Mamestra brassicae (cabbage moth)
Datasheet Types: Pest, Natural enemy, Documented species
Abstract
This datasheet on Mamestra brassicae covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Hosts/Species Affected, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Prevention/Control, Further Information.
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Mamestra brassicae Linnaeus (1758)
- Preferred Common Name
- cabbage moth
- Other Scientific Names
- Barathra brassicae Linnaeus
- Hypobarathra unicolor Marumo
- Noctua albidilinea Haworth
- Phalaena brassicae Linnaeus
- Phalaena omicron Geoffray
- International Common Names
- Englishcabbage armyworm
- Spanishoruga de la col
- Frenchnoctuelle des chouxnoctuelle du chou
- Local Common Names
- Denmarkkalugle
- Finlandkaaliyoekkoenen
- GermanyHerzwurmKohleule
- Italymamestra del cavolonottua del cavolo
- Japanyoto-musi
- Netherlandskooluil
- Norwaykalfly
- Swedenkalfly
- EPPO Code
- BARABR (Mamestra brassicae)
Pictures
Summary of Invasiveness
Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a polyphagous insect that feeds on a wide variety of crops, with Brassica crops being relatively more affected than other host plants. Its origin seems to be Eurasian, coinciding with its distribution throughout the Palaearctic region from Europe to Japan and subtropical Asia. In Africa it has only been reported in Libya. Its rather restricted distribution indicates that the invasive potential of this insect is limited. However, adults have been shown to have the capacity to fly distances of up to 60 km with the help of wind.
Taxonomic Tree
Description
Descriptions of each stage of the life cycle can be found in the books by Carter (1984) and Heath and Emmet (1979). The eggs have also been described by Korycinska (2012).
Eggs
The eggs are relatively small, hemispherical, ribbed and reticulate. They are whitish in colour when newly laid, but turn gradually to purplish-brown with a brown to purple micropyle and basal ring. A few hours before hatching they darken to greyish black. The eggs are laid singly in regular batches of up to 70-80 eggs, mainly on the undersides of leaves. Korycinkska (2012) has described the eggs of M. brassicae using stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy.
Larvae
There are six instars. First- and second-instar larvae are about 3-10 mm long, greenish and more or less translucent with black hairs on black warts. First-instar larvae have a black head capsule, but after the first moulting it turns light brown. The prolegs on the third and fourth abdominal segments are poorly developed in the first two or three instars. From the third instar, the larvae are pale green with yellowish intersegmental bands. The dorsal region turns gradually darker with each moult, and in the last instar the majority of the larvae are brownish-green or blackish-green.
Heath and Emmet (1979) described full-grown larvae. The body is about 50 mm long, elongate, and with a slight dorsal hump on abdominal segment 8. The head capsule is light brown, and the dorsal region of the body is from fairly bright green, through brownish green to almost black. The dorsal line is fine and black. On each side there is one sub-dorsal line of blackish bars. The spiracular line is broad and pale green or pale ochreous. The spiracles are white. The ventral region is yellowish-green.
Pupae
The pupae are elongate, 17-22 mm long, and reddish-brown and glossy. The wing- and limb-cases are finely sculptured. The abdominal segments are darker brown and evenly tapered, and there is a finely pitted anterior band on each segment. Segment 8 is sharply excavated to a narrow conical cremaster with two short apically hooked spines. Pupation takes place within flimsy cocoons in the soil (Heath and Emmet, 1979).
Adults
The adult moths have a wingspan of 34-50 mm. The forewings are mottled and may appear grey-brown, brown or blackish-brown, with variable reddish-brown scaling. Sub-basal, antemedian and postmedian lines are inconspicuous and slightly paler than the background colour, and have a fine dark edge. A kidney-shaped stigmata outlined in black with a whitish distal margin and a less clearly defined proximal margin, is placed near the centre of each forewing. The subterminal line is very variable. When present it is whitish and irregular, with two angular projections (like a W). The hindwings are fuscous and generally paler than the forewings. They are light greyish towards the base, and have a darker terminal shade. The fringe has a greyish central line. The forelegs have a characteristic brown, slightly curved, apically pointed tibial spur. Like other species in the subfamily Hadeninae, M. brassicae adults have hairy eyes (Seitz, 1913).
Distribution
Mamestra brassicae is present throughout the Palaearctic region from Europe to Japan and subtropical Asia. Its main distribution is the latitudes from 30°N to 70°N (Ogaard, 1983; Finch and Thompson, 1992; Turnock and Carl, 1995; Wu et al., 2015). In Africa it has only been reported in Libya (EPPO, 2022). The species is not present in America and Oceania (APPPC, 1987; Zhang, 1994; EPPO, 2022). The species can move up to 60 km, typically with the help of wind (Wu et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2020). According to Finch and Thomson (1992), M. brassicae is abundant throughout Central Europe and temperate Asia. Ogaard (1983) states that the species is present mainly between 30°N and 70°N. The species is abundant all over Denmark, and in southern Scandinavia and Finland (Skou, 1991). In Norway, M. brassicae occurs as a pest up to 62°N (Johansen, 1997b). The species is not found in Iceland.
Distribution Map
Distribution Table
Risk of Introduction
Mamestra brassicae appears to be quite restricted to its present distribution. It does not seem to be spreading further. However, the species can fly distances of up to 60 km, typically with the help of wind (Wu et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2020).
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Natural Dispersal
Mamestra brassicae can fly distances of up to 60 km, typically with the help of wind (Wu et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2020).
Plant Trade
Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport | Pest stages | Borne internally | Borne externally | Visibility of pest or symptoms |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves | Arthropods/Larvae | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye | |
Leaves | Arthropods/Eggs | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye | |
Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx | Arthropods/Larvae | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye | |
Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx | Arthropods/Eggs | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye | |
Fruits (inc. pods) | Arthropods/Larvae | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye | |
Fruits (inc. pods) | Arthropods/Eggs | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye |
Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport |
---|
Bark |
Bulbs/Tubers/Corms/Rhizomes |
Seedlings/Micropropagated plants |
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches |
Roots |
True seeds (inc. grain) |
Wood |
Hosts/Species Affected
Mamestra brassicae larvae are extremely polyphagous, although they prefer Brassica crops (Heath and Emmet, 1979; Carter, 1984; Skou, 1991; Finch and Thomson, 1992; Popova, 1993); beetroots, legumes, lettuces, onions and potatoes are also frequently reported to be host plants for M. brassicae (Ogaard, 1983; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989; Finch and Thomson, 1992; Zhang, 1994; Lemic et al., 2016). The species is found on many other vegetable crops, and also in ornamental plants and deciduous trees (Heath and Emmet, 1979; Carter, 1984; Harvey et al., 2016; Campbell, 2019).
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Growth Stages
Fruiting stage
Flowering stage
Vegetative growing stage
Symptoms
Small larvae feed on the underside of the external leaves where they make small perforations. As the larvae grow older, the feeding holes become larger. Severe infestations of small larvae may rapidly skeletonize the leaves, and can sometimes destroy small plants. Older larvae tunnel into the heart of the plants. They leave considerable amounts of faeces, which favour growth of decaying bacteria and fungi. Most crop losses caused by the larvae occur as a result of boring and fouling rather from the amount of plant tissue eaten. Because of this, even slight infestations of older larvae could be damaging in crops such as heading cabbage, which can become unmarketable (Heath and Emmet, 1979; Finch and Thomson, 1992). In soyabean, feeding by M. brassicae larvae may destroy young buds, leading to distorted growth; the larvae also bore into the pods and feed on the seeds (Lihnell, 1940). In ornamentals such as dahlia, chrysanthemum and rose, M. brassicae larvae feed on leaves, buds and petals, and they may bore into the fruits in fruiting crops such as tomato.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis | Disease stage |
---|---|---|---|
Plants/Fruit/external feeding | |||
Plants/Fruit/frass visible | |||
Plants/Fruit/internal feeding | |||
Plants/Growing point/external feeding | |||
Plants/Inflorescence/external feeding | |||
Plants/Inflorescence/frass visible | |||
Plants/Inflorescence/rot | |||
Plants/Leaves/external feeding | |||
Plants/Leaves/frass visible | |||
Plants/Leaves/internal feeding | |||
Plants/Leaves/rot | |||
Plants/Stems/external feeding | |||
Plants/Vegetative organs/external feeding | |||
Plants/Vegetative organs/frass visible | |||
Plants/Whole plant/external feeding | |||
Plants/Whole plant/frass visible | |||
Plants/Whole plant/plant dead; dieback |
Diagnosis
Korycinska (2012) has described the eggs of M. brassicae using stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The morphology of the different life stages of the insect has also been described (Heath and Emmet, 1979; Carter, 1984).
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
The adults resemble many other dull-coloured members of the Noctuidae. Identification of adult noctuids is often done on the basis of male genitalia. Some similar species (adults) can be distinguished by:
Mythimna pallens: no tibial spur on foreleg
Discestra trifolii [Hadula trifolii]: no tibial spur on foreleg and smaller size than M. brassicae
Lacanobia w-latinum: no tibial spur on foreleg
Manilkara zapota: glabrous eyes and no tibial spur on foreleg
Apamea spp.: glabrous eyes and no tibial spur on foreleg
It is difficult to distinguish between larvae from different noctuid species, especially in the youngest instars. See Heath and Emmet (1979) or Skinner (1998) for full description of the larvae.
Habitat
Skou (1991) states that the species is found mostly in cultivated/agricultural areas. In an experiment including monoculture and biculture plots with different Brassica oleracea genotypes and set up with different spatial heterogeneity, M. brassicae showed clear preferences for certain genotypes, but did not seem to respond to spatial heterogeneity and patch size (Hambäck et al., 2009; Bukovinszky et al., 2010). However, predation and parasitism rates of M. brassicae larvae are positively correlated with proximity to woody habitats and pasture areas, respectively (Bianchi et al., 2005).
Habitat List
Category | Sub category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | Terrestrial – Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Principal habitat | Natural |
Biology and Ecology
Genetics
Mamestra brassicae has 31 chromosomes, which have been defined by Sahara et al. (2013). Expression sequence tags (EST) and fosmid libraries have also been constructed for this insect (Kamimura et al., 2012). Additional genetic studies have been conducted with M. brassicae, for example, to characterize odorant receptors and fatty acid transporters (Park et al., 2008; Vogt et al., 2009; Köblös et al., 2018).
Reproductive Biology
The adult moths emerge from pupae in the soil. Shortly after emergence the moths mate, and the females deposit their eggs in regular batches of up to 70-80 eggs, mainly on the undersides of leaves. Egg deposition is unimodally distributed with a more or less distinct peak a few days after the onset of the oviposition period (Johansen, 1997a). The mean and maximum number of eggs per female is reported to be about 500-1500 and 2000-3000, respectively (see, for example, Noll, 1961; Poitout and Bues, 1982; Ogaard, 1983; Johansen, 1997a). Mean batch size is in the range of 14-37 eggs (Poitout and Bues, 1982; Hommes, 1983; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989; Johansen, 1996b). Number of eggs per batch is higher for young females than old females (Rygg and Kjos, 1975). Fecundity is affected by several factors, such as genetic constitution, development in the preceding immature stages, host plant, nourishment of the larvae and viral diseases (Noll, 1961).
The effect of temperature on fecundity is described by Johansen (1997a). The number of eggs laid per day increased from 27 at 11°C to 117 at 23°C. The mean egg deposition period was found to be 11-38 days within this temperature range. The egg deposition period becomes prolonged at low temperatures (10-13.5°C) (Noll, 1961; Johansen, 1997a), and is delayed or inhibited at temperatures higher than 30°C (Noll, 1961).
The eggs normally hatch in 6-14 days, and the larvae immediately start to feed on the leaves. Young larvae feed gregariously. In field experiments with white cabbage, Johansen (1997a) found that the larvae started to spread all over the host plant within a few hours after hatching. After 1-2 days they were found on the nearest neighbouring plants and rows, and they continued to disperse radially from the original infested plant throughout the larval stage. In the first three or four instars, the larvae feed mainly on the external leaves. From the fifth instar they display a negative phototaxis (Omino et al., 1973) and move into the heart of the plants. Nearly full-grown larvae are often concealed in the soil during daytime and enter the plants to feed at night. Larval development normally takes 4-7 weeks. Mature larvae leave the plants to pupate in thin cocoons in the soil at a depth of about 3-5 cm (Rygg and Kjos, 1975). Hibernation and aestivation take place in the pupal stage (Goto et al., 2001; Yamada et al. 2017).
Physiology and Phenology
Depending on the climate, M. brassicae has one to three generations per year. In Central Europe and most parts of southern Europe two or three generations occur, whereas in the northern parts of the distribution area M. brassicae is univoltine or partially bivoltine (Ogaard, 1983; Turnock and Carl, 1995). Skou (1991) states that two or three generations occur in Denmark. Degree-day calculations indicate that the species may be partly bivoltine in Denmark and Norway in warm years (Johansen, 1996b; Ogaard, 1983). In the UK, the species is also reported to be univoltine (Heath and Emmet, 1979) or partially bivoltine (Finch and Thompson, 1992). The species is bivoltine in Hokkaido in Japan (Tsutsui et al., 1988), Belgrade (Injac and Krnjajic, 1989), Moldova and other southern regions of the former USSR (Filippov, 1982), Germany (Hommes, 1983; Kahrer, 1984) and France (Poitout and Bues, 1982). The onset of the flight of the first generation in a growing season will vary according to the climatic conditions. In north-western Europe the first adults emerge in May-June (Finch and Thomson, 1992; Johansen, 1996a; Skou, 1991). In regions where M. brassicae is bivoltine, the adult flight of the first generation usually occurs in May-June and the second flight in August-September (see, for example, Poitout and Bues, 1982; Hommes, 1983). The flight period is often extended, and as a result, the generations will overlap in areas where more than one generation occurs. Thus, adults may be encountered throughout the growing season, with one to three more or less distinct peaks (see, for example Poitout and Bues, 1982; Hommes, 1983; Ogaard, 1983; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989). Flight and oviposition seem to be inhibited by heavy rainfall (Johansen, 1996b). Within a population, eggs are deposited over a period of several weeks. As a consequence, the age structure found on infested crops may consist of a mixture of eggs and different larval instars.
Longevity
The longevity of the adults is approximately 23 days (Johansen et al., 2007).
Activity Patterns
The species is nocturnal (Heath and Emmet, 1979; Rojas et al., 2001), so emergence from pupae, flight, mating activity, egg deposition and feeding mostly take place during the dark period.
Population Size and Density
Mamestra brassicae larvae can be found in variable densities; in cole crops densities typically range between 0.1 and 0.7 larvae per plant (Cartea et al., 2009a; Hambäck et al., 2009; Bukovinszky et al., 2010).
Nutrition
According to Finch and Thompson (1992) the size of the adults is largely governed by the nutritional value of the host plant on which the larvae have been living.
Environmental Requirements
The effect of temperature on development has been described by Ogaard (1983), Injac and Krjajic (1989) and Johansen (1997a). Johansen (1997a) and Ogaard (1983) have established lower developmental thresholds and thermal requirements for different developmental stages for a Norwegian and a Danish M. brassicae population, respectively. Mean developmental times were found to be 7.6-29.5 days for eggs, 39.8-98.3 days for larvae (temperature range 10.5-18.5°C), 18.2-96.9 days for pupae, and 3.3-9.4 days for the preoviposition period (temperature range 10.0-23.0°C) (Johansen, 1997a). Egg to adult development takes about 6 weeks at 25°C (Ogaard, 1983), 9 weeks at 20°C and 15 weeks at 15°C (Johansen, 1997a). The supercooling point of diapausing and non-diapausing pupae of M. brassicae has been found to be -20°C, but is reduced in contact with moisture (Tsutsui et al., 1988).
Diapause is facultative and occurs in the pupal stage; it is regulated mainly by temperature and photoperiod (Goto et al., 2001; Yamada et al., 2017). Winter diapause is induced by a function of low temperature and decreasing day length (Goto et al., 2001; Denlinger, 2002). In areas with hot and dry summers, a summer dormancy (aestivation) is induced by high temperature and a long photoperiod (see, for example, Poitout and Bues, 1982; Grüner and Sauer, 1988). The critical day length triggering winter diapause and aestivation is found to be about 14-16 h. The temperature affects the response level and critical day length (see, for example, Furunishi et al., 1982; Ogaard, 1983; Grüner and Sauer, 1988). However, the factors inducing diapause seem to differ according to the climatic zone. For example, in northern Russia, the diapause seems to be more dependent on temperature than day length (Bonnemaison, 1965). The time of adult eclosion from the pupal stage is mainly dependent on temperature (Tanaka et al., 2013).
Johansen (1997a) found that the weight of the pupae decreased with declining temperature during the larval period within the range 10.5-18.0°C. In laboratory experiments, larval mortality increased with decreasing temperature within the range 10.5-18.0°C and eggs and larvae did not survive at 8.5°C (Johansen, 1997a). In the field, mortality has often been found to be very high during the larval stage (Hommes, 1983; Johansen, 1996b; 1997b). Winter mortality was also found to be very high. The generation survival ratio was 0.0016-0.0041 over a 5-year period (Johansen, 1996b; 1997a, b). Life-tables for a Norwegian M. brassicae population on white cabbage have been constructed and analysed (Johansen, 1996b).
Climate
Climate type | Description | Preferred or tolerated | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
Am - Tropical monsoon climate | Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25])) | Tolerated | |
C - Temperate/Mesothermal climate | Average temp. of coldest month > 0°C and < 18°C, mean warmest month > 10°C | Preferred | |
D - Continental/Microthermal climate | Continental/Microthermal climate (Average temp. of coldest month < 0°C, mean warmest month > 10°C) | Tolerated |
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Latitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude lower (m) | Altitude upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
30°N to 70°N |
Air Temperature
Parameter | Lower limit (°C) | Upper limit (°C) |
---|---|---|
Absolute minimum temperature | 8.5 |
Natural enemy of
Notes on Natural Enemies
Mamestra brassicae has a wide range of natural enemies, but their effectiveness in suppressing this insect is variable. However, natural enemies may play an important role in population regulation, and measures that preserve and help the build-up of natural enemies should be integrated into pest management programmes and production practices. For instance, intercropping cabbage with different flowering crops has been found to increase the number of natural enemies (Theunissen et al., 1992). Only a few of the natural enemies of M. brassicae have been used commercially, such as the egg parasitoid Trichogramma. Different species of Trichogramma (e.g. Trichogramma evanescens, Trichogramma chilonis and Trichogramma dendrolimi) have been tested to control M. brassicae; a relatively high summer temperature and dense host population is required to achieve a high parasitization rate by these parasitoids (Finch and Thompson, 1992). The parasitization rates that can be achieved are variable, but rates of parasitism of up to almost 100% have been reported (see, for example, Filippov, 1982; Kahrer, 1984; Finch and Thompson, 1992). Other parasitoids that have been studied for biocontrol of M. brassicae include Eulophus pennicornis (Veire, 1993; Butaye and Degheele, 1995), Meteorus gyrator [Meteorus pendulus] (Smethurst et al., 2004), Microplitis mediator (Belz et al., 2014) and Telenomus laeviceps (Barloggio et al., 2019).
The parasitoids Trichogramma semblidis (Trichogrammatidae), M. mediator and Aleiodes sp. (Braconidae), Voria ruralis, Siphona cristata (Tachinidae), the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Chrysopidae) and the entomopathogenic fungus Erynia virescens (Entomophthorales) have been recorded as natural enemies of M. brassicae in Norway, but none of them has been found to have great impact on the population density of the species (Carl et al., 1986; Turnock and Carl, 1995; Klingen et al., 1996; Johansen, 1996b; 1997b). However, Johansen (1997b) and Hommes (1983) suggested that predators may be a noteworthy mortality factor in Norwegian and German cabbage fields, respectively. According to Ogaard (1983) no effective natural enemies have been found in Denmark.
Forster et al. (1992) and Peters (1992) investigated the parasitoid complex in cabbage crops in Germany. They found that M. mediator was the dominant parasitoid species, while Trichogramma spp., Campoletis annulata, Aleiodes borealis, Rogas sp. (Braconidae) and E. pennicornis (Eulophidae) were found more rarely and in lower numbers. E. pennicornis has also been found parasitizing M. brassicae in sweet pepper crop grown at a commercial glasshouse in Belgium (Veire, 1993). Turnock and Carl (1995) reviewed literature on parasitoids of M. brassicae in Central Europe, and found that the species with the highest constancy and abundance were M. mediator, Exetastes cinctipes [Exetastes atrator] (Ichnumonidae), Siphona flavifrons and Eurithia consobrina (Tachinidae), in that order. E. consobrina was the dominant parasitoid of M. brassicae in the Moscow region, and in this and other parts of the former USSR where M. brassicae is univoltine, this parasitoid has been found to infest 28-88% of the larvae. In the Kiev region where M. brassicae is bivoltine, 64-94% of the larvae are parasitized.
The polyphagous predators Philonthus atratus (Staphylinidae) and Bembidion tetracolum (Carabidae) have been found to feed on M. brassicae eggs, while Pterostichus melanarius and Harpalus rufipes (Carabidae) fed on both eggs and larvae of M. brassicae in non-choice laboratory experiments (Johansen, 1997b).
Mamestra brassicae larvae can be controlled by baculoviruses (Poitout and Bues, 1982; Geissler et al., 1991; Finch and Thompson, 1992) and Bacillus thuringiensis (Filippov, 1982; Ter-Simonjan et al., 1982; Terytze and Terytze, 1987; Collier et al., 1996). The bacterial or viral preparations should be applied when the larvae are small. Commercial products of B. thuringiensis and baculoviruses are available in some countries. Laboratory studies in France have indicated that the entomopathogenic fungi Paecilomyces fumosoroseus [Cordyceps fumosorosea] and Nomuraea rileyi are potentially valuable biological control agents (Maniania and Fargues, 1992). The entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae can also lower damage by M. brassicae larvae (Beck et al., 2014).
Natural enemies
Impact Summary
Category | Impact |
---|---|
Crop production | Negative |
Impact
In central parts of the distribution area M. brassicae is a serious pest, mainly on Brassica crops, beetroots and legumes, but also on other vegetable crops (see, for example, Heath and Emmet, 1979; Filippov, 1982; Poitout and Bues, 1982; Hommes 1983; Øgaard, 1983; Kahrer, 1984; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989; Finch and Thomson, 1992, Van de Steene, 1994). In these areas, the greatest damage is usually caused by the larvae of the second generation which are often more numerous than the first generation (Kahrer, 1984; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989). In the northern areas (Scandinavia and Finland) the occurrence as a serious pest is more sporadic (Skou, 1991; Johansen, 1997b).
In cabbage crops in Germany, M. brassicae is a main pest with regular occurrence. In field experiments, 27-98% of the plants in different cabbage crops were infested (Hommes, 1983). According to Filippov (1982) larval infestation of cabbage in Moldova leads to harvest losses of 8-80%. In a study of white cabbage in Norway, weight losses due to larval damage were 10-13% (Rygg and Kjos, 1975). In Belgium, insecticides are often applied to Brussels sprouts every 2-3 weeks to control M. brassicae larvae (Van de Steene, 1994).
Impact: Economic
Small larvae feed on the underside of the external leaves where they make small perforations. As the larvae grow older, the feeding holes become larger. Severe infestations of small larvae may rapidly skeletonize the leaves, and can sometimes destroy small plants. Older larvae tunnel into the heart of the plants. They leave considerable amounts of faeces, which favour growth of decaying bacteria and fungi. Most crop losses caused by the larvae occur as a result of boring and fouling rather from the amount of plant tissue eaten. Because of this, even slight infestations of older larvae could be damaging in crops such as heading cabbage, which can become unmarketable (Heath and Emmet, 1979; Finch and Thomson, 1992). In soyabean, feeding by M. brassicae larvae may destroy young buds, leading to distorted growth; the larvae also bore into the pods and feed on the seeds (Lihnell, 1940). In ornamentals such as dahlia, chrysanthemum and rose, M. brassicae larvae feed on leaves, buds and petals, and they may bore into the fruits in fruiting crops such as tomato.
In central parts of the distribution area M. brassicae is a serious pest, mainly on Brassica crops, beetroots and legumes, but also on other vegetable crops (see, for example, Heath and Emmet, 1979; Filippov, 1982; Poitout and Bues, 1982; Hommes, 1983; Ogaard, 1983; Kahrer, 1984; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989; Finch and Thomson, 1992; Steene, 1994). In these areas, the greatest damage is usually caused by the larvae of the second generation, which often occur in higher densities than the first generation (Kahrer, 1984; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989). In the northern areas (Scandinavia and Finland) the occurrence as a serious pest is more sporadic (Skou, 1991; Johansen, 1997b).
In field experiments in Germany, 27-98% of the plants in different cabbage crops were infested by M. brassicae and it was the main pest (Hommes, 1983). According to Filippov (1982), larval infestation of cabbage in Moldova leads to harvest losses of 8-80%. In a study of white cabbage in Norway, cabbage weight losses due to M. brassicae larval damage were 10-13% (Rygg and Kjos, 1975).
Impact: Environmental
The impact of this species has been studied mostly in agricultural settings.
Risk and Impact Factors
Invasiveness
Has a broad native range
Is a habitat generalist
Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
Impact outcomes
Host damage
Negatively impacts agriculture
Negatively impacts livelihoods
Negatively impacts animal/plant collections
Damages animal/plant products
Impact mechanisms
Pest and disease transmission
Herbivory/grazing/browsing
Detection and Inspection
Pheromone traps can be used to detect and monitor the populations of the insect (see, for example, Terytze and Adam, 1981; Poitout and Bues, 1982; Hommes, 1983; Veire and Dirinck, 1986; Terytze et al., 1987; Bues et al., 1988; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989; Johansen, 1996a). Pheromone traps have been found to be more effective than light traps in catching the first adults of the first generation (Injac and Krnjajic, 1989). At ports of entry, Korycinska (2012) has described the eggs of M. brassicae using stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy.
Prevention and Control
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Control
Cultural Control and Sanitary Methods
Damage to early cabbage can be reduced by early planting of the seedlings, so the development of marketable heads occurs before the mass emergence of larvae (Filippov, 1982).
Autumn ploughing has been found to increase winter mortality of M. brassicae pupae in Japan (Tsutsui et al., 1988); this is probably the result of factors such as increased predation, mechanical damage and exposure to low temperature. Filippov (1982) found that summer harrowing, ploughing after harvesting, and early autumn ploughing destroyed about 70-90% of the pupae.
Nets and fleeces prevent damage from M. brassicae provided there are no pupae in the soil when the crop covers are applied (Steene et al., 1992).
Intercropping has been found to decrease populations of M. brassicae in cabbage and Brussels sprouts (Theunissen and Ouden, 1980; Theunissen et al., 1992; 1995; Wiech, 1996; Finch and Kienegger, 1997; Brandsæter et al., 1998).
Host Plant Resistance
An Australian cauliflower line has been found to be resistant to infestation of M. brassicae in the Netherlands (Finch and Thompson, 1992). Different varieties of white and red cabbage and Savoy cabbage differ in susceptibility to M. brassicae; red cabbage has been found to be less infested with larvae than white cabbage and Savoy cabbage (Hommes, 1983). A red-foliaged variety of Brussels sprouts has also been found to show some resistance against M. brassicae (Dunn and Kempton, 1976). Some varieties of cabbage and kale have been identified as showing some resistance to M. brassicae (Cartea et al., 2009b; 2010). High glucosinolate content is a resistance factor that slows down the feeding and development of M. brassicae larvae (Badenes-Pérez and Cartea, 2021).
Biological Control
Mamestra brassicae has a wide range of natural enemies, but their effectiveness in suppressing this insect is variable. However, natural enemies may play an important role in population regulation, and measures that preserve and help the build-up of natural enemies should be integrated into pest management programmes and production practices. For instance, intercropping cabbage with different flowering crops has been found to increase the number of natural enemies (Theunissen et al., 1992). Only a few of the natural enemies of M. brassicae have been used commercially, such as the egg parasitoid Trichogramma. Different species of Trichogramma (e.g. Trichogramma evanescens, Trichogramma chilonis and Trichogramma dendrolimi) have been tested to control M. brassicae; a relatively high summer temperature and dense host population is required to achieve a high parasitization rate by these parasitoids (Finch and Thompson, 1992). The parasitization rates that can be achieved are variable, but rates of parasitism of up to almost 100% have been reported (see, for example, Filippov, 1982; Kahrer, 1984; Finch and Thompson, 1992). Other parasitoids that have been studied for biocontrol of M. brassicae include Eulophus pennicornis (Veire, 1993; Butaye and Degheele, 1995), Meteorus gyrator [Meteorus pendulus] (Smethurst et al., 2004), Microplitis mediator (Belz et al., 2014) and Telenomus laeviceps (Barloggio et al., 2019).
Mamestra brassicae larvae can be controlled by baculoviruses (Poitout and Bues, 1982; Geissler et al., 1991; Finch and Thompson, 1992) and Bacillus thuringiensis (Filippov, 1982; Ter-Simonjan et al., 1982; Terytze and Terytze, 1987; Collier et al., 1996). The bacterial or viral preparations should be applied when the larvae are small. Commercial products of B. thuringiensis and baculoviruses are available in some countries. Laboratory studies in France have indicated that the entomopathogenic fungi Paecilomyces fumosoroseus [Cordyceps fumosorosea] and Nomuraea rileyi are potentially valuable biological control agents (Maniania and Fargues, 1992). The entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae can also lower damage by M. brassicae larvae (Beck et al., 2012).
Chemical Control
In areas where two generations of M. brassicae occur during the growing season, several treatments with insecticides are often needed to control M. brassicae larvae (see, for example, Steene, 1994). In northern countries, where M. brassicae is univoltine, a single properly timed insecticide treatment may be sufficient (Finch and Thompson, 1992; Johansen, 1996a). In Belgium, insecticides are often applied to Brussels sprouts every 2-3 weeks to control M. brassicae larvae (Steene, 1994).
To be effective, insecticides must be applied when the larvae are small (less than 12-20 mm, first- to fourth-instar larvae) (Rygg and Kjos, 1975; Kahrer, 1984; Finch and Thompson, 1992). Older larvae bore into the heart of the plants and are protected from the treatment. Older larvae may also be more resistant to insecticides than younger larvae (Rygg and Kjos, 1975; Kahrer, 1984; Steene, 1994). Insecticides should be applied about 10 days after peak egg deposition (Kahrer, 1984). Thus, it is necessary to monitor the occurrence of M. brassicae (see Field Monitoring section below).
Insecticides currently in use are within the groups of organophosphates, pyrethroids, carbamates, organochlorines and insect growth regulators. Formulations of natural plant extracts have been tested and great attention has been paid to seed extracts from the neem tree (Azadirachta indica), which have shown promising results for the control of M. brassicae larvae (Schmutterer, 1985; Karelina et al., 1992; Mordue et al., 1993; Meadow and Seljåsen, 1996; Seljåsen and Meadow, 2006). Narrow-spectrum insecticides should be chosen when possible to preserve and encourage the build-up of natural enemies.
Monitoring and Surveillance (incl. remote sensing)
Timing of chemical and biological control tactics is essential to achieve a good control of M. brassicae, because insecticides and biological agents must be applied at the vulnerable stage. Temperature-dependent development and the lack of synchrony of the different life stages make precise timing difficult.
Pheromone traps can be used to detect and monitor the populations of the insect (see, for example, Terytze and Adam, 1981; Poitout and Bues, 1982; Hommes, 1983; Veire and Dirinck, 1986; Terytze et al., 1987; Bues et al., 1988; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989; Johansen, 1996a). Light traps can be used to monitor the flight of M. brassicae (Hommes, 1983; Injac and Krnjajic, 1989). The adults are also attracted to sugar (Skou, 1991). Sex pheromone traps have been found to be more effective than light traps in catching the first adults of the first generation (Injac and Krnjajic, 1989). Sex pheromone dispensers and traps are commercially available.
A degree-day model for the prediction of field occurrence of adults, eggs and small larvae, and favourable spraying time has been developed (Johansen, 1996a). The prediction model is implemented as a voice board response system for prognosis and advice for growers in Norway.
Hommes (1983) developed preliminary action thresholds for the different developmental stages of M. brassicae. Damage thresholds for injurious lepidopterous larvae on cabbage have been used in several European countries (Hommes et al., 1988).
Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
Information on the maximum temperatures in which the insect can survive and develop was not available.
References
APPPC, 1987. Insect pests of economic significance affecting major crops of the countries in Asia and the Pacific region.Technical Document No. 135.Bangkok, Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific region (RAPA).
Badenes-Pérez, F.R., Cartea, M.E., 2021. Glucosinolate induction and resistance to the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae, differs among kale genotypes with high and low content of sinigrin and glucobrassicin.Plants, 10(9) 1951.
Barloggio, G., Tamm, L., Nagel, P., Luka, H., 2019. Selective flowers to attract and enhance Telenomus laeviceps (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae): a released biocontrol agent of Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Bulletin of Entomological Research, 109(2) 160-168.
Beck, B., Brusselman, E., Nuyttens, D., Moens, M., Temmerman, F., Pollet, S., Weyenberg, S. van, Spanoghe, P., 2014. Improving the biocontrol potential of entomopathogenic nematodes against Mamestra brassicae: effect of spray application technique, adjuvants and an attractant.Pest Management Science, 70(1) 103-112.
Belz, E., Géneau, C.E., Fürst, M., Balmer, O., Andermatt, P., Pfiffner, L., Westerd, L., Luka, H., 2014. Rearing of Microplitis mediator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).European Journal of Entomology, 111(3) 443-447.
Bhat, D.M., Bhagat, R.C., Qureshi, A.A., 2016. First report of cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) attacking kale and knol khol vegetables from Kashmir, India.Annals of Entomology, 34(1/2) 69-73. http://www.connectjournals.com/useradmin/paid_online_journals_subcat.php?bookmark=CJ-005125
Bianchi, F.J.J.A., Wingerden, W.K.R.E. van, Griffioen, A.J., Veen, M. van der, Straten M.J.J. van der, Wegman, R.M.A., Meeuwsen, H.A.M., 2005. Landscape factors affecting the control of Mamestra brassicae by natural enemies in Brussels sprout.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 107(2/3) 145-150.
Bonnemaison, L., 1965. Insect pests of crucifers and their control.Annual Review of Entomology, 10233-356.
Brandsæter, L.O., Netland, J., Meadow, R., 1998. Yields, weeds, pests and soil nitrogen in a white cabbage-living mulch system.Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 16(3) 291-309.
Bues, R., Poitout, H.S., Toubon, J.F., 1988. Utilization in the framework of reasoned control, sex pheromones of four species of Noctuidae (Mamestra brassicae L., Scotia segetum Schiff., Scotia ipsilon Hfn., Heliothis armigera Hbn). (Utilisation dans le cadre d'une lutte raisonnée des phéromones sexuelles de quatre espèces de Lépidoptères Noctuidae (Mamestra brassicae L., Scotia segetum Schiff., Scotia ipsilon Hfn., Heliothis armigera Hbn).) In: Colloques de l'INRA, (46) 139-156.
Bukovinszky, T., Gols, R., Kampa, A., Oliveira-Domingues, F. de, Hambäck, P.A., Jongema, Y., Bezemer, T.M., Dicke, M., Dam, N.M. van, Harvey, J.A., 2010. Combined effects of patch size and plant nutritional quality on local densities of insect herbivores.Basic and Applied Ecology, 11(5) 396-405.
Butaye, L., Degheele, D., 1995. Benzoylphenyl ureas effect on growth and development of Eulophus pennicornis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a larval ectoparasite of the cabbage moth (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Journal of Economic Entomology, 88(3) 600-605.
Campbell, C.A.M., 2019. New and resurgent insect pests on low trellis hops.Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 21(2) 209-218.
Carl, K., Affolter, F., Tschorsnig, P., 1986. Canola insects. Natural enemies of Mamestra configurata'. Ernestia consobrina Meig., Tachinidae and Microplitis mediator (Hal.), Braconidae. Annual Report.Delemont, Switzerland: CAB lnternational lnstitute of Biological Control, European Station. 1-7.
Cartea, M.E., Francisco, M., Lema, M., Soengas, P., Velasco, P., 2010. Resistance of cabbage (Brassica oleracea capitata group) crops to Mamestra brassicae.Journal of Economic Entomology, 103(5) 1866-1874.
Cartea, M.E., Padilla, G., Vilar, M., Velasco, P., 2009. Incidence of the major Brassica pests in northwestern Spain.Journal of Economic Entomology, 102(2) 767-773.
Cartea, M.E., Soengas, P., Ordás, A., Velasco, P., 2009. Resistance of kale varieties to attack by Mamestra brassicae.Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 11(2) 153-160.
Carter, D.J., 1984. Pest Lepidoptera of Europe with special reference to the British Isles.Dordrecht, Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk.
Christensen, S., Enge, S., Jensen, K.R., Müller, C., Kiær, L.P., Agerbirk, N., Heimes, C., Hauser, T.P., 2019. Different herbivore responses to two co-occurring chemotypes of the wild crucifer Barbarea vulgaris.Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 13(1) 19-30.
Collier, R.H., Blood Smyth, J., Jarret, P., 1996. Managing caterpillar pests of Brassica crops.IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 1981-88.
Cuc, G., Pop, O., Pop, D., Oltean, I., Oros, S., 2007. Research concerning the integrated control of diseases pests and weeds in cabbage crop.Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Agriculture, 63/64271-276.
Denlinger, D.L., 2002. Regulation of diapause.Annual Review of Entomology, 4793-122.
Dunn, J.A., Kempton, D.P.H., 1976. Varietal differences in the susceptibility of Brussels sprouts to Lepidopterous pests.Annals of Applied Biology, 82(1) 11-19.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database.Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
EPPO, 2022. In: EPPO global database. Paris, France: EPPO. https://gd.eppo.int/
Filippov, N., 1982. Integrated control of pests of vegetable crops grown in the open in Moldavia.Acta Entomologica Fennica, 406-9.
Finch, S., Kienegger, M., 1997. A behavioural study to help clarify how undersowing with clover affects host-plant selection by pest insects of brassica crops.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 84(2) 165-172.
Finch, S., Thompson, A.R., 1992. Pests of cruciferous crops.Vegetable crop pests, [ed. by McKinlay, R.G.]. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan. 87-138.
Forster, R., Hildenhagen, R., Hommes, M., Schorn-Kasten, K., 1992. Integrierter Pflanzenschutz im Gemüsebau. Praktizierung von Bekämpfungsschwellen für Kohlschädlinge.Schriftenreihe des Bundesministers für Ernärung, Landwirtenschaft und Forsten, Reihe A: Angewante Wissenschaft, Heft 411Schriftenreihe des Bundesministers für Ernärung, Landwirtenschaft und Forsten.
Forster, R., Hommes, M., 1992. Supervised control of lepidopterous pests in white cabbage. In: Bulletin OILB/SROP, 15(4) 127-137.
Freuler, J., 1992. Guidelines and scouting methods in integrated production of field vegetable crops; the situation in Switzerland. In: Bulletin OILB/SROP, 15(4) 122-126.
Furunishi, S., Masaki, S., Hashimoto, Y., Suzuki, M., 1982. Diapause responses to photoperiod and night interruption in Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Applied Entomology and Zoology, 17(3) 398-409.
Geissler, K., Schliephake, E., Rutskaja, V., 1991. Investigations on the insecticidal efficiency of the nuclear polyhedrosis virus of the cabbage moth (Mamestra brassicae L.). (Untersuchungen zur insektiziden Wirksamkeit des Kernpolyeder- Virus der Kohleule (Mamestra brassicae L.).) Archiv für Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz, 27(2) 157-161.
Goto, M., Li, Y.P., Kayaba, S., Outani, S., Suzuki, K., 2001. Cold hardiness in summer and winter diapause and post-diapause pupae of the cabbage armyworm, Mamestra brassicae L. under temperature acclimation.Journal of Insect Physiology, 47(7) 709-714.
Grüner, C., Sauer, K.P., 1988. Aestival dormancy in the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). 1. Adaptive significance of variability of two traits: day length thresholds triggering aestival dormancy and duration of aestival dormancy.Oecologia, 74(4) 515-523.
Güçlü, Ș., Hayat, R., Gültekin, L., Tozlu, G., 2006. Some biological observations on Mamestra brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), an important cabbage pest in Erzurum, Turkey.Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, 37(1) 17-20.
Guo, J.L., Li, X.K., Shen, X.J., Wang, M.L., Wu, K.M., 2020. Flight performance of Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under different biotic and abiotic conditions.Journal of Insect Science, 20(1)
Hambäck, P.A., Björkman, M., Rämert, B., Hopkins, R.J., 2009. Scale-dependent responses in cabbage herbivores affect attack rates in spatially heterogeneous systems.Basic and Applied Ecology, 10(3) 228-236.
Harvey, J.A., Hengeveld, E., Malcicka, M., 2016. The cabbage moth or the sorrel moth (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)?European Journal of Entomology, 113320-324. http://www.eje.cz/artkey/eje-201601-0041_The_cabbage_moth_or_the_sorrel_moth_Lepidoptera_Noctuidae.php
Heath, J., Emmet, A.M., 1979. The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. Volume 9. Sphingidae- Noctuidae Noctuinae and Hadeninae., Volume 9London, UK: Curwen Books. 288 pp.
Heath, J., Emmet, A.M., 1983. The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland., Vol. 9Colchester, UK: Harley Books.
Hommes, M., 1983. Studies on the population dynamics and integrated control of cabbage pests. (Untersuchungen zur Populationsdynamik und integrierten Bekämpfung von Kohlschädlingen.) In: Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, (213) 210 pp.
Hommes, M., Dunne, R., Ellis, P.R., Fischer, S., Freuler, J., Kahrer, A., Terretaz, C., 1988. Testing damage thresholds for caterpillars and aphids on cabbage in five European countries- report on a collaborative project done in 1985 and 1986. In: Bulletin SROP, 9(1) 118-126.
Injac, M., Krnjajić, S., 1989. Phenology of the cabbage moth (Mamestra brassicae L.) in the Belgrade region. (Phénologie de la noctuelle du chou (Mamestra brassicae L.) dans la région de Belgrade.) Zaštita Bilja, 40(4) 423-431.
Johansen, N.S., 1996. Biology, life-tables and prognosis model of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Norway: Agricultural University of Norway, Ås. 110 pp.
Johansen, N.S., 1996. Prediction of field occurrence of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): pheromone traps and degree-day model.Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(4) 541-554.
Johansen, N.S., 1997. Influence of temperature on development, fecundity and survival of the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae (L.) (Lep., Noctuidae) in relation to the improvement of forecasting and control methods.Journal of Applied Entomology, 121(2) 81-88.
Johansen, N.S., 1997. Mortality of eggs, larvae and pupae and larval dispersal of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae, in white cabbage in south-eastern Norway.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 83(3) 347-360.
Johansen, N.S., Moen, L.H., Egaas, E., 2007. Sterol demethylation inhibitor fungicides as disruptors of insect development and inducers of glutathione S-transferase activities in Mamestra brassicae.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. C, Toxicology and Pharmacology, 145(3) 473-483.
Kahrer, A., 1984. The cabbage moth (Mamestra brassicae L.). (Die Kohleule (Mamestra brassicae L.).) Pflanzenarzt, 37(8) 132-133.
Kamimura, M., Tateishi, K., Tanaka-Okuyama, M., Okabe, T., Shibata, F., Sahara, K., Yasukochi, Y., 2012. EST sequencing and fosmid library construction in a non-model moth, Mamestra brassicae, for comparative mapping.Genome, 55(11) 775-781.
Karelina, T.N., Filippov, N.A., Kleeberg, H., Kovalev, B.G., Puhalskya, N.A., 1992. Evaluation of the biological activity of NeemAzal and NeemAzal-S against Mamestra brassicae, Pieris rapae and Heliothis armigera.Insecticides: mechanism of action and resistance, [ed. by Otto, D., Weber, B.]. Bristol, UK: Intercept Ltd.95-106.
Klingen, I., Johansen, N.S., Hofsvang, T., 1996. The predation of Chrysoperla carnea (Neurop., Chrysopidae) on eggs and larvae of Mamestra brassicae (Lep., Noctuidae).Journal of Applied Entomology, 120(6) 363-367.
Köblös, G., François, M.C., Monsempes, C., Montagné, N., Fónagy, A., Jacquin-Joly, E., 2018. Molecular characterization of MbraOR16, a candidate sex pheromone receptor in Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Journal of Insect Science, 18(5) 5. https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/18/5/5/5106220
Korycinska, A., 2012. A description of the eggs of seven species of Noctuidae (Lepidoptera) commonly transported by plant trade to the UK, and their separation using stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy.Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 155(1) 15-28. http://www.nev.nl/tve
Lemic, D., Drmić, Z., Bažok, R., 2016. Population dynamics of noctuid moths and damage forecasting in sugar beet.Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 18(2) 128-136.
Leur, H. van, Vet, L.E.M., Putten, W.H. van der, Dam, N.M. van, 2008. Barbarea vulgaris glucosinolate phenotypes differentially affect performance and preference of two different species of lepidopteran herbivores.Journal of Chemical Ecology, 34(2) 121-131.
Lihnell, D., 1940. Diseases and insect infestations in soybeans. (Sjukdomar og Insektsangrepp i srets soyaodlingar.) VSxtskyddnotiser, 490-92.
Maniania, N.K., Fargues, J., 1992. Susceptibility of Mamestra brassicae (L.) and Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) larvae (Lep., Noctuidae) to the hyphomycetes Paecilomyces fumosoroseus (Brown and Smith) and Nomuraea rileyi (Samson) at two temperatures.Journal of Applied Entomology, 113(5) 518-524.
Meadow, R., Seljåsen, R., 1996. Dose-response tests with Neem Azal-T against the cabbage moth, 1995.Arthropod Management Tests, 22411.
Metspalu, L., Jõgar, K., Ploomi, A., Hiiesaar, K., Kivimägi, I., Luik, A., 2010. Effects of biopesticide Neem EC on the Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).Agronomy Research, 8Special II465-470. http://www.eau.ee/%cb%9cagronomy/vol08Spec2/p08s226.pdf
Mordue, A.J., McKinlay, R.D., Davidson, G., Hughes, J., 1993. Azadirachtin and NeemAzal-F in the control of lepidopteran pests of brassicas in Scotland.Practice oriented results on use and production of neem-ingredients and pheromones. Proceedings of the 2nd workshop, Wetzlar, Germany, [ed. by Kleeberg, H.]. 87-88.
Noll, J., 1961. Ober den Einfluss der Umweltfaktoren auf die Eiablage der Kohleule (Barathra brassicae L.).VorlSufige Mitteilung. Mitteilungen aus der Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Berlin-Dahlem, 104143-145.
Ogaard, L., 1983. The cabbage moth (Mamestra brassicae (L.), Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Development in Denmark illustrated by a simple simulation. (Kaluglen (Mamestra brassicae (L.), Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Udviklingsmuligheder i Danmark belyst ved simpel simulation.) Entomologiske Meddelelser, 50(1) 36-46.
Omino, T., Yokoi, S., Tsuji, H., 1973. Experimental studies on the daytime behaviour of Noctuid larvae, the cabbage armyworm, Mamestra brassicae, the tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura and the black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon.Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 17(4) 215-220.
Park H.Y., Kim, M.S., Paek, A., Jeong, S.E., Knipple, D.C., 2008. An abundant acyl-CoA (Δ9) desaturase transcript in pheromone glands of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae, encodes a catalytically inactive protein.Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 38(5) 581-595.
Peters, G., 1992. Auftreten und Artenspectrum einheimischer Parasitoide wichtiger Schadlepidopteren im Kohlanbaugebiet der Köln-Bonner Bucht sowie Möglichkeiten zur Förderung von Apanteles rubecula Marsh. (Hym., Braconidae) als Larvenparasitoid von Pieris rapae (L.) (Lep., Pieridae). Dr. Agric thesis.Bonn, Germany: Institut für Pflanzenkrankheiten der Rheinischen Friederich-Wilhelms-UniversitSt zu Bonn.
Planteforsk, ITAS, 1997. Guidelines for the use of TELEVIS. Advice on crop growing. (Brukerhsndbok TELEVIS. Rsd om plantedyrking). Norway: The Norwegian Crop Research Institute, Plant Protection Centre and the Instrument Service AS.
Poitout, S., Bues, R., 1982. The principal injurious noctuids. (Les principales noctuelles nuisibles.) Phytoma, (337) 39-43.
Popova, T., 1993. A study of antibiotic effects on cabbage cultivars on the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Entomological Review, 72125-132.
Robinson, G.S., Ackery, P.R., Kitching, I.J., Beccaloni, G.W., Hernández, L.M., 2010. HOSTS- a database of the world's Lepidopteran hostplants.London: Natural History Museum. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosts
Rojas, J.C., Wyatt, T.D., Birch, M.C., 2001. Oviposition by Mamestra brassicae (L.) (Lep., Noctuidae) in relation to age, time of day and host plant.Journal of Applied Entomology, 125(3) 161-163.
Rygg, T., Kjos, Ø., 1975. Biology and control of the cabbage moth (Mamestra brassicae (L.). (Kålfly, (Mamestra brassicae (L.)). Noen unders¢kelser over dets biologi og bekjempelse.) Gartneryrket, 65286-290.
Sahara, K., Yoshido, A., Shibata, F., Fujikawa-Kojima, N., Okabe, T., Tanaka-Okuyama, M., Yasukochi, Y., 2013. FISH identification of Helicoverpa armigera and Mamestra brassicae chromosomes by BAC and fosmid probes.Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 43(8) 644-653.
Schmutterer, H., 1985. Which insect pests can be controlled by application of neem seed kernel extracts under field conditions?Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 100(5) 468-475.
Seitz, A., 1913. The Macrolepidoptera of the world., XV. Volume.Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag des Seitzschen Werkes (Alfred Kernen). 386 pp.
Seljåsen, R., Meadow, R., 2006. Effects of neem on oviposition and egg and larval development of Mamestra brassicae L.: dose response, residual activity, repellent effect and systemic activity in cabbage plants.Crop Protection, 25(4) 338-345.
Skinner, B., 1998. Colour identification guide to the moths of the British Isles (Macrolepidoptera)., 2nd ednLondon, UK: Viking.
Skou, P., 1991. Nordens Ugler. Hsndbog over de i Danmark, Norge, Sverige, Finland og Island forekommende arter av Herminiidae og Noctuidae (Lepidoptera). [The Hermidiidae and Noctuidae of Denmark and Fennoscandinavia.]. Stenstrup, Denmark: Apollo Books.
Smethurst, F., Bell, H.A., Matthews, H.J., Edwards, J.P., 2004. The comparative biology of the solitary endoparasitoid Meteorus gyrator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on five noctuid pest species.European Journal of Entomology, 101(1) 75-81.
Steene, F. van de, 1994. Laboratory studies of the effectiveness of insecticides against caterpillars of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae (L.).Bulletin OILB SROP, 17194-201.
Steene, F. van de, Benoit, F., Ceustermans, N., 1992. The use of covers to reduce cabbage root fly and caterpillar damage in white cabbage crops. In: Bulletin OILB/SROP, 15(4) 155-167.
Tanaka, K., Kimura, Y., Watari, Y., 2013. The cabbage moth modulates the adult eclosion time in response to the amplitude of temperature cycle.Biological Rhythm Research, 44(1) 163-167.
Ter-Simonjan, L.G., Bushtshik, T.N., Voskresenskaja, V.N., 1982. Biological control of pests in vegetable plantings.Acta Entomologica Fennica, 4033-35.
Terytze, K., Adam, H., 1981. The use of pheromone traps for the biological control of the cabbage moth (Barathra brassicae L.) by means of egg parasites of the genus Trichogramma (Trichogramma evanescens Westw.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae; Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae). (Zur Verwendung von Pheromonfallen fur die biologische Bekampfung der Kohleule (Barathra brassicae L.) mittels Eiparasiten der Gattung Trichogramma (Trichogramma evanescens Westw.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae; Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae).) Archiv fur Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz, 17(6) 387-396.
Terytze, K., Adam, H., Kovaljev, B., 1987. The use of pheromone traps for monitoring harmful Lepidoptera species on cabbage. (Einsatz von Pheromonfallen zur Überwachung von schádlichen Lepidopteren-Arten im Kohlgemüseanbau.) Archiv für Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz, 23(6) 465-473.
Terytze, K., Terytze, H., 1987. The use of bacterial preparations (Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner) for the control of harmful Lepidoptera species on cabbage (Eubacterales: Bacillaceae). (Einsatz von Bakterienpräparaten (Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner) zur Bekämpfung von schädlichen Lepidopteren-Arten im Kohlgemüseanbau (Eubacterales: Bacillaceae).) Archiv für Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz, 23(5) 377-387.
Theunissen, J., Booij, C.J.H., Schelling, G., Noorlander, J., 1992. Intercropping white cabbage with clover. In: Bulletin OILB/SROP, 15(4) 104-114.
Theunissen, J., Booji, C.J.H., Lotz, L.A.P., 1995. Effects of intercropping white cabbage with clovers on pest infestation and yield.Entomologica Experimentalis et Applicata, 74(1) 7-16.
Theunissen, J., Ouden, H. den, 1980. Effects of intercropping with Spergula arvensis on pests of brussels sprouts.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 27(3) 260-268.
Tsutsui, H., Hirai, Y., Honma, K., Tanno, K., Shimada, K., Sakagami, S.F., 1988. Aspects of overwintering in the cabbage armyworm, Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) I. Supercooling points and contents of glycogen and trehalose in pupae.Applied Entomology and Zoology, 23(1) 52-57.
Turnock, W.J., Carl, K.P., 1995. Evaluation of the Palaearctic Eurithia consobrina (Diptera: Tachinidae) as a potential biocontrol agent for Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Canada.Biocontrol Science and Technology, 5(1) 55-67.
Veire, M. van de, 1993. First observations in glasshouse sweet peppers in Belgium and laboratory rearing of the parasitic wasp Eulophus pennicornis (Hym.: Eulophidae).Entomophaga, 38(1) 61-62.
Veire, M. van de, Dirinck, P., 1986. Sex pheromone components of the cabbage armyworm, Mamestra brassicae: isolation, identification and field experiments.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 41(2) 153-155.
Vogt, R.G., Miller, N.E., Litvack, R., Fandino, R.A., Sparks, J., Staples, J., Friedman, R., Dickens, J.C., 2009. The insect SNMP gene family.Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 39(7) 448-456.
Wiech, K., 1996. Intercropping as possible method of cabbage pest control in Poland. In: Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Pests and Diseases- 1996: Volume 2: Proceedings of an International Conference, Brighton, UK, 18-21 November 1996. Farnham, UK: British Crop Protection Council. 675-678.
Wu, X., Fu, X., Guo, J., Zhao, X., Wu, K., 2015. Annual migration of cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), over the sea in Northern China.PLoS ONE, 10(7) e0132904. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132904
Yamada, N., Kataoka, H., Mizoguchi, A., 2017. Myosuppressin is involved in the regulation of pupal diapause in the cabbage army moth Mamestra brassicae.Scientific Reports, 7(1) 41651.
Zhang, B.C., 1994. Index of economically important Lepidoptera.Wallingford, UK: CAB International. 599 pp.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 4 August 2022
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
Citing Literature
- Xiaoqin Yang, Xiaowei Peng, Chengfeng Lei, Yuanqin Min, Jia Hu, Xiulian Sun, Virus-host coevolutionary analyses of an Alphabaculovirus with a wide host range, Journal of General Virology, 10.1099/jgv.0.001959, 105, 2, (2024).
View Options
View options
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.