Skip the header
No access
Review Article
9 July 2020

Tail docking in dogs: behavioural, physiological and ethical aspects

Abstract

Tail docking has been practiced on dogs for many years for various reasons, including aesthetics, breeding standards and hygiene, to facilitate reproductive handling in some dog breeds, breeders’ decisions and tradition, or to prevent lesions during play or work, to name a few. Little research, however, has been done to demonstrate whether this practice causes acute pain in animals, even though it is now well known that animals, including dogs, are highly sensitive to both positive and negative stimuli. Currently, we have a broad range of methods for measuring pain that utilise diverse parameters (physiological, behavioural and metabolic), and techniques that include evaluating changes in behaviour and facial expressions, monitoring opioid and dopaminergic neurotransmission, measuring glucocorticoid levels, changes in blood hormone and lactate concentrations, the dynamics of cardiac and respiratory frequency, pupil diameter and variations in blood pressure. Many countries have banned this practice because it is deemed unnecessary, unjustifiable under any circumstances and harmful for animal welfare. The objective of the present review is to demonstrate that tail docking is a painful and unnecessary practice that presents more complications than benefits in dogs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Weary DM, Niel L, Flower FC, Fraser D. Identifying and preventing pain in animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2006;100:67–76.
2.
Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, et al. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology and Behaviour 2007;92:375–97.
3.
Spinka M. Social dimension of emotions and its implication for animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2012;138:170–80.
4.
Mathews K, Kronen PW, Lascelles D, Nolan A, Robertson S, Steagall PV, et al. Guidelines for recognition, assessment and treatment of pain: WSAVA Global Pain Council members and co-authors of this document. Journal of Small Animal Practice 2014;55:E10–68.
5.
Rutherford KMD. Assessing pain in animals. Animal Welfare 2002;11:31–53.
6.
Bennet PC, Perini E. Tail docking in dogs: a review of the issues. Australian Veterinary Journal 2003;81:208–18.
7.
Wiseman-Orr ML, Scott EM, Reid J, Nolan AM. Validation of a structured questionnaire as an instrument to measure chronic pain in dogs on the basis of effects on health-related quality of life. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2006;67:1826–36.
8.
Brondani JT, Luna SP, Padovani CR. Refinement and initial validation of a multidimensional composite scale for use in assessing acute postoperative pain in cats. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2011;72:174–83.
9.
Landa L. Pain in domestic animals and how to assess it: a review. Veterinární Medicína 2012;57:185–92.
10.
Webster AJF. Assessment of welfare state: the five freedoms. Naturwissenschaften Review Articles 1998;85:262–9.
11.
Gutiérrez BJ. Evaluación de la eficacia del dexketoprofeno en el control del dolor intra y postoperatorio en perros sometidos a cirugía ortopédica [dissertation]. España: Universidad de Córdoba; 2017.
12.
Saritas ZK, Saritas TB, Pamuk K, Korkmaz M, Yaprakci MV, Yilmaz O, et al. Evaluation of preemptive dexketoprofen trometamol effect on blood chemistry, vital signs and postoperative pain in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy 2015;116:191–5.
13.
Dalla-Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration. PLoS One 2014;9:e92281.
14.
Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH. An equine pain face. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2015;42:103–14.
15.
Lezama-Garcia K, Orihuela A, Olmos-Hernandez A, Reyes-Long S, Mota-Rojas D. Facial expressions and emotions in domestic animals. CAB Reviews 2019;14(28):1–12.
16.
Epstein ME, Rodan I, Griffenhagen G, Kadrlik J, Petty MC, Robertson SA, et al. AAHA/AAFP pain management guidelines for dogs and cats. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 2015;17:251–72.
17.
Ashley FH, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Veterinary Journal 2005;37:565–75.
18.
Viñuela-Fernández I, Jones E, Welsh EM, Fleetwood-Walker SM. Pain mechanisms and their implication for the management of pain in farm and companion animals. The Veterinary Journal 2007;174:227–39.
19.
Martínez GE. Monitoreo y tratamiento del dolor agudo en pediatría. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología 2017;40:285–6.
20.
Hernández-Avalos I, Mota-Rojas D, Mora-Medina P, Martínez-Burnes J, Casas-Alvarado A, Verduzco-Mendoza A, et al. Review of different methods used for clinical recognition and assessment of pain in dogs and cats. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine 2019;7:43–54.
21.
Noonan GJ, Rand JS, Priest J, Ainscow J, Blackshaw JK. Behavioural observations of piglets undergoing tail docking, teeth clipping and ear notching. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1994;39:203–13.
22.
Noonan GJ, Rand JS, Blackshaw JK, Priest J. Behavioural observations of puppies undergoing tail docking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1996;49:335–42.
23.
Quartarone V, Voslářová E, Russo M, Doleželová P, Passantino A. A comparison of laws preventing unnecessary canine cosmetic surgery in Italy and in the Czech Republic. Acta Veterinaria Brno 2012;81:83–8.
24.
Wansbrough RK. Cosmetic tail docking of dogs. Australian Veterinary Journal 1996;74:59–63.
25.
Noonan GJ, Rand JS, Blackshaw JK, Priest J. Tail docking in dogs: a sample of attitudes of veterinarians and dog breeders in Queensland. Australian Veterinary Journal 1996;73:86–8.
26.
Johnson J. Dogs, cats, and their people: the place of the family pet and attitudes about pet keeping [master thesis]. Canada: University of Waterloo; 2009.
27.
Australian Veterinary Association (AVA). AVA strongly supports push for national tail docking ban on dogs. Media releases, 13 August 2018. Available from: URL: www.ava.com.au/node/112427 [accessed: 26 April 2019].
28.
Sinmez CC, Yigit A, Aslim G. Tail docking and ear cropping in dogs: a short review of laws and welfare aspects in the Europe and Turkey. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2017;16:431–7.
29.
Swabe J. Veterinary dilemmas: ambiguity and ambivalence in human-animal interaction. In: Podersbeck A, Paul E, Serpell J, editors. Companion animals and us: exploring the relationships between people and pets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 292–312.
30.
Festa L. Person, animal, thing: the 1796 dog tax and the right to superfluous things. Eighteenth-Century Life 2009;33:1–44.
31.
Morton DB. Docking of dogs: practical and ethical aspects. The Veterinary Record 1992;131:301–6.
32.
Fadeyemi AJ. Tail docking in dogs: evaluation of current practices and ethical aspects in southwest Nigeria. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health 2014;6:18–24.
33.
Siniscalchi M, Lusito R, Vallortigara G, Quaranta A. Seeing left- or right-asymmetric tail wagging produces different emotional responses in dogs. Current Biology 2013;23(22):2279–82.
34.
Firnkes A, Barteles A, Bidoli E, Erhard M. Appeasement signals used by dogs during dog-human. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2017;19:35–44.
35.
Mellor DJ. Tail docking of canine puppies: reassessment of the tail’s role in communication, the acute pain caused by docking and interpretation of behavioural responses. Animals 2018;8:1–18.
36.
Kiley-Worthington M. The tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular reference to their causation and function as displays. Behaviour 1976;56:69–114.
37.
Nott HMR. Social behaviour of the dog. In: Thorne C, editor. The Waltham book of dog and cat behaviour. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1992. p. 97–114.
38.
Leaver SDA, Reimchen TE. Behavioural responses of canis familiaris to different tail lengths of a remotely-controlled life-size dog replica. Behaviour 2008;145:386–8.
39.
Artelle KA, Dumoulin LK, Reimchen TE. Behavioural responses of dogs to asymmetrical tail wagging of a robotic dog replica. Laterality 2011;16:129–35.
40.
Coren S. How to speak dog. New York (NY): The Free Press; 2000.
41.
Reefmann N, Butikofer Kaszàs F, Wechsler B, Gygax L. Ear and tail postures as indicators of emotional valence in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2009;118:199–207.
42.
Reimert I, Bolhuis J, Kemp B, Rodenburg TB. Indicators of positive and negative emotions and emotional contagion in pigs. Physiology and Behaviour 2012;109:42–50.
43.
Nordquist R, Van der Enburg FJ, Velkers FC, Fijn L, Arndt S. Mutilating procedures, management practices, and housing conditions that may affect the welfare of farm animals: implications for welfare research. Animals 2017;7:1–22.
44.
Mills KE, von Keyserlingk MA, Niel L. A review of medically unnecessary surgeries in dogs and cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2016;248(2):167–71.
45.
Skarda RT, Tranquilli WJ. Local and regional anaesthetic and analgesic techniques in dogs. In: Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Kurt A, editors. Lumb & Jones veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. 4th ed. Oxford: Grimm Blackwell Publishing Limited; 2007. p. 576.
46.
Eyarefe OD, Oguntoye CO. Cosmetic tail docking: an overview of abuse and report of an interesting case. BMC Veterinary Research 2016;12:41.
47.
Mota-Rojas D, Velarde A, Maris-Huertas S, Nelly-Cajiao M, editors. Animal welfare, a global vision in Ibero-America [Bienestar Animal una visión global en Iberoamérica]. 3rd ed. Barcelona, Spain: Elsevier; 2016. p. 516. Available from: URL: https://www.elsevier.com/books/bienestar-animal/mota-rojas/978-84-9113-026-0 [accessed: 10 January 2020].
48.
Mota-Rojas D, Orihuela A, Strappini-Asteggiano A, Cajiao-Pachón MN, Agüera-Buendía E, Mora-Medina P, et al. Teaching animal welfare in veterinary schools in Latin America. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine 2018;6:131–40.
49.
Schuster A, Lenard HG. Pain in newborns and prematures: current practice and knowledge. Brain and Development 1990;12:459–65.
50.
Craig KD, Whitfield MF, Grunau RV, Linton J, Hadjistavropoulos HD. Pain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices. Pain 1993;52:287–99.
51.
Johnston CC, Stevens BJ, Yang F, Horton L. Differential responses to pain by very premature neonates. Pain 1995;61:471–9.
52.
Goubet N, Clifton RK, Shah B. Learning about pain in preterm newborns. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 2001;22:418–27.
53.
Owens ME. Pain in infancy: conceptual and methodological issues. Pain 1984;20:213–30.
54.
Anand KJS, Phil D, Carr DB. The neuroanatomy, neurophysiology and neurochemistry of pain, stress and analgesia in newborns and children. Pediatric Clinics of North America 1989;36:795–822.
55.
Anand KJS, Craig KD. New perspectives on the definition of pain. Pain 1996;67:3–6.
56.
Dubner R. Methods of assessing pain in animals. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Textbook of pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 293–302.
57.
Yilmaz G, Gurakan B, Saatci U. Topuk kan ı alınma sonrası bebeklerin aglama s urelerine etki eden fakt orler. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 2002;45:232–6.
58.
Lester SJ, Mellor DJ, Ward RN, Holmes RJ. Cortisol responses of young lambs to castration and tailing using different methods. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 1991;39:134–8.
59.
Lester SJ, Mellor DJ, Holmes RJ, Ward RN, Stafford KJ. Behavioural and cortisol responses of lambs to castration and tailing using different methods. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 1996;44:45–54.
60.
Molony V, Kent LE, Robertson IS. Behavioural responses of lambs of three ages in the first three hours after three methods of castration and tail docking. Research in Veterinary Science 1993;55:236–45.
61.
Moffett C. Tail docking: the long and the short of it. Irish Veterinarian Journal 2007;60:718–9.
62.
Zegarra-Piérola JW. Bases fisiopatológicas del dolor. Acta Médica Peruana 2007;24:35–8.
63.
Stafford KV. Pain in dogs: recognition and alleviation. In: The welfare of dogs. Animal welfare. Vol. 4. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 111–28.
64.
Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 2011;152:S2–15.
65.
Kent LE, Molony V. Changes in plasma cortisol concentration in lambs of three ages after three methods of castration and tail docking. Research in Veterinary Science 1993;55:246–51.
66.
Gross TL, Carr SH. Amputation neuroma of docked tails in dogs. Veterinary Pathology 1990;27:61–2.
67.
French NP, Morgan KL. Neuromata in docked lambs’ tails. Research in Veterinary Science 1992;52:389–90.
68.
Fitzgerald M. The neurobiology of fetal and neonatal pain. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. A textbook of pain. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 153–63.
69.
Ceyhan D, Gulec MS. Postoperatif agr ı sadece nosiseptif agr ı mıdır? Agrı 2010;22:47–52.
70.
Johnston CC, Stremler RL, Stevens BJ, Horton LJ. Effectiveness of oral sucrose and simulated rocking on pain responses in preterm neonates. Pain 1997;72:193–9.
71.
Jensen TS, Rasmussen P. Phantom pain and other phenomena after amputation. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Textbook of pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 651–65.
72.
Lunam CA, Glatz PC, Hsu YJ. The absence of neuromas in beaks of adult hens after conservative trimming at hatch. Australian Veterinary Journal 1996;71:46–9.
73.
Simonsen HB, Klinken L, Bindseil E. Histopathology of intact and docked pigtails. British Veterinary Journal 1991;147:407–12.
74.
Holt PE, Thrusfield MV. Association in bitches between breed, size, neutering and docking, and acquired urinary incontinence due to incompetence of the urethral sphincter mechanism. The Veterinary Record 1993;133:177–80.
75.
Wada N, Hori H, Tokuriki M. Electromyographic and kinematic studies of tail movements in dogs during treadmill locomotion. Journal of Morphology 1993;217:105–13.
76.
Strejffert G. Tail injuries of Shorthaired German Pointer dogs in Sweden 1989; 1992. Available from: URL: http://www.cdb.org/sweden.htm [accessed: 15 October 2001].
77.
Darke PG, Thurusfield MV, Aitken CG. Association between tail injuries and docking in dogs. Veterinary Record 1985;116:409.
78.
Mota-Rojas D, Ceballos MC, Orihuela A, Corredor MC, Pérez E, Ramírez R, et al. Painful practices in farm animals. In: Mota-Rojas D, Velarde A, Maris-Huertas S, Cajiao PMN (Editors). Bienestar animal, una visión global en Iberoamérica. 3rd ed. Barcelona, España: Editorial Elsevier; 2016. p. 137–54.
79.
Diesel G, Pfeiffer D, Crispin S, Brodbelt D. Risk factors for tail injuries in Great Britain. Veterinary Record 2010;166:812–7.
80.
Wells A, Hill KE, Stafford KJ, Wink WD. The tail injury justification of canine tail docking: prevalence, causes, treatments and risk factors of canine tail injuries in New-Zealand. New Zealand: Institute of Veterinary Animal and Biochemical Sciences, Massey University; 2011. Available from: URL: http://tail-waggingcampaign.org.nz/documents/Massey%20%University%20reference&20material.pdf [accessed: 19 September 2015].
81.
Mills KE, Robbins J, von Keyserlingk MAG. Tail docking and ear croping dogs: public awareness and perceptions. PLoS One 2016;11:e0158131.
82.
Council of Docked Breeds. 2010. Available from: URL: https://www.cdb.org/vet_research.htm [accessed: 21 December 2019].
83.
Agnew CA. The causes of animal abuse: a social-psychological analysis. Theoretical Criminology 1998;2:177–209.
84.
Morgan CA. Stepping up to the plate: animal welfare, veterinarians, and ethical conflicts [dissertation]. Canada: University of British Columbia; 2009. p. 1–206.
85.
Morton DB, Griffiths PHM. Guidelines on the recognition of pain distress and discomfort in experimental animals and a hypothesis of assessment. Veterinary Record 1985;116:431–6.
86.
Potthoff A, Carithers RW. Pain and analgesia in dogs and cats. Compendium of Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 1989;11:887–96.
87.
Hansen B, Hardie E. Prescription and use of analgesics in dogs and cats in a veterinary teaching hospital: 258 cases (1983–1989). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1993;202:1485–94.
88.
Watson AD, Nicholson A, Church DB, Pearson MRB. Use of anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs in dogs and cats. Australian Veterinary Journal 1996;74:201–10.
89.
Dohoo SE, Dohoo IR. Post-operative use of analgesics in dogs and cats by Canadian veterinarians. Canadian Veterinary Journal 1996;37:546–51.
90.
Dohoo SE, Dohoo IR. Factors influencing the post-operative use of analgesics in dogs and cats. Canadian Veterinary Journal 1996;37:552–6.
91.
Dohoo SE, Dohoo IR. Attitudes and concerns of Canadian animal health technologists towards postoperative pain management in dogs and cats. Canadian Veterinary Journal 1998;39:491–6.
92.
Hansen B. Through a glass darkly: using behaviour to assess pain. Seminars in Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (Small Animal) 1997;12:61–74.
93.
Hardie EM, Hansen BD, Carroll GS. Behavior after ovariohysterectomy in the dog: what’s normal? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1997;51:111–28.
94.
Hellyer PW, Gaynor JS. Acute post-surgical pain in dogs and cats. Compendium of Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian (Small Animals) 1998;20:140–53.
95.
Hellyer PW, Frederick C, Lacy M, Salman MD, Wagner AE. Attitudes of veterinary medical students, house officers, clinical faculty, and staff toward pain management in animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1999;214:238–44.
96.
Firth AM, Haldane SL. Development of a scale to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1999;214:615–59.
97.
Fox SM, Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ, Lowoko CRO, Hodge H. The effects of ovariohysterectomy plus different combinations of halothane anaesthesia and butorphanol analgesia on behaviour in the bitch. Research in Veterinary Science 2000;68:265–74.
98.
Capner CA, Lascelles BDX, Waterman-Pearson AE. Current British veterinary attitudes to perioperative analgesia for dogs. Veterinary Record 1999;145:95–9.
99.
Holton LL, Pawson P, Nolan A, Reid J, Scott EM. Development of a behaviour-based scale to measure acute pain in dogs. Veterinary Record 2001;148:525–31.
100.
Hugonnard M, Leblond A, Keroack S, Cadoré JL, Troncy E. Attitudes and concerns of French veterinarians towards pain and analgesia in dogs and cats. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2004;31:154–63.
101.
Joubert KE. The use of analgesic drugs by South African veterinarians. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 2001;72:57–60.
102.
Kyles AE, Hardie EM, Hansen BD, Papich MG. Comparison of transdermal fentanyl and intramuscular oxymorphone on postoperative behavior after ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Research in Veterinary Science 1998;65:245–51.
103.
Williams VM, Lascelles BDX, Robson MC. Current attitudes to, and use of, peri-operative analgesia in dogs and cats by veterinarians in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 2005;53:193–202.
104.
Morton CM, Reid J, Scott EM, Holton LL, Nolan AM. Application of a scaling model to establish and validate an interval level pain scale for assessment of acute pain in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2005;66:2154–66.
105.
Raekallio M, Heinonen KM, Kuussaari J, Vainio O. Pain alleviation in animals: attitudes and practices of Finnish Veterinarians. The Veterinary Journal 2003;165:131–5.
106.
Conzemius MG, Hill CM, Sammarco JL, Perkowski SZ. Correlation between subjective and objective measures used to determine severity of post-operative pain in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1997;210:1619–22.
107.
Conzemius MG, Aper RL, Hill CM. Evaluation of a canine total-elbow arthroplasty system: a preliminary study in normal dogs. Veterinary Surgery 2001;30:11–20.
108.
Franks JN, Boothe HW, Taylor L, Geller S, Carroll GL, Cracas V, et al. Evaluation of transdermal fentanyl patches for analgesia in cats undergoing onychectomy. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2000;217:1013–20.
109.
Holton LL, Scott EM, Nolan AM, Reid J, Welsh E. Relationship between physiological factors and clinical pain in dogs scored using a numerical rating scale. Journal of Small Animal Practice 1998;39:469–74.
110.
Hudson JT, Slater MR, Taylor L, Scott HM, Kerwin SC. Assessing repeatability and validity of a visual analogue scale questionnaire for use in assessing pain and lameness in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2004;65:1634–43.
111.
Robertson SA. How do we know if they hurt? Pain assessment in small animals. Veterinary Medicine 2003;98:700–9.
112.
Romans CW, Conzemius MG, Horstman CL, Gordon WJ, Evans RB. Use of pressure platform gait analysis in cats with and without bilateral onychectomy. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2004;65:1276–8.
113.
Romans CW, Gordon, WJ, Robinson DA, Evans R, Conzemius MG. Effect of postoperative analgesic protocol on limb function following onychectomy in cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2005;227:89–93.
114.
Borer LR, Peel JE, Seewald W, Schawalder P, Spreng DE. Effect of carprofen, etodolac, meloxicam or butorphanol in dogs with induced acute synovitis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2003;64:1429–37.
115.
Budsberg SC. Long-term temporal evaluation of ground reaction forces during development of experimentally induced osteoarthritis in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2001;62:1207–11.
116.
Cambridge AJ, Tobias KM, Newberry RC, Sarkar DK. Subjective and objective measurements of post-operative pain in cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2000;217:685–90.
117.
Anil SS, Anil L, Deen J. Challenges of pain assessment in domestic animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2002;220:313–9.
118.
Council of Europe. European convention for the protection of pet animals. 1987. Available from: URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/125 [accessed: 14 December 2019].
119.
Canadian Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA). Cosmetic alteration-position statement. Available from: URL: www.canadianveterinarians.net/documents/cosmetic-alteration [accessed: 27 April 2019].
120.
Crook A. Cosmetic surgery in North America and Latin America. World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress. Davis. Ca. USA. 2001. Proceedings p. 54–55.
121.
Asamblea Legislativa Del Distrito Federal, VI Legislatura. Ley de Protección a los Animales del Distrito Federal. Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal 26 de febrero de 2002. Última reforma publicada en la Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal el 18 de diciembre de. 2014. p. 39.
122.
Mota-Rojas D, Broom DM, Orihuela A, Velarde A, Napolitano N, Alonso-Spilsbury M. Effects of human-animal relationship on animal productivity and welfare. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology 2020;8 :196–205.
123.
Mota-Rojas D, Orihuela A, Martínez-Burnes J, Gómez J, Mora-Medina J, Alavez B, et al. Neurological modulation of facial expressions in pigs and implications for production. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology 2020;8. In review.
124.
González-Lozano M, Mota-Rojas D, Orihuela A, Martínez-Burnes J, Di Francia, Braghieri A, et al. Behavioral, physiological, and reproductive performance of buffalo cows during eutocic and dystocic parturitions. Applied Animal Science 2020;36:407–22.
125.
Mota-Rojas D, López-Mayagoitia A, Martínez-Burnes J, Muns R, Villanueva-García D, Mora-Medina P, et al. Invited review: is vitality assessment important in neonatal animals? CAB Reviews 2018;13(036):1–13.
126.
Mota-Rojas D, Martínes-Burnes J, Napolitano F, Domínguez M, Guerrero-Legarreta I, Mora-Medina P, et al. Invited review: dystocia: factors affecting parturition in domestic animals. CAB Reviews 2020;15(013):1–16.
127.
Mora-Medina P, Mota-Rojas D, Arch-Tirado E, Roldán P, Vázquez C, Terrazas A, et al. Behavior of lambs at different ages during brief periods of increased sensorial isolation from their mothers. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2017;22:29–34.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Issue publication date: 1 January 2020
Received: 20 January 2020
Accepted: 26 May 2020
Published online: 9 July 2020

Keywords:

  1. tail docking
  2. pain
  3. dog welfare
  4. behavioural
  5. ethical and physiological aspects
  6. nociceptive transmission

Language

English

Authors

Affiliations

Brenda Reyes-Sotelo
Master in Science Program “Maestría en Ciencias Agropecuarias”, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco Campus, 04960, Mexico City, Mexico.
Neurophysiology of Pain, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), 04960, Mexico City, Mexico.
Julio Martínez-Burnes
Graduate and Research Department, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, 87000, Victoria City, Mexico.
Jocelyn Gómez
Neurophysiology of Pain, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), 04960, Mexico City, Mexico.
Karina Lezama
Neurophysiology of Pain, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), 04960, Mexico City, Mexico.
Miguel González-Lozano
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, México City, México.
Ismael Hernández-Ávalos
Clinical Pharmacology and Veterinary Anaesthesia, Department of Biological Science, FESC, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, 54714, Mexico.
Alejandro Casas
Neurophysiology of Pain, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), 04960, Mexico City, Mexico.
Yuridia Herrera
Neurophysiology of Pain, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), 04960, Mexico City, Mexico.
Patricia Mora-Medina
Department of Livestock Sciences, FESC, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 54714, Mexico City, Mexico.

Notes

*
Correspondence: Daniel Mota-Rojas. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

Citing Literature

  • Scientific and technical assistance on welfare aspects related to housing and health of cats and dogs in commercial breeding establishments, EFSA Journal, 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8213, 21, 9, (2023).
  • The Welfare of Fighting Dogs: Wounds, Neurobiology of Pain, Legal Aspects and the Potential Role of the Veterinary Profession, Animals, 10.3390/ani12172257, 12, 17, (2257), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation