Phasianus colchicus (common pheasant)
Publication: CABI Compendium
70470
Datasheet Types: Natural enemy, Livestock species, Invasive species, Host animal
Abstract
This datasheet on Phasianus colchicus covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Management, Genetics and Breeding, Economics, Further Information.
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Phasianus colchicus
- Preferred Common Name
- common pheasant
- International Common Names
- Englishfarmed game production: pheasantsgame pheasantpheasantpheasant, commonring-necked pheasanttrue pheasant
- Spanishfaisán vulgarfaisante
- Frenchfaisanfaisan communfaisan de Colchide
- Russianobyknovennyi fazan
- Chinesehuán jing zhì
- Portuguesefaisão
- Local Common Names
- Czech Republicbažant obecný
- Denmarkfasan
- Finlandfasaani
- GermanyFasan, Edel-Fasan, Jagd-JagdfasanJagdtfasanen
- Hungaryfacan
- Icelandfashani
- Irangharghawol
- Italyfagiano comune
- Japankouraikiji
- Netherlandsfazant
- Norwayfasan
- Polandbazant
- Slovakiabažant obycajný
- Swedenfasan
- DADIS local name
- Phasianos
- DADIS main name
- common Belgian pheasant
- DADIS main name
- ring neck pheasant
- EPPO code
- PHSNCO (Phasianus colchicus)
Pictures
Summary of Invasiveness
P. colchicus is an attractive, colourful medium-sized bird with a native range in Eurasia. In its native range, it shows considerable variation in habitat, being found mainly in the overgrown edges of rivers, hilly areas and close to cultivation. Where it has been introduced, it is closely associated with grassland and agricultural land, often near to woodland edges. Due to its popularity as a game bird, it has been extensively and deliberately introduced to other areas, including Europe, North America, Japan and Australasia. The adverse effects of these introductions are not clear, and in general they appear to be small compared to the size of the introduced population. In the USA, there could be competitive effects on some threatened native birds, and in Japan some sources indicate that the species affects the native P. versicolor by hybridization.
Taxonomic Tree
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
The number of subspecies of Phasianus colchicus is unclear from the literature. According to Switzer (2011) and Zhang et al. (2014), there are 31 subspecies, and these are described according to morphological characters and plumage (Zhang et al., 2014), and often divided into either 5 or 6 groups (see table below).
Kozyrenko et al. (2009) suggested that the number of subspecies could be in the range 31–37, and found very low population genetic differences between three separate populations of Phasianus colchicus pallasi.
Recent phylogenetic investigations do not support the currently described subspecies, and there appears to be widespread hybridization, especially for the Chinese ring-necked pheasants (Qu et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2014).
The table below has been compiled using the following sources: Avibase (2015); Qu et al. (2009); GBWF (2012).
Group | Scientific Name | Common Name |
The Phasianus colchicus colchicus group. Caucasus pheasants or Black-necked pheasants | P.c. colchicus, Linnaeus, 1758 | Southern Caucasus Pheasant |
P.c. persicus, Severtsov, 1875 | Persian Pheasant | |
P.c. septentrionalis, Lorenz, 1888 | Northern Caucasian Pheasant | |
P.c. talischensis, Lorenz, 1888 | Talisch Caucasian Pheasant | |
The Phasianus colchicus chrysomelas/principalis group White-winged pheasants | P.c. bianchii, Buturlin, 1904 | Bianchi’s Pheasant |
P.c. chrysomelas, Severtsov, 1875 | Khivan Pheasant | |
P.c. principalis, Sclater, PL, 1885 | Northern Pheasant / Prince of Wales’ Pheasant | |
P.c. zerafschanicus, Tarnovski, 1893 | Zerafshan Pheasant | |
P.c. zarudnyi, Buturlin, 1904 | Zarudny’s Pheasant | |
The Phasianus colchicus mongolicus group Mongolian ring-necked pheasants/ Kirghiz pheasants | P.c. bergii, Zarudny, 1914 (considered to be identical to P.c. turcestanicus) | |
P.c. mongolicus, von Brandt, 1844 | Kirghiz Pheasant | |
P.c. turcestanicus, Lorenz, 1896 | Syr Daria Pheasant | |
The Phasianus colchicus tarimensis group Tarim pheasants | P.c. shawii, Elliot, 1870 | Yarkland Pheasant |
P.c. tarimensis , Pleske, 1889 | Tarim Pheasant | |
The Phasianus colchicus torquatus group Chinese ring-necked pheasants/ Grey-rumped pheasants | P.c. alaschanicus, Alphéraky & Bianchi, 1908 | Alashan Pheasant |
P.c. decollatus, Swinhoe, 1870 | Kweichow Pheasant | |
P.c. elegans, Elliot, 1870 | Stone’s Pheasant | |
P.c. edzinensis, Sushkin, 1926 | Gobi (Ring-necked) Pheasant | |
P.c. formosanus, Elliot, 1870 | Formosan (Ring-necked) Pheasant | |
P.c . hagenbecki, Rothschild, 1901 | Kobdo (Ring-necked) Pheasant | |
P.c. karpowi, Buturlin, 1904 | Korean (Ring-necked) Pheasant | |
P.c. kiangsuensis, Buturlin, 1904 | Shansi Pheasant | |
P.c. pallasi, Rothschild, 1903 | Manchurian (Ring-necked) Pheasant | |
P.c. rothschildi, La Touche, 1922 | Rothschild’s Pheasant | |
P.c. satscheuensis, Pleske, 1892 | Satchu (Ring-necked) Pheasant | |
P.c. sohokotensis, Buturlin, 1908 | Sohokhoto Pheasant | |
P.c. strauchi, Przevalski, 1876 | Strauch’s Pheasant | |
P.c. suehschanensis, Bianchi, 1906 | Sungpan Pheasant | |
P.c. takatsukasae, Delacour, 1927 | Tonkinese (Ring-necked) pheasant | |
P.c. torquatus, Gmelin, JF, 1789 | Chinese (Ring-necked) pheasant | |
P.c. vlangalii, Przevalski, 1876 | Zaidan Pheasant |
The green pheasant, Phasianus versicolor, also known as the Japanese Pheasant, was previously considered to be a subspecies of P. colchicus, although now it is considered to be a separate species (BirdLife International, 2015c; McGowan et al., 2013). In Japan, where P. versicolor is native, introduced P. colchicus does not always thrive, potentially due to competition from P. versicolor, and the two do not hybridize particularly successfully (McGowan et al., 2013). (However, P. c. karpowi is listed as an invasive species with a hybridization impact on P. versicolor by some authorities -- NIES, 2015). In Hawaii, where both P. colchicus and P. versicolor are introduced, hybridization is successful (McGowan et al., 2013).
When considered to be part of P. colchicus, P. versicolor was allocated to a sixth group, the Phasianus colchicus versicolor group with four subspecies (see table below).
Scientific Name | Common Name |
Phasianus versicolor versicolor, Vieillot, 1825, (P. c. versicolor) | Kyushu Green (Ring-necked) Pheasant |
Phasianus versicolor robustipes, Kuroda Sr, 1919 (P. c. robustipes) | Northern Green (Ring-necked) Pheasant |
Phasianus versicolor tanensis, Kuroda Sr, 1919 (P. c. tanensis) | Pacific Green (Ring-necked) Pheasant |
Phasianus versicolor tohkaidi, Momiyama, 1922 (P.c. tohkaidi) | Shikoku Green (Ring-necked) Pheasant |
Switzer (2011) does consider P. versicolor to be part of P. colchicus, and describes two main groups of P. colchicus: colchicus and versicolor. Colchicus (described as having barred, coppery/red/yellow mantle and underparts, and a prominent neck ring) is found in mainland Eurasia, and versicolor (described as green on the neck, breast and upper belly and without the neck ring) as native to Japan and introduced to Hawaii.
Description
There is a high degree of sexual dimorphism in P. colchicus, with the male bird being typically larger and more colourful than the smaller brown female. Males typically have multicoloured plumage with long, pointed and barred tails with heads ranging from glossy dark green to iridescent purple (Switzer, 2011). The RSPB (2015) describe the males as having rich chestnut, golden-brown and black markings on the tail and body with a dark green head and red face wattling; there may or may not be a white neck ring, and males are conspicuous and noisy (Elphick and Woodward, 2003). The female is described by the RSPB (2015) as mottled, with paler brown and black (and with a shorter tail and no wattles or pinnae, the latter being the tufts of feathers behind the eyes that the males have – Robertson, 1988).
Males are 75–89 cm long (tail 42.5–59 cm) and weigh 770–1990 g, and females are 53–62 cm long (tail 29–31 cm) and weigh 545–1453 g (McGowan et al., 2013). Wingspan is 70-90 cm (McGowan et al., 2013).
Due to breeding and hybridization with P. versicolor, there are also forms with dark plumage, known as melanistic (mutant) pheasants.
History
The common pheasant originates from Asia. It was introduced into Greece during the ninth century BC, then into Italy by the Romans and into France and England during the tenth century AD. They were introduced into North America at the end of the nineteenth century and are now present in most of the United States and Canada (Mullin, 2000). According to Delacour (1977) pheasants were well known in China and other Asian countries over three thousand years ago. The name was thought to have originated from the Greeks who named them the bird of Colchis, living along the river Phasis.
Population Table
Population size | |
---|---|
Status | Not under threat |
Status
The species is not threatened in its original range and has extended its range through introduction into other countries. The number of subspecies crossed to obtain the introduced populations (Europe, North American, and North Africa) explain the variability in size and in plumage colour of pheasants.
Composition
The pheasants found in the areas where they have been introduced often result from crosses between different subspecies. The most frequent are Phasianus colchicus colchicus, P. c. torquatus, P.c. mongolicus and P. c. karpowi. Some populations also contain proportions of Phasianus versicolor crosses. The various crosses and subspecies show a wide range of coloration and size. The pheasants found in Europe are heavier than their American counterparts. However, the Americans have selected a heavy pheasant with white plumage for meat production.
Pathogens Carried
Distribution
BirdLife International (2015b) lists the native range of European P. colchicus as: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, and lists countries in Europe where it was introduced as: Albania; Andorra; Austria; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Croatia; Czech Republic; Denmark; Finland; France; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Ireland, Rep. of; Italy; Latvia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of; Moldova; Montenegro; Netherlands; Norway; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Russian Federation; Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; Turkey; Ukraine; United Kingdom – i.e. most European countries.
Switzer (2011) lists the native range as extending from the Caspian Sea, east across central Asia to China, including Korea, Japan (although this refers to P. versicolor) and Burma [Myanmar]. The species has been introduced to Europe, North America, Hawaii, Australia and New Zealand, and in North America it is mostly established on mid-latitude agricultural land (Switzer, 2011).
Lever (2005) lists the natural range of P. colchicus as the southern Palaearctic and north-eastern Oriental regions -- in Eastern Europe in parts of the Caucasus Mountains, and in Asia from northern Asia Minor east to Korea, China and Taiwan. Lever (2005) lists the naturalized range as Europe (British Isles, Continental Europe), Asia (Japan), North America (Canada, Mexico, USA), West Indies, South America (Chile), Australasia (Australia, New Zealand), Atlantic Ocean (St. Helena), Indian Ocean (Mascarene Islands), and the Pacific Ocean (French Polynesia, Hawaiian Islands), although the continued presence of the species in a few countries is uncertain.
In North America, populations are established on most mid-latitude agricultural lands from southern Canada to Utah and California to the New England states, and south to Virginia (Giudice and Ratti, 2015).
In Japan, P. c. karpowi was introduced for hunting, and its range now is described as: Hokkaido, Honshu (the Pacific side of Kanto to Tokai Districts, Nara), Shikoku (Ehime), Kyushu (Fukuoka, Miyazaki, mainland Kagoshima Prefectures, Tsushima, and Osumi), and Amami, Okinawa, and Sakishima Islands (NIES, 2015).
Distribution Map
Distribution Table
History of Introduction and Spread
P. colchicus has been widely introduced, for hunting or food, to Europe, North America and other areas, from its native range in Asia. Since many introductions happened centuries ago, it is difficult to know precisely when this happened. Some of the known introductions are listed in the History of Introduction table or mentioned in the Distribution table. It is possible that the species was introduced to what is now the UK in the 11th century, since that is when the first documentary evidence of its presence there occurs (as a food source) (Lever, 2005; Yardley, 2009). The UK now has the largest population of P. colchicus in Europe (BirdLife International, 2015a).
Introductions
Introduced to | Introduced from | Year | Reasons | Introduced by | Established in wild through | References | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural reproduction | Continuous restocking | |||||||
Australia | 1855-1960s | Yes | No | Several introductions between 1855 and 1960s. First attempts in Victoria only temporarily successful; later introductions to Tasmania and S. Australia successful | ||||
Bahamas | 1950s | No | No | Possibly established on Eleuthera | ||||
Chile | UK | 1886 | No | No | Died out by 1900 | |||
Chile | Germany | 1914 | Yes | No | Small population: ‘hardly found in the feral state’ | |||
Dominican Republic | 1950s | No | No | Some may survive on Hispaniola in the hills near Cabo Rojo | ||||
New Zealand | 1842-1910 | Yes | No | Several introductions over the years | ||||
Oregon | 1881 | Yes | No | |||||
UK | 11th cent | Yes | No | Date and reason uncertain; possbly introduced in 11th centrury |
Risk of Introduction
P. colchicus has already been widely introduced to Europe, North America, Hawaii, Australia, New Zealand and other areas. Since it can utilize various habitats (BirdLife International, 2015b), wherever the birds are managed as game near to suitable wild habitat it is possible that they could escape and become naturalized.
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Accidental Introduction
Most introductions appear to be deliberate.
Intentional Introduction
P. colchicus has been knowingly and extensively introduced to Europe, North America, Hawaii and other regions of the world as a game bird that has naturalized. In areas where it is managed as a game bird, it is intentionally released from pens into surrounding estates/countryside in large numbers for hunting (GWCT, 2015).
Pathway Causes
Pathway cause | Notes | Long distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Animal production (pathway cause) | Deliberate introduction as gamebird from Asia to Europe, N. America, Chile, Australia & New Zealand | Yes | Yes | |
Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause) | Deliberate introduction as gamebird from Asia to Europe, N. America, Chile, Australia & New Zealand | Yes | Yes | |
Intentional release (pathway cause) | Deliberate introduction as gamebird from Asia to Europe, N. America, Chile, Australia & New Zealand | Yes | Yes |
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
P. colchicus is closely related to the Green Pheasant, Phasianus versicolor (once considered a subspecies of P. colchicus) (BirdLife International, 2015c). Male P. versicolor are described as having green necks, breasts and upper bellies, and do not have the white neck ring (Switzer, 2011). Similar species in Europe include the Golden pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus), distinguished by its shyer nature, and very bright red underparts, yellow head and lower back and finely barred tail (RSPB, 2015), and Lady Amherst’s pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae), easily distinguished by its white underbelly, yellow lower back edged in red and bare blueish skin on the face and legs (RSPB, 2015; Heinzel et al., 1998).
