Skip the header
Open access
Datasheet
Enhanced
16 November 2021

Chenopodium album (fat hen)

Datasheet Types: Pest, Invasive species, Host plant, Crop

Abstract

This datasheet on Chenopodium album covers Identity, Overview, Associated Diseases, Pests or Pathogens, Distribution, Hosts/Species Affected, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Management, Genetics and Breeding, Food Quality, Food Safety, Economics, Further Information.

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Chenopodium album L. 1753
Preferred Common Name
fat hen
Other Scientific Names
Chenopodium album subsp. reticulatum (Aellen) Beauge ex Greuter & Burdet
Chenopodium reticulatum Aellen
International Common Names
English
bacon-weed
common lambsquarters (US)
frost-blite
mealweed
pigweed
white goosefoot
Spanish
campo
cenizo
chual
quinoa
quniqua del quniquilla
salado
yuyo blanco
French
anserine blanche
chenopode blanc
farineuse
Portuguese
acarinha-branca
catassol
Local Common Names
Brazil
ancarinha-branca
Denmark
hvidmelet gaasefod
Ethiopia
amadamddo
Finland
jauhosavikka
Germany
Gemeiner gansefuss
Weisser Gansefuss
India
bathu
bathua
chandan bathua
jhil
kulf
pappu kura
parupu kire
vastuk
Indonesia
dieng putih
Iran
salmak
Italy
farinaccio
selvatico
Japan
akaza
shiroza
Netherlands
luismelde
Norway
meldestokk
Pakistan
bathwra
jhill
South Africa
withondebossie
Sweden
svinmalla
vitmalla
Taiwan
li
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)
pepejiuga
EPPO code
CHEAL (Chenopodium album)

Pictures

An adult individual of Chenopodium album.
C. album
An adult individual of Chenopodium album.
R.K. Malik
Chenopodium album (fat hen); inflorescence.
Inflorescence
Chenopodium album (fat hen); inflorescence.
©Rasbak/via Wikimedia Commons - CC BY-SA 3.0
Chenopodium album plants.
C. album
Chenopodium album plants.
R.K. Malik
Leaves of C. album.
Leaves
Leaves of C. album.
R.K. Malik
Chenopodium album seedlings.
Seedlings
Chenopodium album seedlings.
R.K. Malik
An adult flowering plant showing inflorescences clustered in panicles at the end of branches.
C. album
An adult flowering plant showing inflorescences clustered in panicles at the end of branches.
R.K. Malik
A. Chenopodium murale and B. Chenopodium album. (Sen, 1981).
Line artwork of Chenopodium species
A. Chenopodium murale and B. Chenopodium album. (Sen, 1981).
©R.K. Malik

Overview

A very variable cosmopolitan, polyploid weedy complex, with landraces selected in the Himalayan region cultivated as a pseudocereal for seeds. Landraces grown for seed are usually taller than their weedy counterparts (up to 4 m tall) and inflorescences are large, compact, exserted and leafless, often drooping. Hermaphrodite and female flowers develop in non-shattering seed heads with larger seeds than wild plants. It is also cultivated across the Himalayas and northern India as a leafy vegetable. Young leaves and stems are collected from the wild, or grown in home gardens, elsewhere in Africa, Asia and South America. It is valued for its high protein content and balanced amino acids with high lysine and methionine contents. C. album contains several antinutritional factors such as saponins, phytates and oxalic acid, but these are largely broken down by cooking. Leaves and seeds are used in traditional medicine to treat a wide range of disorders and have been used as an anthelmintic, cardiotonic, carminative, digestive, diuretic and laxative. C. album has also been used to treat rheumatism, liver disorders and burns. 

Summary of Invasiveness

C. album seems to grow most vigorously in temperate and subtemperate regions, but it is also a potentially serious weed in almost all winter-sown crops of the tropics and subtropics. It is a common weed in about 40 crops in 47 countries, being most frequent in sugarbeet, potatoes, maize and cereals. It is one of the principal weeds of Canada and Europe, and in India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan and South Africa is ranked amongst the six most serious weeds. In temperate climates, it is a problem in almost all summer- and winter-sown crops.
In subtropical regions it is most common in wheat, chickpea, barley, winter vegetables, horticultural gardens, maize, sunflower and soybean. In addition, it is an important weed of tea and upland rice in Japan, citrus orchards and vineyards in Spain, cotton, soyabean and strawberries in the former Soviet Union, cotton, pastures and groundnuts in the USA, rice in Mexico and tobacco in Canada. In Europe and America, it is a problem weed in maize, soybean, wheat, barley, potato and all vegetable crops.

Taxonomic Tree

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

The genus Chenopodium comprises around 150 species, of which C. quinoa and C. album are important nutritionally. C. album appears to be free of nomenclature problems, but it has been recorded as hybridizing with a number of members of the genus, namely: C. ficifolium  (= C. x zahnii), C. berlandieri (= C. x variabile), C. opulifolium (= C. x preissmannii) and C. suecicum (= C. x fursajewii). The generic name is derived from the Greek word Chen, meaning goose, and the Latin word podium (foot). The species name, album (meaning white) refers to the white-grey grainy particles that are found on the undersides of the leaves.
C. album is somewhat poorly circumscribed taxonomically, and genotypes cultivated in the Himalayas that are assigned to C. album bear little similarity to the weedy form of C. album (Partap et al., 1998). However, C. album and related hexaploid species have a single flavonoid profile that supports the recognition of a single species (Rahiminejad and Gornall, 2004). Studies by Mandák et al. (2012) confirm that Chenopodium species do not hybridize freely across ploidy levels and analysis is DNA content suggests that C. album is an alloploid derivative of a cross between unknown diploid and tetraploid species.

