Skip the header
Open access
Datasheet
Enhanced
22 November 2023

Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur)

Datasheet Types: Pest, Invasive species, Host plant

Abstract

This datasheet on Xanthium strumarium covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Hosts/Species Affected, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Further Information.

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Xanthium strumarium L.
Preferred Common Name
common cocklebur
Other Scientific Names
Xanthium abyssinicum Wallr.
Xanthium acerosum Greene
Xanthium acutilobum Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium acutum Greene
Xanthium affine Greene
Xanthium americanum Walt.
Xanthium arcuatum Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium arenarium Lasch
Xanthium aridum St.John
Xanthium barcinonense Sennen
Xanthium brevirostre Wallr.
Xanthium bubalocarpon Bush
Xanthium calvum Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium campestre Greene
Xanthium cenchroides Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium chasei Fernald
Xanthium chinense Mill.
Xanthium cloessplateaum D.Z.Ma
Xanthium commune Britton
Xanthium cordifolium Stokes
Xanthium crassifolium Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium cuneatum Moench
Xanthium curvescens Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium cylindraceum Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium cylindricum Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium decalvatum Widder
Xanthium discolor Wallr.
Xanthium echinatum Murray
Xanthium echinellum Greene ex Rydb.
Xanthium fuscescens Jord. & Fourr.
Xanthium glabratum (DC.) Britton
Xanthium glanduliferum Greene
Xanthium globosum C.Shull
Xanthium homothalamum Spreng.
Xanthium indicum DC.
Xanthium inflexum Mack. & Bush
Xanthium japonicum Widder
Xanthium leptocarpum Millsp. & Sherff
Xanthium longirostre Wallr.
Xanthium macounii Britton
Xanthium mongolicum Kitag.
Xanthium nigri Ces.
Xanthium occidentale Bertol.
Xanthium oligacanthum Piper
Xanthium oviforme Wallr.
Xanthium riparium Lasché
Xanthium ripicola J. Holub
Xanthium roxburghii Wallr.
Xanthium speciosum Kearney
Xanthium sphaerocephalum Salzm. ex Ball
Xanthium varians Greene
Xanthium wootonii Cockerell
International Common Names
English
beach cocklebur
Canada cocklebur
clotbur
cocklebur
ditchbur
donkey burr
donkeyburr
European cockle bur
heartleaf
large cocklebur
rough cocklebur
sheep burr
woolgarie bur
Spanish
arrancamoños
bardana
bardana menor
cachurrera
cadillo
cardo garbancero
chayotillo
gatillo
higueruela
French
glouteron
lampourde glouteron
Chinese
cang
cang er
Local Common Names
Australia
Noogoora bur
sheep bur
Cuba
guizazo de caballos
Czech Republic
řepeň durkoman
Dominican Republic
cadillo de gato
cadillo de tres pies
gatico
Estonia
pugu-väärtakjas
Germany
amerikanische Spitzklette
gemeine Spitzklette
gewöhnliche Spitzklette
Kropfspitzklette
östliche Spitzklette
India
adhisishi
bada gokhru bhakra
chota dhatura
ghaghra
sansakhuli
Italy
lappola comune
nappola minore
Japan
onamomi
Lesser Antilles
burrweed
zaydri couchou
Lithuania
paprastasis dagišius
Malaysia
buah anjang
Nepal
bhainse kuro
bhende kuro
Netherlands
late stekelnoot
ongedoornde stekelnoot
Pakistan
puth kando
Poland
rzepień pospolity
Portugal
amor-de-hortelão
bardana-menor
carrapicho-de-carneiro
carrapicho-grande
South Africa
kankerroos
large cocklebur
Taiwan
tsai-er
Thailand
kachab
Turkey
koca pıtrak
siraco out
USA
heart-leaf cocklebur

Pictures

Fruiting habit of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Lyon, Nevada, USA. January 2015.
Habit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Fruiting habit. Lyon, Nevada, USA. January 2015.
©James D. Morefield (2011)/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Young plant of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur) with its fruit.
Fruit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Fruit on young plant. Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii. February 2007.
©Forest and Kim Starr/via Starr Environmental - CC BY 4.0
Fruits of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii. March 2009.
Fruit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Fruits. Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii. March 2009.
©Forest and Kim Starr/via Starr Environmental - CC BY 4.0
Fruit of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii. March 2009.
Fruit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Fruit. Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii. March 2009.
©Forest and Kim Starr/via Starr Environmental - CC BY 4.0
Habit of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Kondivli, Maharashtra, India. December 2021.
Habit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Habit. Kondivli, Maharashtra, India. December 2021.
©Dinesh Valke/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Habit of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Kondivli, Maharashtra, India. December 2021.
Habit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Habit. Kondivli, Maharashtra, India. December 2021.
©Dinesh Valke/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Flowers of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur) with developing fruits. Chakan, Maharashtra, India. November 2011.
Flowers
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Flowers with developing fruits. Chakan, Maharashtra, India. November 2011.
©Dinesh Valke/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Flowers of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur) with developing fruits. Chakan, Maharashtra, India. November 2011.
Flowers
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Flowers with developing fruits. Chakan, Maharashtra, India. November 2011.
©Dinesh Valke/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Habit of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Cardwell, Montana, USA. September 2016.
Habit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Habit. Cardwell, Montana, USA. September 2016.
©Matt Lavin/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Immature fruit of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Cardwell, Montana, USA. September 2016.
Fruit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Immature fruit. Cardwell, Montana, USA. September 2016.
©Matt Lavin/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Fruiting habit of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Hobble Creek, Utah, USA. January 2015.
Habit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Fruiting habit. Hobble Creek, Utah, USA. January 2015.
©Andrey Zharkikh/via Flickr - CC BY 2.0
Habit of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area, California, USA. July 2015.
Habit
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Habit. Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area, California, USA. July 2015.
©Matt Lavin/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Mature seedpods of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Vasai, Maharashtra, India. February 2023.
Seedpod
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Mature seedpods. Vasai, Maharashtra, India. February 2023.
©Dinesh Valke/via Flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Seedpod of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. December 2008.
Seedpod
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Seedpod. Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. December 2008.
©Forest and Kim Starr/via Starr Environmental - CC BY 4.0
Seedlings of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. December 2008.
Seedlings
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Many seedlings. Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. December 2008.
©Forest and Kim Starr/via Starr Environmental - CC BY 4.0
Seedlings of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur) in wetland. Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. December 2008.
Seedling
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Seedlings in wetland. Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. December 2008.
©Forest and Kim Starr/via Starr Environmental - CC BY 4.0
Seedlings of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. December 2008.
Seedling
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Many seedlings. Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. December 2008.
©Forest and Kim Starr/via Starr Environmental - CC BY 4.0
Seedling of Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur). Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. February 2008.
Seedling
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur); Seedling. Lua Kealialalo, Kahoolawe, Hawaii. February 2008.
©Forest and Kim Starr/via Starr Environmental - CC BY 4.0

Summary of Invasiveness

Xanthium strumarium is a cosmopolitan annual herb that has become a widespread agricultural and environmental weed. Considered one of the world’s worst weeds, this species produces large numbers of seeds that are easily spread, due to their ability to float and to “hitchhike” on humans and animals. Once established, X. strumarium can quickly become the dominant species in an area because of its prolific seed production and high germination and survival rates. It is very successful in invading disturbed sites, wastelands, roadsides, cultivated lands, riverbanks, grasslands, beaches and coastal thickets. It can occur scattered but can also form dense stands that displace native vegetation, inhibit the germination and growth of other plant species, and alter natural regeneration processes.

Taxonomic Tree

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

The genus Xanthium comprises annual herbs that often behave as weeds. Species within this genus are characterized by the presence of peculiar spiny female capitula or burs. Since Linnaeus described the first two species of Xanthium in 1753 (X. strumarium L. and X. spinosum L.), a large number of specific epithets have been given for the species in this genus. For example, Millspaugh and Sherff (1919) in their revision of North American Xanthium listed 21 species. However, other taxonomists have reduced the number of species to two or three (Cronquist, 1945; Strother, 2006). Löve and Dansereau (1959) in their revision recognized only two species: X. strumarium and X. spinosum. Additionally, these authors recognized two infraspecific taxa within X. strumarium: X. strumarium subsp. strumarium (native to the Old World) and X. strumarium subsp. cavanillesii (native to the Americas). In the most recent revision of the genus using molecular and phylogenetic analyses, Tomasello (2018) has delimited the genus Xanthium to five species.

Plant Type

Annual
Seed / spore propagated
Broadleaved
Herbaceous

Description

The following description is from Flora of China Editorial Committee (2018):
Herbs, annual, 20-120 cm; nodal spines absent. Petiole 3.5-10 cm not winged; median cauline leaves deltate-ovate, 9-25 cm, papery, densely scabrid on both surfaces, base shallowly cordate to broadly cuneate, margin irregularly dentate, often obsoletely 3-lobed, apex acute. Capitula monoecious. Male capitula in terminal umbels; phyllaries 1-seriate, oblong-lanceolate, ca. 2.2 mm; outer paleae oblong-lanceolate, inner paleae lanceolate, ca. 2.2 mm; corolla white, tubular, ca. 2.5 mm, 5-dentate. Female capitula axillary; phyllaries 1-seriate, oblong-lanceolate, ca. 3 mm, inner bracts connate with outer paleae. Burs sessile, oblong, ellipsoid, or ovoid, 10-18 × 6-12 mm, densely puberulent, 2-beaked.

Distribution

The native distribution range of X. strumarium is still unclear. While some authors consider this species as probably having originated in North America (Strother, 2006; USDA-NRCS, 2018), others consider it as native to the Old World, as supported by the numerous fossil records in Europe dating all the way back to the last glacial period (Löve, 1975; Tomasello, 2018). Currently, X. strumarium has a pantropical distribution and can be found widely naturalized in both the Old and New Worlds (USDA-ARS, 2018).

Distribution Map

This content is currently unavailable.

Distribution Table

This content is currently unavailable.

Risk of Introduction

Xanthium strumarium has all the characteristics which favour its ability to inhabit a range of habitats: an effective dispersal mechanism, tolerance of a wide variety of soil types, high seed output and viability and germination under varied environments, rapid seedling growth and a well-developed root system. The traits of this species that contribute to its widespread geographic and environmental distribution are reviewed by Kaul (1961). As this species has an almost worldwide distribution, having been introduced to so many countries, it is likely to spread further.

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Xanthium strumarium spreads by seed. Each plant can produce 500 to 5400 burs (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983). The spiny burs are readily dispersed by adhering to animal fur, human clothing and shoes, and as a contaminant of wool, mud, hay bales, agricultural products and seed pastures. Burs are buoyant and can float for up to 30 days, thus being easily dispersed to beaches and pastures subject to flooding. Viability of seeds buried in the soil does not generally exceed 5 years (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).

Pathway Causes

Pathway causeNotesLong distanceLocalReferences
Crop production (pathway cause)Noxious weed in agricultureYesYes
Disturbance (pathway cause)Common weed in disturbed sites, roadsides, pastures, etcYesYes
Hitchhiker (pathway cause)Burs are often dispersed adhered to human clothing, shoes, animal fur and as a contaminant in agricultural productsYesYes
Medicinal use (pathway cause)Used in traditional medicine in China, IndiaYesYes
Mitch (1987), Talakal et al. (1995)

Pathway Vectors

Hosts/Species Affected

Xanthium strumarium is a weed of many economically important crops. It is extremely competitive in crops such as soyabean, cotton and peanut and can also affect alfalfa, wheat, pepper, bean, maize, tomato and sorghum plantations as well as orchards and vineyards. X. strumarium also serves as a host for a number of pathogens and pests affecting crops (Villaseñor and Espinosa, 1998; Vibrans, 2009).

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

HostFamilyHost statusReferences
Allium cepa (onion)LiliaceaeUnknown
Arachis hypogaea (groundnut)FabaceaeMain
Beta vulgaris (beetroot)ChenopodiaceaeMain 
Brassica carinata (African cabbage)BrassicaceaeUnknown
Capsicum spp. Main 
Chrysanthemum (daisy)AsteraceaeUnknown
Cicer arietinum (chickpea)FabaceaeUnknown
CitrusRutaceaeUnknown
Colocasia esculenta (taro)AraceaeOther 
Eragrostis tef (teff)PoaceaeUnknown
Glycine max (soyabean)FabaceaeMain
Gossypium (cotton)MalvaceaeUnknown
Gossypium hirsutum (Bourbon cotton)MalvaceaeMain 
Helianthus annuus (sunflower)AsteraceaeOther
Milanova et al. (2007), Moskova et al. (2018)
Hordeum vulgare (barley)PoaceaeUnknown
Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)ConvolvulaceaeUnknown
Lens culinaris Unknown
Oryza sativa (rice)PoaceaeOther 
Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)FabaceaeOther
Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)PoaceaeMain
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)SolanaceaeMain
Bayram et al. (2015), Saeed and Ali (2020)
Solanum melongena (aubergine)SolanaceaeUnknown
Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)PoaceaeMain 
Spinacia oleracea (spinach)ChenopodiaceaeUnknown
Triticum aestivum (wheat)PoaceaeOther
Hassannejad and Ghafarbi (2013), Hassannejad et al. (2014), Shah et al. (2014), Fazal and Muhammad (2015), Nigussie et al. (2017)
Zea mays (maize)PoaceaeMain
Shah and Khan (2006), Milanova et al. (2007), Oh et al. (2007), Zeeshan et al. (2016), Nigussie et al. (2017)

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

Xanthium strumarium resembles X. spinosum, but these two species can be distinguished by the following traits (Queensland Government, 2018):
Xanthium strumarium has relatively large leaves (up to 20 cm long) that are very broad (up to 18 cm across) and often have three or five lobes with irregularly toothed margins. Both leaf surfaces are green in colour and rough to the touch (i.e. scabrous). Its stems do not bear any spines and its relatively large fruit (7-20 mm long) are topped with two distinct 'beaks' (about 4 mm long).
Xanthium spinosum has small to moderately-sized leaves (2-10 cm long) that are relatively narrow (6-30 mm wide) and usually have three irregular lobes. These leaves have dark green upper surfaces and whitish coloured undersides. Its stems bear three-pronged spines near the leaf bases and its moderately-sized fruit (8-15 mm long) are sometimes topped with two small 'beaks' (1-2 mm long).

Habitat

Xanthium strumarium often grows in moist sandy pits, riverbanks, grasslands, along beaches, coastal dunes, watercourses and floodplains, and has expanded to open environments created by human activities, such as cultivated fields, roadsides, wastelands, pastures and ruderal places. It thrives in damp or seasonally wet alkaline soils from near sea level to altitudes of 2000 m (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Pitcher, 2001; Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2018; Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2018). It is most often found in the temperate zone, but also occurs in subtropical and Mediterranean climates. It prefers open communities and will disappear if shaded or crowded (Kaul, 1971). It is not common in mountainous regions (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).

Habitat List

CategorySub categoryHabitatPresenceStatus
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural landPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural landPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural landPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedManaged grasslands (grazing systems)Present, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedManaged grasslands (grazing systems)Present, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedManaged grasslands (grazing systems)Present, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedDisturbed areasPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedDisturbed areasPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedDisturbed areasPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedRail / roadsidesPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedRail / roadsidesPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedRail / roadsidesPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedUrban / peri-urban areasPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedUrban / peri-urban areasPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedUrban / peri-urban areasPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural grasslandsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural grasslandsPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural grasslandsPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanksPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanksPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanksPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalWetlandsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalWetlandsPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalWetlandsPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
Littoral Coastal areasPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
Littoral Coastal areasPresent, no further detailsNatural
Littoral Coastal areasPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
Littoral Coastal dunesPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
Littoral Coastal dunesPresent, no further detailsNatural
Littoral Coastal dunesPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
Freshwater LakesPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
Freshwater LakesPresent, no further detailsNatural
Freshwater LakesPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
Freshwater ReservoirsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
Freshwater ReservoirsPresent, no further detailsNatural
Freshwater ReservoirsPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
Freshwater Rivers / streamsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
Freshwater Rivers / streamsPresent, no further detailsNatural
Freshwater Rivers / streamsPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural
Freshwater PondsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
Freshwater PondsPresent, no further detailsNatural
Freshwater PondsPresent, no further detailsProductive/non-natural

Biology and Ecology

Genetics

All Xanthium taxa are tetraploid with a chromosome number of 2n = 36 (Löve and Dansereau, 1959). The related species X. spinosum is more homogeneous throughout its range than X. strumarium. Hybrids between the two species can occur (Löve, 1975).

Reproductive Biology

Xanthium strumarium is a monoecious, wind-pollinated, self-compatible and predominately self-pollinated species. The staminate heads are located above the pistillate heads on the main axis and side shoots, an arrangement favouring inbreeding (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Pitcher, 2001).

Physiology and Phenology

Xanthium strumarium has the C3 photosynthetic pathway (Sharkey and Raschke, 1981). In China, this species has been recorded flowering during July and August and fruiting in September and October (Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2018). In North America, plants produce flowers and fruits from July to October (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2018). In Australia, flowering occurs from summer through to early autumn (Queensland Government, 2018).
Xanthium strumarium produces two types of seeds (somatic polymorphism). Each bur contains two seeds, with the smaller one often pushed upwards toward the beaked end of the fruit. The lower seed has a shorter dormant period and germinates first. This appears to be a strategy to assure germination in the event the immediate environment happens to be unsuitable (Redosevich and Holt, 1984; Pitcher, 2001). In the northern hemisphere, seed germination and emergence generally occur in late spring or early summer and light is not required for germination (Stoller and Wax, 1974).

Longevity

Xanthium strumarium is an annual herbaceous species (USDA-NRCS, 2018). It overwinters as seed on or below the surface of the soil. Viability of seeds buried in the soil does not exceed 5 years (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).

Population Size and Structure

Two types of populations have been described for X. strumarium (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983): (1) populations located along shores or watercourses which tend to be small, ephemeral, and homogeneous with seed dispersal by wind and water and (2) populations in ruderal habitats, agricultural fields or waste areas that tend to be large, dense and heterogeneous with tall, vigorous plants producing large numbers of seeds. Seed dispersal in these areas is primarily the result of human activities. Both types of populations, however, occupy unstable habitats and are continually shifting to newly disturbed areas (Pitcher, 2001).

Environmental Requirements

Xanthium strumarium tolerates a wide variety of soil types and textures and a soil pH range of 5.2- 8.0, as well as frequent flooding and saline conditions (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).

Climate

Climate typeDescriptionPreferred or toleratedRemarks
Af - Tropical rainforest climate> 60mm precipitation per monthTolerated 
Am - Tropical monsoon climateTropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25]))Tolerated 
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer< 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])Tolerated 
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate< 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])Tolerated 
BS - Steppe climate> 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitationPreferred 
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summerWarm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summersPreferred 
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winterWarm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters)Preferred 
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all yearWarm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all yearPreferred 
Ds - Continental climate with dry summerContinental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers)Tolerated 

Latitude/Altitude Ranges

Latitude North (°N)Latitude South (°S)Altitude lower (m)Altitude upper (m)
5545  

Rainfall Regime

Summer
Winter
Bimodal
Uniform

Soil Tolerances

Soil texture > Light
Soil texture > Medium
Soil texture > Heavy
Soil reaction > Acid
Soil reaction > Neutral
Soil reaction > Alkaline
Soil drainage > Seasonally waterlogged
Special soil tolerances > Saline

List of Pests

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Natural Enemies

Xanthium strumarium is a host of numerous important pests and diseases, including the fungi Alternaria helianthi [Alternariaster helianthi], Rhizoctonia solani [Thanatephorus cucumeris] and Puccinia xanthii, and the leafminer, Liriomyza helianthi (Julien et al., 1979; Spencer and Steyskal, 1986; Abbas and Barrentine, 1995; Singh et al., 2012).
A literature review of insect pests associated with X. strumarium in different parts of the world and in Southern California was carried out by Hilgendorf and Goeden (1982; 1983).

Natural enemies

Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Alternaria zinniae (leaf spot of zinnia)Pathogen not specific  
Alternariaster helianthi (leaf blight of sunflower)Pathogen not specific  
Colletotrichum coccodes (black dot of potato)Pathogen not specific   
Colletotrichum dematium (leaf spot)Pathogen not specific   
Epiblema strenuana (ragweed borer)Herbivore
Plants|Stems
not specific  
Euaresta aequalisHerbivore
Plants|Seeds
not specific  
Eucosma imbridanaHerbivore
Plants|Seeds
not specific  
Gloeosporium orbicularePathogen not specific   
Liriomyza helianthiHerbivore
Plants|Leaves
not specific  
Mecas cana saturninaHerbivore not specific  
Nupserha vexatorHerbivore
Plants|Stems
not specific  
Oedopa sp.Herbivore
Plants|Roots
to genus  
Phyllachora canaliculataPathogen not specific   
Protomyces gravidus (biocontrol of ragweed)Pathogen not specific  
Puccinia xanthiiPathogen
Plants|Leaves
Plants|Stems
not specific  
Thanatephorus cucumeris (many names, depending on host)Pathogen
Plants|Leaves
not specific  
Zygogramma bicolorata (Mexican beetle)Herbivore
Plants|Growing point
Plants|Leaves
Plants|Inflorescence
not specific  

Impact Summary

CategoryImpact
Cultural/amenityNegative
Economic/livelihoodNegative
Environment (generally)Positive and negative
Human healthNegative

Impact

Xanthium strumarium is a major weed of row crops such as soyabeans, cotton, maize and groundnuts in many parts of the world, including North America, southern Europe, the Middle East, South Africa, India and Japan. In 1995, it ranked as the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh most troublesome weed in soyabean, cotton, maize and groundnut, respectively, across 10 southern states in the USA. Between 1974 and 1995, X. strumarium decreased in importance in maize, soyabean and groundnuts in the southern USA, but increased in cotton (Webster and Coble, 1997). These rankings were based on distribution, abundance and difficulty of control.

In soyabeans, cocklebur has been reported to cause the highest reductions in yield of all annual weeds in both northern and southern production areas of the USA (Stoller et al., 1987). Soyabean yield losses are estimated at 10 to 16% for 0.5 plants of X. strumarium per m of row, 65% for 4 plants and 80% for over 10 plants per m of row, for weeds emerging at the same time as the crop (Stoller et al., 1987; Rushing and Oliver, 1998). Similar yield losses from cocklebur were reported in Ontario, Canada (Weaver, 1991). In Italy, Sartorato et al. (1996) recommended an economic threshold of only 0.05 plants of X. strumarium per square m in soyabeans. In addition to direct yield losses through competition, infestations of X. strumarium decrease soyabean seed quality and harvesting efficiency. One cocklebur per m of row was shown to cause a 7.2% increase in foreign material in harvested soyabeans, a 5.2% increase in seed moisture content, decreased test weight by 58.6 g/L seed, and reduced combine speed (Ellis et al., 1998). The authors recommended use of a pre-harvest desiccant when cocklebur densities exceeded 0.5 plants per m of row.

In cotton in the USA, seed yield losses of 60 to 90 kg/ha (approximately 5%) have been reported from cocklebur growing at a density of one plant per 15 m of row in Mississippi (Snipes et al., 1982). Cotton yield losses from one plant of X. strumarium per 3 m of row varied from 6 to 27% in North Carolina (Byrd and Coble, 1991). The critical period for cocklebur in cotton lasted from 2 to 10 weeks after cotton emergence (Snipes et al., 1987).

In groundnuts, cocklebur has been reported to cause yield losses of 31-39% at a density of 0.5 plants and 88% at 4 plants per m of row in the southern USA (Royal et al., 1997a, b). Cocklebur densities higher than 1 plant per 2 m of row reduced deposition of the fungicide chlorothalonil by 34% (Royal et al., 1997b).

The economic impact of X. strumarium in maize is somewhat lower than for soyabeans, cotton and groundnuts. Yields of maize in Illinois, USA have been reported to decrease by 10% at 1 cocklebur per m of row, to a maximum yield loss of 27% at a density of 4.7 cockleburs per m of row (Beckett et al., 1988).

Infestations of X. strumarium can also cause significant yield losses in horticultural row crops (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983). In snap beans, yield losses of 5 to 50% were reported for densities of X. strumarium ranging from 0.5 to 8 per square m (Neary and Majek, 1990).

Xanthium strumarium also has a detrimental impact on livestock production which has been best documented in Australia, where it is abundant in sheep-grazing regions in the eastern half of the continent in Queensland and New South Wales (Wapshere, 1974b; Hocking and Liddle, 1986). The burs lodge in animal hair and sheep wool, and are difficult to remove when the wool is processed after shearing. Contaminated wool requires special treatment and may have a price penalty of 25% or more (Wapshere, 1974b). The prickly burs can cause considerable discomfort to animals by clinging to hair on the legs and matting the tails and manes of horses.

Xanthium strumarium also has an economic impact in pastures, where cattle, sheep and pigs may be poisoned by eating young plants. The cotyledons contain a toxic compound, carboxyatractyloside, which is absent in older plants (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1982; Hocking and Liddle, 1986; Martin et al., 1992). Symptoms include vomiting, muscular spasms, liver degeneration and occasionally death.

Cocklebur serves as a host for a number of pathogens of crops. Sunflowers have been reported to be damaged by the rust Puccinia xanthii, commonly found on cocklebur, and by alternaria leaf spot (Alternaria helianthi), also found on cocklebur in North America (Hocking and Liddle, 1986). Cocklebur is reported to be a host for Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum which contaminate soyabean and discolour seed and result in a lowered price (Hocking and Liddle, 1986). X. strumarium is also an alternate host for the insect Spilosoma obliqua (Lepidoptera) which attacks Egyptian clover in India (Dhaliwal, 1993), and for Colletotrichum capsici, which causes anthracnose on tomato fruit and cotton seedlings in the USA (Mclean and Roy, 1991).

The Xanthium genus is closely related to the Ambrosia (ragweed) genus, and X. strumarium produces large amounts of highly antigenic pollen (Reddi et al., 1980). The glandular hairs on the leaves and stem secrete a substance which causes contact dermititis in allergic individuals (King, 1966).

Impact: Economic

Xanthium strumarium is a major weed of crops in many parts of the world where it greatly reduces yield and interferes with combine harvesting. It is a strong competitor for nutrients and water. It is ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in soyabean, cotton, maize and groundnut, across North America, Europe and Australia where it can cause reductions in yield (Stoller et al., 1987; Rushing and Oliver, 1998).
In 1995, X. strumarium ranked as the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh most troublesome weed in soyabean, cotton, maize and groundnut, respectively, across ten southern states in the USA. Between 1974 and 1995, X. strumarium decreased in importance in maize, soyabean and groundnuts in the southern USA, but increased in cotton (Webster and Coble, 1997). These rankings were based on distribution, abundance and difficulty of control. In soyabean, X. strumarium has been reported to cause the highest reductions in yield of all annual weeds in both northern and southern production areas of the USA (Stoller et al., 1987). Soyabean yield losses are estimated at 10% to 16% for 0.5 plants of X. strumarium per m of row, 65% for four plants and 80% for over ten plants per m of row, for weeds emerging at the same time as the crop (Stoller et al., 1987; Rushing and Oliver, 1998). Similar yield losses due to X. strumarium were reported in Ontario, Canada (Weaver, 1991). In Italy, Sartorato et al. (1996) recommended an economic threshold of only 0.05 plants of X. strumarium per square m in soyabeans. In addition to direct yield losses through competition, infestations of X. strumarium decrease soyabean seed quality and harvesting efficiency. One cocklebur per m of row was shown to cause a 7.2% increase in foreign material in harvested soyabeans, a 5.2% increase in seed moisture content, decreased test weight by 58.6 g/L seed and reduced combine speed (Ellis et al., 1998). The authors recommend the use of a pre-harvest desiccant when X. strumarium densities exceeded 0.5 plants per m of row.
In cotton in the USA, seed yield losses of 60 to 90 kg/ha (approximately 5%) have been reported from X. strumarium growing at a density of one plant per 15 m of row in Mississippi (Snipes et al., 1982). Cotton yield losses from one plant of X. strumarium per 3 m of row varied from 6% to 27% in North Carolina (Byrd and Coble, 1991). The critical period for X. strumarium in cotton lasted from 2 to 10 weeks after cotton emergence (Snipes et al., 1987). In groundnuts, X. strumarium has been reported to cause yield losses of 31-39% at a density of 0.5 plants and 88% at four plants per m of row in the southern USA (Royal et al., 1997a, b). X. strumarium densities higher than one plant per 2 m of row reduced deposition of the fungicide chlorothalonil by 34% (Royal et al., 1997b). The economic impact of X. strumarium in maize is somewhat lower than for soyabeans, cotton and groundnuts. Yields of maize in Illinois have been reported to decrease by 10% at one cocklebur per m of row, to a maximum yield loss of 27% at a density of 4.7 cockleburs per m of row (Beckett et al., 1988).
Infestations of X. strumarium can also cause significant yield losses in horticultural row crops (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983). In snap beans, yield losses of 5% to 50% were reported for densities of X. strumarium ranging from 0.5 to 8 per square m (Neary and Majek, 1990).
Xanthium strumarium has a detrimental impact on livestock production (Wapshere, 1974b; Hocking and Liddle, 1986). The burs lodge in animal hair and sheep wool, and are difficult to remove when the wool is processed after shearing. Contaminated wool requires special treatment and may have a price penalty of 25% or more (Wapshere, 1974b). The prickly burs can cause considerable discomfort to animals by clinging to hair on the legs and matting the tails and manes of horses.
Xanthium strumarium also has an economic impact in pastures, where cattle, sheep and pigs may be poisoned if they consume seedlings and young plants. Symptoms include vomiting, muscular spasms, liver degeneration and occasionally death. The cotyledons contain a toxic compound, carboxyatractyloside, which is absent in older plants (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Hocking and Liddle, 1986; Martin et al., 1992).
Xanthium strumarium is considered a noxious weed because it serves as a host for a number of pests and pathogens of crops. Sunflowers have been reported to be damaged by Puccinia xanthii and Alternaria helianthi [Alternariaster helianthi], both commonly found on X. strumarium (Hocking and Liddle, 1986). X. strumarium also hosts Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum, both fungal pests of soyabean (Hocking and Liddle, 1986). It is also an alternate host of Spilosoma obliqua [Spilarctia obliqua] (Lepidoptera) that attacks Egyptian cotton in India (Dhaliwal, 1993), and of Colletotrichum capsici, which causes anthracnose on tomato fruit and cotton seedlings (McLean and Roy, 1991).

Impact: Environmental

Impact on Habitats

In South Africa, X. strumarium competes with native species along riverbanks and also invades overgrazed pastures and spreads at the expense of native species (SAPIA, 2018). In Australia, it is regarded as an environmental weed and often invades riparian zones along river systems where it forms dense thickets. It has been listed as a priority environmental weed in seven Australian Natural Resource Management regions (Queensland Government, 2018). In Hawaii, X. strumarium is listed as a common weed of low elevation, relatively dry, disturbed habitats, but also invades seasonally wet areas (Wagner et al., 1999; PIER, 2018). In South Korea, it has invaded sand dunes (Kim, 2005).
Across East Africa, X. strumarium is listed as invasive in Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya. In Kenya, this species has been recorded within the Tsavo National Park and the Meru National Park. It is widespread in Tanzania and Uganda and often invades pastures and grazing lands, causing reductions in forage production (BioNET-EAFRINET, 2018). In Ethiopia, X. strumarium has been identified as one of the top 20 invasive plant species. It is the dominant species on rangelands across Teltele, Yabello, Dire, Miyo, Moyale, Arero and Liben districts and it is also particularly abundant in rift valleys of the Oromia region (Nigussie et al., 2017; Seifu et al., 2017).

Impact on Biodiversity

Xanthium strumarium is a weed with impacts mostly in disturbed and semi-natural habitats. It is an aggressive herb that often becomes the dominant species in areas along the shores of ponds and rivers, floodplains, riverbanks, beaches and coastal dunes, but also in disturbed grasslands and forest edges. Once established, it rapidly forms dense thickets that outcompete native plant species for water and nutrients, altering the species structure and composition of invaded habitats as well as natural successional patterns (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Pitcher, 2001; Queensland Government, 2018; SAPIA, 2018). A laboratory experiment showed that leaf extracts of X. strumarium may inhibit the germination and restrict the growth of other plants, suggesting allelopathic activity in this species (Sinha and Singh, 2004).

Threatened Species

Threatened speciesWhere threatenedMechanismsReferencesNotes
Schiedea apokremnos (Kauai schiedea)
Hawaii
Competition (unspecified)
 

Impact: Social

Xanthium strumarium produces large amounts of highly antigenic pollen (Reddi et al., 1980). The glandular hairs on the leaves and stems secrete a substance that causes contact dermatitis in allergic individuals (King, 1966). The burs are irritants and annoying to humans and wildlife and thus may reduce recreational opportunities. In humans, the spiny burs can cause injury and may stick to clothing and shoes. It can be a serious problem in recreational areas, primarily along reservoirs, lakes and riverbanks (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Pitcher, 2001; DiTomaso et al., 2013).

Risk and Impact Factors

Invasiveness

Proved invasive outside its native range
Has a broad native range
Abundant in its native range
Highly adaptable to different environments
Is a habitat generalist
Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
Pioneering in disturbed areas
Highly mobile locally
Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
Fast growing
Has high reproductive potential
Gregarious
Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year

Impact outcomes

Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
Modification of successional patterns
Monoculture formation
Negatively impacts agriculture
Negatively impacts human health
Negatively impacts animal health
Reduced amenity values
Reduced native biodiversity
Threat to/ loss of endangered species
Threat to/ loss of native species
Damages animal/plant products

Impact mechanisms

Allelopathic
Causes allergic responses
Competition - monopolizing resources
Competition - smothering
Pest and disease transmission
Hybridization
Poisoning
Rapid growth
Produces spines, thorns or burrs

Likelihood of entry/control

Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
Difficult to identify/detect in the field
Difficult/costly to control

Uses

Xanthium strumarium has been used for various medicinal purposes, including the treatment of malaria in India (Mitch, 1987; Talakal et al., 1995). It has a long history of use as a medicinal plant in China; the traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and the safety aspects of X. strumarium have been reviewed by Fan et al. (2019). It is used as a leafy vegetable in China, and in Northeast India, the floral tops and the two leaves below are boiled in water and eaten, the toxic substances being removed by washing and cooking (PROSEA, 2018). The achenes yield a pale, yellow oil which can be used for cooking and industrial purposes. In India, the dry stems are used as fuel (PROSEA, 2018). The genus name is derived from the Greek ‘xanthos' which means 'yellow', and the plant may once have been used to produce a dye (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).

Uses List

Environmental > Host of pest
Materials > Dyestuffs
Medicinal, pharmaceutical > Traditional/folklore
Fuels > Miscellaneous fuels
Human food and beverage > Oil/fat
Human food and beverage > Vegetable

Prevention and Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Control

Cultural Control

Neither grazing nor burning is considered an effective means of control; not only is X. strumarium unpalatable, the seeds and foliage contain a glycoside which is toxic and fatal to livestock (DiTomaso et al., 2013).

Physical/Mechanical Control

Hand pulling is effective on small incipient populations. Pulling is most effective before bur development and seed dispersal. Mowing or disking at the flowering stage is also an effective strategy, but resprouts may occur after mowing and secondary treatment may be required (DiTomaso et al., 2013).

Biological Control

Biological control of X. strumarium has been attempted with Alternaria helianthi [Alternariaster helianthi] (Abbas and Barrentine, 1995) and Puccinia xanthii (Julien et al., 1979), and seed predation by the moth, Phaneta imbridana [Eucosma imbridana], and the trypetid fly, Euaresta aequalis (Hare and Futuyma, 1978; Hare, 1980). The stem-boring beetle Nupserha vexator (previously referred to as Nupserha antennata), native to India and Pakistan, was released in Australia in 1964 but provides little control since much of the damage occurs after the plants have set seed (Stride and Straatman, 1963; Wapshere, 1974a, b; Klinken and Morin, 2012). Another potential biocontrol agent is Oedopa sp. which feeds exclusively on the roots of Xanthium species (Hilgendorf and Goeden, 1983).

Chemical Control

Herbicides such as sulcitrone, amitrole, bentazon, dicamba, 2,4-D, glyphosate and fomesafen have been used to control X. strumarium when growing as a weed in cultivation (Mamarot and Rodriguez, 1997). In Papua New Guinea, Henty and Pritchard (1975) indicate susceptibility to 2,4-D, MCPB, amitrole, ametryne and diuron recommended for broad-leaved weeds, including atrazine, dicamba, metribuzin, bentazon, acifluorfen and imazethapyr. However, populations resistant to imidazolinones, ALS-inhibiting herbicides, and the arsenical herbicides MSMA/DSMA have been reported in the USA (Heap, 1997; Boyette and Hoagland, 2013).

Links to Websites

NameURLComment
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gatewayhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS)http://griis.org/Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list

References

Abbas, H.K., Barrentine, W.L., 1995. Alternaria helianthi and imazaquin for control of imazaquin susceptible and resistant cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) biotypes.Weed Science, 43(3) 425-428.
Acevedo-Rodríguez, P., Strong, M.T., 2012. Catalogue of the seed plants of the West Indies.Washington, DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. 1192 pp. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm
Ahmad, Z., Khan, S.M., Ali, S., Inayat-ur-Rahman, Ara, H., Noreen, I., Khan, A., 2016. Indicator species analyses of weed communities of maize crop in District Mardan, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 22(2) 227-238. http://www.wssp.org.pk/SearchViaList/85f2b9507de3d718f94122555958c33a/8229716c1c1ad23b1ea10452ba59f128
Altınok, H.H., 2013. Fusarium species isolated from common weeds in eggplant fields and symptomless hosts of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melongenae in Turkey.Journal of Phytopathology, 161(5) 335-340.
Axmacher, J.C., Sang, W.G., 2013. Plant invasions in China-challenges and chances.PLoS ONE, 8(5) e64173.
Bayram, Y., Büyük, M., Özaslan, C., Bektaș, Ö., Bayram, N., Mutlu, Ç., Ateș, E., Bükün, B., 2015. New host plants of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Turkey.Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 12(2) 43-46. http://jotaf.nku.edu.tr/
Beckett, T.H., Stoller, E.W., Wax, L.M., 1988. Interference of four annual weeds in corn (Zea mays).Weed Science, 36(6) 764-769.
Bethune, S., Griffin, M., Joubert, D.F., 2004. National review of invasive alien species, Namibia.Windhoek, Namibia: Ministry of Environment and Tourism.
Bhute, N.K., 2012. Record of Zygogramma bicolorata Pallister feeding on cocklebur Xanthium strumarium L. in Maharashtra.Pestology, 3624-28.
BioNET-EAFRINET, 2018. Invasive plants key and fact sheets. https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/eafrinet/pests.htm
Boyette, C.D., Hoagland, R.E., 2013. Bioherbicidal potential of a strain of Xanthomonas spp. for control of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium).Biocontrol Science and Technology, 23(2) 183-196.
Broome, R., Sabir, K., Carrington, S., 2007. In: Plants of the Eastern Caribbean. Online database.Barbados: University of the West Indies. http://ecflora.cavehill.uwi.edu/index.html
Bükün, B., 2005. Weed flora changes in cotton growing areas during the last decade after irrigation of Harran plain in Șanliurfa, Turkey.Pakistan Journal of Botany, 37(3) 667-672. http://www.pjbot.org
Byrd, J.D. Jr, Coble, H.D., 1991. Interference of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).Weed Technology, 5(2) 270-278.
Cartwright, R.D., Templeton, G.E., 1988. Biological limitations of Protomyces gravidus as a mycoherbicide for giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida.Plant Disease, 72(7) 580-582.
Celepcİ, E., Uygur, S., Kaydan, M.B., Uygur, F.N., 2017. Mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) species on weeds in Citrus (Rutaceae) plantations in Çukurova Plain, Turkey.Türkiye Entomoloji Bülteni, 7(1) 15-21. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/315531
Chikuruwo, C., Masocha, M., Murwira, A., Ndaimani, H., 2017. Predicting the suitable habitat of the invasive Xanthium strumarium L. in southeastern Zimbabwe.Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(1) 17-31.
Conners, I.L., 1967. An annotated index of plant diseases in Canada and fungi recorded on plants in Alaska, Canada and Greenland.Publ. Res. Br. Canada Dept Agric., 1251 381 pp.
Cronquist, A., 1945. Notes on the Compositae of the North-Eastern United States, II. Heliantheae and Helenieae.Rhodora, 47396-405.
DAISIE, 2018. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org/default.do
Darkoh, M.B.K., Mbaiwa, J.E., 2014. Okavango Delta - a Kalahari oasis under environmental threat.Journal of Biodiversity and Endangered Species, 2(4) 1000138.
Dhaliwal, J.S., 1993. Role of some weeds in the carry-over of Spilosoma obliqua (Walker) to Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.).Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, 30(3-4) 168-170.
DiTomaso, J.M., Kyser, G.B., et al., 2013. Weed control in natural areas in the Western United States.Weed Research and Information Center, University of California. 544 pp.
Ellis, J. M., Shaw, D.R., Barrentine, W.L., 1998. Soybean (Glycine max) seed quality and harvesting efficiency as affected by low weed densities.Weed Technology, 12(1) 166-173.
Fan, W.X., Fan, L.H., Peng, C.Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Li, L., Wang, J.L., Zhang, D.Y., Peng, W., Wu, C.J., 2019. Traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and toxicology of Xanthium strumarium L.: a review.Molecules, 24(2) 359.
Fazal, H., Muhammad, I., 2015. Ecology of weeds in wheat crops of Kalash valley, district Chitral, Hindukush Range, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 21(3) 425-433.
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2018. In: Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2018. In: Flora of North America North of Mexico. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=1
Fotopoulos, V., Dovas, C.I., Katis, N.I., 2011. Incidence of viruses infecting spinach in Greece, highlighting the importance of weeds as reservoir hosts.Journal of Plant Pathology, 93(2) 389-395. http://sipav.org/main/jpp/index.php/jpp/article/view/1194
Gobatto, D., Oliveira, L.A. de, Franco, D.A. de S., Velásquez, N., Daròs, J.A., Eiras, M., 2019. Surveys in the chrysanthemum production areas of Brazil and Colombia reveal that weeds are potential reservoirs of chrysanthemum stunt viroid.Viruses, 11(4) 355.
GRIIS, 2018. Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species. http://www.griis.org/
Hare, J.D., 1980. Variation in fruit size and susceptibility to seed predation among and within populations of the cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L.Oecologia, 46(2) 217-222.
Hare, J.D., Futuyma, D.J., 1978. Different effects of variation of Xanthium strumarium L. (Compositae) on two insectseed predators.Oecologia, 37109-120.
Hassannejad, S., Ghafarbi, S.P., 2013. Weed flora survey of Tabriz wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields.Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), 3(9) 118-132. http://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JBES-Vol3No9-p118-132.pdf
Hassannejad, S., Ghafarbi, S.P., Abbasvand, E., Ghisvandi, B., 2014. Quantifying the effects of altitude and soil texture on weed species distribution in wheat fields of Tabriz, Iran.Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), 5(1) 590-596.
Heap, I.M., 1997. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds. Annual Report.Weed Science Society of America.
Henty, E.E., Pritchard, G.H., 1975. Weeds of New Guinea and their control. In: Botany Bulletin, 7Ed. 2 180 pp.
Hilgendorf, J.H., Goeden, R.D., 1982. Phytophagous insects reported worldwide from the noxious weeds spiny clotbur, Xanthium spinosum, and cocklebur, X. strumarium.Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 28(2) 147-152.
Hilgendorf, J.H., Goeden, R.D., 1983. Phytophagous insect faunas of spiny clotbur, Xanthium spinosum, and cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium, in southern California.Environmental Entomology, 12(2) 404-411.
Hocking, P.J., Liddle, M.J., 1986. The biology of Australian weeds: 15. Xanthium occidentale Bertol. complex and Xanthium spinosum L.Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 52(4) 191-221.
Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D.L., Pancho, J.V., Herberger, J.P., 1977. The world's worst weeds. Distribution and biology.Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University Press of Hawaii. 610 pp.
Julien, M.H., Broadbent, J.E., Matthews, N.C., 1979. Effects of Puccinia xanthii on Xanthium strumarium (Compositae).Entomophaga, 24(1) 29-34.
Kaul, V., 1961. Water relations of Xanthium strumarium L.Science and Culture, 27495-491.
Kaul, V., 1971. Physiological-ecology of Xanthium strumarium Linn. 4. Effect of climatic factors on growth and distribution.New Phytologist, 70(4) 799-812.
Kelly, S.G., 1931. The control of Noogoora burr and Bathurst burr by insects.Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia, 4(3) 161-172.
Khan, M.A., Qureshi, R.A., Gillani, S.A., Ghufran, M.A., Batool, A., Sultana, K.N., 2010. Invasive species of federal capital area Islamabad, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(3) 1529-1534. http://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/42(3)/PJB42(3)1529.pdf
Khan, R.U., Wazir, S.M., Subhan, M., Ullah, S., Ullah, H., Farooq, A., Jaffar, F., Shazia, Shah, I.A., Kamal, F., 2012. Weed flora of sugarcane in district Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 18(4) 541-552. http://www.wssp.org.pk/article.htm
Khuroo, A.A., Rashid, I., Reshi, Z., Dar, G.H., Wafai, B.A., 2007. The alien flora of Kashmir Himalaya.Biological Invasions, 9(3) 269-292.
Kim, K.D., 2005. Invasive plants on disturbed Korean sand dunes.Estuarine, Coastal & Shelf Science, 62(1/2) 353-364.
King, L.J., 1966. Weeds of the world: biology and control.Leonard Hill Books, London; Interscience Publishers Inc., New York. 526 pp.
Klinken, R.D. van, Morin, L., 2012. Xanthium occidentale Bertol. - Noogoora burr.Biological control of weeds in Australia, [ed. by Julien, M., McFadyen, R., Cullen, J.]. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
Löve, D., 1975. The genus Acanthoxanthium (DC.) Fourr revived.Lagascalia, 555-71.
Löve, D., Dansereau, L., 1959. Biosystematic studies on Xanthium: taxonomic appraisal and ecological status.Can. J. Botany, 37173-208.
Mamarot, J., Rodriguez, A., 1997. Sensibilité des mauvaises herbes aux herbicides, 4th editionParis, France: Association de Coordination Technique Agricole.
Martin, T., Johnson, B.J., Sangiah, S., Burrows, G.E., 1992. Experimental cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) intoxication in calves. In: Poisonous plants. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, [ed. by James, L.F., Keeler, R.F., Bailey, E.M., Cheeke, P.R., Hegarty, M.P.]. Ames, IA 50010, USA: Iowa State University Press. 489-494.
McLean, K.S., Roy, K.W., 1991. Weeds as a source of Colletotrichum capsici causing anthracnose on tomato fruit and cotton seedlings.Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 13(2) 131-134.
Milanova, S., Boneva, P., Grigorova, P., Valkova, M., 2007. Weed survey in central north Bulgaria. In: European Weed Research Society, 14th EWRS Symposium, Hamar, Norway, 17-21 June 2007, [ed. by Fløistad, E.]. Doorwerth, Netherlands: European Weed Research Society. 217 pp. http://www.ewrs-symposium2007.com
Millspaugh, C.F., Sherff, E.E., 1919. Revision of the North American species of Xanthium.Field Museum of Natural History. Botanical Series, 49-49.
Mir, C., 2012. Estrategia Nacional de Especies Exóticas Invasoras Realizado en el marco del Proyecto “Mitigando las amenazas de las especies exóticas invasoras en el Caribe Insular”.Dominican Republic: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales Santo Domingo.
Mitch, L.W., 1987. Cockleburs.Weed Technology, 1(4) 359-360.
Mondin, C.A., 2015. Xanthium in lista de espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB80772
Moskova, T., Dimitrov, G., Tityanov, M., 2018. Distribution and degree of weed growth of amaranth and other weeds in sunflower crops in Plovdiv and Stara Zagora regions.Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans, 21(1) 158-168. http://www.rimsa.eu/images/forage_production_vol_21-1_part_2_2018.pdf
Muller, S., 2004. Plantes invasives en France.Paris: Muséum National d'Historire Naturelle.
Neary, P.E., Majek, B.A., 1990. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference in snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris).Weed Technology, 4(4) 743-748.
Nehl, D.B., Brown, J.F., 2000. Biological control of the Noogoora burr complex with Alternaria zinniae: environmental conditions favouring disease.Australasian Plant Pathology, 29(2) 71-80.
Nigussie, S.T., Amare, S.A., Manaye, M.M., Edget, M.B., Ashenafi, A.H., Girum, F.B., Tesfaye, B.H., 2017. Invasion and impacts of Xanthium strumarium in Borena Zone of Oromia Region, Ethiopia.Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, 5(8) 350-355.
Oh, S.M., Moon, B.C., Kim, C.S., 2007. Current status on influx and habitat of exotic weeds in Korea. In: Proceedings of the 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society (APWSS) Conference, 2-6 October 2007, Colombo, Sri Lanka, [ed. by Marambe, B., Sangakkara, U.R., Costa, W.A.J.M. de, Abeysekara, A.S.K.]. Peradeniya, Sri Lanka: Asian Pacific Weed Science Society. 608-613.
Paudel, K.C., Kaini, B.R., 2003. Nepal sharing experiences from agricultural and forestry sectors. Nepal.Invasive Alien Species in South-Southeast Asia., [ed. by Pallewatta, N., Reaser, J.K., Gutierrez, A.T.]. National Reports and Directory of Resources. The Global Invasive Species Programme. www.gisp.org/downloadpubs/SOUTH_AN.PDF
PIER, 2018. In: Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
Pitcher, D., 2001. Element stewardship abstract for Xanthium strumarium.USA: Global Invasive Species Team, The Nature Conservancy.
PROSEA, 2018. Plant Resources of South-East Asia. Bogor, Indonesia: PROSEA Foundation. http://proseanet.org/prosea/e-prosea.php
Protopopova, V.V., Shevera, M.V., Mosyakin, S.L., 2006. Deliberate and unintentional introduction of invasive weeds: a case study of the alien flora of Ukraine.Euphytica, 148(1/2) 17-33.
Reddi, C.S., Reddi, E.U.B., Bai, A.J., Raju, K.V.R., Reddi, M.S., 1980. The ecology of anther dehiscence, pollen liberation anddispersal in Xanthium strumarium L.Indian Journal of Ecology, 7171-181.
Redosevich, S.R., Holt, J.S., 1984. Weed ecology.New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Royal, S.S., Brecke, B.J., Colvin, D.L., 1997. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference with peanut (Arachis hypogaea).Weed Science, 45(1) 38-43.
Royal, S.S., Brecke, B.J., Shokes, F.M., Colvin, D.L., 1997. Influence of broadleaf weeds on chlorothalonil deposition, foliar disease incidence, and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield.Weed Technology, 11(1) 51-58.
Rushing, G.S., Oliver, L.R., 1998. Influence of planting date on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference in early-maturing soybean (Glycine max).Weed Science, 46(1) 99-104.
Saeed, G.M., Ali, H.H., 2020. Determination of the field spread of tomato spotted wilt Orthotospovirus on the Solanaceae crops and the associated weeds in Nineveh province.Plant Archives, 20(2) 6362-6366. http://www.plantarchives.org/20-2/6362-6366%20(6758).pdf
Sanz-Elorza, M., Dana Sánchez, E.D., Sobrino Vesperinas, E., 2004. Atlas de las plantas alóctonas invasoras de España.Madrid, Spain: Dirección General para la Biodiversidad. 378 pp.
Sartorato, I., Berti, A., Zanin, G., 1996. Estimation of economic thresholds for weed control in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.).Crop Protection, 15(1) 63-68.
Seifu, A., Seboka, N., Misganaw, M., 2017. Impact of invasive alien plant, Xanthium strumarium, on species diversity and composition of invaded plant communities in Borena zone, Ethiopia.Biodiversity International Journal, 1(1) 15-22.
Shah, G.M., Khan, M.A., 2006. Checklist of noxious weeds of district Mansehra, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 12(3) 213-219. http://wssp.org.pk/
Shah, S.M., Asad Ullah, Fazal Hadi, 2014. Ecological characteristics of weed flora in the wheat crop of Mastuj valley, district Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 20(4) 479-487.
Sharkey, T.D., Raschke, K., 1981. Effect of light quality on stomatal opening in leaves of Xanthium strumarium L.Plant Physiology, 68(5) 1170-1174.
Singh, R., Sunder, S., Dodan, D.S., 2012. Status and weed hosts of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn, the incitant of sheath blight of rice in Haryana.Plant Disease Research (Ludhiana), 27(2) 225-228.
Sinha, N.K., Singh, S.J., 2004. Allelopathic effects of Xanthium strumarium on Parthenium hysterophorus.Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 9(3) 313-315.
Snipes, C.E., Buchanan, G.A., Street, J.E., McGuire, J.A., 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).Weed Science, 30(5) 553-556.
Snipes, C.E., Street, J.E., Walker, R.H., 1987. Interference periods of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).Weed Science, 35(4) 529-532.
Sobrino, E., Sanz-Elorza, M., Dana, E.D., González-Moreno, A., 2002. Invasibility of a coastal strip in NE Spain by alien plants.Journal of Vegetation Science, 13(4) 585-594.
Spencer, K.A., Steyskal, G.C., 1986. Agriculture Handbook., 638USDA. vi + 478 pp.
Stoller, E.W., Harrison, S.K., Wax, L.M., Regnier, E.E., Nafziger, E.D., 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max).Reviews of Weed Science, 3155-181.
Stoller, E.W., Wax, L.M., 1974. Dormancy changes and the fate of some annual weed seeds in the soil.Weed Science, 22(2) 151-155.
Stride, G.O., Straatman, R., 1963. On the biology of Mecas saturnina and Nupserha antennata, Cerambycid Beetles associated with Xanthium species.Australian Journal of Zoology, 11F9446-469.
Strother, J.L., 2006. Xanthium.Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 21Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Tahira, J.J., Khan, S.N., 2017. Diversity of weed flora in onion fields of Punjab, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 23(2) 245-253. http://www.wssp.org.pk/resources/images/paper/955QW1498306408.pdf
Talakal, T.S., Dwivedi, S.K., Sharma, S.R., 1995. In vitro and in vivo antitrypanosomal activity of Xanthium strumarium leaves.Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 49(3) 141-145.
Tomasello, S., 2018. How many names for a beloved genus?-coalescent-based species delimitation in Xanthium L.(Ambrosiinae, Asteraceae).Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 127135-145.
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010. In: Schiedea apokremnos (maolioli). 5-year review: summary and evaluation.USA: US Fish and Wildlife Service. 16 pp.
USDA-ARS, 2018. In: Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysimple.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2018. In: The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, North Carolina, USA: National Plant Data Team. https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov/
Vibrans, H., 2009. Malezas de México.CONABIO. http://www.conabio.gob.mx
Villaseñor, R.J.L., Espinosa, J.G., 1998. Catálogo de malezas de México. D.F., México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Consejo Nacional Consultivo Fitosanitario.
Wagner, W.L., Herbst, D.R., Sohmer, S.H., 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai'i.Hawaii, USA: University of Hawai'i Press. 1948 pp.
Wapshere, A.J., 1974. An ecological study of an attempt at biological control of Noogoora burr (Xanthium strumarium).Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 25(2) 275-292.
Wapshere, A.J., 1974. The regions of infestation of wool by Noogoora burr (Xanthium strumarium), their climates and the biological control of the weed.Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 25(5) 775-781.
Weaver, S.E., 1991. Size-dependent economic thresholds for three broadleaf weed species in soyabeans.Weed Technology, 5(3) 674-679.
Weaver, S.E., Lechowicz, M.J., 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 56. Xanthium strumarium L.Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 63(1) 211-225.
Webb, C.J., Sykes, W.R., Garnock-Jones, P.J., 1988. Flora of New Zealand, IV. Naturalised pteridophytes, gymnosperms, dicotyledons.Christchurch, New Zealand: Botany Division, DSIR. 1365 pp. http://floraseries.landcareresearch.co.nz/pages/Book.aspx?fileName=Flora%204.xml
Webster, T.M., Coble, H.D., 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995.Weed Technology, 11(2) 308-317.
Zeeshan, A., Khan, S.M., Shahab Ali, Inayat-ur-Rahman, Hussan Ara, Iram Noreen, Ayesha Khan, 2016. Indicator species analyses of weed communities of maize crop in District Mardan, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 22(2) 227-238.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 22 November 2023

Language

English

Authors

Affiliations

Julissa Rojas-Sandoval

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

Citing Literature

  • Responses of seed germination of Xanthium orientale L. and Xanthium spinosum L. to temperature, Plant Protection Science, 10.17221/124/2023-PPS, 60, 3, (295-304), (2024).

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation