in the roots, stems and leaves and an alkaloid, jambosine, has been found in the bark of the tree and of the roots (Morton, 1987).

Risk and Impact Factors

Invasiveness

Proved invasive outside its native range
Has high reproductive potential

Impact outcomes

Damaged ecosystem services
Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
Negatively impacts agriculture

Impact mechanisms

Competition - monopolizing resources
Pest and disease transmission

Likelihood of entry/control

Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
Difficult/costly to control

Uses

Fruits of S. jambos were once viewed as desirable and valuable, but today they are of limited economic value especially as trees are very low yielding. The fruits must be freshly picked, bruise easily and are highly perishable, and therefore they are rarely marketed (Morton, 1987). They are slightly bland and around the tropics fruits are mostly eaten out-of-hand by children. In some regions they are made into preserves, jellies or sometimes prepared in a number of other ways, often mixed with other types of fruits (Morton, 1987).
A yellow-coloured essential oil, important in the perfume industry, is derived from the leaves by distillation. In southern Mexico, S. jambos is one of the commonest shade-trees in coffee cultivation (Soto-Pinto et al., 2000). It has been used in agroforestry to provide shelter, as the species is rather wind resistant. It makes a good ornamental species with its regular shape, attractive foliage and striking appearance in bloom, it is a useful avenue tree along driveways, and urban situations. It is an excellent firewood and is commonly used for domestic fuel on Pitcairn Island. Wadsworth (1943) reported that large quantities of S. jambos wood were used as fuel for drying tobacco in Puerto Rico and branches used as tobacco poles in Cuba. Trees coppice profusely and the wood makes very good charcoal. The wood has been used in small quantities for a variety of minor products ranging from baskets to furniture and musical instruments. The heartwood is heavy and hard and is suitable for use as construction timber; however, the wood is very susceptible to termite attack and not durable in the soil.
Seedless fruits were formerly distilled to make 'rosewater' (Morton, 1987), said to be equal to the best obtained from rose petals. On Pitcairn Island, where honey production is one the few exportable products produced by the islanders, S. jambos is probably one of the main sources of nectar for bees. Morton (1987) reported that the honey has a good amber colour and that much was produced in the San Cristobal River Valley in Cuba. The bark contains 7% tannin on a dry weight basis and is used for tanning and dyeing purposes. A number of traditional medicinal uses have been reported (Morton, 1987) such as in tonics or diuretics, but their actual importance to human health is unknown.

Uses: Wood Uses

S. jambos wood has been used in small quantities for a variety of minor products ranging from baskets to furniture and musical instruments. The heartwood is heavy and hard and is suitable for use as construction timber; however, the wood is very susceptible to termite attack and is not durable in the soil. It is an excellent firewood and is commonly used for domestic fuel on Pitcairn Island. Wadsworth (1943) reported that large quantities of S. jambos wood were used as fuel for drying tobacco in Puerto Rico and branches used as tobacco poles in Cuba. Trees coppice profusely and the wood makes very good charcoal.

Uses: Non-Wood Uses

Fruits of S. jambos were once viewed as desirable and valuable, but today they are of limited economic value especially as trees are very low yielding. The fruits must be freshly picked, bruise easily and are highly perishable, and therefore they are rarely marketed (Morton, 1987). They are slightly bland and around the tropics fruits are mostly eaten out-of-hand by children. In some regions they are made into preserves, jellies or sometimes prepared in a number of other ways, often mixed with other types of fruits (Morton, 1987). A yellow-coloured essential oil, important in the perfume industry, is derived from the leaves by distillation. Seedless fruits were formerly distilled to make 'rosewater' (Morton, 1987), said to be equal to the best obtained from rose petals. On Pitcairn Island, where honey production is one the few exportable products produced by the islanders, S. jambos is probably one of the main sources of nectar for bees. Morton (1987) reported that the honey has a good amber colour and that much was produced in the San Cristobal River Valley in Cuba. The bark contains 7% tannin on a dry weight basis and is used for tanning and dyeing purposes. A number of traditional medicinal uses have been reported (Morton, 1987) such as in tonics or diuretics, but their actual importance to human health is unknown.

Uses: Land Uses

In southern Mexico, S. jambos is one of the commonest shade-trees in coffee cultivation (Soto-Pinto et al., 2000). It has been used in agroforestry to provide shelter, as the species is rather wind resistant. It makes a good ornamental species with its regular shape, attractive foliage and striking appearance in bloom, it is a useful avenue tree along driveways, and urban situations. S. jambos is commonly found around homesteads and forms large stands, often pure, in many parts of the tropics. It has been used as an agroforestry tree to form field boundaries and provide shelter, and is also known to occur under the canopy of mature disturbed forest, and is also found in pastures and waste places. As it also suppresses light-demanding species, such as the invasive Lantana camara, in some instances S. jambos should not be eradicated but instead contained and managed to produce habitats favouring endemic species.

Uses List

General > Ornamental
Materials > Dye/tanning
Materials > Essential oils
Medicinal, pharmaceutical > Traditional/folklore
Human food and beverage > Fruits
Human food and beverage > Honey/honey flora

Wood Products

Charcoal
Furniture
Roundwood > Posts
Roundwood > Stakes
Woodware > Musical instruments

Prevention and Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Mechanical Control

Seedlings can be removed by hand-pulling (Soria et al., 2002).

Chemical Control

In the Galapagos, S. jambos has been successfully controlled by hacking the plant and applying one of three different herbicides: picloram/methyl metsulfuron, picloram alone in diesel, and pure glyphosate (effective but not very economical) (Soria et al., 2002). In Hawaii, glyphosate was applied to notches in the trunks but was found to be ineffective (Motooka et al., 1983).

Biological Control

S. jambos has never been considered as a target for biological control attempts.

Silviculture Characteristics

S. jambos grows in more or less synchronous flushes, one of which brings on flowering. Flowering occurs after a quiescent period, e.g. in spring in the subtropics, late in the dry season in East Java. The fruit ripens 3 months after bloom. In Puerto Rico and Jamaica, flowering and fruiting occurs nearly throughout the year, though infrequently in the summer (Little and Wadsworth, 1964; Morton, 1987). In the Bahamas and Florida, USA, the main reproductive season is from May through to July. In India, fruiting time varies according to regions; in the south flowering usually occurs in January, with fruit ripening in March and April, whereas elsewhere, fruit ripening takes place in April and May or in July and August. Some varieties produce fruit in February and March (Morton, 1987). In the East Usambara mountains of Tanzania there are two flowering seasons, December to January and September to October and fruits take a few weeks to ripen (Voigt, 1914). Van Lingen (1991) stated that fruits take 3 months to mature.Little is known about the reproductive biology of S. jambos. Sexual reproduction may start from as early as 4 years old and at higher altitude trees fail to flower and fruit. It is probably solely or mostly bee pollinated and produces a limited amount of fruits per tree, with mature trees yielding 2 kg of fruit each season (Morton, 1987), which probably reflects the low number of large fruit produced rather than pollination failure or fruit abortion. Chantaranothai and Parnell (1994) found that in cultivation, 73% of flowers set fruit and that apomixis and self-fertilization occur freely. The seeds are polyembryonic (producing 1 to 4 sprouts), germination requires 10 to 25 days to start and continues for up to 120 days (Voigt, 1914; Wadsworth, 1943; Schmitt and Riviere, 2002). After one week of drying, seed viability remains high (Schmitt and Riviere, 2002) but there is no seed bank. Trees coppice freely when cut and vegetative propagation can occur via layering. Various propagation techniques are described by Morton (1987). Establishment normally takes place in established vegetation where there is some shade and plenty of moisture.In areas with steep topography fruits can be locally dispersed by gravity down slopes. As the tree is common along some riparian forests, dispersal by water probably occurs. It is thought to be dispersed by animals as clumps of naturally regenerated saplings are often found some distance from a seed source. Wadsworth (1943) suggested that bats and rodents may be involved, and on Pitcairn Island Polynesian rats are probably the principal disseminators.

Silviculture Characteristics

Tolerates > waterlogging
Tolerates > wind
Tolerates > shade
Tolerates > salt wind
Ability to > regenerate rapidly
Ability to > coppice

Silviculture Practice

Vegetative propagation by > cuttings
Vegetative propagation by > air layering
Stand establishment using > natural regeneration
Stand establishment using > planting stock

Management

Control of the tree as a weedS. jambos seedlings can be removed by hand-pulling (Soria et al., 2002). Wadsworth (1943) suggested that infestations in Dominican pine forest should be treated with sodium arsenite, but thought this method would be expensive and had not been tried. In the Galapagos, S. jambos has been successfully controlled by hacking the plant and applying one of three different herbicides: picloram/methyl metsulfuron, picloram alone in diesel, and pure glyphosate (effective but not very economical) (Soria et al., 2002). In Hawaii, glyphosate was applied to notches in the trunks but was found to be ineffective (Motooka et al., 1983). S. jambos has never been considered as a target for biological control attempts.

Genetic Resources and Breeding

Whereas some authors maintain that the trees are rather variable, others do not mention this aspect. There are no cultivars. For successful selection or breeding work, a better insight into yield, yield-limiting factors, and variability of characteristics is necessary. Such work may also be directed towards enhancing the production of essential oils or the ornamental value. However, germplasm collections have yet to be established.

Disadvantages

Concern with S. jambos has only arisen in countries where the awareness of biological invasion is high. In Dade County, Florida, USA, homeowners are encouraged not to plant S. jambos close to native plant communities (Anon., 2000). In Durban, South Africa, it is an escaped ornamental that has been listed as a Category 3 plant 'which have amenity value and which may be grown, but not planted, propagated, imported or traded', and cannot be grown within 30 m of a watercourse (Anon., 2001).Both the seeds and the roots are said to be poisonous. A hydrocyanic acid has been reported in the roots, stems and leaves and an alkaloid, jambosine, has been found in the bark of the tree and of the roots (Morton, 1987). On Pitcairn Island, the spreading, shallow and dense rooting system makes cultivation of gardens next to trees an arduous task and its heavy shading is deleterious to crop growth (Binggeli, 2001). In the Dominican Republic it became a serious weed in Pinus occidentalis forests, preventing the regeneration of the pine (Wadsworth, 1943).On a number of oceanic tropical islands the presence and perceived spread of S. jambos has been viewed with some concern in recent years. A set of attributes (production of monotypic stands, ability to cast dense shade, and establishment of seedlings under shade) have been viewed as serious threats to native vegetation and associated fauna. On some small islands S. jambos now constitutes a high proportion of the woodland resource. By the 1990s S. jambos covered a large area of Pitcairn Island and the species was viewed as a major threat to the biodiversity of the island because of its rapid spread into various native plant communities (Diamond, 1994). However, spread into semi-natural vegetation is limited and slow (Binggeli, 2001). It clearly impacts on native vegetation and monotypic stands generally have a very limited number of native species. It outcompetes native trees but also suppresses other invasive species such as Lantana camara. In doing so it allows some native species such as tree ferns (Cyathea medullaris) to regenerate under a S. jambos canopy. However, this regeneration will die unless the canopy opens up. Once S. jambos produces mature monotypic stands, soil erosion becomes prevalent. The lack of ground vegetation and the near absence of small rootlets allow soil to be washed away even on moderately sloping hillsides. In extreme cases all soil may be washed away from surface roots. On Pitcairn Island, streams originating from unmanaged S. jambos stands have produced deep gullies down to the bedrock.The heavy shade cast by S. jambos stands reduce species richness, but does allow some native species to regenerate. It also appears to be an important substrate for some epiphytes. In Puerto Rico, it is the most important phorophyte for a species of orchid (Rodriguez-Robles et al., 1990). It also appears to be a favoured habit for some endemic species. In the Seychelles S. jambos is not listed, like other invaders, as a threat to orthopteroids, a group of large striking insects, instead it is given as one of the host species (Matyot, 1998). The endangered Rodrigues Warbler Acrocephalus rodericanus were mostly found in S. jambos-dominated woodland (Showler et al., 2002).

Links to Websites

NameURLComment
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gatewayhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list.
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS)http://griis.org/Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list.

Bibliography

Akamine EK, Goo T, 1979. Respiration and ethylene production in fruits of species and cultivars of Psidium and species of Eugenia. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 104 (5): 632-635.FAO-SIDA, 1982. Fruit-bearing forest trees. FAO Forestry Paper 34. Rome, 71-73.Fish BE, 1976. The roseapple. Californian Rare Fruit Growers Yearbook, 8: 100-111.Morton JF, 1987. Fruits of warm climates. Creative Resource Systems Inc., Winterville, USA:383-386.Whistler WA, 1988. A revision of Syzygium (Myrtaceae) in Samoa. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 69: 167-192.

References

Anon., 2000. Plants to avoid when landscaping homes in Dade County. Dade Chapter of the Florida Native Plant Society. http://www.fnps.org/chapters/dade/pubs/PlantsToAvoid.pdf.
Anon., 2001. Beautiful but dangerous - Invasive alien plants of Durban and the eastern, sub-tropical region of South Africa with some indigenous alternatives. http://www.durban.gov.za/environment/pdfs/MoreAliens11_14.pdf.
Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT, 2012. Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 98:1192 pp. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm
Ashton PS, 1981. Myrtaceae. In: Dassanayake MD, Fosberg FR, eds. A revised handbook to the flora of Ceylon. Volume II. Smithsonian & NSF, Washington, 403-472.
Asprey GF, Robbins RG, 1953. The vegetation of Jamaica. Ecological Monographs, 23:359-412.
Binggeli P, 2001. Time-lags between introduction, establishment and rapid spread of introduced environmental weeds. In: Proceedings of the III International Weed Science Congress, CD-ROM, International Weed Science Society, Corvallis. Chapter 8.
Binggeli P, 2003. Invasive plants. In: Goodman SM, Benstead, JP, eds. The natural history of Madagascar. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Binggeli P, Starmer J, 1997. Pitcairn Island. Aliens, 6:2.
Broome R, Sabir K, Carrington S, 2007. Plants of the Eastern Caribbean. Online database. Barbados: University of the West Indies. http://ecflora.cavehill.uwi.edu/index.html
Brown KA, Scatena FN, Gurevitch J, 2006. Effects of an invasive tree on community structure and diversity in a tropical forest in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecology and Management, 226(1/3):145-152.
Brown WH, 1954. Useful plants of the Philippines. Volume 2. Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Manila.
Burkill HM, 1997. The useful plants of West tropical Africa. Volume 4. Families M-R. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens.
Chang TT, 1995. Phellinus eugeniae sp. nov. on Eugenia jambos in Taiwan. Mycological Research, 99(12):1527-1528; 8 ref.
Chantaranothai P, Parnell JAN, 1994. The breeding biology of some Thai Syzygium species. Tropical Ecology, 35(2):199-208; 21 ref.
Di Stefano JF, Fournier LA, Carranza J, Marin W, Mora A, 1998. Invasive potential of Syzigium jambos (Myrtaceae) in forest fragments: the case of Ciudad Colon, Costa Rica. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 46:567-573.
Diamond JM, 1994. Biogeography - Pitcairn before the Bounty. Nature, 369:608-609.
Exell AW, 1944. Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of S. Tome. Norwich: Jarrold and Sons Ltd., 270.
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2012. Flora of China Web. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Herbaria. http://flora.huh.harvard.edu/china/
Forzza RC, Leitman PM, Costa AF, Carvalho Jr AA, et al., 2012. List of species of the Flora of Brazil (Lista de espécies Flora do Brasil). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Rio de Janeiro Botanic Garden. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/2012/