Females and juveniles of P. colchicus could potentially be mistaken for other pheasants (or other species such as partridges, although the long pointed tail should set them apart).
Habitat
P. colchicus occupy grassland and farmland habitats, preferring relatively open cover, such as grass and stubble fields with nearby trees or bushes for cover (Switzer, 2011). As generalists, they will though occupy a range of habitat types, except for dense tropical or alpine forests or very dry areas (Switzer, 2011). They prefer areas near to water although they can obtain water from dew, insects and succulent vegetation (Switzer, 2011).
In its natural range, P. colchicus shows considerable variation in habitat, being found mainly in the overgrown edges of rivers, hilly areas close to cultivation and cultivated flat land (BirdLife International, 2015b).
P. colchicus has a range territory size of 0.8–3.2 km2 (Switzer, 2011).
Habitat List
Category | Sub category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | ||||
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Principal habitat | |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Principal habitat | |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Principal habitat | |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Natural forests | Principal habitat | |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Principal habitat | |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Principal habitat | |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Wetlands | Principal habitat | |
Terrestrial | Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural | Scrub / shrublands | Secondary/tolerated habitat |
Biology and Ecology
Genetics
P. colchicus have a diploid number of 81 and 82 for females and males, respectively, with the sex chromosomes always unpaired in females (Castillo et al., 2010).
The complete mitochondrial genome of P. colchicus is 16,692 bp long and is composed of 13 typical protein coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, 2 rRNA genes and 1 putative control region (Li et al., 2013).
Kozyrenko et al. (2009) suggest that the number of subspecies could be in the range 31–37, and found very low population genetic differences between three separate populations of Phasianus colchicus pallasi. Phylogenetic studies on Chinese subspecies of P. colchicus have not supported the subspecies (Qu et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2014).
Initially found in the UK, there are melanistic forms of P. colchicus (Heinzel et al., 1998; GBWF, 2012) most likely due to a recessive allele (GBWF, 2012).
P. colchicus may hybridize with P. versicolor (McGowan et al., 2013; NIES, 2015).
Reproductive Biology
P. colchicus have a polygamous mating system, where males have a harem of females and take no part in rearing the chicks (McLash, 2008). Males actively defend a territory and crow in an attempt to attract females to mate with (McLash, 2008). Females chose to mate with males with intermediate similarity of histocompatibility complex (Baratti et al., 2012) and with long tails and ear tufts (Switzer, 2011).
The females are not territorial (Switzer, 2011), construct a nest on the ground, and lay 6-14 eggs (McLash, 2008) (7-15 eggs according to Switzer, 2011; 9-14 eggs in the native range in Azerbaijan, according to BirdLife International, 2015b), laying one egg a day (Switzer, 2011). Larger clutches occur when more than one female lays her eggs in the same nest (Switzer, 2011). The nest is a shallow depression in the ground, often lined with plant material (BirdLife International, 2015b).
Hatching can take 23–28 days and fledging takes 7–12 days, with the time to complete independence being 70–80 days (Switzer, 2011). The young are precocial and are able to run around and eat soon after hatching (McLash, 2008; Switzer, 2011). Sexual maturity occurs at 1 year old (Switzer, 2011).
The breeding season can be highly variable in both native and introduced ranges (McGowan et al., 2013). Breeding occurs once a year and the season extends from March to June (Switzer, 2011). In the native range in Azerbaijan, egg-laying occurs in April and May (BirdLife International, 2015b).
Longevity
P. colchicus can typically live for 11–18 years in captivity, and approximately 3 years in the wild (Switzer, 2011). Males may have an annual survival rate of 7%, compared with 21-46% for females. These figures can be lower where hunting occurs (Switzer, 2011).
Activity Patterns/Behaviour
P. colchicus have a range territory size of 0.8–3.2km2, with the range being smaller in winter than during the nesting season. They are social birds and can form flocks in the autumn in areas of food and cover (Switzer, 2011).
They spend most of their time on the ground (where they scratch for food in the undergrowth with their bills) and in trees, and can run swiftly, holding their tails up at a 45 degree angle. They have a strutting gait when walking and are strong fliers, with the ability to take off suddenly. They use dust bathing to help remove skin cells, excess oil and old feathers (Switzer, 2011).
Mass migrations may occur in the native range but in its introduced range the species is sedentary (BirdLife International, 2015b). P. colchicus pallasi in the Russian Far East undergoes seasonal migrations of 200-300 km in a straight line in extremely severe and snowy winters. P. c. mongolicus in the mountains of Central Asia has also been recorded as undergoing seasonal migration (Kulikova et al., 2002).
Population Size and Structure
The estimated global population size of P. colchicus is very large (although decreasing), at 45– 300 million individuals, with the population in Europe estimated at 10.2– 14.1 million (BirdLife International, 2015c).
Nutrition
P. colchicus have a diet consisting of waste grain, weed seeds, fruits, leaves and insects (McLash, 2008). In the native range, they feed on plant matter such as fruits, seeds, leaves, buds and a small amount of animal matter such as insects (BirdLife International, 2015b). Where the species is introduced it is an opportunistic omnivore, feeding on a diverse range of food, but preferring energy-rich items such as cultivated grains, mast and fruits (BirdLife International, 2015b). Crops eaten include maize (Zea mays), wheat (Triticum), barley (Hordeum vulgare) and flax (Linum) (Switzer, 2011). In North America, weed seeds eaten include foxtail (Setaria), ragweed (Ambrosia) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) (Switzer, 2011). Fruits eaten include wild grape (Vitis), apples (Malus), and blackberries (Rubus). The birds also eat grasshoppers (Orthoptera), caterpillars (Lepidoptera), crickets (Gryllidae), and snails (Gastropoda) (Switzer, 2011).
Environmental Requirements
P. colchicus prefer areas near to water, although they can obtain water from dew, insects and succulent vegetation (Switzer, 2011).
Environment Requirements
Environmental Requirements Table
Climate | Preferred | Range of Tolerance |
---|---|---|
Temperate | Yes | |
Subtropical | Yes | |
Arid Tropics | No | |
Wet Tropics | Yes | |
Microclimate | lowland |
Climate
Climate type | Description | Preferred or tolerated | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year | Tolerated | |
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers | Preferred | |
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter | Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters) | Preferred | |
Ds - Continental climate with dry summer | Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers) | Tolerated |
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Latitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude lower (m) | Altitude upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
66 | 46 |
List of Diseases and Disorders
Natural enemy of
Notes on Natural Enemies
Pheasants are susceptible to the viral infection Newcastle disease (ND) (Jørgensen et al., 1999; Aldous and Alexander, 2008). Between 1994 and 2005, outbreaks of ND in pheasants were recorded in Denmark, Finland, France, Great Britain, Ireland, Italy and Northern Ireland (Aldous and Alexander, 2008). Pheasants are also susceptible to respiratory diseases caused by coronaviruses, which have been found to have a high degree of genetic similarity with the coronaviruses of chickens and turkeys (Cavanagh et al., 2002). In captivity, P. colchicus may be susceptible to marble spleen disease caused by type II avian adenovirus (Lee et al., 2001).
P. colchicus are susceptible to several nematode parasites (Gassal and Schmäschke, 2006; Santilli and Bagliacca, 2011). Other parasites include: Borrelia burgdorferi, ticks (Ixodes ricinus), fleas (Siphonaptera), tapeworms (Railletina) (Switzer, 2011) and lice (Mallophaga) (Dik and Uslu, 2006, referring to captive birds in Turkey; Rak et al., 1975, reporting Amyrsidea hexapilosus [Amyrsidea (Argimenopon) perdicis] in wild birds in Iran).
In the UK, P. colchicus are predated by buzzards (Buteo buteo), owls, sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and other mammals (Parrott, 2015; Kenward et al., 2001). A study in the UK and Austria found nest predation by corvids, foxes (Vulpes vulpes), badgers (Meles meles) and other mammals (Draycott et al., 2008). In Sweden, goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) have also been shown to predate P. colchicus (Kenward et al., 1981). Predators recorded in North America include: domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), coyotes (Canis latrans), mink (Neovison vison), weasels (Mustela spp.), striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), raccoons (Procyon lotor), great horned owls (Bubo virginianus), red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), red-shouldered hawks (Buteo lineatus), rough-legged hawks (Buteo lagopus), Cooper’s hawks (Accipiter cooperii), peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus), northern harriers (Circus cyaneus [Circus hudsonius]) and snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) (Switzer, 2011).
Natural enemies
Natural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accipiter cooperii | Predator | not specific | ||||
Accipiter gentilis | Predator | not specific | ||||
Accipiter nisus | Predator | not specific | ||||
Amyrsidea perdicis | Parasite | |||||
Ascaridia | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Borrelia burgdorferi | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Bubo virginianus | Predator | not specific | ||||
Buteo buteo | Predator | not specific | ||||
Buteo jamaicensis | Predator | not specific | ||||
Buteo lagopus | Predator | not specific | ||||
Buteo lineatus | Predator | not specific | ||||
Canis latrans (Coyote) | Predator | not specific | ||||
Canis lupus familiaris (dogs) | Predator | not specific | ||||
Capillaria | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Chelydra serpentina | Predator | not specific | ||||
Circus hudsonius | Predator | not specific | ||||
Coronavirus | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Corvidae | Predator | not specific | ||||
Eimeria | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Falco peregrinus | Predator | not specific | ||||
Heterakis | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Ixodes ricinus (sheep tick) | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Meles meles | Predator | not specific | ||||
Mephitis mephitis (striped skunk) | Predator | not specific | ||||
Mustela | Predator | not specific | ||||
Neovison vison (American mink) | Predator | not specific | ||||
Newcastle disease virus | Pathogen | not specific | ||||
Procyon lotor (raccoon) | Predator | not specific | ||||
Raillietina | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Siphonaptera | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Strigiformes | Predator | not specific | ||||
Syngamus | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Vulpes vulpes (red fox) | Predator | not specific |
Impact Summary
Category | Impact |
---|---|
Cultural/amenity | Positive |
Economic/livelihood | Positive |
Environment (generally) | Positive and negative |
Impact: Economic
P. colchicus has no major effects on crops, although there may be localized effects after captive-bred releases. Any small amount of local damage to crop plants in Europe and the USA is far outweighed by the economic value of the species (Lever, 2005). The species was said to be an agricultural pest on St Helena in the 1950s, although the population has declined substantially since then (Lever, 2005).
Due to the susceptibility of P. colchicus to Newcastle disease, and its potential to spread this to other birds, it can be a cause of economic losses if an embargo on poultry sales is imposed as a result of an outbreak (Switzer, 2011).
Impact: Environmental
Impact on Habitats
Where large numbers of pheasants are released for the hunting season, this sudden influx of birds could potentially affect local ecosystems. They could potentially deplete food sources for other animals, affect ground/hedge flora, and attract more predators to the environment (GWCT, 2015). Some research suggests that captive bred P. colchicus that are released into suitable habitat have an extremely low survival rate (Sodeikat et al., 1995), and that those that survive the shooting season do not breed well (GWCT, 2015), which might limit their effect.
It has been suggested that P. colchicus spread seeds of non-native plants on Hawaii, although they may also facilitate the dispersal and germination of indigenous species (Lever, 2005).
Impact on Biodiversity
Where large numbers are released to boost wild populations for the hunting season, this influx of birds could potentially reduce the diversity of ground/hedge flora, other grain- and seed-eating birds, and amphibians and reptiles (GWCT, 2015), although as mentioned above released birds may not survive or breed well.
Farm-reared P. colchicus that are managed and released could potentially spread parasites to wild populations (Santilli and Bagliacca, 2011).
A UK-based study found that management of wild P. colchicus as a gamebird on farmland had no effect on farmland passerine diversity, although for some species, individual numbers increased (Stoate, 2002). Areas that are managed as suitable habitat for P. colchicus may attract wildlife and so could have a positive impact on biodiversity. On the other hand, in the UK there are reports of continued persecution of raptors near game bird rearing and release sites (Smart et al., 2010).
In the USA, P. colchicus may have an inhibitory effect (as a competitor) on the Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus (classified as Near Threatened – IUCN, 2015) and may also affect the Greater Prairie-chicken Tympanuchus cupido (in whose nests they sometimes lay their own eggs, and which is classified as Vulnerable) (Lever, 2005). P. colchicus has also been recorded as a brood parasite of the Vulnerable Lesser Prairie-chicken T. pallidicinctus in Kansas, USA (Hagen et al., 2002). It is possible that exotic introductions have an effect on Attwater’s Greater Prairie-chicken Tympanuchus cupido attwateri, which is on the US list of endangered species, and prohibiting the introduction to public lands of exotic species such as P. colchicus has been proposed as an action to aid recovery of T. c. attwateri (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010).
P. colchicus may negatively affect Perdix perdix (grey partridge) through nest parasitism, habitat competition, disease transmission and aggressive behaviour (Switzer, 2011).
P. colchicus karpowi is listed as an invasive species with a hybridization impact on the native Japanese species P. versicolor by some authorities (NIES, 2015), although according to McGowan et al. (2013) the two do not hybridize particularly successfully.
If as has been suggested P. colchicus spread seeds of non-native plants on Hawaii (Lever, 2005), this could have an adverse effect on native biodiversity, although they may also facilitate the dispersal and germination of indigenous species (Lever, 2005). The species has had neglible impact on terrestrial invertebrates in Hawaii and does not compete with endemic bird species there (Lever, 2005).
Threatened Species
Threatened species | Where threatened | Mechanisms | References | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Colinus virginianus | USA | Competition | ||
Tympanuchus cupido | USA | Competition Pest and disease transmission | ||
Tympanuchus cupido attwateri (Attwater's greater prairie chicken) | Texas | |||
Tympanuchus pallidicinctus | Kansas |
Risk and Impact Factors
Invasiveness
Proved invasive outside its native range
Highly adaptable to different environments
Is a habitat generalist
Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food
Highly mobile locally
Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
Gregarious
Impact outcomes
Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
Threat to/ loss of endangered species
Threat to/ loss of native species
Impact mechanisms
Competition (unspecified)
Hybridization
Likelihood of entry/control
Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
Uses
Economic Value
P. colchicus is a food source throughout its range. Where it is managed for hunting, it is of economic benefit to land owners and local communities by attracting paying visitors to the area. There is a considerable national and international trade in chicks and viable eggs (Aldous and Alexander, 2008). A recent report (PACEC, 2012) found that game shooting (predominantly of pheasants) on Exmoor, UK, contributed £18 million per year to the UK economy, of which £4 million remained in the local area.
Social Benefit
During the hunting/shooting season there is presumably a positive social benefit for the people involved. Since pheasants are attractive birds, they also have positive social benefits to people who are walking, birdwatching etc. in the countryside where they are likely to encounter them.
P. colchicus meat is a good nutritional source of iron -- 100g of drumstick can provide 23.6% of the recommended daily intake (Franco and Lorenzo, 2013).
Environmental Services
It has been suggested that P. colchicus in Hawaii facilitate the dispersal and germination of indigenous plant species as well as introduced ones. In this way, it has been suggested that the species may help to restore degraded ecosystems on Maui (Lever, 2005).
Management of land for pheasants may benefit other species as well.
Uses List
General > Sport (hunting, shooting, fishing, racing)
Materials > Feathers
Human food and beverage > Meat/fat/offal/blood/bone (whole, cut, fresh, frozen, canned, cured, processed or smoked)
Products
In Europe, pheasants are mostly produced as game birds and are the favourite target of over 7 million hunters. In France alone, 13 million pheasants are produced for 1.6 million hunters each year. In the United States, pheasants produced for meat (Jumbo pheasants) have a big share of the total pheasant production (Woodard et al., 1993).
Prevention and Control
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
There are no reports in the literature of any prevention and control measures against P. colchicus (even in Japan where P. c. karpowi is considered invasive), except for the suggestion in the USA that its introduction to public lands, along with that of other exotic species, should be prohibited to aid the recovery of the endangered Attwater's Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido attwateri) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010). It is unlikely that the general public is aware of any issues with the bird as an introduced species, unless they are involved in activities where its presence would be noticed.
Reproduction
In natural conditions, males attract females to form a harem. The major sexual displays are feeding, courtship and lateral displays. The rise in testosterone in males is shown by the increased vertical size of the wattles and increased body weight (Briganti et al., 1999). In natural conditions the first egg is observed at the end of March, but the maximum laying period is at the beginning of May. Clutch size varies between 10 to 15 eggs (Penkov, 1996).
The egg formation starts when day length reaches 12 hours 30 minutes and the first egg is laid 3 weeks later. In captivity reproduction occurs in pens with 1 male and 6 to 8 females, or in groups with, for example 8 males and 42 females (Gavard-Gongallud, 2000). Eggs can be kept for up to 7 days at 15-16°C. They spend 21 days in the incubator at 37.8°C and a relative humidity of about 50 %. The eggs are turned twice a day. They then spend 3.5 days in the hatcher at a temperature of 37.5°C and about 80 % relative humidity. Hatching occurs after 24.5 to 25 days (Gavard-Gongallud, 2000).
Reproduction Table
Performance Criterion | Value |
---|---|
Age at first conception/lay (months) | 8 - 10 |
Husbandry
Throughout the rearing period a lot of attention should be devoted to vegetation in the aviaries and to the number of feeders and drinkers. When these need to be changed to fit the animal requirements, the changes should be progressive to avoid under-consumption.
Table: Feeder and drinker requirements for groups of 500 pheasants.
Ages in weeks | Feeders | Drinkers |
1 | 8 plates | 8 x 1 litre bells |
2 – 3 | 4 plates4 linear feeders 0.5 m | 8 x 1.5 litre bells |
4 – 6 | 6 linear feeders 0.5 m | 4 x 1.5 litre bells+ 4 linear automatic 1 m |
7 - 10 | 8 linear feeders 1 m | 6 linear automatic 1 m |
> 11 | 8 linear feeders 1 m | 7 linear automatic 1 m |
The feeders and drinkers should be evenly spread over the surface of the aviary. Food and water should be available ad libitum. Food should be presented as small crumbs during the first 3 weeks, as crumbs between 4 and 6 weeks of age and then as pellets (2.5 mm in diameter from 7 to 10 weeks of age and 4 mm thereafter).
Husbandry Table
Type | |
---|---|
Extensive | |
Outdoor | |
Outdoor Space: | 0.05m² - 5m² |
Health
Pheasants are susceptible to most of the diseases found in gallinaceous birds. The major problems are due to Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Escherichia coli (collibacillosis) and Clostridium botulism (botulism). The major diseases found only in pheasants are marbled spleen disease and gapeworms.
The marbled spleen disease is characterized by swelling and marbling of the spleen, swelling of the liver, pulmonary congestion and death (up to 100% of the flock). Vaccination of the flock using a tissue culture called turkey haemorrhagic enteritis (THE) can be performed when pheasants are 5 weeks old. The vaccine can be distributed in drinking, water and is usually successful.
The gapeworm (Syngamus) is a parasitic worm living in the pheasant’s trachea. It is frequent in aviaries where pheasants are kept for prolonged periods. Gapeworm can be successfully treated with Tramizol in drinking water and with Thibenzole and Flubenzole in the food (Woodard et al., 1993).
Another frequently encountered health problem is feather pecking and cannibalism. It can take different forms such as feather pulling and toe, head or nose pecking. It is often the symptom that something is wrong with the food (nutritionally imbalanced) or with the management, for example the density is too high or the aviary has been badly planted.
Nutritional Requirements
The food consumption in g/pheasant/period are as follows for normal animals with a mean body weight of 1.5 kg (males) or 1.15 kg (females).
Age in weeks | g/bird/period |
1-3 | 310 |
4-6 | 660 |
7-10 | 1400 |
11-20 | 4300 |
1-20 | 6670 |
The form of presentation of food should be adapted to age (see husbandry section).
The optimum flock of pheasants will have a normal growth with good feathering and be homogenous. Protein and amino acid levels are essential to reach this goal. An excess of protein during early life leads to good growth but bad feathering, and this is often followed by cannibalism (Melin and Larbier, 1988). The tendency now is to increase the percentage of fibre in the food (Schulze, 1992; Bagliacca et al., 1996; Draycott et al., 1998). This increase the development of the gut, the intestine and caeca and gives the animal better potential when re-introduced into the wild.
During the winter period the food distributed should contain 19 % protein and 11.5 MJ/kg of energy. One third of the food should be provided as wheat and two thirds as complete food. One month before laying, calcium is increased to 1.9 % and available phosphorus to 0.46 % of the diet. During the laying period, food should contain 21.5 % protein, 11.3MJ/kg energy and 3 % calcium (Gavard-Gongallud, 2000).
Nutritional Requirements Table
Daily Requirement | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Layers | Broilers | Broiler Breeders | Dual Purpose | Mature Males | |
Water (l/day) | 0.13 - 0.14 | 0.03 - 0.14 | |||
Protein (g/day) | 9.05 | 7.62 - 13.34 | |||
Amino Acids (g/day) | |||||
Methionine (Met) (M) | 0.023 | 0.019 - 0.028 | |||
Threonine (Thr) (T) | 0.0391 | 0.03 - 0.0524 | |||
Valine (Val) (V) | 0.0476 | 0.0314 - 0.0619 | |||
Arginine (Arg) (R) | 0.0429 | 0.0343 - 0.0762 | |||
Isoleucine (Ile) (I) | 0.0619 | 0.0286 - 0.0572 | |||
Leucine (Leu) (L) | 0.0667 | 0.0333 - 0.0905 | |||
Histidine (His) (H) | 0.0214 | 0.0167 - 0.0285 | |||
Phenylalanine (Phe) (F) | 0.0429 | 0.0291 - 0.0572 | |||
Lysine (Lys) (K) | 0.0228 | 0.036 - 0.083 | |||
Tyrosine (Tyr) (Y) | 0.0104 | 0.007 - 0.0128 | |||
Vitamins | |||||
Pantothenic Acid (mg/day) | 0.4288 - 0.5717 | ||||
Choline (mg/day) | 35.73 - 47.64 | ||||
Vitamin B Complex (Vitamin B(12)) (mg/day) | 0.00048 - 0.00057 | ||||
Vitamin K (mg/day) | 0.0715 - 0.0953 | ||||
Vitamin B Complex (Thiamin) (B\s\do(1)) (mg/day) | 0.0953 - 0.1191 | ||||
Vitamin B Complex (Pyridoxine) (B\s\do(6)) (mg/day) | 0.1906 - 0.2382 | ||||
Retinol (Vitamin A) (i.u.) | 571.68 | 190.56 - 238.2 | |||
Vitamin B Complex (Riboflavin) (B(2)) (mg/day) | 0.14292 - 0.19056 | ||||
Minerals (mg/day) | |||||
Selenium (Se) | 0.0095 - 0.0142 | ||||
Calcium (Ca) | 905.16 - 1429.2 | 538.332 - 857.52 | |||
Sodium (Na) | 85.752 | ||||
Iodine (I) | 0.0191 | ||||
Manganese (Mn) | 2.6202 - 3.3348 | ||||
Iron (Fe) | 3.3348 - 3.8112 | ||||
Copper (Cu) | 0.3811 - 0.4764 | ||||
Zinc (Zn) | 2.8584 - 3.8112 |
Genetics
The pheasant karyotype is characterized by 2n=82. There are relatively few studies on genetics of plumage colour. However white strains for meat production and melanistic forms for hunting have been developed.
As the genetics table shows, heritabilities of body weight are variable. For reproduction characteristics, Petitjean et al. (1990) found a heritability of 0.4 for the number of spermatozoa per ejaculate and genetic correlations of 0.4 between this character and the number of eggs laid, and of 0.6 with the number of chicks hatched per incubated egg.
Molecular genetics of wild introduced populations show that these populations are very fragmented (Giesel et al., 1997).
Genetics
Genetic Parameters for Economic Traits
Trait | Heritability | Repeatability | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
16 week body weight | 0.27-0.79 | Kim Yang 1998; Petitjean et al. 1990; Rizzi R et al. 1994 | |
Length of tarsus | 0.27-0.34 | Kim Yang 1998; Rizzi R et al. 1994 | |
Number of spermatozoa per ejaculate | 0.4 | Petitjean et al. 1990 | |
Flight length | 0.56 | Boyer Melin 1974 | |
Age at first egg | 0.34 | ||
Egg number | 0.21 | ||
Egg weight | 0.48 | ||
% fertility | 0.29 |
Genetic Resources and Breeding
The major characters selected were first chosen to improve the number of chicks hatched per female. Selection was thus directed towards a reduction of age at first egg and an increase in the number of eggs to incubate (32-35 g). In France, the mean number of eggs per female increased from 55 to 75 between 1990 and 2000. Other characters can also be used in selection. As an example, Boyer and Melin (1974) showed a heritability of 0.56 for the flight length. In France the tendency is to have pheasants able to reproduce in the wild. To improve this character, Melin and Damange (1997) selected in captivity on the basis of expression of brooding behaviour, which proved to be successful.
Performance
In aviaries with no artificial light the natural laying period extends from the end of March to the end of July. The number of eggs laid per year varies between 50 and 80 for most of the flocks (Tserveni-Gousi and Yannakopoulos, 1990; Mantovani et al., 1993; Cetin et al., 1997) and depends on the strain and also on the length of the period of collection. Egg weight is about 33 g (Mantovani et al., 1993; Cetin et al., 1997), but can be a lot lighter (23 to 27g, Yang and Kim, 1993). Chicken weight is about 65 % of the egg weight giving chicks of 22 g from normal 33 g eggs (Yang and Kim, 1993). Body weight is highly variable and can depend on the strain, rearing and feeding conditions (Melin and Larbier, 1988; Ricard et al., 1991).
Performance Table
Performance | Optimum | Typical or Moderate | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eggs | ||||
Egg weight (g) | 33 | 30-33 | 33 | |
Growth | ||||
Preweaning growth rate (kg/day) (mammals) | 0.0096 | 0-0 | 0.0096 | |
Height and Weight | ||||
Age at body maturity (months) | 9 | |||
Body weight female - birth (kg) | 0.022 | 0.019-0.022 | ||
Body weight female - mature (kg) | 1.15 | 0.95-1.15 | ||
Body weight male - birth (kg) | 0.022 | 0.019-0.022 | ||
Body weight male - mature (kg) | 1.5 | 1.5-1.5 | 1.5 |
Economic and Socioeconomic Aspects
Pheasants are mostly kept in outdoor aviaries and the investment is low. This makes them suitable for small-scale production. The food conversion ratio is poor and in European conditions the pheasant can be sold only as a game animal. It represents an annual turnover of 600 million francs (about 100 million Euro) in France alone (Melin and Damange, 1997).
Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
Several gaps in knowledge regarding the impacts of game bird management on non-target species have been identified by Mustin et al. (2011), including: ecological, economic and social trade-offs; effects of medications on non-target organisms; effects of predator control; the persecution of raptors; and biodiversity impacts (at a landscape level) of the release of game birds.
Links to Websites
Name | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6 | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) | http://griis.org/ | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
References
Aldous EW, Alexander DJ, 2008. Newcastle disease in pheasants (Phasianus colchicus): a review. Veterinary Journal, 175(2):181-185. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10900233
Avibase, 2015. Avibase - the world bird database. http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/avibase.jsp?lang=EN
Bagliacca M et al., 1996. Effect of dietary fibre content on intestinal development and metabolic profile in growing pheasants. Rivista di Avicoltura, 65:33-39.
Baratti M, Dessì-Fulgheri F, Ambrosini R, Bonisoli-Alquati A, Caprioli M, Goti E, Matteo A, Monnanni R, Ragionieri L, Ristori E, Romano M, Rubolini D, Scialpi A, Saino N, 2012. MHC genotype predicts mate choice in the ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25(8):1531-1542. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1420-9101
Benchiekh N, 1988. Réponse dirrecte et corrélée à une sélection pour la reproduction chez le fasian. DEA, Univ. Rennes, 68pp.
BirdLife International, 2015. Phasianus colchicus (Common Pheasant). European Red List of Birds. Supplementary Material. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 17 pp. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/userfiles/file/Species/erlob/supplementarypdfs/45100023_phasianus_colchicus.pdf
BirdLife International, 2015. Phasianus colchicus (Linnaeus, 1758), European Red List Assessment. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International, 3 pp. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/userfiles/file/Species/erlob/summarypdfs/45100023_phasianus_colchicus.pdf
BirdLife International, 2015. Species factsheet: Phasianus colchicus. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/speciesfactsheet.php?id=1016870
Boyer JP, Melin JM, 1974. Behavioral genetics: activity, growth and flying length in female pheasants - their significance. In: XV World Poultry Congress, 1974/08/11-16. New Orleans (USA), 262-263.
Briganti F, Papeschi A, Mugnai T, Dessi Fulgheri F, 1999. Effect of testosterone on male traits and behaviour in juvenile pheasants. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 11:171-178.
Castillo A, Romboli I, Marzoni M, Stanyon R, 2010. Karyotype of chicken-pheasant hybrids. Avian Biology Research, 3(1):17-21.
Cavanagh D, Mawditt K, Welchman D de B, Britton P, Gough RE, 2002. Coronaviruses from pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) are genetically closely related to coronaviruses of domestic fowl (infectious bronchitis virus) and turkeys. Avian Pathology, 31(1):81-93.
Cetin O, Kirikci K, Tepeli C, 1997. Breeding possibilities for pheasants (P. colchicus) under intensive conditions in a cold climate zone: 2. Growth and carcass characters. Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(1):69-76; 24 ref.
Clements JF, Schulenberg TS, Iliff MJ, Robertson TA, Fredericks TA, Sullivan BL, Wood CL, 2014. The ebird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: Version 6.9. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/
Delacour J, 1977. The Pheasants of the World. Alton, UK: Nimrod Press Ltd, 119-136.
Dik B, Uslu U, 2006. Cuclotogaster heterographus (Mallophaga: Lipeuridae) infestation on ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) in Konya. (Konya'da halkali sülünlerde (Phasianus colchicus) Cuclotogaster heterographus (Mallophaga: Lipeuridae) enfestasyonu.) Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi, 30(2):125-127. http://www.tparazitolderg.org
Draycott RAH, Hoodless AN, Ludiman MN, Robertson PA, 1998. Effects of spring feeding on body condition of captive-reared ring-necked pheasants in Great Britain. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62(2):557-563; 26 ref.
Draycott RAH, Hoodless AN, Woodburn MIA, Sage RB, 2008. Nest predation of Common Pheasants Phasianus colchicus. Ibis (London), 150(s1):37-44. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/121384197/HTMLSTART
Draycott RAH, Pock K, Carroll JP, 2002. Sustainable management of a wild pheasant population in Austria. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft, 48(s1):346-353.
eBird, 2015. eBird. USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology and National Audubon Society. http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
Eguchi K, Amano HE, 2004. Spread of exotic birds in Japan. Ornithological Science, 3(1):3-11.
Elphick J, Woodward J, 2003. Pocket Birds. London, UK: Dorling Kindersley.
Flegel CS, 1996. Genetic heterogeneity and differentiation resulting from Sichuan pheasant (Phasianus colchicus strauchi) introductions in southern Michigan [PhD Thesis]. East Lansing, Michigan, USA: University of Michigan.
Franco D, Lorenzo JM, 2013. Meat quality and nutritional composition of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) reared in an extensive system. British Poultry Science, 54(5):594-602. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbps20
Gassal S, Schmäschke R, 2006. The helminth and coccidial fauna of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) in view of the specific environmental conditions in pheasantries and in the wild. (Zur Helminthen- und Kokzidienfauna des Jagdfasans (Phasianus colchicus) unter Berücksichtigung der spezifischen Umweltbedingungen in Fasanerien und in freier Wildbahn.) Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 119(7-8):295-302. https://vetline.de/8963056/150/3130/69443
Gavard-Gongallud N, 2000. L'élevage du gibier à plumes: Elevage - Pathologie - Habitat - Populations. Eds: France Agricole. ISBN: 2-85557-050-6.
GBWF, 2012. Common Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). http://www.gbwf.org/pheasants/phasianus_colchicus.html
Giesel JT, Brazeau D, Koppelman R, Shiver D, 1997. Ring-necked pheasant population genetic structure. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61:1332-1338.
Giudice J, Ratti J, 2015. Ring-necked Pheasant. The Birds of North America Online, record 572 [ed. by Poole, A.]. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/572/
Guderley H, Jacques L, 1987. Liver specific pyruvate kinase in pheasants Phasianus colchicus. The International Journal of Biochemistry, 19(6):561-564.
GWCT (Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust), 2015. The impact of pheasant releases. Fordingbridge, UK: Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust. http://www.gwct.org.uk/game/research/species/pheasant/the-impact-of-pheasant-releases/
Hagen CA, Jamison BE, Robel RJ, Applegate RD, 2002. Ring-necked pheasant parasitism of lesser prairie-chicken nests in Kansas. Wilson Bulletin, 114(4):522-524.
Heinzel H, Fitter R, Parslow J, 1998. Birds of Britain and Europe with North Africa and the Middle East. London, UK: HarperCollins Publishers.
IUCN, 2015. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/
Jaksic FM, 1998. Vertebrate invaders and their ecological impacts in Chile. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7(11):1427-1445.
Jørgensen PH, Handberg KJ, Ahrens P, Hansen HC, Manvell RJ, Alexander DJ, 1999. An outbreak of Newcastle disease in free-living pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Journal of Veterinary Medicine. Series B, 46(6):381-387.
Kenward RE, Hall DG, Walls SS, Hodder KH, 2001. Factors affecting predation by buzzards Buteo buteo on released pheasants Phasianus colchicus. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38(4):813-822.
Kenward RE, Marcström V, Karlbom M, 1981. Goshawk winter ecology in Swedish pheasant habitats. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 45(2):397-408.
Kim DC, Yang YH, 1998. Heritability and genetic correlation of 20-week body weight and various body measurements in the growing period in Korean ring-necked pheasant. Korean Journal of Animal Science, 40:145-150.
Kozyrenko MM, Fisenko PV, Zhuravlev YuN, 2009. Genetic variation of Manchurian pheasant (Phasianus colchicus pallasi Rotshild, 1903) inferred from mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Russian Journal of Genetics, 45(4):460-468. http://www.springerlink.com/content/vj3232k254k23r07/?p=a78690fe38094512a7f538616f03f051&pi=10
Kulikova IV, Chelomina GN, Zhuralev YN, 2002. RAPD-PCR analysis of genetic diversity in the Manchurian pheasant. Russian Journal of Genetics, 38(6):699-703.
Lee JungKeun, Choi JaeHoon, Lee DongWoo, Kim SunJoong, Fitzgerald SD, Lee YongSoon, Kim DaeYong, 2001. Marble spleen disease in pheasants in Korea. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 63(6):699-701.
Lever C, 2005. Naturalised birds of the world. London, UK: T & AD Poyser.
Li X, Ren Q, Kan X, Qian C, Li X, Qian M, 2013. Complete mitochondrial genome of the ring-necked pheasant, Phasianus colchicus (Galliformes: Phasianidae). Mitochondrial DNA, 24(2):89-90.
Mantovani C, Cerolini S, Mangiagalli MG, Bellagamba F, Rizzi R, 1993. Egg laying of caged pheasants in a controlled environment. Rivista di Avicoltura, 62(7-8):39-42; 14 ref.
Matthews TW, Taylor JS, Powell LA, 2012. Ring-necked pheasant hens select managed Conservation Reserve Program grasslands for nesting and brood-rearing. Journal of Wildlife Management, 76(8):1653-1660. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1937-2817
McGowan PJK, Kirwan GM, Boesman P, 2013. Common Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive [ed. by Hoyo, J. del \Elliott, A. \Sargatal, J. \Christie, D. A. \Juana, E. de]. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions. http://www.hbw.com/species/common-pheasant-phasianus-colchicus
McLash TL, 2008. Ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) habitat selection in southeastern Alberta [MSc thesis]. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta.
Melin JM, Damange JP, 1997. Gli allevamenti di selvaggina in Francia. Tocchini M, Banti P, Mori L, eds. Seminario di informazione: L'organizzazione dei servizi di gestione della fauna e della caccia in Francia. Arsia Firenze (Italy), 155-159.
Melin JM, Larbier M, 1988. Effect of the amount of protein in starter diets on growth and feathering performances in pheasants. Annales de Zootechnie, 37(3):143-50; 5 ref.
Mullin JM, 2000. Game Bird Propagation Wildlife System, edition 6. ISBN: 0-929902-00-10.
Mustin K, Newey S, Irvine J, Arroyo B, Redpath S, 2011. Biodiversity impacts of game bird hunting and associated management practices in Europe and North America. Aberdeen, UK: James Hutton Institute, 71 pp. http://www.hutton.ac.uk/sites/default/files/files/RSPB_ReportFINAL_Covers.pdf
NIES (National Institute for Environmental Studies), 2015. Invasive Species of Japan. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute for Environmental Studies. http://www.nies.go.jp/biodiversity/invasive/index-en.html
PACEC (Public and Corporate Economic Consultants), 2012. The role of game shooting in Exmoor. Final Report. Cambridge, UK: Public and Corporate Economic Consultants, vii + 55 pp. http://www.exmoor-nationalpark.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/271653/GESAPACECreport231006-3.pdf
Parrott D, 2015. Impacts and management of common buzzards Buteo buteo at pheasant Phasianus colchicus release pens in the UK: a review. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61(2):181-197. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10344-014-0893-1
Penkov V, 1996. On the fertility of the common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus L.). The game and the man. Proceedings International Union of Game Biologists 22nd congress Sofia, Bulgaria, 4-8 September 1995., 83-88; 8 ref.
Petitjean M, Bencheikh N, Malineau G, 1990. A study of the variability of standards for growth and fertility in pheasants. In: Control of fertility in domestic birds, Tours, France, 2-4 July 1990. Colloques de l'INRA, 1990, No. 54. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 157-165.
Qu J, Liu N, Bao X, Wong X, 2009. Phylogeography of the ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchius) in China. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 52(1):125-132.
Rak H, Anwar M, Niak A, 1975. The species of Mallophaga in wild birds in Iran. Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique, 68(6):588-591.
Ricard FH, Petitjean MJ, Melin JM, Marche G, Malineau G, 1991. Growth rate and abdominal fat of young pheasants reared in aviaries or in confinement. Productions Animales, 4(2):117-121; 7 ref.
Riley TZ, Clark WR, Ewing DE, Vohs PA, 1998. Survival of ring-necked pheasant chicks during brood rearing. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62(1):36-44.
Rizzi R et al., 1994. Heritabilities and genetic correlations of conformation and plumage characteristics in pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Poultry Science, 73:1204-1210.
Robertson PA, 1988. In: The Pheasants. Flegg and Chumphries. ISBN: 0-852639503.
RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds), 2015. Bird Guide. Sandy, UK: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. http://www.rspb.org.uk/discoverandenjoynature/discoverandlearn/birdguide
Santilli F, Bagliacca M, 2011. Occurrence of eggs and oocysts of intestinal parasites of pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) in droppings collected in differently managed protected areas of Tuscany (Italy). European Journal of Wildlife Research, 58(1):369-372.
Schulze JE, 1992. Comparison of the bodily condition of artificially reared and free-living pheasants. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Kondition von menschenaufgezogenen und wild lebenden Fasanen (Phasianus colchicus L.)., 92 pp.; 99 ref.
Sfougaris AI, Nastis AS, Papageorgiou NK, 1996. Food resources and quality for the introduced Cretan wild goat or agrimi Capra aegagrus cretica on Atalandi Island, Greece, and implications for ecosystem management. Biological Conservation, 78(3):239-245.
Smart J, Amar A, Sim IMW, Etheridge B, Cameron D, Christie G, Wilson JD, 2010. Illegal killing slows population recovery of a re-introduced raptor of high conservation concern - the red kite Milvus milvus. Biological Conservation, 143(5):1278-1286. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V5X-4YR29J3-1&_user=10&_coverDate=05%2F31%2F2010&_rdoc=31&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235798%232010%23998569994%231910715%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5798&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=37&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a061640bb8553c3f800ac21d5a09a11c
Sodeikat G, Niepel L, Fehlberg U, Pohlymeyer K, 1995. Comparative study on survival of released pheasants (Phasianus colchicus spec.) reared under intensive and extensive conditions. (Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Auswilderung und Überlebensfähigkeit von Jagdfasanen (Phasianus colchicus spec.) aus Intensiv- und Extensivhaltung.) Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 102(3):112-116.
Stoate C, 2002. Multifunctional use of a natural resource on farmland: wild pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) management and the conservation of farmland passerines. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11(4):561-573.
Switzer C, 2011. Phasianus colchicus. In: Animal Diversity Web. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. http://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Phasianus_colchicus/
Tserveni Gousi AS, Yannakopoulos AL, 1990. Quality characteristics of pheasant eggs and effect of egg weight and shell quality on chick weight. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 54:54-56.
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010. Attwater's Prairie-Chicken Recovery Plan, Second Revision. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA: US Fish and Wildlife Service, ix + 107 pp.
Westerov K, 1986. Productivity of New-Zealand pheasants population. New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs. Wildlife Publications, 408:1-144.
Woodard AE, Vohra P, Danton V, 1993. Commercial and ornamental. Game bird breeders. Eds: Hancock House Publishers. ISBN: 0-88839-311-3.
Yang YH, Kim KI, 1993. Artificial light and improved feed formulation for pheasant production. II. Effect of artificial light control on fertility and hatchability. Korean Journal of Animal Sciences, 35:279-284.
Yang YH, Kim KI, 1993. Artificial light control and improved feed formulation for pheasant production. I. Effect of artificial light control on sexual maturity and egg production. Korean Journal of Animal Sciences, 35(4):271-277; 12 ref.
Yardley M, 2009. The history of the pheasant. The Field. http://www.thefield.co.uk/features/the-history-of-the-pheasant-22364
Zarringhabaie GE, Javanmard A, Pirahary O, 2012. Random amplified polymorphic markers as indicator for genetic conservation program in Iranian pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). The Scientific World Journal, 2012:article 640381. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2012/640381/abs/
Zhang LiXun, An Bei, Backström N, Liu NaiFa, 2014. Phylogeography-based delimitation of subspecies boundaries in the common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Biochemical Genetics, 52(1/2):38-51. http://rd.springer.com/journal/10528
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 7 June 2015
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
Citing Literature
- Carolyn B. Meyer, Timothy A. Walker, Alex B. Francisco, Emily B. Morrison, Joseph S. Meyer, Method to assess the potential magnitude of terrestrial European avian population reductions from ingestion of lead ammunition, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0273572, 17, 8, (e0273572), (2022).
View Options
View options
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.