Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur)
Datasheet Types: Pest, Invasive species, Host plant
Abstract
This datasheet on Xanthium strumarium covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Hosts/Species Affected, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Further Information.
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Xanthium strumarium L.
- Preferred Common Name
- common cocklebur
- Other Scientific Names
- Xanthium abyssinicum Wallr.
- Xanthium acerosum Greene
- Xanthium acutilobum Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium acutum Greene
- Xanthium affine Greene
- Xanthium americanum Walt.
- Xanthium arcuatum Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium arenarium Lasch
- Xanthium aridum St.John
- Xanthium barcinonense Sennen
- Xanthium brevirostre Wallr.
- Xanthium bubalocarpon Bush
- Xanthium calvum Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium campestre Greene
- Xanthium cenchroides Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium chasei Fernald
- Xanthium chinense Mill.
- Xanthium cloessplateaum D.Z.Ma
- Xanthium commune Britton
- Xanthium cordifolium Stokes
- Xanthium crassifolium Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium cuneatum Moench
- Xanthium curvescens Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium cylindraceum Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium cylindricum Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium decalvatum Widder
- Xanthium discolor Wallr.
- Xanthium echinatum Murray
- Xanthium echinellum Greene ex Rydb.
- Xanthium fuscescens Jord. & Fourr.
- Xanthium glabratum (DC.) Britton
- Xanthium glanduliferum Greene
- Xanthium globosum C.Shull
- Xanthium homothalamum Spreng.
- Xanthium indicum DC.
- Xanthium inflexum Mack. & Bush
- Xanthium japonicum Widder
- Xanthium leptocarpum Millsp. & Sherff
- Xanthium longirostre Wallr.
- Xanthium macounii Britton
- Xanthium mongolicum Kitag.
- Xanthium nigri Ces.
- Xanthium occidentale Bertol.
- Xanthium oligacanthum Piper
- Xanthium oviforme Wallr.
- Xanthium riparium Lasché
- Xanthium ripicola J. Holub
- Xanthium roxburghii Wallr.
- Xanthium speciosum Kearney
- Xanthium sphaerocephalum Salzm. ex Ball
- Xanthium varians Greene
- Xanthium wootonii Cockerell
- International Common Names
- Englishbeach cockleburCanada cockleburclotburcockleburditchburdonkey burrdonkeyburrEuropean cockle burheartleaflarge cockleburrough cocklebursheep burrwoolgarie bur
- Spanisharrancamoñosbardanabardana menorcachurreracadillocardo garbancerochayotillogatillohigueruela
- Frenchglouteronlampourde glouteron
- Chinesecangcang er
- Local Common Names
- AustraliaNoogoora bursheep bur
- Cubaguizazo de caballos
- Czech Republicřepeň durkoman
- Dominican Republiccadillo de gatocadillo de tres piesgatico
- Estoniapugu-väärtakjas
- Germanyamerikanische Spitzklettegemeine Spitzklettegewöhnliche SpitzkletteKropfspitzkletteöstliche Spitzklette
- Indiaadhisishibada gokhru bhakrachota dhaturaghaghrasansakhuli
- Italylappola comunenappola minore
- Japanonamomi
- Lesser Antillesburrweedzaydri couchou
- Lithuaniapaprastasis dagišius
- Malaysiabuah anjang
- Nepalbhainse kurobhende kuro
- Netherlandslate stekelnootongedoornde stekelnoot
- Pakistanputh kando
- Polandrzepień pospolity
- Portugalamor-de-hortelãobardana-menorcarrapicho-de-carneirocarrapicho-grande
- South Africakankerrooslarge cocklebur
- Taiwantsai-er
- Thailandkachab
- Turkeykoca pıtraksiraco out
- USAheart-leaf cocklebur
Pictures
Summary of Invasiveness
Xanthium strumarium is a cosmopolitan annual herb that has become a widespread agricultural and environmental weed. Considered one of the world’s worst weeds, this species produces large numbers of seeds that are easily spread, due to their ability to float and to “hitchhike” on humans and animals. Once established, X. strumarium can quickly become the dominant species in an area because of its prolific seed production and high germination and survival rates. It is very successful in invading disturbed sites, wastelands, roadsides, cultivated lands, riverbanks, grasslands, beaches and coastal thickets. It can occur scattered but can also form dense stands that displace native vegetation, inhibit the germination and growth of other plant species, and alter natural regeneration processes.
Taxonomic Tree
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
The genus Xanthium comprises annual herbs that often behave as weeds. Species within this genus are characterized by the presence of peculiar spiny female capitula or burs. Since Linnaeus described the first two species of Xanthium in 1753 (X. strumarium L. and X. spinosum L.), a large number of specific epithets have been given for the species in this genus. For example, Millspaugh and Sherff (1919) in their revision of North American Xanthium listed 21 species. However, other taxonomists have reduced the number of species to two or three (Cronquist, 1945; Strother, 2006). Löve and Dansereau (1959) in their revision recognized only two species: X. strumarium and X. spinosum. Additionally, these authors recognized two infraspecific taxa within X. strumarium: X. strumarium subsp. strumarium (native to the Old World) and X. strumarium subsp. cavanillesii (native to the Americas). In the most recent revision of the genus using molecular and phylogenetic analyses, Tomasello (2018) has delimited the genus Xanthium to five species.
Plant Type
Annual
Seed / spore propagated
Broadleaved
Herbaceous
Description
The following description is from Flora of China Editorial Committee (2018):
Herbs, annual, 20-120 cm; nodal spines absent. Petiole 3.5-10 cm not winged; median cauline leaves deltate-ovate, 9-25 cm, papery, densely scabrid on both surfaces, base shallowly cordate to broadly cuneate, margin irregularly dentate, often obsoletely 3-lobed, apex acute. Capitula monoecious. Male capitula in terminal umbels; phyllaries 1-seriate, oblong-lanceolate, ca. 2.2 mm; outer paleae oblong-lanceolate, inner paleae lanceolate, ca. 2.2 mm; corolla white, tubular, ca. 2.5 mm, 5-dentate. Female capitula axillary; phyllaries 1-seriate, oblong-lanceolate, ca. 3 mm, inner bracts connate with outer paleae. Burs sessile, oblong, ellipsoid, or ovoid, 10-18 × 6-12 mm, densely puberulent, 2-beaked.
Distribution
The native distribution range of X. strumarium is still unclear. While some authors consider this species as probably having originated in North America (Strother, 2006; USDA-NRCS, 2018), others consider it as native to the Old World, as supported by the numerous fossil records in Europe dating all the way back to the last glacial period (Löve, 1975; Tomasello, 2018). Currently, X. strumarium has a pantropical distribution and can be found widely naturalized in both the Old and New Worlds (USDA-ARS, 2018).
Distribution Map
Distribution Table
Risk of Introduction
Xanthium strumarium has all the characteristics which favour its ability to inhabit a range of habitats: an effective dispersal mechanism, tolerance of a wide variety of soil types, high seed output and viability and germination under varied environments, rapid seedling growth and a well-developed root system. The traits of this species that contribute to its widespread geographic and environmental distribution are reviewed by Kaul (1961). As this species has an almost worldwide distribution, having been introduced to so many countries, it is likely to spread further.
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Xanthium strumarium spreads by seed. Each plant can produce 500 to 5400 burs (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983). The spiny burs are readily dispersed by adhering to animal fur, human clothing and shoes, and as a contaminant of wool, mud, hay bales, agricultural products and seed pastures. Burs are buoyant and can float for up to 30 days, thus being easily dispersed to beaches and pastures subject to flooding. Viability of seeds buried in the soil does not generally exceed 5 years (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).
Pathway Causes
Pathway cause | Notes | Long distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crop production (pathway cause) | Noxious weed in agriculture | Yes | Yes | |
Disturbance (pathway cause) | Common weed in disturbed sites, roadsides, pastures, etc | Yes | Yes | |
Hitchhiker (pathway cause) | Burs are often dispersed adhered to human clothing, shoes, animal fur and as a contaminant in agricultural products | Yes | Yes | |
Medicinal use (pathway cause) | Used in traditional medicine in China, India | Yes | Yes | Mitch (1987), Talakal et al. (1995) |
Pathway Vectors
Pathway vector | Notes | Long distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clothing, footwear and possessions (pathway vector) | Burs as hitchhikers | Yes | Yes | |
Debris and waste associated with human activities (pathway vector) | Burs as contaminant and/or hitchhikers | Yes | Yes | |
Machinery and equipment (pathway vector) | Burs as contaminant and/or hitchhikers | Yes | Yes | |
Mulch, straw, baskets and sod (pathway vector) | Burs as contaminant and/or hitchhikers | Yes | Yes | |
Livestock (pathway vector) | Burs adhere to hair and fur | Yes | Yes | |
Soil, sand and gravel (pathway vector) | Burs as contaminant | Yes | Yes | |
Land vehicles (pathway vector) | Burs as contaminant | Yes | Yes | |
Water (pathway vector) | Burs are buoyant and float for up to 30 days | Yes | Yes | |
Wind (pathway vector) | Yes | Yes |
Hosts/Species Affected
Xanthium strumarium is a weed of many economically important crops. It is extremely competitive in crops such as soyabean, cotton and peanut and can also affect alfalfa, wheat, pepper, bean, maize, tomato and sorghum plantations as well as orchards and vineyards. X. strumarium also serves as a host for a number of pathogens and pests affecting crops (Villaseñor and Espinosa, 1998; Vibrans, 2009).
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Family | Host status | References |
---|---|---|---|
Allium cepa (onion) | Liliaceae | Unknown | |
Arachis hypogaea (groundnut) | Fabaceae | Main | |
Beta vulgaris (beetroot) | Chenopodiaceae | Main | |
Brassica carinata (African cabbage) | Brassicaceae | Unknown | |
Capsicum spp. | Main | ||
Chrysanthemum (daisy) | Asteraceae | Unknown | |
Cicer arietinum (chickpea) | Fabaceae | Unknown | |
Citrus | Rutaceae | Unknown | |
Colocasia esculenta (taro) | Araceae | Other | |
Eragrostis tef (teff) | Poaceae | Unknown | |
Glycine max (soyabean) | Fabaceae | Main | |
Gossypium (cotton) | Malvaceae | Unknown | |
Gossypium hirsutum (Bourbon cotton) | Malvaceae | Main | |
Helianthus annuus (sunflower) | Asteraceae | Other | Milanova et al. (2007), Moskova et al. (2018) |
Hordeum vulgare (barley) | Poaceae | Unknown | |
Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato) | Convolvulaceae | Unknown | |
Lens culinaris | Unknown | ||
Oryza sativa (rice) | Poaceae | Other | |
Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) | Fabaceae | Other | |
Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane) | Poaceae | Main | |
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) | Solanaceae | Main | Bayram et al. (2015), Saeed and Ali (2020) |
Solanum melongena (aubergine) | Solanaceae | Unknown | |
Sorghum bicolor (sorghum) | Poaceae | Main | |
Spinacia oleracea (spinach) | Chenopodiaceae | Unknown | |
Triticum aestivum (wheat) | Poaceae | Other | Hassannejad and Ghafarbi (2013), Hassannejad et al. (2014), Shah et al. (2014), Fazal and Muhammad (2015), Nigussie et al. (2017) |
Zea mays (maize) | Poaceae | Main | Shah and Khan (2006), Milanova et al. (2007), Oh et al. (2007), Zeeshan et al. (2016), Nigussie et al. (2017) |
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Xanthium strumarium resembles X. spinosum, but these two species can be distinguished by the following traits (Queensland Government, 2018):
Xanthium strumarium has relatively large leaves (up to 20 cm long) that are very broad (up to 18 cm across) and often have three or five lobes with irregularly toothed margins. Both leaf surfaces are green in colour and rough to the touch (i.e. scabrous). Its stems do not bear any spines and its relatively large fruit (7-20 mm long) are topped with two distinct 'beaks' (about 4 mm long).
Xanthium spinosum has small to moderately-sized leaves (2-10 cm long) that are relatively narrow (6-30 mm wide) and usually have three irregular lobes. These leaves have dark green upper surfaces and whitish coloured undersides. Its stems bear three-pronged spines near the leaf bases and its moderately-sized fruit (8-15 mm long) are sometimes topped with two small 'beaks' (1-2 mm long).
Habitat
Xanthium strumarium often grows in moist sandy pits, riverbanks, grasslands, along beaches, coastal dunes, watercourses and floodplains, and has expanded to open environments created by human activities, such as cultivated fields, roadsides, wastelands, pastures and ruderal places. It thrives in damp or seasonally wet alkaline soils from near sea level to altitudes of 2000 m (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Pitcher, 2001; Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2018; Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2018). It is most often found in the temperate zone, but also occurs in subtropical and Mediterranean climates. It prefers open communities and will disappear if shaded or crowded (Kaul, 1971). It is not common in mountainous regions (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).
Habitat List
Category | Sub category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Wetlands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Wetlands | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Wetlands | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Littoral | Coastal areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Littoral | Coastal areas | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Littoral | Coastal areas | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural | |
Littoral | Coastal dunes | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Littoral | Coastal dunes | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Littoral | Coastal dunes | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural | |
Freshwater | Lakes | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Lakes | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | Lakes | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural | |
Freshwater | Reservoirs | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Reservoirs | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | Reservoirs | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural | |
Freshwater | Rivers / streams | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Rivers / streams | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | Rivers / streams | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural | |
Freshwater | Ponds | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Ponds | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | Ponds | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Biology and Ecology
Genetics
All Xanthium taxa are tetraploid with a chromosome number of 2n = 36 (Löve and Dansereau, 1959). The related species X. spinosum is more homogeneous throughout its range than X. strumarium. Hybrids between the two species can occur (Löve, 1975).
Reproductive Biology
Xanthium strumarium is a monoecious, wind-pollinated, self-compatible and predominately self-pollinated species. The staminate heads are located above the pistillate heads on the main axis and side shoots, an arrangement favouring inbreeding (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Pitcher, 2001).
Physiology and Phenology
Xanthium strumarium has the C3 photosynthetic pathway (Sharkey and Raschke, 1981). In China, this species has been recorded flowering during July and August and fruiting in September and October (Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2018). In North America, plants produce flowers and fruits from July to October (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2018). In Australia, flowering occurs from summer through to early autumn (Queensland Government, 2018).
Xanthium strumarium produces two types of seeds (somatic polymorphism). Each bur contains two seeds, with the smaller one often pushed upwards toward the beaked end of the fruit. The lower seed has a shorter dormant period and germinates first. This appears to be a strategy to assure germination in the event the immediate environment happens to be unsuitable (Redosevich and Holt, 1984; Pitcher, 2001). In the northern hemisphere, seed germination and emergence generally occur in late spring or early summer and light is not required for germination (Stoller and Wax, 1974).
Longevity
Xanthium strumarium is an annual herbaceous species (USDA-NRCS, 2018). It overwinters as seed on or below the surface of the soil. Viability of seeds buried in the soil does not exceed 5 years (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).
Population Size and Structure
Two types of populations have been described for X. strumarium (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983): (1) populations located along shores or watercourses which tend to be small, ephemeral, and homogeneous with seed dispersal by wind and water and (2) populations in ruderal habitats, agricultural fields or waste areas that tend to be large, dense and heterogeneous with tall, vigorous plants producing large numbers of seeds. Seed dispersal in these areas is primarily the result of human activities. Both types of populations, however, occupy unstable habitats and are continually shifting to newly disturbed areas (Pitcher, 2001).
Environmental Requirements
Xanthium strumarium tolerates a wide variety of soil types and textures and a soil pH range of 5.2- 8.0, as well as frequent flooding and saline conditions (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).
Climate
Climate type | Description | Preferred or tolerated | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
Af - Tropical rainforest climate | > 60mm precipitation per month | Tolerated | |
Am - Tropical monsoon climate | Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25])) | Tolerated | |
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | Tolerated | |
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | Tolerated | |
BS - Steppe climate | > 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitation | Preferred | |
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers | Preferred | |
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter | Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters) | Preferred | |
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year | Preferred | |
Ds - Continental climate with dry summer | Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers) | Tolerated |
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Latitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude lower (m) | Altitude upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
55 | 45 |
Rainfall Regime
Summer
Winter
Bimodal
Uniform
Soil Tolerances
Soil texture > Light
Soil texture > Medium
Soil texture > Heavy
Soil reaction > Acid
Soil reaction > Neutral
Soil reaction > Alkaline
Soil drainage > Seasonally waterlogged
Special soil tolerances > Saline
List of Pests
Notes on Natural Enemies
Xanthium strumarium is a host of numerous important pests and diseases, including the fungi Alternaria helianthi [Alternariaster helianthi], Rhizoctonia solani [Thanatephorus cucumeris] and Puccinia xanthii, and the leafminer, Liriomyza helianthi (Julien et al., 1979; Spencer and Steyskal, 1986; Abbas and Barrentine, 1995; Singh et al., 2012).
A literature review of insect pests associated with X. strumarium in different parts of the world and in Southern California was carried out by Hilgendorf and Goeden (1982; 1983).
Natural enemies
Natural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alternaria zinniae (leaf spot of zinnia) | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Alternariaster helianthi (leaf blight of sunflower) | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Colletotrichum coccodes (black dot of potato) | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Colletotrichum dematium (leaf spot) | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Epiblema strenuana (ragweed borer) | Herbivore | Plants|Stems | not specific | |||
Euaresta aequalis | Herbivore | Plants|Seeds | not specific | |||
Eucosma imbridana | Herbivore | Plants|Seeds | not specific | |||
Gloeosporium orbiculare | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Liriomyza helianthi | Herbivore | Plants|Leaves | not specific | |||
Mecas cana saturnina | Herbivore | not specific | ||||
Nupserha vexator | Herbivore | Plants|Stems | not specific | |||
Oedopa sp. | Herbivore | Plants|Roots | to genus | |||
Phyllachora canaliculata | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Protomyces gravidus (biocontrol of ragweed) | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Puccinia xanthii | Pathogen | Plants|Leaves Plants|Stems | not specific | |||
Thanatephorus cucumeris (many names, depending on host) | Pathogen | Plants|Leaves | not specific | |||
Zygogramma bicolorata (Mexican beetle) | Herbivore | Plants|Growing point Plants|Leaves Plants|Inflorescence | not specific |
Impact Summary
Category | Impact |
---|---|
Cultural/amenity | Negative |
Economic/livelihood | Negative |
Environment (generally) | Positive and negative |
Human health | Negative |
Impact
Xanthium strumarium is a major weed of row crops such as soyabeans, cotton, maize and groundnuts in many parts of the world, including North America, southern Europe, the Middle East, South Africa, India and Japan. In 1995, it ranked as the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh most troublesome weed in soyabean, cotton, maize and groundnut, respectively, across 10 southern states in the USA. Between 1974 and 1995, X. strumarium decreased in importance in maize, soyabean and groundnuts in the southern USA, but increased in cotton (Webster and Coble, 1997). These rankings were based on distribution, abundance and difficulty of control.
In soyabeans, cocklebur has been reported to cause the highest reductions in yield of all annual weeds in both northern and southern production areas of the USA (Stoller et al., 1987). Soyabean yield losses are estimated at 10 to 16% for 0.5 plants of X. strumarium per m of row, 65% for 4 plants and 80% for over 10 plants per m of row, for weeds emerging at the same time as the crop (Stoller et al., 1987; Rushing and Oliver, 1998). Similar yield losses from cocklebur were reported in Ontario, Canada (Weaver, 1991). In Italy, Sartorato et al. (1996) recommended an economic threshold of only 0.05 plants of X. strumarium per square m in soyabeans. In addition to direct yield losses through competition, infestations of X. strumarium decrease soyabean seed quality and harvesting efficiency. One cocklebur per m of row was shown to cause a 7.2% increase in foreign material in harvested soyabeans, a 5.2% increase in seed moisture content, decreased test weight by 58.6 g/L seed, and reduced combine speed (Ellis et al., 1998). The authors recommended use of a pre-harvest desiccant when cocklebur densities exceeded 0.5 plants per m of row.
In cotton in the USA, seed yield losses of 60 to 90 kg/ha (approximately 5%) have been reported from cocklebur growing at a density of one plant per 15 m of row in Mississippi (Snipes et al., 1982). Cotton yield losses from one plant of X. strumarium per 3 m of row varied from 6 to 27% in North Carolina (Byrd and Coble, 1991). The critical period for cocklebur in cotton lasted from 2 to 10 weeks after cotton emergence (Snipes et al., 1987).
In groundnuts, cocklebur has been reported to cause yield losses of 31-39% at a density of 0.5 plants and 88% at 4 plants per m of row in the southern USA (Royal et al., 1997a, b). Cocklebur densities higher than 1 plant per 2 m of row reduced deposition of the fungicide chlorothalonil by 34% (Royal et al., 1997b).
The economic impact of X. strumarium in maize is somewhat lower than for soyabeans, cotton and groundnuts. Yields of maize in Illinois, USA have been reported to decrease by 10% at 1 cocklebur per m of row, to a maximum yield loss of 27% at a density of 4.7 cockleburs per m of row (Beckett et al., 1988).
Infestations of X. strumarium can also cause significant yield losses in horticultural row crops (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983). In snap beans, yield losses of 5 to 50% were reported for densities of X. strumarium ranging from 0.5 to 8 per square m (Neary and Majek, 1990).
Xanthium strumarium also has a detrimental impact on livestock production which has been best documented in Australia, where it is abundant in sheep-grazing regions in the eastern half of the continent in Queensland and New South Wales (Wapshere, 1974b; Hocking and Liddle, 1986). The burs lodge in animal hair and sheep wool, and are difficult to remove when the wool is processed after shearing. Contaminated wool requires special treatment and may have a price penalty of 25% or more (Wapshere, 1974b). The prickly burs can cause considerable discomfort to animals by clinging to hair on the legs and matting the tails and manes of horses.
Xanthium strumarium also has an economic impact in pastures, where cattle, sheep and pigs may be poisoned by eating young plants. The cotyledons contain a toxic compound, carboxyatractyloside, which is absent in older plants (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1982; Hocking and Liddle, 1986; Martin et al., 1992). Symptoms include vomiting, muscular spasms, liver degeneration and occasionally death.
Cocklebur serves as a host for a number of pathogens of crops. Sunflowers have been reported to be damaged by the rust Puccinia xanthii, commonly found on cocklebur, and by alternaria leaf spot (Alternaria helianthi), also found on cocklebur in North America (Hocking and Liddle, 1986). Cocklebur is reported to be a host for Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum which contaminate soyabean and discolour seed and result in a lowered price (Hocking and Liddle, 1986). X. strumarium is also an alternate host for the insect Spilosoma obliqua (Lepidoptera) which attacks Egyptian clover in India (Dhaliwal, 1993), and for Colletotrichum capsici, which causes anthracnose on tomato fruit and cotton seedlings in the USA (Mclean and Roy, 1991).
The Xanthium genus is closely related to the Ambrosia (ragweed) genus, and X. strumarium produces large amounts of highly antigenic pollen (Reddi et al., 1980). The glandular hairs on the leaves and stem secrete a substance which causes contact dermititis in allergic individuals (King, 1966).
Impact: Economic
Xanthium strumarium is a major weed of crops in many parts of the world where it greatly reduces yield and interferes with combine harvesting. It is a strong competitor for nutrients and water. It is ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in soyabean, cotton, maize and groundnut, across North America, Europe and Australia where it can cause reductions in yield (Stoller et al., 1987; Rushing and Oliver, 1998).
In 1995, X. strumarium ranked as the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh most troublesome weed in soyabean, cotton, maize and groundnut, respectively, across ten southern states in the USA. Between 1974 and 1995, X. strumarium decreased in importance in maize, soyabean and groundnuts in the southern USA, but increased in cotton (Webster and Coble, 1997). These rankings were based on distribution, abundance and difficulty of control. In soyabean, X. strumarium has been reported to cause the highest reductions in yield of all annual weeds in both northern and southern production areas of the USA (Stoller et al., 1987). Soyabean yield losses are estimated at 10% to 16% for 0.5 plants of X. strumarium per m of row, 65% for four plants and 80% for over ten plants per m of row, for weeds emerging at the same time as the crop (Stoller et al., 1987; Rushing and Oliver, 1998). Similar yield losses due to X. strumarium were reported in Ontario, Canada (Weaver, 1991). In Italy, Sartorato et al. (1996) recommended an economic threshold of only 0.05 plants of X. strumarium per square m in soyabeans. In addition to direct yield losses through competition, infestations of X. strumarium decrease soyabean seed quality and harvesting efficiency. One cocklebur per m of row was shown to cause a 7.2% increase in foreign material in harvested soyabeans, a 5.2% increase in seed moisture content, decreased test weight by 58.6 g/L seed and reduced combine speed (Ellis et al., 1998). The authors recommend the use of a pre-harvest desiccant when X. strumarium densities exceeded 0.5 plants per m of row.
In cotton in the USA, seed yield losses of 60 to 90 kg/ha (approximately 5%) have been reported from X. strumarium growing at a density of one plant per 15 m of row in Mississippi (Snipes et al., 1982). Cotton yield losses from one plant of X. strumarium per 3 m of row varied from 6% to 27% in North Carolina (Byrd and Coble, 1991). The critical period for X. strumarium in cotton lasted from 2 to 10 weeks after cotton emergence (Snipes et al., 1987). In groundnuts, X. strumarium has been reported to cause yield losses of 31-39% at a density of 0.5 plants and 88% at four plants per m of row in the southern USA (Royal et al., 1997a, b). X. strumarium densities higher than one plant per 2 m of row reduced deposition of the fungicide chlorothalonil by 34% (Royal et al., 1997b). The economic impact of X. strumarium in maize is somewhat lower than for soyabeans, cotton and groundnuts. Yields of maize in Illinois have been reported to decrease by 10% at one cocklebur per m of row, to a maximum yield loss of 27% at a density of 4.7 cockleburs per m of row (Beckett et al., 1988).
Infestations of X. strumarium can also cause significant yield losses in horticultural row crops (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983). In snap beans, yield losses of 5% to 50% were reported for densities of X. strumarium ranging from 0.5 to 8 per square m (Neary and Majek, 1990).
Xanthium strumarium has a detrimental impact on livestock production (Wapshere, 1974b; Hocking and Liddle, 1986). The burs lodge in animal hair and sheep wool, and are difficult to remove when the wool is processed after shearing. Contaminated wool requires special treatment and may have a price penalty of 25% or more (Wapshere, 1974b). The prickly burs can cause considerable discomfort to animals by clinging to hair on the legs and matting the tails and manes of horses.
Xanthium strumarium also has an economic impact in pastures, where cattle, sheep and pigs may be poisoned if they consume seedlings and young plants. Symptoms include vomiting, muscular spasms, liver degeneration and occasionally death. The cotyledons contain a toxic compound, carboxyatractyloside, which is absent in older plants (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Hocking and Liddle, 1986; Martin et al., 1992).
Xanthium strumarium is considered a noxious weed because it serves as a host for a number of pests and pathogens of crops. Sunflowers have been reported to be damaged by Puccinia xanthii and Alternaria helianthi [Alternariaster helianthi], both commonly found on X. strumarium (Hocking and Liddle, 1986). X. strumarium also hosts Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum, both fungal pests of soyabean (Hocking and Liddle, 1986). It is also an alternate host of Spilosoma obliqua [Spilarctia obliqua] (Lepidoptera) that attacks Egyptian cotton in India (Dhaliwal, 1993), and of Colletotrichum capsici, which causes anthracnose on tomato fruit and cotton seedlings (McLean and Roy, 1991).
Impact: Environmental
Impact on Habitats
In South Africa, X. strumarium competes with native species along riverbanks and also invades overgrazed pastures and spreads at the expense of native species (SAPIA, 2018). In Australia, it is regarded as an environmental weed and often invades riparian zones along river systems where it forms dense thickets. It has been listed as a priority environmental weed in seven Australian Natural Resource Management regions (Queensland Government, 2018). In Hawaii, X. strumarium is listed as a common weed of low elevation, relatively dry, disturbed habitats, but also invades seasonally wet areas (Wagner et al., 1999; PIER, 2018). In South Korea, it has invaded sand dunes (Kim, 2005).
Across East Africa, X. strumarium is listed as invasive in Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya. In Kenya, this species has been recorded within the Tsavo National Park and the Meru National Park. It is widespread in Tanzania and Uganda and often invades pastures and grazing lands, causing reductions in forage production (BioNET-EAFRINET, 2018). In Ethiopia, X. strumarium has been identified as one of the top 20 invasive plant species. It is the dominant species on rangelands across Teltele, Yabello, Dire, Miyo, Moyale, Arero and Liben districts and it is also particularly abundant in rift valleys of the Oromia region (Nigussie et al., 2017; Seifu et al., 2017).
Impact on Biodiversity
Xanthium strumarium is a weed with impacts mostly in disturbed and semi-natural habitats. It is an aggressive herb that often becomes the dominant species in areas along the shores of ponds and rivers, floodplains, riverbanks, beaches and coastal dunes, but also in disturbed grasslands and forest edges. Once established, it rapidly forms dense thickets that outcompete native plant species for water and nutrients, altering the species structure and composition of invaded habitats as well as natural successional patterns (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Pitcher, 2001; Queensland Government, 2018; SAPIA, 2018). A laboratory experiment showed that leaf extracts of X. strumarium may inhibit the germination and restrict the growth of other plants, suggesting allelopathic activity in this species (Sinha and Singh, 2004).
Threatened Species
Threatened species | Where threatened | Mechanisms | References | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Schiedea apokremnos (Kauai schiedea) | Hawaii | Competition (unspecified) |
Impact: Social
Xanthium strumarium produces large amounts of highly antigenic pollen (Reddi et al., 1980). The glandular hairs on the leaves and stems secrete a substance that causes contact dermatitis in allergic individuals (King, 1966). The burs are irritants and annoying to humans and wildlife and thus may reduce recreational opportunities. In humans, the spiny burs can cause injury and may stick to clothing and shoes. It can be a serious problem in recreational areas, primarily along reservoirs, lakes and riverbanks (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983; Pitcher, 2001; DiTomaso et al., 2013).
Risk and Impact Factors
Invasiveness
Proved invasive outside its native range
Has a broad native range
Abundant in its native range
Highly adaptable to different environments
Is a habitat generalist
Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
Pioneering in disturbed areas
Highly mobile locally
Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
Fast growing
Has high reproductive potential
Gregarious
Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
Impact outcomes
Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
Modification of successional patterns
Monoculture formation
Negatively impacts agriculture
Negatively impacts human health
Negatively impacts animal health
Reduced amenity values
Reduced native biodiversity
Threat to/ loss of endangered species
Threat to/ loss of native species
Damages animal/plant products
Impact mechanisms
Allelopathic
Causes allergic responses
Competition - monopolizing resources
Competition - smothering
Pest and disease transmission
Hybridization
Poisoning
Rapid growth
Produces spines, thorns or burrs
Likelihood of entry/control
Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
Difficult to identify/detect in the field
Difficult/costly to control
Uses
Xanthium strumarium has been used for various medicinal purposes, including the treatment of malaria in India (Mitch, 1987; Talakal et al., 1995). It has a long history of use as a medicinal plant in China; the traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and the safety aspects of X. strumarium have been reviewed by Fan et al. (2019). It is used as a leafy vegetable in China, and in Northeast India, the floral tops and the two leaves below are boiled in water and eaten, the toxic substances being removed by washing and cooking (PROSEA, 2018). The achenes yield a pale, yellow oil which can be used for cooking and industrial purposes. In India, the dry stems are used as fuel (PROSEA, 2018). The genus name is derived from the Greek ‘xanthos' which means 'yellow', and the plant may once have been used to produce a dye (Weaver and Lechowicz, 1983).
Uses List
Environmental > Host of pest
Materials > Dyestuffs
Medicinal, pharmaceutical > Traditional/folklore
Fuels > Miscellaneous fuels
Human food and beverage > Oil/fat
Human food and beverage > Vegetable
Prevention and Control
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Control
Cultural Control
Neither grazing nor burning is considered an effective means of control; not only is X. strumarium unpalatable, the seeds and foliage contain a glycoside which is toxic and fatal to livestock (DiTomaso et al., 2013).
Physical/Mechanical Control
Hand pulling is effective on small incipient populations. Pulling is most effective before bur development and seed dispersal. Mowing or disking at the flowering stage is also an effective strategy, but resprouts may occur after mowing and secondary treatment may be required (DiTomaso et al., 2013).
Biological Control
Biological control of X. strumarium has been attempted with Alternaria helianthi [Alternariaster helianthi] (Abbas and Barrentine, 1995) and Puccinia xanthii (Julien et al., 1979), and seed predation by the moth, Phaneta imbridana [Eucosma imbridana], and the trypetid fly, Euaresta aequalis (Hare and Futuyma, 1978; Hare, 1980). The stem-boring beetle Nupserha vexator (previously referred to as Nupserha antennata), native to India and Pakistan, was released in Australia in 1964 but provides little control since much of the damage occurs after the plants have set seed (Stride and Straatman, 1963; Wapshere, 1974a, b; Klinken and Morin, 2012). Another potential biocontrol agent is Oedopa sp. which feeds exclusively on the roots of Xanthium species (Hilgendorf and Goeden, 1983).
Chemical Control
Herbicides such as sulcitrone, amitrole, bentazon, dicamba, 2,4-D, glyphosate and fomesafen have been used to control X. strumarium when growing as a weed in cultivation (Mamarot and Rodriguez, 1997). In Papua New Guinea, Henty and Pritchard (1975) indicate susceptibility to 2,4-D, MCPB, amitrole, ametryne and diuron recommended for broad-leaved weeds, including atrazine, dicamba, metribuzin, bentazon, acifluorfen and imazethapyr. However, populations resistant to imidazolinones, ALS-inhibiting herbicides, and the arsenical herbicides MSMA/DSMA have been reported in the USA (Heap, 1997; Boyette and Hoagland, 2013).
Links to Websites
Name | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6 | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list |
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) | http://griis.org/ | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list |
References
Abbas, H.K., Barrentine, W.L., 1995. Alternaria helianthi and imazaquin for control of imazaquin susceptible and resistant cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) biotypes.Weed Science, 43(3) 425-428.
Acevedo-Rodríguez, P., Strong, M.T., 2012. Catalogue of the seed plants of the West Indies.Washington, DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. 1192 pp. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm
Ahmad, Z., Khan, S.M., Ali, S., Inayat-ur-Rahman, Ara, H., Noreen, I., Khan, A., 2016. Indicator species analyses of weed communities of maize crop in District Mardan, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 22(2) 227-238. http://www.wssp.org.pk/SearchViaList/85f2b9507de3d718f94122555958c33a/8229716c1c1ad23b1ea10452ba59f128
Altınok, H.H., 2013. Fusarium species isolated from common weeds in eggplant fields and symptomless hosts of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melongenae in Turkey.Journal of Phytopathology, 161(5) 335-340.
Axmacher, J.C., Sang, W.G., 2013. Plant invasions in China-challenges and chances.PLoS ONE, 8(5) e64173.
Bayram, Y., Büyük, M., Özaslan, C., Bektaș, Ö., Bayram, N., Mutlu, Ç., Ateș, E., Bükün, B., 2015. New host plants of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Turkey.Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 12(2) 43-46. http://jotaf.nku.edu.tr/
Beckett, T.H., Stoller, E.W., Wax, L.M., 1988. Interference of four annual weeds in corn (Zea mays).Weed Science, 36(6) 764-769.
Bethune, S., Griffin, M., Joubert, D.F., 2004. National review of invasive alien species, Namibia.Windhoek, Namibia: Ministry of Environment and Tourism.
Bhute, N.K., 2012. Record of Zygogramma bicolorata Pallister feeding on cocklebur Xanthium strumarium L. in Maharashtra.Pestology, 3624-28.
BioNET-EAFRINET, 2018. Invasive plants key and fact sheets. https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/eafrinet/pests.htm
Boyette, C.D., Hoagland, R.E., 2013. Bioherbicidal potential of a strain of Xanthomonas spp. for control of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium).Biocontrol Science and Technology, 23(2) 183-196.
Broome, R., Sabir, K., Carrington, S., 2007. In: Plants of the Eastern Caribbean. Online database.Barbados: University of the West Indies. http://ecflora.cavehill.uwi.edu/index.html
Bükün, B., 2005. Weed flora changes in cotton growing areas during the last decade after irrigation of Harran plain in Șanliurfa, Turkey.Pakistan Journal of Botany, 37(3) 667-672. http://www.pjbot.org
Byrd, J.D. Jr, Coble, H.D., 1991. Interference of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).Weed Technology, 5(2) 270-278.
Cartwright, R.D., Templeton, G.E., 1988. Biological limitations of Protomyces gravidus as a mycoherbicide for giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida.Plant Disease, 72(7) 580-582.
Celepcİ, E., Uygur, S., Kaydan, M.B., Uygur, F.N., 2017. Mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) species on weeds in Citrus (Rutaceae) plantations in Çukurova Plain, Turkey.Türkiye Entomoloji Bülteni, 7(1) 15-21. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/315531
Chikuruwo, C., Masocha, M., Murwira, A., Ndaimani, H., 2017. Predicting the suitable habitat of the invasive Xanthium strumarium L. in southeastern Zimbabwe.Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(1) 17-31.
Conners, I.L., 1967. An annotated index of plant diseases in Canada and fungi recorded on plants in Alaska, Canada and Greenland.Publ. Res. Br. Canada Dept Agric., 1251 381 pp.
Connor, R.A., 2008. Anguilla invasive species strategy 2008 (draft). 43 pp. https://www.cabi.org/Uploads/isc/caribbean-legislation/anguilla-invasive-species-strategy-2008.pdf
Cronquist, A., 1945. Notes on the Compositae of the North-Eastern United States, II. Heliantheae and Helenieae.Rhodora, 47396-405.
DAISIE, 2018. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org/default.do
Darkoh, M.B.K., Mbaiwa, J.E., 2014. Okavango Delta - a Kalahari oasis under environmental threat.Journal of Biodiversity and Endangered Species, 2(4) 1000138.
Dhaliwal, J.S., 1993. Role of some weeds in the carry-over of Spilosoma obliqua (Walker) to Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.).Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, 30(3-4) 168-170.
DiTomaso, J.M., Kyser, G.B., et al., 2013. Weed control in natural areas in the Western United States.Weed Research and Information Center, University of California. 544 pp.
Ellis, J. M., Shaw, D.R., Barrentine, W.L., 1998. Soybean (Glycine max) seed quality and harvesting efficiency as affected by low weed densities.Weed Technology, 12(1) 166-173.
Fan, W.X., Fan, L.H., Peng, C.Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Li, L., Wang, J.L., Zhang, D.Y., Peng, W., Wu, C.J., 2019. Traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and toxicology of Xanthium strumarium L.: a review.Molecules, 24(2) 359.
Fazal, H., Muhammad, I., 2015. Ecology of weeds in wheat crops of Kalash valley, district Chitral, Hindukush Range, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 21(3) 425-433.
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2018. In: Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2018. In: Flora of North America North of Mexico. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=1
Fotopoulos, V., Dovas, C.I., Katis, N.I., 2011. Incidence of viruses infecting spinach in Greece, highlighting the importance of weeds as reservoir hosts.Journal of Plant Pathology, 93(2) 389-395. http://sipav.org/main/jpp/index.php/jpp/article/view/1194
Gobatto, D., Oliveira, L.A. de, Franco, D.A. de S., Velásquez, N., Daròs, J.A., Eiras, M., 2019. Surveys in the chrysanthemum production areas of Brazil and Colombia reveal that weeds are potential reservoirs of chrysanthemum stunt viroid.Viruses, 11(4) 355.
GRIIS, 2018. Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species. http://www.griis.org/
Hare, J.D., 1980. Variation in fruit size and susceptibility to seed predation among and within populations of the cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L.Oecologia, 46(2) 217-222.
Hare, J.D., Futuyma, D.J., 1978. Different effects of variation of Xanthium strumarium L. (Compositae) on two insectseed predators.Oecologia, 37109-120.
Hassannejad, S., Ghafarbi, S.P., 2013. Weed flora survey of Tabriz wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields.Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), 3(9) 118-132. http://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JBES-Vol3No9-p118-132.pdf
Hassannejad, S., Ghafarbi, S.P., Abbasvand, E., Ghisvandi, B., 2014. Quantifying the effects of altitude and soil texture on weed species distribution in wheat fields of Tabriz, Iran.Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), 5(1) 590-596.
Heap, I.M., 1997. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds. Annual Report.Weed Science Society of America.
Henty, E.E., Pritchard, G.H., 1975. Weeds of New Guinea and their control. In: Botany Bulletin, 7Ed. 2 180 pp.
Hilgendorf, J.H., Goeden, R.D., 1982. Phytophagous insects reported worldwide from the noxious weeds spiny clotbur, Xanthium spinosum, and cocklebur, X. strumarium.Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 28(2) 147-152.
Hilgendorf, J.H., Goeden, R.D., 1983. Phytophagous insect faunas of spiny clotbur, Xanthium spinosum, and cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium, in southern California.Environmental Entomology, 12(2) 404-411.
Hocking, P.J., Liddle, M.J., 1986. The biology of Australian weeds: 15. Xanthium occidentale Bertol. complex and Xanthium spinosum L.Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 52(4) 191-221.
Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D.L., Pancho, J.V., Herberger, J.P., 1977. The world's worst weeds. Distribution and biology.Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University Press of Hawaii. 610 pp.
Julien, M.H., Broadbent, J.E., Matthews, N.C., 1979. Effects of Puccinia xanthii on Xanthium strumarium (Compositae).Entomophaga, 24(1) 29-34.
Kaul, V., 1961. Water relations of Xanthium strumarium L.Science and Culture, 27495-491.
Kaul, V., 1971. Physiological-ecology of Xanthium strumarium Linn. 4. Effect of climatic factors on growth and distribution.New Phytologist, 70(4) 799-812.
Kelly, S.G., 1931. The control of Noogoora burr and Bathurst burr by insects.Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia, 4(3) 161-172.
Khan, M.A., Qureshi, R.A., Gillani, S.A., Ghufran, M.A., Batool, A., Sultana, K.N., 2010. Invasive species of federal capital area Islamabad, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(3) 1529-1534. http://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/42(3)/PJB42(3)1529.pdf
Khan, R.U., Wazir, S.M., Subhan, M., Ullah, S., Ullah, H., Farooq, A., Jaffar, F., Shazia, Shah, I.A., Kamal, F., 2012. Weed flora of sugarcane in district Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 18(4) 541-552. http://www.wssp.org.pk/article.htm
Khuroo, A.A., Rashid, I., Reshi, Z., Dar, G.H., Wafai, B.A., 2007. The alien flora of Kashmir Himalaya.Biological Invasions, 9(3) 269-292.
Kim, K.D., 2005. Invasive plants on disturbed Korean sand dunes.Estuarine, Coastal & Shelf Science, 62(1/2) 353-364.
King, L.J., 1966. Weeds of the world: biology and control.Leonard Hill Books, London; Interscience Publishers Inc., New York. 526 pp.
Klinken, R.D. van, Morin, L., 2012. Xanthium occidentale Bertol. - Noogoora burr.Biological control of weeds in Australia, [ed. by Julien, M., McFadyen, R., Cullen, J.]. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
Löve, D., 1975. The genus Acanthoxanthium (DC.) Fourr revived.Lagascalia, 555-71.
Löve, D., Dansereau, L., 1959. Biosystematic studies on Xanthium: taxonomic appraisal and ecological status.Can. J. Botany, 37173-208.
Mamarot, J., Rodriguez, A., 1997. Sensibilité des mauvaises herbes aux herbicides, 4th editionParis, France: Association de Coordination Technique Agricole.
Martin, T., Johnson, B.J., Sangiah, S., Burrows, G.E., 1992. Experimental cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) intoxication in calves. In: Poisonous plants. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, [ed. by James, L.F., Keeler, R.F., Bailey, E.M., Cheeke, P.R., Hegarty, M.P.]. Ames, IA 50010, USA: Iowa State University Press. 489-494.
McLean, K.S., Roy, K.W., 1991. Weeds as a source of Colletotrichum capsici causing anthracnose on tomato fruit and cotton seedlings.Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 13(2) 131-134.
Milanova, S., Boneva, P., Grigorova, P., Valkova, M., 2007. Weed survey in central north Bulgaria. In: European Weed Research Society, 14th EWRS Symposium, Hamar, Norway, 17-21 June 2007, [ed. by Fløistad, E.]. Doorwerth, Netherlands: European Weed Research Society. 217 pp. http://www.ewrs-symposium2007.com
Millspaugh, C.F., Sherff, E.E., 1919. Revision of the North American species of Xanthium.Field Museum of Natural History. Botanical Series, 49-49.
Mir, C., 2012. Estrategia Nacional de Especies Exóticas Invasoras Realizado en el marco del Proyecto “Mitigando las amenazas de las especies exóticas invasoras en el Caribe Insular”.Dominican Republic: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales Santo Domingo.
Mitch, L.W., 1987. Cockleburs.Weed Technology, 1(4) 359-360.
Mondin, C.A., 2015. Xanthium in lista de espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB80772
Moskova, T., Dimitrov, G., Tityanov, M., 2018. Distribution and degree of weed growth of amaranth and other weeds in sunflower crops in Plovdiv and Stara Zagora regions.Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans, 21(1) 158-168. http://www.rimsa.eu/images/forage_production_vol_21-1_part_2_2018.pdf
Muller, S., 2004. Plantes invasives en France.Paris: Muséum National d'Historire Naturelle.
Neary, P.E., Majek, B.A., 1990. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference in snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris).Weed Technology, 4(4) 743-748.
Nehl, D.B., Brown, J.F., 2000. Biological control of the Noogoora burr complex with Alternaria zinniae: environmental conditions favouring disease.Australasian Plant Pathology, 29(2) 71-80.
Nigussie, S.T., Amare, S.A., Manaye, M.M., Edget, M.B., Ashenafi, A.H., Girum, F.B., Tesfaye, B.H., 2017. Invasion and impacts of Xanthium strumarium in Borena Zone of Oromia Region, Ethiopia.Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, 5(8) 350-355.
Oh, S.M., Moon, B.C., Kim, C.S., 2007. Current status on influx and habitat of exotic weeds in Korea. In: Proceedings of the 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society (APWSS) Conference, 2-6 October 2007, Colombo, Sri Lanka, [ed. by Marambe, B., Sangakkara, U.R., Costa, W.A.J.M. de, Abeysekara, A.S.K.]. Peradeniya, Sri Lanka: Asian Pacific Weed Science Society. 608-613.
Paudel, K.C., Kaini, B.R., 2003. Nepal sharing experiences from agricultural and forestry sectors. Nepal.Invasive Alien Species in South-Southeast Asia., [ed. by Pallewatta, N., Reaser, J.K., Gutierrez, A.T.]. National Reports and Directory of Resources. The Global Invasive Species Programme. www.gisp.org/downloadpubs/SOUTH_AN.PDF
PIER, 2018. In: Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
Pitcher, D., 2001. Element stewardship abstract for Xanthium strumarium.USA: Global Invasive Species Team, The Nature Conservancy.
PROSEA, 2018. Plant Resources of South-East Asia. Bogor, Indonesia: PROSEA Foundation. http://proseanet.org/prosea/e-prosea.php
Protopopova, V.V., Shevera, M.V., Mosyakin, S.L., 2006. Deliberate and unintentional introduction of invasive weeds: a case study of the alien flora of Ukraine.Euphytica, 148(1/2) 17-33.
Queensland Government, 2018. Biosecurity Queensland Edition. http://keyserver.lucidcentral.org/weeds/data/media/Html/index.htm
Reddi, C.S., Reddi, E.U.B., Bai, A.J., Raju, K.V.R., Reddi, M.S., 1980. The ecology of anther dehiscence, pollen liberation anddispersal in Xanthium strumarium L.Indian Journal of Ecology, 7171-181.
Redosevich, S.R., Holt, J.S., 1984. Weed ecology.New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Royal, S.S., Brecke, B.J., Colvin, D.L., 1997. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference with peanut (Arachis hypogaea).Weed Science, 45(1) 38-43.
Royal, S.S., Brecke, B.J., Shokes, F.M., Colvin, D.L., 1997. Influence of broadleaf weeds on chlorothalonil deposition, foliar disease incidence, and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield.Weed Technology, 11(1) 51-58.
Rushing, G.S., Oliver, L.R., 1998. Influence of planting date on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference in early-maturing soybean (Glycine max).Weed Science, 46(1) 99-104.
Saeed, G.M., Ali, H.H., 2020. Determination of the field spread of tomato spotted wilt Orthotospovirus on the Solanaceae crops and the associated weeds in Nineveh province.Plant Archives, 20(2) 6362-6366. http://www.plantarchives.org/20-2/6362-6366%20(6758).pdf
Sanz-Elorza, M., Dana Sánchez, E.D., Sobrino Vesperinas, E., 2004. Atlas de las plantas alóctonas invasoras de España.Madrid, Spain: Dirección General para la Biodiversidad. 378 pp.
SAPIA, 2018. Invasive species south. http://www.invasives.org.za/legislation/item/315-large-cocklebur-xanthium-strumarium-Africa
Sartorato, I., Berti, A., Zanin, G., 1996. Estimation of economic thresholds for weed control in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.).Crop Protection, 15(1) 63-68.
Seifu, A., Seboka, N., Misganaw, M., 2017. Impact of invasive alien plant, Xanthium strumarium, on species diversity and composition of invaded plant communities in Borena zone, Ethiopia.Biodiversity International Journal, 1(1) 15-22.
Shah, G.M., Khan, M.A., 2006. Checklist of noxious weeds of district Mansehra, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 12(3) 213-219. http://wssp.org.pk/
Shah, S.M., Asad Ullah, Fazal Hadi, 2014. Ecological characteristics of weed flora in the wheat crop of Mastuj valley, district Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 20(4) 479-487.
Sharkey, T.D., Raschke, K., 1981. Effect of light quality on stomatal opening in leaves of Xanthium strumarium L.Plant Physiology, 68(5) 1170-1174.
Singh, R., Sunder, S., Dodan, D.S., 2012. Status and weed hosts of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn, the incitant of sheath blight of rice in Haryana.Plant Disease Research (Ludhiana), 27(2) 225-228.
Sinha, N.K., Singh, S.J., 2004. Allelopathic effects of Xanthium strumarium on Parthenium hysterophorus.Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 9(3) 313-315.
Snipes, C.E., Buchanan, G.A., Street, J.E., McGuire, J.A., 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).Weed Science, 30(5) 553-556.
Snipes, C.E., Street, J.E., Walker, R.H., 1987. Interference periods of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).Weed Science, 35(4) 529-532.
Sobrino, E., Sanz-Elorza, M., Dana, E.D., González-Moreno, A., 2002. Invasibility of a coastal strip in NE Spain by alien plants.Journal of Vegetation Science, 13(4) 585-594.
Spencer, K.A., Steyskal, G.C., 1986. Agriculture Handbook., 638USDA. vi + 478 pp.
Stoller, E.W., Harrison, S.K., Wax, L.M., Regnier, E.E., Nafziger, E.D., 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max).Reviews of Weed Science, 3155-181.
Stoller, E.W., Wax, L.M., 1974. Dormancy changes and the fate of some annual weed seeds in the soil.Weed Science, 22(2) 151-155.
Stride, G.O., Straatman, R., 1963. On the biology of Mecas saturnina and Nupserha antennata, Cerambycid Beetles associated with Xanthium species.Australian Journal of Zoology, 11F9446-469.
Strother, J.L., 2006. Xanthium.Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 21Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Tahira, J.J., Khan, S.N., 2017. Diversity of weed flora in onion fields of Punjab, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 23(2) 245-253. http://www.wssp.org.pk/resources/images/paper/955QW1498306408.pdf
Talakal, T.S., Dwivedi, S.K., Sharma, S.R., 1995. In vitro and in vivo antitrypanosomal activity of Xanthium strumarium leaves.Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 49(3) 141-145.
Tomasello, S., 2018. How many names for a beloved genus?-coalescent-based species delimitation in Xanthium L.(Ambrosiinae, Asteraceae).Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 127135-145.
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010. In: Schiedea apokremnos (maolioli). 5-year review: summary and evaluation.USA: US Fish and Wildlife Service. 16 pp.
USDA-ARS, 2018. In: Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysimple.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2018. In: The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, North Carolina, USA: National Plant Data Team. https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov/
Vibrans, H., 2009. Malezas de México.CONABIO. http://www.conabio.gob.mx
Villaseñor, R.J.L., Espinosa, J.G., 1998. Catálogo de malezas de México. D.F., México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Consejo Nacional Consultivo Fitosanitario.
Wagner, W.L., Herbst, D.R., Sohmer, S.H., 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai'i.Hawaii, USA: University of Hawai'i Press. 1948 pp.
Wapshere, A.J., 1974. An ecological study of an attempt at biological control of Noogoora burr (Xanthium strumarium).Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 25(2) 275-292.
Wapshere, A.J., 1974. The regions of infestation of wool by Noogoora burr (Xanthium strumarium), their climates and the biological control of the weed.Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 25(5) 775-781.
Weaver, S.E., 1991. Size-dependent economic thresholds for three broadleaf weed species in soyabeans.Weed Technology, 5(3) 674-679.
Weaver, S.E., Lechowicz, M.J., 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 56. Xanthium strumarium L.Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 63(1) 211-225.
Webb, C.J., Sykes, W.R., Garnock-Jones, P.J., 1988. Flora of New Zealand, IV. Naturalised pteridophytes, gymnosperms, dicotyledons.Christchurch, New Zealand: Botany Division, DSIR. 1365 pp. http://floraseries.landcareresearch.co.nz/pages/Book.aspx?fileName=Flora%204.xml
Webster, T.M., Coble, H.D., 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995.Weed Technology, 11(2) 308-317.
Zeeshan, A., Khan, S.M., Shahab Ali, Inayat-ur-Rahman, Hussan Ara, Iram Noreen, Ayesha Khan, 2016. Indicator species analyses of weed communities of maize crop in District Mardan, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 22(2) 227-238.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 22 November 2023
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
Citing Literature
- Biljana Kelečević, Zlatan Kovačević, Siniša Mitrić, Sava Vrbničanin, Responses of seed germination of Xanthium orientale L. and Xanthium spinosum L. to temperature, Plant Protection Science, 10.17221/124/2023-PPS, 60, 3, (295-304), (2024).
View Options
View options
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.