Gooding EGB, Loveless AR, Proctor GR, 1965. Flora of Barbados. London, UK: Ministry of Overseas Development.
Govaerts R, 2013. World Checklist of Myrtaceae. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
Guillaumin A, 1942. Les plantes introduites en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Revue de Botanique Appliquée et d'Agriculture Tropicale, 22:13-47.
Harris DR, 1965. Plants, animals and man in the Outer Leeward islands. University of California Publications in Geography, 18.
Heartsill-Scalley T, Aide TM, 2003. Riparian vegetation and stream condition in a tropical agriculture-secondary forest mosaic. Ecological Applications, 13:225-234.
Jim CY, 1990. Trees in Hong Kong: species for landscape planting. Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
Küffer C, Edwards PJ, Fleischmann K, Schumacher E, Dietz H, 2003. Invasion of woody plants into the Seychelles tropical forests: habitat invasibility and propagule pressure. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 69:65-75.
Leblanc L, Putoa R, 2000. Fruit flies in French Polynesia and Pitcairn Islands. Pest Advisory Leaflet, 29. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Suva.
Leung GPC, Hau BCH, Corlett RT, 2009. Exotic plant invasion in the highly degraded upland landscape of Hong Kong, China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18(1):191-202. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p9g46t6g36813672/?p=5a720354c6a64eb8a46e26c61d436769&pi=11
Little EL, Wadsworth FH, 1964. Common trees of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook 249.
Lobo Cabezas S, 2012. Exotic flora in El Rodeo: wealth, status and distribution. (Flora exótica de El Rodeo: riqueza, condición y distribución.) Brenesia, No.77:129-146.
Lorence DH, Sussman RW, 1986. Exotic species invasion into Mauritius wet forest remnants. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2:147-162.
Macdonald IAW, Thébaud C, Strahm W, Strasberg D, 1991. Effects of alien plant invasions on native vegetation remnants on La Réunion (Mascarene Islands, Indian Ocean). Environmental Conservation, 18:51-61.
Matthew KM, 1969. The exotic flora of Kodaikanal Palni Hills. Records of the Botanical Survey of India, 20(1).
Matyot P, 1998. The orthopteroids of the Seychelles: a threatened island fauna. Journal of Insect Conservation, 2:235-246.
Meerman J, 2003. Non-native flora of Belize. http://biological-diversity.info/invasive_flora.htm.
Meyer JY, 2000. Preliminary review of the invasive plants in the Pacific islands (SPREP Member Countries). In: Sherley G, tech. ed. Invasive species in the Pacific: a technical review and draft regional strategy. South Pacific Regional Environment Programme, Samoa.
Morton JF, 1987. Fruits of warm climate. Miami, USA: JF Morton.
Motooka PS, Nagai G, Ching L, 1983. Cut-surface application of glyphosate to control tropical brush species. In: Abstracts. Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America 1983, 96.
PIER, 2013. Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
Palli F, 2002. Arbres de la Martinique. http://www.palli.ch/~kapeskreyol/divers/arbres.html.
Pauwels L, 1993. Nzayilu N'ti - Guide des arbres et arbustes de la région de Kinshasa - Brazzaville. Scripta Botanica Belgica, 4:1-495.
Rodriguez-Robles JA, Ackerman JD, Melendez EJ, 1990. Host distribution and hurricane damage to an orchid population at Toro Negro Forest, Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science, 26:163-164.
Schmitt L, Rivière JN, 2002. Comparative life-history traits of two Syzygium species (Myrtaceae): one invasive alien in La Réunion, the other native. Acta Botanica Gallica, 149(4):457-466; 31 ref.
Seifriz W, 1943. The plant life of Cuba. Ecological Monographs, 13:376-426.
Showler DA, Cote IM, Jones CG, 2002. Population census and habitat use of Rodrigues warbler Acrocephalus rodericanus. Bird Conservation International, 12:211-230.
Smith CW, 1985. Impact of alien plants on Hawaii's native biota. In: Stone CP, Scott JM, eds. Hawaii's Terrestrial Ecosystems: Preservation and Management. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University of Hawaii Press, 180-250.
Soria M, Taylor U, Tye A, Wilkinson SR, 2002. Manual de identificación y manejo de malezas en Galápagos. Charles Darwin Research Station, Puerto Ayora, Galapagos.
Soto-Pinto L, Perfecto I, Castillo-Hernandez J, Caballero-Nieto J, 2000. Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 80:61-69.
Space JC, Flynn T, 2000. Observations on invasive plant species in American Samoa. USDA Forest Service, Honolulu, 51.
Space JC, Flynn T, 2000. Report to the Government of Niue on invasive plant species of environmental concern. USDA Forest Service, Honolulu, 34.
Space JC, Flynn T, 2001. Report to the Kingdom of Tonga on invasive plant species of environmental concern. Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: USDA Forest Service.
Space JC, Waterhouse BM, Miles JE, Tiobech J, Rengulbai K, 2003. Report to the Republic of Palau on invasive plant species of environmental concern. Honolulu, USA: USDA Forest Service.
Strahm W, 1989. Plant Red Data Book for Rodrigues. Konigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books.
Tessmann DJ, Dianese JC, Miranda AC, Castro LHR, 2001. Epidemiology of a Neotropical rust (Puccinia psidii): periodical analysis of the temporal progress in a perennial host (Syzygium jambos). Plant Pathology, 50(6):725-731; 22 ref.
Turland NJ, 1994. Myrtaceae. In: Press JR & Short MJ, eds, Flora of Madeira. London, UK: HMSO, 231-233.
Voigt W, 1914. Tropische Fruchtbäume. Ihre Beschreibung, Kultur und die Verwendung ihere Ergebnisse. Der Pflanzer, 10(5):255-262.
Wadsworth FH, 1943. Pomarrosa, Jambosa jambos (L.) Millsp. and its place in Puerto Rico. Caribbean Forester, 4:183-194.
Walker EH, 1976. Flora of Okinawa and the Southern Ryukyu Islands. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution.
Watson J, Trueman M, Tufet M, Henderson S, Atkinson R, 2010. Mapping terrestrial anthropogenic degradation on the inhabited islands of the Galapagos Archipelago. Oryx, 44(1):79-82. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ORX
Whistler WA, 1988. A revision of Syzygium (Myrtaceae) in Samoa. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 69:167-192.
Witt, A., Luke, Q., 2017. Guide to the naturalized and invasive plants of Eastern Africa, [ed. by Witt, A., Luke, Q.]. Wallingford, UK: CABI. vi + 601 pp. http://www.cabi.org/cabebooks/ebook/20173158959
Yahaya Ibrahim, 2003. Forest ecosystems of the Comoros: biodiversity, principle threats, prospect for improvement - the case of Kartala forest on Ngazidja island. (Ecosystèmes forestiers des Comores: biodiversité, principales menaces, perspective de mise en valeur - le cas de la forêt du Kartala dans l'île de Ngazidja.) In: Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on invasive alien species and terrestrial ecosystem rehabilitation in Western Indian Ocean Island States, Seychelles, 13-17 October 2003: sharing experience, identifying priorities and defining joint action [ed. by Mauremootoo, J. R.]. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN-The World Conservation Union, 105-118. http://www.issg.org
van Lingen TG, 1991. Syzygium jambos (L.) Alston. In: Verheij EWM, Coronel RE, eds. Plant Resources of South-East Asia No. 2. Edible fruits and nuts. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc, 296-298.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 24 July 2013

Language

English

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

Citing Literature

  • Comparisons of habitat types and host tree species across a threatened Caribbean orchid’s core and edge distribution, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 10.1017/S0266467421000572, (1-17), (2022).

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation