Ameiurus nebulosus (brown bullhead)
Datasheet Types: Natural enemy, Invasive species, Host animal
Abstract
This datasheet on Ameiurus nebulosus covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Further Information.
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Ameiurus nebulosus (Lesueur, 1819)
- Preferred Common Name
- brown bullhead
- Other Scientific Names
- Ictalurus nebulosus (Lesueur, 1819)
- International Common Names
- Frenchbarbotte brune
- Local Common Names
- bullhead, mudcat, hornpout, catfish, common bullhead, horned pout
- Francepoisson chat
Pictures
Summary of Invasiveness
A. nebulosus is a fish of the Ictaluridae family, commonly known as a brown bullhead. It has been introduced outside of its native range in North America to other areas of North America, Europe, Asia and Pacific islands (i.e. New Zealand, Hawaii). It was likely spread primarily for recreational angling opportunities. Its spread has been undoubtedly facilitated by its ability to survive low oxygen concentrations for prolonged periods (Scott and Crossman, 1973). Its establishment, once introduced, was likely assisted by its generalist, omnivore diet with feeding aided, even in turbid waters, by its chin barbels (Scott and Crossman, 1973). This diet results in predation on a wide variety of native invertebrates, small vertebrates and fish eggs. Conversely, its stout shape and strong dorsal and pectoral fin spines would minimize predation by native predators. Its parental care of eggs and young would also reduce mortality in the young (Scott and Crossman, 1973). The species is recognized within the Global Invasive Species Database (ISSG, 2009).
Taxonomic Tree
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Within its native range, two subspecies have been identified, Ameiurus nebulous nebulosus, north of a line between Viriginia and North Dakota, and Ameiurus nebulosus marmoratus to the south (Hubbs and Lagler, 1957). Although initially of the Ictalurus genus, Robins et al. (1980) concluded that Ameiurus was valid and was subsequently recommended by Bailey and Robins (1988).
Description
A. nebulosus was described thoroughly by Scott and Crossman (1973) using specimens sampled from Ontario and New Brunswick, Canada: “The species is a moderate-sized catfish with adult total lengths between 203-356 mm. Its greatest body depth occurs at the origin of the dorsal fin, typically 17.7-26.3% of total length. The caudal peduncle (tail fin) is moderately deep (depth 8.1-9.9% of total body length) with a straight or slightly rounded posterior edge. The head is massive and somewhat lengthy, usually 22.6-26.3% of total body length, and quite wide throughout. Its eyes are small, with diameter 10.0-18.7% of head length, round, and protruding. Lips are fleshy, but not prominent, with one pair of long flattened maxillary barbels, which are the longest of four pairs of barbels. Its gill rakers are moderately long and pointed. Fins are as follows: 1 dorsal, ahead of midpoint of body, which is soft-rayed but with a strong leading spine. Pectoral fins are high, broad, rounded, with anterior heavy spine with numerous barbs. Spines in dorsal and pectoral fins can be locked in erect position, presumably as a predation deterrence strategy. The adipose fin is small; pelvic fins inconspicuous; and, anal fin long and slender. The skin lacks scales throughout but is complete with taste glands. Its lateral line is complete throughout the midpoint of the body. The dorsal surface of the head and body may be yellow-brown, olive or grey. Sides are often mottled with vague brown blotches. The underside anterior of pelvic fins may be pale yellow or white. All barbels are dark brown or black, except chin barbels, which may be pale.
During development, eggs are pale in colour and about 3 mm in diameter. Young hatch at 6 mm total length, are yellow in colour initially, but will darken soon after hatching. Once swimming and feeding actively, the young resemble tadpoles with very dark colouration and similar body shape. Growth is rapid, with sexual maturity attained by age 3 (203-330 mm total length) in females. Maximum age in Canada is reported as 6-8 years.”
Pathogens Carried
Distribution Map
Distribution Table
History of Introduction and Spread
A. nebulosus was first introduced in the Pacific islands (1877) with the release of 100-200 individuals for angling in Auckland, New Zealand. These introductions resulted in local viable populations by 1885 (Holcík, 1991). Additional introductions for angling and sport occurred in Hawaii in 1893 (Welcomme, 1988). European introductions occurred concurrently, with individuals from North America introduced to Germany for angling, sport and aquaculture in 1885 (Scott and Crossman, 1973), leading to subsequent intentional and unintentional secondary spread to Poland (1885) (FAO, 1997), the United Kingdom (Bartley, 2006), Hungary (1902) (FAO, 1997), Finland (1922) (FAO, 1997), Belarus (1935) (Reshetnikov et al., 1997) and Bulgaria (1975) (Uzunova and Zlatanova, 2007). Recent introductions (1984) of A. nebulosus from North America to Hubei province and Beijing, China have occurred solely for aquaculture.
Within the United States, A. nebulosus was introduced west of its native Mississippi drainage for angling, sport and aquaculture purposes throughout the 1900s. Introductions within Canada have been concentrated within British Columbia, within the lower Fraser River and lakes within Vancouver Island (Crossman, 1991). The source population, date and reasons for introduction are uncertain for British Columbia populations.
Introductions
Introduced to | Introduced from | Year | Reasons | Introduced by | Established in wild through | References | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural reproduction | Continuous restocking | |||||||
Belarus | Germany | 1935 | Yes | No | ||||
British Columbia | USA | No | No | Suspected USA source, but some uncertainty | ||||
Bulgaria | Europe | 1975 | Yes | No | ||||
Chile | USA | 1908 | Yes | No | ||||
China | USA | 1984 | No | No | ||||
Finland | Germany | 1922 | Yes | No | FAO (Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1997) | |||
Germany | North America | 1885 | Yes | No | ||||
Hawaii | California | 1893 | No | No | ||||
Hungary | Germany | 1902 | Yes | No | FAO (Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1997) | |||
Italy | North America | 1906 | Yes | No | ||||
Mississippi | 1900s | No | No | |||||
New Zealand | USA | 1877 | Yes | No | ||||
Poland | Germany | 1885 | Yes | No | FAO (Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1997) | |||
Puerto Rico | USA | 1915 | Yes | No | ||||
UK | Italy | Yes | No |
Risk of Introduction
Although A. nebulosus is not considered a quarantined pest, several countries (Switzerland (Wittenberg, 2005); Poland (FAO, 1997); Chile (Welcomme, 1988)) report adverse effects on native fish communities following its establishment. The risk of accidental introduction from aquaculture facilities (see Distribution Table for list of facilities) will be dependant upon the type of facility (e.g., enclosed versus wild pens) and proximity to natural waterbodies. Facilities that are physically connected to natural waterbodies likely pose the greatest risk of introduction. Of these facilities, the effectiveness of physical barriers (e.g., netting, electricity) will determine the likelihood of introduction due to potential escapement.
The risk of introduction of A. nebulosus for angling and sport purposes is dependant upon the goals and regulations of fishery management programs (e.g., the encouragement of non-native fish stocking for sport, or biological control) and the prevalence of unauthorized introductions within areas of potential introduction. Although angling for A. nebulosus within Canada is relatively unpopular (Scott and Crossman, 1973), the initial introduction to Europe and the Pacific islands for angling suggests almost global popularity as a sportfish; therefore, unauthorized introductions for angling purposes may occur.
The risk of introduction of A. nebulosus for angling and sport purposes is dependant upon the goals and regulations of fishery management programs (e.g., the encouragement of non-native fish stocking for sport, or biological control) and the prevalence of unauthorized introductions within areas of potential introduction. Although angling for A. nebulosus within Canada is relatively unpopular (Scott and Crossman, 1973), the initial introduction to Europe and the Pacific islands for angling suggests almost global popularity as a sportfish; therefore, unauthorized introductions for angling purposes may occur.
Natural dispersal of wild populations through drainage networks will likely occur given the species’ moderate swimming ability (Scott and Crossman, 1973). In particular, the ability to travel throughout degraded waterbodies is facilitated by the species’ ability to withstand high water temperatures (up to 37.5°C), industrial pollution, and low oxygen concentrations for prolonged periods (Scott and Crossman, 1973). Over-winter survival is also likely high and may not hinder dispersal success, given the species’ ability to tolerate 0.2 ppm oxygen during winter (Scott and Crossman, 1973).
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Natural Dispersal
A. nebulosus is a moderately strong swimmer (Scott and Crossman, 1973) that is capable of surviving degraded, warmwater freshwater environments; therefore, the species will undoubtedly increase its introduced range through natural dispersal within drainage networks. The magnitude of spread will be dependant upon the spatial configuration of potential habitats and their connectivity via drainage networks. Most natural dispersal within the native range of Canada and the USA has occurred at local levels (Fuller et al., 1999).
Vector Transmission
Although A. nebulosus are predated upon by larger fishes, the likelihood of long-distance dispersal resulting from this vector is low. Most piscivorous fishes are unable to utilize A. nebulosus for food due to their sharp, strong dorsal and pectoral spines that may lock into an erect position when predated upon.
Intentional Introduction
Introduction via fisheries (angling/sport purposes) and aquaculture are the dominant long-distance (national; international) vectors. Intentional introductions by fisheries managers may result in long-distance travel events via stocking from source populations. Aquaculture introductions may have similar magnitudes of spread. For example, China (Beijing and Hubei province) stocked A. nebulosus for aquaculture purposes from USA broodstock (Welcomme, 1988). Unauthorized introductions by anglers also has the potential to contribute to local, national or international events but may be constrained by the effectiveness of certain legal restrictions that prohibit import of live organisms across borders.
A. nebulosus is a moderately strong swimmer (Scott and Crossman, 1973) that is capable of surviving degraded, warmwater freshwater environments; therefore, the species will undoubtedly increase its introduced range through natural dispersal within drainage networks. The magnitude of spread will be dependant upon the spatial configuration of potential habitats and their connectivity via drainage networks. Most natural dispersal within the native range of Canada and the USA has occurred at local levels (Fuller et al., 1999).
Vector Transmission
Although A. nebulosus are predated upon by larger fishes, the likelihood of long-distance dispersal resulting from this vector is low. Most piscivorous fishes are unable to utilize A. nebulosus for food due to their sharp, strong dorsal and pectoral spines that may lock into an erect position when predated upon.
Intentional Introduction
Introduction via fisheries (angling/sport purposes) and aquaculture are the dominant long-distance (national; international) vectors. Intentional introductions by fisheries managers may result in long-distance travel events via stocking from source populations. Aquaculture introductions may have similar magnitudes of spread. For example, China (Beijing and Hubei province) stocked A. nebulosus for aquaculture purposes from USA broodstock (Welcomme, 1988). Unauthorized introductions by anglers also has the potential to contribute to local, national or international events but may be constrained by the effectiveness of certain legal restrictions that prohibit import of live organisms across borders.
Pathway Causes
Pathway cause | Notes | Long distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aquaculture (pathway cause) | Yes | |||
Fisheries (pathway cause) | Yes | |||
Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause) | Yes | |||
Intentional release (pathway cause) | Yes | |||
Interbasin transfers (pathway cause) | Yes | |||
Interconnected waterways (pathway cause) | Yes | |||
Live food or feed trade (pathway cause) | Known within native range in Canada (N Mandrak, DFO Canada, personal communication, 2009) | Yes |
Pathway Vectors
Pathway vector | Notes | Long distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aircraft (pathway vector) | Yes | |||
Aquaculture stock (pathway vector) | Yes | |||
Bait (pathway vector) | Known within native range in Canada (N Mandrak, DFO, Canada, personal communication, 2009) | Yes |
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
The brown bullhead (A. nebulosus) is frequently confused with black bullhead Ameiurus melas (southern Canada, USA and parts of Mexico), yellow bullheadAmeiurus natalis (southern Canada, parts of USA), snail bullhead Ameiurus brunneus (southern USA), spotted bullhead Ameiurus serracanthus (southern USA) and flat bullhead Ameiurus platycephalus (southern USA).
A. nebulosus is immediately distinguishable from spotted bullhead by the lack of obvious darkened blotches running the length of the body, whereas a strongly depressed head distinguishes the flat bullhead. Differences between brown, black and yellow bullhead are more conspicuous and concern the morphology of anal rays and pectoral spines. While the yellow bullhead’s anal fin overlaps anterior rays of its caudal fin, both brown bullhead and black bullhead have anal fins that do not reach anterior rays of the caudal fin. Yellow bullhead have relatively smooth pectoral spines; black bullhead possess barbs that point towards head when fins are closed against the body; whereas, the barbs of brown bullhead point towards the caudal fin when closed (Scott and Crossman, 1973; Fuller et al., 1999).
Habitat
A. nebulosus prefers warmwater habitats within lakes, ponds, rivers and streams. Coincident with its introduction for aquaculture and sport, it may also inhabit artificial channels (e.g., irrigation ditches; canals) that possess suitably warm water for spawning (21.1°C). Aquatic vegetation is usually necessary, as are mud or sand bottoms. The species is benthic and, therefore, persists most frequently in the nearshore area, but has been captured as deep as 12 m in offshore habitats (Scott and Crossman, 1973). The physiological tolerances of the species allow colonization of very warm (up to 37.5°C) waters with low (as little as 0.2 ppm) dissolved oxygen. The species is frequently found within waters containing substantial domestic and industrial pollution, but may bury within mud substrates to avoid continual exposure to pollutants (Scott and Crossman, 1973).
Habitat List
Category | Sub category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Freshwater | ||||
Freshwater | Irrigation channels | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Productive/non-natural | |
Freshwater | Lakes | Principal habitat | Natural | |
Freshwater | Reservoirs | Principal habitat | Productive/non-natural | |
Freshwater | Rivers / streams | Principal habitat | Natural | |
Freshwater | Ponds | Principal habitat | Productive/non-natural | |
Brackish | ||||
Brackish | Estuaries | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Natural |
Biology and Ecology
Genetics
Hybridization between brown bullhead and black bullhead may occur where the species frequently co-occur (Scott and Crossman, 1973). No other hybrids are known within North America. A. nebulosus has been sequenced and is described in Arai et al. (2001), Hardman and Page (2003), Hubert et al. (2008) and Sullivan et al. (2006).
Hybridization between brown bullhead and black bullhead may occur where the species frequently co-occur (Scott and Crossman, 1973). No other hybrids are known within North America. A. nebulosus has been sequenced and is described in Arai et al. (2001), Hardman and Page (2003), Hubert et al. (2008) and Sullivan et al. (2006).
Reproductive Biology
The spawning behaviour of A. nebulosus was described in detail by Scott and Crossman (1973): “Spawning occurs in late spring and summer in Canada, when water temperatures reach 21.1°C. Regions lacking a yearly cooling period may have repeated spawning events within a single year. During spawning, one or both sexes clear a shallow nest in mud or sand, usually near aquatic vegetation or other available cover (rocks, stumps). Water depth may be between 15 cm and several meters. Spawning sites are usually contained within protected waters (coves, bays, etc.), with spawning occurring during the day. Male and female circle the nest, caressing with barbels. Following deposition, eggs are pale in colour and coated with mucus, 3 mm in diameter. Between 2000-13,000 eggs may be deposited by mature females. Egg care is provided by one or both parents, during which the eggs are fanned continuously with paired fins to increase oxygen concentrations. In Ontario, Canada, eggs take 6-9 days to hatch at 20.6-23.3°C. Immediately following hatching young are 6 mm in length and pale, but soon darken and swim and feed actively. Of note is the spherical swimming pattern that young will follow, which occurs immediately above one or both of the resting parents, until young are 51 mm total length. Growth is rapid with young reaching 51-122 mm by the end of the first growing season.”
The spawning behaviour of A. nebulosus was described in detail by Scott and Crossman (1973): “Spawning occurs in late spring and summer in Canada, when water temperatures reach 21.1°C. Regions lacking a yearly cooling period may have repeated spawning events within a single year. During spawning, one or both sexes clear a shallow nest in mud or sand, usually near aquatic vegetation or other available cover (rocks, stumps). Water depth may be between 15 cm and several meters. Spawning sites are usually contained within protected waters (coves, bays, etc.), with spawning occurring during the day. Male and female circle the nest, caressing with barbels. Following deposition, eggs are pale in colour and coated with mucus, 3 mm in diameter. Between 2000-13,000 eggs may be deposited by mature females. Egg care is provided by one or both parents, during which the eggs are fanned continuously with paired fins to increase oxygen concentrations. In Ontario, Canada, eggs take 6-9 days to hatch at 20.6-23.3°C. Immediately following hatching young are 6 mm in length and pale, but soon darken and swim and feed actively. Of note is the spherical swimming pattern that young will follow, which occurs immediately above one or both of the resting parents, until young are 51 mm total length. Growth is rapid with young reaching 51-122 mm by the end of the first growing season.”
Physiology and Phenology
Physiological specializations allow A. nebulosus to tolerate waters contaminated with organic and inorganic pollutants (Scott and Crossman, 1973). The species may also adapt to extremely low dissolved oxygen concentrations and warm waters (Scott and Crossman, 1973). The specific physical mechanisms of these physiological specializations are unknown. Little documentation exists regarding phenological variation in native and exotic ranges.
Physiological specializations allow A. nebulosus to tolerate waters contaminated with organic and inorganic pollutants (Scott and Crossman, 1973). The species may also adapt to extremely low dissolved oxygen concentrations and warm waters (Scott and Crossman, 1973). The specific physical mechanisms of these physiological specializations are unknown. Little documentation exists regarding phenological variation in native and exotic ranges.
Nutrition
As an adaptation for prey capture within turbid waters, the species uses oral barbels to sense food items. A. nebulosus is a generalist omnivore, feeding mostly at night and eating benthic organisms that occur frequently within freshwaters: waste, molluscs, immature insects, terrestrial insects, leeches, crustaceans, worms, algae, plant material, fishes and fish eggs (Scott and Crossman, 1973). Young (30-60 mm total length) prefer chironomid larvae, ostracods, amphipods, mayflies and other small aquatic invertebrates (Scott and Crossman, 1973).
Water Tolerances
Parameter | Minimum value | Maximum value | Typical value | Status | Life stage | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conductivity (µmhos/cm) | Optimum | Variable | ||||
Dissolved oxygen (mg/l) | Optimum | As low as 0.2 tolerated | ||||
Salinity (part per thousand) | 0 | Optimum | 8-15 tolerated | |||
Turbidity (JTU turbidity) | Optimum | Variable; 100 NTU tolerated (estimated) | ||||
Velocity (cm/h) | Optimum | Low(<0.1 m/s) | ||||
Water temperature (ºC temperature) | Optimum | Preferred unknown; 36.1 tolerated; 37.5 lethal |
List of Diseases and Disorders
Natural enemy of
Notes on Natural Enemies
By virtue of its strong pectoral and dorsal spines, the adult A. nebulosus is well protected from predation by all but the largest fish predators in their native range in Canada (Scott and Crossman, 1973). Although present in juveniles, the spines are less robust making juveniles more susceptible to predation by fishes with a wider range in size. Within its native range, predators include members of the pike family (Esox spp.) and pike perches (Sander spp.) (Scott and Crossman, 1973). Where introduced on the Gulf Islands of British Columbia in Canada, there are no other piscivorous fishes present and, hence, no native predators to introduced A. nebulosus.
Natural enemies
Natural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Esox lucius (pike) | Predator | not specific | ||||
Esox masquinongy | Predator | not specific | ||||
Esox niger (chain pickerel) | Predator | not specific | ||||
Sander canadensis (sauger) | Predator | not specific | ||||
Sander vitreus (walleye) | Predator | not specific |
Impact Summary
Category | Impact |
---|---|
Cultural/amenity | Negative |
Economic/livelihood | Positive and negative |
Environment (generally) | Negative |
Human health | None |
Impact: Economic
To date, economic impacts resulting from A. nebulosus introductions have not been quantified. In certain cases of wild establishment, A. nebulosus introductions have the potential to hinder local commercial and sport fisheries through competition with target species.
Impact: Environmental
Impact on Habitats
A. nebulosus may increase physical disturbance within freshwaters due to their benthivorous feeding habits. Although their barbels may aid in prey capture, foraging aggressively within substrates may be necessary to dislodge certain benthic prey items, which in-turn can increase turbidity and lead to altered productivity and nutrient cycling. Estimates regarding habitat impacts following A. nebulosus introductions have not been quantified.
Impact on Biodiversity
A. nebulosus introductions may lead to competition for food or space and predation on small fishes, invertebrates or other small food items. Of particular concern is the potential for altered energetic pathways within recipient ecosystems, given their omnivorous diet and a body structure that precludes predation from but all of the largest fishes. Scott and Crossman (1973) describe the following parasites known from within the species, which have the potential to infect recipient fish communities following A. nebulosus introductions: Protozoa, Trematoda, Cestoda, Nematoda, Acanthocephala, leeches, Mollusca, and Crustacea.
Threatened Species
Threatened species | Where threatened | Mechanisms | References | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gasterosteus | British Columbia | Competition - monopolizing resources Predation | ||
Pacifastacus fortis (Shasta crayfish) | California | Predation |
Impact: Social
A. nebulosus populations may hinder local native sport fisheries by out-competing target fishes, resulting in reduced angling opportunities and their social impacts. Alternatively, introductions may be encouraged locally if A. nebulosus are favoured for sport. Introduction into previously fishless waters may provide new or valued angling opportunities. Current estimates of social impacts resulting from introductions have not been documented.
Risk and Impact Factors
Invasiveness
Proved invasive outside its native range
Has a broad native range
Abundant in its native range
Highly adaptable to different environments
Is a habitat generalist
Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
Pioneering in disturbed areas
Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food
Highly mobile locally
Fast growing
Has high reproductive potential
Has high genetic variability
Impact outcomes
Altered trophic level
Damaged ecosystem services
Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
Modification of natural benthic communities
Negatively impacts aquaculture/fisheries
Reduced native biodiversity
Threat to/ loss of endangered species
Threat to/ loss of native species
Impact mechanisms
Competition - monopolizing resources
Interaction with other invasive species
Predation
Likelihood of entry/control
Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
Highly likely to be transported internationally illegally
Difficult/costly to control
Uses
Economic Value
A. nebulosus have been utilized within their native and introduced range primarily for sport and aquaculture, although the species may also be found inadvertently within the aquarium trade, and may be used occasionally as a research laboratory organism (N Mandrak, DFO, Canada, personal communication, 2009). Economic benefits from aquaculture occur primarily within Chile, China, Bulgaria and Belarus (Welcomme, 1988; Tan and Tong, 1989; Reshetnikov et al., 1997; Mikhov, 2000), although the magnitude of these benefits remain uncertain.
Social Benefit
Introduced populations of A. nebulosus to Europe and some Pacific islands originally provided social benefits as sportfish (Welcomme, 1988), but their current social value as sportfish within their introduced range is unknown. Within their native range, the species may be held within zoos or public aquariums (N Mandrak, DFO, Canada, personal communication, 2009).
Environmental Services
Canadian environmental monitoring programs have used A. nebulosus for contaminant biomonitoring within degraded and recovering ecosystems (Arcand-Hoy and Metcalfe, 1999). No other environmental services have been reported.
Uses List
General > Botanical garden/zoo
General > Laboratory use
General > Pet/aquarium trade
General > Research model
General > Sport (hunting, shooting, fishing, racing)
Human food and beverage > Meat/fat/offal/blood/bone (whole, cut, fresh, frozen, canned, cured, processed or smoked)
Animal feed, fodder, forage > Fishmeal
Detection and Inspection
A. nebulosus may be detected from shallow waters using conventional fish sampling methods (minnow traps, fyke nets, seines, boat and backpack electrofishers). Once captured, the species may be identified through analysis of meristics and morphometry using the dichotomous key from Scott and Crossman (1973).
Prevention and Control
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Prevention
Eradication
Eradication may involve the use of chemical agents (e.g., rotenone) to induce mortality within introduced populations, although such methods should be evaluated for their potential effects on non-target fishes. Other measures (e.g., physical removal using fish sampling gears: fyke nets, seines, boat and backpack electrofishers) may also be effective.
Control
Physical/mechanical control
Physical control should involve, if possible, physical isolation of introduced populations, which may require physical (e.g., block nets) or electrical barriers.
Movement control
As with physical control, movement control will involve physical isolation of introduced populations using physical or electrical barriers.
Biological control
Biological control of adult A. nebulosus is unlikely given the paucity of natural predators within the native range, although juveniles may be predated upon by certain large-bodied fishes (e.g., Esox spp. within native range).
Monitoring and Surveillance
Population monitoring will involve physical sampling of invaded and potentially invaded freshwaters using conventional fish sampling methods (minnow traps, fyke nets, seines, boat and backpack electrofishers).
Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
Several authors have described A. nebulosus introductions to broad geographical areas (e.g., Welcomme, 1988), but such reports typically lack details of specific biological and economic impacts due to their substantial geographic scope. Therefore, future research should describe the complete biological and economic impacts associated with local A. nebulosus introductions, which would allow for better understanding of the risks associated with intentional or unintentional A. nebulosus introductions. Determining the economic benefits of A. nebulosus aquaculture should also be described, which would allow fishery managers to evaluate its use given the potential for inadvertent biological and economic harm.
Links to Websites
Name | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6 | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) | http://griis.org/ | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
SARA Registry (Canada) | www.sararegistry.com |
Organizations
Name | Address | Country | URL |
---|---|---|---|
United States Geological Survey: Nonindigenous Aquatic Species | Florida Integrated Science Center (FISC) Gainesville, FL 32653 | USA |
References
Amori G, Angelici FM, Frugis S, Gandolfi G, Groppali R, Lanza B, Relini B, Vicini G, 1993. [English title not available]. (Vertebrata) In: Checklist Delle Specie Della Fauna Italiana [ed. by Minelli A, Ruffo S, Posta La] Calderini, Bologna, 83 pp.
Appleby C, 1999. A list of Norwegian common names of fishes. FishBase [ed. by Froese R, Pauly]. http://www.fishbase.org
Arcand-Hoy LD, Metcalfe CD, 1999. Biomarkers of exposure of brown bullheads (Ameiurus nebulosus) to contaminants in the lower Great Lakes, North America. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18:740-749.
Bailey RM, Robbins CR, 1988. Changes in North American fish names, especially as related to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 1985. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 45:92-103.
Bartley DM, 2006. Introduced species in fisheries and aquaculture: information for responsible use and control. Rome, Italy, FAO: unpaginated.
Bogutskaya NG, Naseka A, 2002. An overview of nonindigenous fishes in inland waters of Russia. Proc. Zool. Inst. Russ. Acad. Sci, 296:21-30.
COSEWIC (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada), 2009. COSEWIC species database. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. http://www.cosewic.gc.ca
Coad BW, 1995. Freshwater fishes of Iran. Acta Sci. Nat. Acad. Sci. Brno, 29(1):1-64.
Crossman EJ, 1991. Introduced freshwater fishes: A review of the North American perspective with emphasis on Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48(1):46-57.
Csavas I, 1995. Status and perspectives of culturing catfishes in East and Southeast Asia. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on the Biological Bases for Aquaculture of Siluriformes, Montpellier, France, 23-27 May 1994.
FAO (Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 1997. FAO database on introduced aquatic species. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/fishery/dias/en
Frier JO, 1994. [English title not available]. (Danske ferskvandsfisk og deres udbredelsesomrade.) In: Truede ferskvandsfiskearter i Norden. TemaNord [ed. by Frier JO], 4-6, 83-99.
Fuller PL, Nico LG, Williams JD, 1999. Nonindigenous fishes introduced into inland waters of the United States. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: American Fisheries Society. [American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 27]
Hardman M, Page LM, 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among Bullhead catfishes of the genus Ameiurus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae). Copeia, 3(1):20-33.
Holcík J, 1991. Fish introductions in Europe with particular reference to its central and eastern part. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48(Suppl.1):13-23.
Hubbs CL, Lagler DF, 1957. Fishes of the Great Lakes Region. Michigan, United States: Bulletin of the Cranbrook Institute of Science, No. 26:135 pp.
Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, Watkinson D, Dumont P, Curry A, Bentzen P, Zhang J, April J, Bernatchez L, 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. Plos One, 3(6):e2490.
ISSG (Invasive Species Specialist Group), 2009. ISSG database on global invasive species. Auckland, New Zealand: Invasive Species Specialist Group and IUCN Species Survival Commission. http://www.issg.org/database/welcome/
Litvak MK, Mandrak NE, 1993. Ecology of freshwater baitfish use in Canada and the United States. Fisheries, 18(12):6-13.
Maya Arai, Assil IQ, Abou-Samra AB, 2001. Characterization of three corticotropin-releasing factor receptors in catfish: a novel third receptor is predominantly expressed in pituitary and urophysis. Endocrinology, 142(1):446-454.
Mikhov S, 2000. Checklist of fishes of Bulgaria. FishBase checklist. http://www.fishbase.org
Movchan YV, 1988. Fauna of Ukraine. Naukova dumka, Kiev, : Publishing House, 367.
Nowak M, Kosco J, Popek W, Epler P, 2010. First record of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Teleostei: Ictaluridae) in Poland. Journal of Fish Biology, 76(6):1529-1532.
Pérez JE, Alfonsi C, Nirchio M, Muñoz C, Gómez JA, 2003. The introduction of exotic species in aquaculture: a solution or part of the problem? Interciencia, 28(4):234-238.
Reshetnikov YS, Bogutskaya N, Vasil'eva E, Dorofeeva E, Naseka A, Popova O, Savvaitova K, Sideleva V, Sokolov L, 1997. An annotated check-list of the freshwater fishes of Russia. Journal of Ichthyology, 37:687-736.
Robins CR, Bailey RM, Bond CE, Brooker JR, Lachner EA, Lea RN, Scott WB, 1980. A list of common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. A list of common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada., Ed. 4:174pp.
Scott WB, Crossman EJ, 1973. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Bulletin 184, NO. 184:966 pp.
Sullivan JP, Lundberg JG, Hardman M, 2006. A phylogenetic analysis of the major groups of catfishes (Teleostei: Siluriformes) using rag1 and rag2 nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 41(3):636-662. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10557903
Tan Y, Tong HE, 1989. The status of the exotic aquatic organisms in China. Proceedings of the Workshop on Introduction of Exotic Aquatic Organisms in Asia. Asian Fisheries Society Special Publication [ed. by Silva SSDe], 35-43.
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009. Shasta crayfish, Pacifastacus fortis, 5-year review: Summary and evalution. In: Shasta crayfish, Pacifastacus fortis, 5-year review: summary and evalution.US Fish and Wildlife Service. 22 pp.
Uzunova E, Zlatanova S, 2007. A review of the fish introductions in Bulgarian freshwaters. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 37(1):55-61. http://www.aiep.pl/index.html
Welcomme RL, 1988. International introductions of inland aquatic species. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 294. Rome, Italy: FAO, 318 pp.
Wittenberg R, 2005. An inventory of alien species and their threat to biodiversity and economy in Switzerland. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre report to the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape. The environment in practice 0629. Bern, : Federal Office for the Environment, 155.
Yamamoto MN, 1992. Occurrence, distribution and abundance of accidentally introduced freshwater aquatic organisms in Hawaii. State of Hawaii, Freshwater Fisheries Research and Surveys, Proj. No. F-14-R-16.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 16 March 2009
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.