Description

An erect, branched (occasionally unbranched) annual herb, green, more or less coated with white mealy pubescence. Cotyledons petiole, lanceolate-linear, mealy, bluish-grey with a reddish tinge beneath, 6–12 mm long and 1.5–4 mm broad (Korsmo et al., 1981). Roots stout and tapering at the end. Many branches may emerge from main tap root system. Epidermal cells are more or less polygonal in shape. Fewer, smaller stomata on upper compared to lower leaf surface (Srivastava, 1967). Stems erect, branched towards apex, 0.2–2 m tall, glabrous, furrowed, often with red or light-green streaks, branching varies from slight to extensive. Leaves alternate, simple ovate to rhomboid-oval, uppermost leaves mostly lanceolate, sometimes linear and sessile, glabrous, usually white with a mealy-covering, particularly on young leaves, all leaves densely covered with small, utriculate hairs. Inflorescence in irregular spikes clustered in panicles at the ends of the branches. Flower perfect, small, sessile, green; calyx of 5 sepals that are more or less keeled and nearly covering the mature fruit; petals 1; stamens 5, pistil 1, with 2 or 3 styles, ovary single-celled, attached at right angles to the flower axis. Fruits is an achene (seed covered by the thin papery pericarp). Seed nearly circular in outline, oval in cross section, sides convex, glossy, black, mean size 1.5 mm x 1.4 mm in diameter, weight 1.2 mg.

Distribution

C. album is a cosmopolitan weed which is so widely distributed that its geographical origin is obscured. It is equally widely distributed in both the northern and southern hemispheres, occurring in Asia, North America, Europe  (Brenan and Akeroyd, 1993), India, South Africa, Australia and South America (Williams, 1963). It is present throughout North America  (Bassett and Crompton, 1978Lorenzi and Jeffery, 1987). In tropical regions it is mostly found at higher altitudes. It is domesticated in the Himalayan region where it is grown as a grain crop and it is cultivated as a traditional leafy vegetable in India (Jansen, 2004). There is archaeological evidence to suggest it was cultivated as a pseudocereal in Europe in prehistory (Stokes and Rowley-Conwy, 2002).

Distribution Map

This content is currently unavailable.

Distribution Table

This content is currently unavailable.

Hosts/Species Affected

C. album seems to grow most vigorously in temperate and subtemperate regions, however it is also a potentially serious weed in almost all winter-sown crops of the tropics and subtropics. It is a common weed in about 40 crops in 47 countries, being most frequent in sugarbeet, potatoes, corn and cereals. It is one of the principal weeds of Canada and Europe, and in India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan and South Africa is ranked amongst the six most serious weeds (Holm et al., 1977). In temperate climates, it is a problem in almost all summer- and winter-sown crops.

In subtropical regions it is most common in wheat, chickpea, barley, winter vegetables, horticultural gardens, maize, sunflower and soybean. In addition, it is an important weed of tea and upland rice in Japan, citrus orchards and vineyards in Spain, cotton, soyabean and strawberries in the former Soviet Union, cotton, pastures and peanuts in the USA, rice in Mexico and tobacco in Canada (Holm et al., 1977). In Europe and America, it is a problem weed in maize, soybean, wheat, barley, potato and all vegetable crops.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

HostFamilyHost statusReferences
Allium cepa (onion)LiliaceaeUnknown
Allium sativum (garlic)LiliaceaeUnknown
Ananas comosus (pineapple)BromeliaceaeOther 
Arachis hypogaea (groundnut)FabaceaeMain 
Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera (sugarbeet)ChenopodiaceaeMain
Brassica oleracea var. capitata (cabbage)BrassicaceaeMain 
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensisBrassicaceaeUnknown
Camellia sinensis (tea)TheaceaeMain 
Capsicum (peppers)SolanaceaeUnknown
Cicer arietinum (chickpea)FabaceaeMain 
CitrusRutaceaeMain 
Curcuma longa (turmeric)ZingiberaceaeUnknown
Fragaria ananassa (strawberry)RosaceaeMain 
Glycine max (soyabean)FabaceaeMain
Gossypium (cotton)MalvaceaeMain
Helianthus annuus (sunflower)AsteraceaeMain
Hordeum vulgare (barley)PoaceaeMain
Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)ConvolvulaceaeOther 
Linum usitatissimum (flax) Main 
Lupinus luteus (yellow lupin)FabaceaeUnknown
Medicago sativa (lucerne)FabaceaeUnknown
Musa (banana)MusaceaeOther 
Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)SolanaceaeMain
Oryza sativa (rice)PoaceaeMain
pastures Main 
Phaseolus (beans)FabaceaeOther 
Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)FabaceaeUnknown
Piper nigrum (black pepper)PiperaceaeOther 
Pistacia vera (pistachio)AnacardiaceaeUnknown
Pisum sativum (pea)FabaceaeUnknown
Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)PoaceaeOther
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)SolanaceaeMain
Solanum melongena (aubergine)SolanaceaeUnknown
Solanum tuberosum (potato)SolanaceaeMain
Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)PoaceaeMain 
Spinacia oleracea (spinach)ChenopodiaceaeUnknown
Triticum aestivum (wheat)PoaceaeMain
Vitis vinifera (grapevine)VitaceaeMain
Zea mays (maize)PoaceaeMain

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

A number of other Chenopodium species occur as weeds, including Chenopodium murale (see separate datasheet), which has somewhat broader leaves with a distinctly wedge-shaped leaf base, seeds sharply keeled and a higher seed weight than C. album (Sen, 1981). C. murale is also a common weed which grows abundantly in irrrigated, cultivated fields, gardens and waste ground. Also C. opulifolium, a very widespread species, sometimes commoner than C. album as in East Africa, which differs in having leaves about as broad as long and branches often diverging at a wider angle from the stem. Ivens (1968) has a useful table showing the differences between Chenopodium species occurring in East Africa.

Habitat

C. album occurs from sea level to altitudes of 3600 m, and from latitudes 70°N to more than 50°S. It is a common weed of almost all cultivated crops, gardens, horticultural crops and orchards. It is also found on wasteland, in pastures and strips of uncultivated land, and along roadsides and riverbanks. It is tolerant of a wide range of cultural conditions, climates, soil types, fertility and pH, a fact reflected in Coquilat's (1951) suggestion that it is one of the five most widely distributed plants in the world. It is most vigorous in fertile, heavy and well-irrigated soils (reaching up to 2 m in height), often remaining as a dwarf in dryer and less fertile soils.

Habitat List

CategorySub categoryHabitatPresenceStatus
Terrestrial    

Biology and Ecology

C. album reproduces solely by seed. Individuals of this species demonstrate a great deal of plasticity in response to their edaphic and biotic environment, and seed production varies greatly according to these factors. Average seed production varies between 3000 and 20,000 seeds/plant Korsmo et al. (1981), but as many as 50,000–70,000 seeds per plant have been found Mandal and Pal (1990). Seeds are able to remain viable for extended periods in the soil seed bank, perhaps for up to 40 years Toole and Brown (1946). The seeds exhibit considerable polymorphy; some are smooth, some striate, and others possess a raised reticulum. Testa colour also varies significantly and can be black and shiny, brown or brownish-green. All of these variations in colour and form may be found in the seeds of a single plant (Holm et al., 1977). It appears that different seed morphs vary in their dormancy and germination requirements. This variation enables the species to germinate under a range of environmental conditions and may contribute greatly to its success as a weed (Maurya and Ambasht, 1973). C. album is autogamous but also wind pollinated, and flowers are occasionally visited by insects (Blackwell and Powell, 1981). C. album has no specialized seed dispersal mechanisms, so that the majority of seeds simply fall to the ground around the parent plant. They are not buoyant, but may be transported long distances by water. A percentage of seed also passes unharmed through animals and may be transported in this way (Holm et al., 1977).
Typically, freshly harvested seeds exhibit approximately 35% germinability. Low-temperature treatments of between 0°C and 5°C increase germination, as do alternating low and high temperatures, scarification and prolonged soaking over 20 days. Germination is slow for seeds following dry, indoor storage, but rapid for seeds overwintered in the field. In general, germination optima for this species are at 10°C in India, and 25°C in Canada, reflecting the fact that in temperate countries C. album usually behaves as a summer annual and in subtropical countries as a winter annual. Two distinct germination peaks have been recorded in Europe, one between March and May and a second between August and October (Fryer and Makepeace, 1977). In colder climates maximum seedling emergence has been observed between May and July with a peak in the last two weeks of June (Lapointe et al., 1985). The maximum depth from which buried seed is able to emerge is 5 cm (Korsmo et al., 1981), and percentage germination is greatest from seeds lying at, or just below the soil surface.
C. album will flower in any daylength, but an 8-hour photoperiod considerably hastens flowering and maturity. Larger, more vigorous plants result from a long photoperiod (16–18 hours), and for this reason the species is more extensively distributed in temperate zones and sparsely distributed around the equator (Holm et al., 1977). The detailed review by Bassett and Crompton (1978) provides some further information.
C. album occurs from sea level to altitudes of 3600 m, and from latitudes 70°N to more than 50°S. It is a common weed of almost all cultivated crops and found on wasteland, in pastures and strips of uncultivated land, and along roadsides and riverbanks. It is tolerant of a wide range of cultural conditions, climates, soil types, fertility and pH. Growing in temperatures of 5–30°C it is frost tolerant. It is most vigorous in fertile, heavy and well-irrigated soils (reaching up to 2 m in height), often remaining as a dwarf in dryer and less fertile soils.
The size, vigour and reproductive capacity of individual plants is affected by intraspecific competition, but less so by competition from wheat (Williams, 1964; Koblihova et al., 1987). Seed production potential, therefore, varies greatly according to the density of weed populations, and agronomic practices which result in a thick canopy cover will lead to less seed return to the seed bank, as increased density results in shorter plants, fewer inflorescences and reduced seed production. 

Notes on Pests

A downy mildew caused by Peronospora farinosa f.sp. chenopodii has been reported as an important disease of the grain cereal, C. quinoa, which is cultivated in Peru. The same disease has been observed on the weedy species C. album, C. murale and C. ambrosioides and is favoured by warm humid conditions. Alternaria alternata infects C. album causing brown necrotic spots which coalesce to form patches resulting in wilting and dying of leaves. Siddiqui et al. (2009) notes that mortality of weedy C. album was 10–60% in Pakistan. Phoma chenopodiicola also infects C. album and mycotoxins isolated from this pathogen have been proposed as mycoherbicides for weedy C. album (Cimmino et al., 2015). Other fungal diseases affecting plants in the Himalayas include damping off (Sclerotium sp.) and leaf blight caused by Cercospora sp. (Partap et al., 1998).
During surveys in Pakistan, Amin et al. (2017) noted that C. album is infested by five aphid species (Aphis craccivora, A. gossypii, A. nasturtii, Aulocorthum solani and Myzus persicae). The leaf miner Eurisaca melanocompta is also a serious pest. However, the greatest crop losses are due to birds which attack the crop prior to harvest or during drying in the field. Bitter landraces are less prone to attacks compared to sweet ones (Jansen, 2004).
Meloidogyne hapla (a root nematode) was reported on roots of C. album occurring in Kiwi plantations in Basilicata. Heterodera spp., a genus of cyst nematodes, also infect C. album.

List of Pests

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Natural Enemies

A downy mildew caused by Peronospora sp. has been reported as an important disease of the grain cereal, Chenopodium quinoa, which is cultivated in Peru. The same disease has been observed on the weedy species C. album, C. murale and C. ambrosioides (Aragon and Guttierez, 1992). Meloidogyne hapla (a root nematode) was reported on roots of C. album occurring in Kiwi plantations in Basilicata (Ciancio et al., 1992). Heterodera spp., a genus of cyst nematodes, also infect C. album (Bendixen and Rao, 1981).Some further organisms are listed by Bassett and Crompton (1978).

Natural enemies

Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Alternaria alternata (alternaria leaf spot)Pathogen     
Ascochyta betae (leaf blight: Chenopodiaceae)Pathogen   Netherlands 
Ascochyta hyalospora (leaf spot of quinoa)Pathogen     
Passalora dubiaPathogen     
Pleospora calvescens (leaf blight of Chenopodiaceae)Pathogen     

Impact

Introduction

C. album is responsible for important economic losses in agriculture around the world. Except in the extreme desert climate, C. album is found in all inhabited areas of the world where it thrives on all soil types and over a wide range of pH values (Holm et al., 1977). A survey conducted in Canada in 1991 showed that weeds caused estimated average annual losses of $984 million (Swanton et al., 1993). In the USA, a similar survey conducted on 46 crops showed average annual losses of $4.1 billion with current control strategies and $19.6 billion if herbicides were not available (Bridges and Anderson, 1992). Among the weeds implicated with those losses, C. album has been classified as one of the world's worst (Holm et al., 1977; Mitich, 1988). Its worldwide distribution, its ability to colonise new habitats and produce large quantities of seeds with viability extended over several years, its allelopathic potential, as well as the evolution of herbicide resistant biotypes have made C. album a major weed problem in agriculture (Holm et al., 1977; Mitich, 1988; Holt and Lebaron, 1990).

Direct Crop Losses

C. album reduces crop yield by direct competition for light and nutrients. In field and greenhouse experiments, important losses due to C. album have been reported on many crops including maize, soyabeans, tomato, oat, barley, lucerne, and sugarbeet. At the density of 172 to 300 plants/m², C. album was reported to cause between 6 and 58% yield loss in maize in field experiments in Canada (Sibuga and Bandeen, 1980; Ngouajio et al., 1999). In Spain, Torner et al. (1995) reported 22.3% maize yield loss in irrigated field experiments when maize was allowed to compete with C. album at equivalent densities. In the USA, 59% maize yield losses were attributed to uncontrolled populations of C. album in field experiments (Dyck and Liebman, 1995). At a density of 1.6 C. album plants/m of soyabean row, Shurtleff and Coble (1985) observed 15% loss of soyabean seed yield in North Carolina, USA. In Iowa, USA, Staniforth and Lovely (1964) observed about 35% soyabean yield losses due to a natural weed population composed mainly of C. album. In tomato, field experiments conducted in the USA using 64 C. album plants/m of row showed 36% losses of marketable fruits (Bhowmik and Reddy, 1988). In oats, C. album interference in field experiments conducted in Canada caused about 60% losses of grain yield when the weed was allowed to compete with the crop for the entire growing season (Lapointe et al., 1985). Losses of 23-36% of barley yield were attributed to C. album competition in the USA (Conn and Thomas, 1987). Under greenhouse conditions in Canada, about 23% reduction of lucerne biomass yield was recorded by Lapointe et al. (1985) as a direct result of C. album competition.In field studies conducted in Colorado, USA, sugarbeet root yield was reduced by 48% when competing with ca one C. album plant/m of row (Schweizer, 1983). When sugarbeet was grown with 13 C. album plants/m of row that emerged 10 days after the crop, root yield was reduced by 72% in Japan (Watanabe and Hirokawa, 1975). In contrast, when 22 C. album plants/m² were allowed to emerge simultaneously with sugarbeet in Wageningen, The Netherlands, yield losses as high as 93% were obtained (Kropff and Spitters, 1991; Kropff et al., 1992). When grown with a high density of 170 C. album plants/m², sugarbeet root yield was reduced by 86% (Holm et al., 1977). While yield losses due to C. album vary according to crop, weed density and location, in all cases reported, the crop losses were of significant economic impact.Crop seed contamination by weed seeds not only contributes to weed propagation, but also causes important losses in crop seed quality and value. C. album seeds are very small and frequently contaminate crop seeds harvested from weed infested fields (Holm et al., 1977). For example, C. album seeds are frequently found as impurities in many cereal seeds. Williams (1963) reported a carrot contamination rate of one-third at an official seed testing station in the UK. In the USA, contamination of legume seed by C. album has also been reported (Isely, 1960).While allelopathic effects of crop plants or crop residues on weeds are beneficial to farmers, the reverse may cause important economic losses. C. album has been reported to exhibit allelopathic effects on crop plants including maize, soyabeans, carrots, cucumbers, onions, tomatoes, sunflowers, lettuce, squash (Cucurbita maxima) and oats (Bhowmik, 1982; Reinhardt et al. 1994). In the USA, C. album residues were reported to cause 15-30% reduction of maize and soyabean growth under field conditions (Bhowmik and Doll, 1980) and 16-20% soyabean yield losses under glasshouse conditions (Bhowmik, 1982). In laboratory and greenhouse studies conducted in South Africa, Reinhardt et al. (1994) reported 68, 85, 47 and 51% growth inhibition by C. album residues on cucumbers, onions, tomatoes and sunflowers, respectively.The loss of herbicide activity as a result of evolution of resistance among weed populations has become a major concern in agricultural communities over the last three decades (Holt and Lebaron, 1990; Holt, 1992). C. album has been selected for resistance to several herbicides including triazines, substituted ureas, bromoxynil and pyrazon (Solymosi et al., 1986; Vencill and Foy, 1988; De Prado et al., 1989; Hagood, 1989; Holt and Lebaron, 1990; Myers and Harvey, 1993; Glenn et al., 1997). Herbicide-resistant biotypes of C. album have been reported in many countries including Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Italy, France, Germany, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA (Heap, 2000). C. album resistance to herbicides has an important economic impact on agricultural production. Resistant biotypes cause direct losses from competition, especially in no-till production systems. Their control requires the use of alternative herbicides or integrated management systems that include herbicide combinations as well as non-chemical methods (Hagood, 1989; Holt and Lebaron, 1990; Holt, 1992; Myers and Harvey, 1993; Glenn et al., 1997). The additional cost of controlling resistant weed biotypes may increase total farm inputs.

Indirect Crop Losses

As an alternate host of several economically important pests and diseases, C. album is responsible for important indirect losses in agriculture. C. album was reported to be the host of a new plant disease caused by the fungus Stagonospora atriplicis in New Zealand (McKenzie and Dingley, 1996). In Japan, C. album was reported to be a host for Polymyxa betae (Abe and Ui, 1986). This fungus is a vector of rhizomania of sugarbeet caused by beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) (Abe and Tamada, 1986). P. betae isolated from C. album was also reported to thrive on other plant species including spinach (Spinacia oleracea) (Abe and Ui, 1986). C. album is also the alternate host of several crop viruses. In the UK, Stevens et al. (1994) showed that C. album was susceptible to beet yellows virus (BYV). This disease, transmitted primarily by the aphid Myzus persicae, is responsible for up to 47% sugarbeet losses (Smith and Hallsworth, 1990). In the USA, C. album was reported to be a successful host of peanut stunt cucumovirus (Gillaspie and Ghabrial, 1998). In India, Sharma et al. (1998) showed that prunus necrotic ring spot virus (PNRSV) was transmitted to C. album, which was also shown to be susceptible to potato viruses M and S (Ksiazek, 1976).In Quebec, Canada, Bélair and Benoit (1996) reported C. album as an alternate host for the northern root-knot nematode Meloidogyne halpa. This nematode is a major constraint to carrot production in southwestern Quebec. The potato root-knot nematode, Ditylenchus destructor, was shown to infest C. album in South Africa, and thereby survive between crop seasons (De Waele et al., 1990). In South Africa, this nematode is also an important pest of groundnut. In Utah, USA, the insect Pemphigus betae (Homoptera: Aphididae) was shown to have a life cycle that alternates between cottonwood trees (Populus angustifolia) and the roots of C. album (Moran and Whitham, 1988). The beet leafhopper and the common stalkborer are insects that live on C. album, but spread to sugarbeet, tomatoes, corn and certain flowers (Wright, 1972; Mitich, 1988).

Mammalian Losses

C. album is toxic to humans and animals. It produces pollen that causes hay fever (Wodehouse, 1971). C. album produces high concentrations of nitrate and oxalic acid, which are poisonous to many animals including swine and sheep when eaten in large quantities (Kingsbury, 1964; Schmutz et al., 1968; Everist, 1979). When eaten by dairy cows, C. album causes taint in milk (Mitich, 1988). Between 1951 and 1960 the estimated losses of beef cattle due to poisonous plants in 11 western states of the USA were over $17 million (Schmutz et al., 1968). According to the same source, losses of sheep and wool were estimated at nearly $6 million. In 1988, estimated losses of cattle and sheep in 17 western states of the USA were $145,330,080 and $23,779,350 respectively (Nielsen et al., 1988; Frandsen and Boe, 1991); C. album is one of the major species associated with those losses (Lorenz and Dewey, 1988).

Uses

A number of uses have been reported for C. album. The leaves and tender branches may be used as a vegetable in many parts of the world, and also in India in the production of a curd, known locally as Raita (Maheshwari, 1963). Young shoots are boiled and eaten often with other vegetables. They are often dried and stored for later use (Jansen, 2004). It may also be used as a fodder for livestock.
According to Partap and Kapoor (1985), Himalayan chenopod grain consumption is associated with altitude, low family income and social conservatism. In the Himalayas, where it is grown as a subsistence pseudocereal, seeds are ground into flour for pancakes and bread, and may be boiled for gruel. Porridge is also made using roasted and ground grain. In the past, the seeds of Chenopodium album were harvested all over Europe, to be dried and ground into flour for making bread, cakes and gruel. In parts of the Americas they are still used for that purpose (Hatfield, 1971). Fermented alcoholic drinks are also brewed (Jansen, 2004). Usage depends on cultivar type. Farmers may thin grain crops and use the thinnings at a leafy vegetable. Grain are also used as a poultry and livestock feed. Waste husks were used for washing clothes in the past (Partap et al., 1998).
Various medicinal uses have been reported. The leaves may be taken in the form of an infusion or decoction as a laxative and anthelminthic. It has also been recommended by Hindu physicians as a treatment for hepatic disorders and splenic enlargement (Chopra et al., 1958). The finely powdered leaf is used by Zulus as a dusting powder to allay irritation about the external genitalia of children (Watt and Breyer-Brandwijk, 1962). Seeds are used traditionally to improve the appetite and as an anthelmintic, laxative, aphrodisiac and a tonic. They have also been used to treat biliousness, stomach pains, eye and throat problems, piles, and diseases of blood, heart and spleen (Jansen, 2004). Pharmacological studies have demonstrated that C. album is a good candidate for the development of treatments for muscular spasms and pain (Poonia and Upadhayay, 2015). Methanolic and aqueous leaf extracts of C. album demonstrated antilithiatic effects on experimentally induced urolithiasis in rats compared to a standard antilithiatic agent, cystone (Sikarwar et al., 2017). Tests showed C. album had significant anthelmintic activity against cyathostomins, an important gastrointestinal nematode infecting equids. Their effective control is being compromised by widespread resistance to broad spectrum anthelmintics licenced for use in equids. Thus, C. album has considerable potential as an anthelmintic forage or feed supplement (Peachey et al., 2015). 
Research on the medicinal uses and nutritional composition of C. album is comprehensively reviewed by Poonia and Upadhayay (2015).

Uses List

Environmental > Host of pest
Materials > Poisonous to mammals
Medicinal, pharmaceutical > Traditional/folklore
Human food and beverage > Cereal
Human food and beverage > Vegetable
Animal feed, fodder, forage > Fodder/animal feed
Human food and beverage > Flour/starch

Prevention and Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Cultural Control

In India, emergence and establishment of C. album is favoured by sowing in early compared to late November (North-West Asia, particularly India and Pakistan). Populations of this weed can be reduced by effective integrated management involving competitive crop varieties, crop rotation, cross-row sowing, nutrient management and cropping date. Competitive crop varieties can suppress growth of the weed by establishing early canopy cover. In crops such as wheat and barley narrow row spacing, cross row sowing and higher seed rates can further suppress the growth of individuals (Johri et al., 1992).

In areas where the population density of C. album is very high, the stale seed bed technique can be used to encourage weed emergence prior to crop sowing so depleting the soil seed reservoir. Crop rotation and nutrient management can be effectively integrated with other cultural practices for the management of this weed in wheat (Balyan et al., 1988; Bhagawati et al., 1989).

C. album has also been found to be sensitive to flaming (Vanhala, 1996), whilst manual weeding and earthing-up are effective in potato (Jaiswal, 1994). Manual weeding at 25, 40, 55 and 70 days after sowing significantly reduced total weed dry weight and increased wheat yield in trials conducted in Madhya Pradesh, India (Singh and Bajpai, 1992). The major goal of any sustainable cultural control programme should be to prevent the consistent enrichment of the soil seed bank.

Biological Control

Ascochyta caulina, a myco-herbicide, has been used for control of C. album (Horsten and Kempenaar, 1994; Kempenaar, 1995). C. album has been identified among targets for future research into the potential for biological control (Schroeder et al., 1993).

Chemical Control

C. album is sensitive to a range of foliage-applied herbicides, including 2,4-D, MCPA, paraquat, bentazone, dichlofop, isoproturon, metoxuron, methabenzthiazuron, sulfosulfuron, metsulfuron-methyl, chlorotoluron, bromoxynil and dicamba. Lorenzi (1984) and Mamarot and Rodriguez (1997) provide suggestions for use of herbicides and herbicide mixtures in a wide range of crops in Brazil and France respectively. Lorenzi indicates resistance to asulam and only moderate susceptibility to acifluorfen, butachlor and metolachlor in Brazil.

Isoproturon alone, isoproturon + dicamba or 2,4-D + isoproturon + surfactant provided the maximum control of C. album in wheat (Malik et al., 1992). C. album control in soybean (Glycine max) was greater with thifensulfuron (Monks et al., 1993). Tank mixtures of bentazone and imazethapyr controlled both redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and C. album in Phaseolus vulgaris.


Biotypes of this weed, resistant to atrazine, chloridazon and pyridate have been reported (Solymosi and Lehoczki, 1989; Parks et al., 1995). Atrazine-resistant biotypes have been a particular problem in maize, but a combination of reduced herbicide application rates and mechanical cultivation have provided effective alternative control strategies for both triazine-resistant and susceptible C. album biotypes (Parks et al., 1995).

 

Cultivation

In the Himalayas grain crops are grown as a summer crop, sown in April at higher altitudes and in May–June as lower elevations. Fields are prepared and seeds are direct sown by broadcasting and lightly covered with soil (Partap et al., 1998). Broadcasting requires around 20 kg seed per ha and the 1000-seed weight is about 1.4 g. Seeds are also sown in rows 25–50 apart at a depth of 1–2 cm (Jansen, 2004). Partap et al. (1998) notes that row spacings of 50–75 are used. If mean temperatures are above 10°C, seedlings emerge one week later if the soil is sufficiently moist. When plants are 15–30 cm tall they are hand thinned to a spacing of 1–3 plants/m2. Growth period is very variable. Early and daylength-neutral cultivars may take 50–60 days to flowering and 90–110 days to seed maturity. Late and short-day cultivars need 4–5 weeks longer. In some areas of northern India, C. album is commonly intercropped with finger millet, potato, maize, rice, amaranth, foxtail millet, sesame, soyabean, taro, cowpea or common bean (Jansen, 2004). The crop needs relatively little aftercare until harvest which generally takes place in September–October (Partap et al., 1998).
A study comparing the effect of liquid biofertilizers, chemical fertilizers and vermicompost on leafy vegetable C. album showed that liquid biofertilizers Azophos, and chemical fertilizers urea and potassium chloride, improved leaf nutritive value (Srinivasan and Sabitha, 2012).

Harvesting

Mature inflorescences of grain crops are harvested with a sickle, bundled into sheaves which are dried in fields or often carried home and sun dried in the yard. Threshing is achieved by beating with sticks or treading using bullock. Scoop winnowing separates the grain from the chaff and a crude metal sifter is also often used prior to storage. Hand pounding of seeds prior to consumption is required for some cultivars (black, red and brown) to remove the perianth covering the seeds (Partap et al., 1998).
In India grain yields of 0.2–0.6 t/ha are reported (Jansen, 2004). The traditional practice of growing at low densities (1–3 plants/m2) while intercropping in the Himalayas is recommended to optimise grain yields. However, yield varies from individual plants (10–126 g) and depends on crop density, plant growth and the farmland (Partap et al., 1998).
When grown to investigate foliage yield under experimental conditions in India, harvesting was undertaken initially after the third week after sowing, and successive cuttings done at intervals of 15 days. Leaf yields increased with each cutting and highest yields were obtained with the third and final cutting. Mean foliage yield over the 3 cuttings ranged from 0.40 to 3.03 kg/4 m2 for the 13 lines tested (Bhargava et al., 2006).

Postharvest Treatment

Seed moisture content at harvest may be around 20% as the dense inflorescences do not dry easily. Artificial drying to 14% is required prior to storage (Jansen, 2004).

Genetic Resources and Breeding

The chromosome number varies, and has been recorded as n = 9, 18, 27, 36 and 54. Diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid plants have been reported and the tetraploid cytotype from northern India is genetically distinct from the diploid and hexaploid cytotypes. Karyotype analysis, genomic in situ hybridization, flavonoid profiles and analysis using SOS1 homologues show that the hexaploid types are allopolyploids (Ohri, 2015). Genome size stability in Chenopodium across Europe was studied using DAPI flow cytometry (Vít et al., 2016). Intraspecific genome size variation was low (7.7%) in C. album despite its cosmopolitan distribution.
According to Partap et al. (1998), the National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources in New Delhi, India, holds the most extensive collections of wild, weedy and cultivated forms of Chenopodium spp., some from collecting missions in the Himalayans. The USDA National Plant Germplasm System gene bank hold 19 C. album accessions (USDA-ARS, 2017). Further collecting of crop germplasm in the Himalayas is urgently needed as landraces are in danger of genetic erosion due to a lack of crop improvement and also farmers are turning to other more profitable crops (Jansen, 2004). On-farm conservation is recommended to preserve germplasm and contribute to their improvement by participatory plant breeding involving the local communities (Partap et al., 1998).
Selection and breeding opportunities for Chenopodium in the Himalayas and Asia are limited largely due to the lack of germplasm in gene banks. Genetic improvement of productivity and grain quality is required, and identification of saponin-free accessions with high protein and favourable balance of amino acids is a priority (Partap et al., 1998).
Path coefficient analysis on 60 Indian and exotic lines of C. album showed that number of leaves had the highest direct effects on leaf yield followed by leaf length. Direct selection for these characters along with plant height could improve leaf yield (Parkash, 2012). Genotype environment interaction studies were undertaken on 13 vegetable lines of C. album. Leaf protein contents ranged from 3.63 to 4.51 g/100 g and two lines were identified that showed stability for all leaf quality traits. Three lines were high yielding and stable for leaf yield (Bhargava et al., 2008).
Genetic diversity in Indian accessions has been studied using microsatellite markers (Gautam et al., 2012) while simple sequence repeat markers were used to study Chinese C. album accessions (Zhang et al., 2012).
A candidate gene conferring salt tolerance, betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (CaBADH), was cloned from salt tolerant C. album and a plant expression vector constructed. High expression levels were noted under salt stress (Yuan et al., 2010).

Major Cultivars

Four native Chenopodium cultivars grown for seed in the Himalayas have been identified, based primarily on seed colour (Partap et al., 1998):
Black cultivar - around 85% of the seed population have black seeds while the remaining 15% comprise brownish black, brown, light brown and pale yellow seeds
Brown cultivar - around 85% of seeds are brownish black or brown while the rest are light brown, pale yellow or rarely black
Red cultivar - around 98% of seeds are reddish purple with the remaining 2% being pale yellow
Earthen cultivar - seeds are of uniform size and colour, dusty brown
Earthen cultivars tend to be shorter and more branched than the other cultivars and the branches more ascending in habit. Black, brown and red cultivars have dense, compact drooping panicles that are closely branched. Those of the earthen cultivar are distinctly different being looser branched, less compact, broom-like and ascending.

Propagation

Propagated entirely by seed. Typically, freshly harvested seeds exhibit approximately 35% germinability. Low-temperature treatments of between 0°C and 5°C increase germination, as do alternating low and high temperatures, scarification and prolonged soaking over 20 days. Germination is slow for seeds following dry, indoor storage, but rapid for seeds overwintered in the field. In general, germination optima for this species are at 10°C in India, and 25°C in Canada, reflecting the fact that in temperate countries C. album usually behaves as a summer annual and in subtropical countries as a winter annual. Two distinct germination peaks have been recorded in Europe, one between March and May and a second between August and October. In colder climates maximum seedling emergence has been observed between May and July with a peak in the last two weeks of June. The maximum depth from which buried seed is able to emerge is 5 cm, and percentage germination is greatest from seeds lying at, or just below the soil surface.
Leaf, stem and nodal explants of C. album were cultured on modified MS medium, and stem explants performed best on medium containing 2 mg/litre of IAA and NAA, and 0.5 mg/litre of 2,4-D and benzyladenine. Callus induction was highest on medium containing 0.5 mg/litre 2,4-D and 1 mg/litre benzyladenine, and multiple shoots were obtained from calli on MS medium supplemented with 1 mg/litre IAA and 2 mg/litre benzyladenine (Karpagam et al., 2010).

Nutritional Value

Young leaves have the highest nutrient contents, and are rich in protein (4.2%) with a high proportion of amino acids, and significant amounts of calcium, retinol, ascorbic acid, and carotenoids. Young shoots are significantly richer in copper and iron than mature plants while mature plants contain significantly more calcium, magnesium and sodium (Gqaza et al., 2013).
Compared to spinach and cabbage, fibre contents are high (4–6 g/100 g) as are iron levels but are less than amaranth leaves (Poonia and Upadhayay, 2015). C. album foliage and seeds contain all the essential amino acids. According to Gesinski and Nowak (2011) amino acid contents (g/kg) in foliage are glutamic acid (16.83), leucine (13.44), aspartic acid (11.59), arginine (11.29), glycine (10.92), lysine (10.11), tyrosine (9.54), phenylalanine (9.26), threonine (8.18), alanine (7.96), serine (7.92), valine (6.58), isoleucine (5.36), and histidine (4.34). Leaves also contain significant concentrations of polyphenols, flavonoids, proanthocyanidins and carotenoids which have a range of health benefits. There is evidence that antioxidants in food play an important role in illness prevention (Poonia and Upadhayay, 2015).
The National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (USDA, 2017) gives the following proximate contents for raw lambquarters (100 g portion of C. album foliage): water (84.3 g), protein (4.20 g), total lipid (0.80 g), carbohydrate, by difference (7.30 g), total dietary fibre (4.0 g) and energy (43 kcal). Mineral contents are given as calcium (309 mg), potassium (452 mg), phosphorus (72 mg), sodium (43 mg), magnesium (34 mg), iron (1.2 mg) and zinc (0.44 mg). Vitamin contents are given as ascorbic acid (80.0 mg), niacin (1.20 mg), riboflavin (0.44 mg), vitamin B6 (0.27 mg), retinol (580 µg), and folate (30 µg).
According to Partap et al. (1998), the nutrient composition of seeds of Himalayan cultivars (per 100 g) is given as: protein (16 g), fats (7 g), carbohydrate (66 g) and energy (395 kcal). Gesinski and Nowak (2011) report amino acid contents of seeds (g/kg) as: arginine (17.18), glutamic acid (13.56), glycine (10.37), lysine (8.07), leucine (7.58), serine (6.46), aspartic acid (5.94), threonine (5.35), histidine (5.28), tyrosine (5.25), phenylalanine (4.90), valine (3.72), alanine (3.35), isoleucine (3.34) and methionine (2.27).

Phytosanitary Issues/Food Safety

C. album produces pollen that causes allergies and it is listed in the International Union of Immunological Societies allergen nomenclature database (Villalba et al., 2014).
Several antinutritional factors are found in C. album foliage. Saponins are present though in small quantities which are broken down during cooking. Nitrate is also present (3-5% dry weight) but most is concentrated in stems which are discarded when prepared for cooking. Oxalate contents range from 0.9 to 3.9 g/100 g fresh weight again concentrated in the stems although raw leaves do contain some oxalic acid (360-2000 mg/100 g). Phytate levels of 18.1 mg/100 g are also present. Blanching and cooking result in significant reductions in oxalic acid and also phytic acid (Poonia and Upadhayay, 2015).
High concentrations of nitrate and oxalic acid are poisonous to many animals including cattle, swine and sheep when eaten in large quantities. Nitrate poisoning of cattle fed C. album hay was reported by Ozmen et al. (2003). When eaten by dairy cows, C. album causes taint in milk.
C. album is a known hyperaccumulator of heavy metals. In C. album foliage sampled from contaminated soils in India, Ramteke et al. (2016) found high heavy metal levels (by dry weight) compared to soil concentrations for arsenic (1.86 mg/kg), chromium (17.0 mg/kg), cadmium (1.57 mg/kg), lead (2.3 mg/kg) and mercury (0.18 mg/kg). All of these concentrations are higher than permissible safe limits. In a South African study (Gqaza et al., 2013), arsenic and chromium were detected (1.8 and 0.90 mg/1000 g dry weight, respectively) following analysis of C. album leaves sampled from paths and home gardens. These elements are potential carcinogens and care should be taken not to consume large amounts of this vegetable.

Production and Trade

No global production or trade statistics are available.
C. album is mainly grown by subsistence farmers for grain but is traded in local markets across the Himalayan region. A conservative rough estimate of grain production in this area in 1987 was around 400 t, and some 200 t of this were traded in local and regional markets (Partap et al., 1998). Jansen (2004) estimates that 1500 ha in the Himalayas are given over to C. album grain cultivation.

Prospects

The productivity and opportunities for further utilization of the crop are limited and remain constraints to its wider adoption. There is also a lack of research into appropriate crop husbandry to maximise the potential of the crop (Partap et al., 1998).

References

Abe H, Tamada T, 1986. Association of beet necrotic yellow vein virus with isolates of Polymyxa betp Keskin. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 52(2):235-247
Abe H, Ui T, 1986. Host range of Polymyxa betp Keskin strains in rhizomania-infested soils of sugar beet fields in Japan. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 52(3):394-403
Amin, M., Mahmood, K., Bodlah, I., 2017. 271377-1385. http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-27-04/42.pdf
Anupama Sharma, Raja Ram, Zaidi AA, 1998. Rubus ellipticus, a perennial weed host of prunus necrotic ring spot virus in India. Plant Disease, 82(11):1283.
Aragon L, Gutierrez W, 1992. Downy mildew on four Chenopodium species. Fitopatologia, 27(2):104-109
Atul Bhargava, Sudhir Shukla, Deepak Ohri, 2008. 33-15. http://agrobiol.sggw.waw.pl/˜cbcs/articles/CBCS_3_1_2.pdf
Balyan RS, Bhan VM, Malik RK, 1988. Effect of herbicides rotation and crop rotation on weed complex. Haryana Agricultural University Journal of Research, 18:100-107.
Bassett IJ, Crompton CW, 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds. 32. Chenopodium album L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58(4):1061-1072
Bendixen LE, Rao BVV, 1981. Anthropods and nematodes hosted by the World's worst perennial weeds. In: Proceedings, 8th Asian Pacific Weed Science Society. Banglore, India: University of Agricultural Sciences, 175-179.
Bhagawati PC, Faroda AS, Malik RK, 1989. Competition between wheat and associated weeds at different nitrogen rates. Beitrage zur Tropischen Landwirtschaft und Veterinarmedizin, 27(4):427-433
Bhargava, A., Shukla, S., Dixit, B. S., Bannerji, R., Ohri, D., 2006. 3329-38. http://www.cazv.cz
Bhowmik PC, 1982. Allelopathic activity of annual weeds on corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max). Dissertation Abstracts International, B, 42(7):2637
Bhowmik PC, Doll JD, 1980. Field studies on allelopathic effects of weed and crop residues. Proceedings North Central Weed Control Conference., Volume 35:82-83
Bhowmik PC, Reddy KN, 1988. Interference of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Technology, 2(4):505-508
Bindal Gautam, Rathour Rajeev, Sharma, T. R., Rana, J. C., Dev, S. K., 2012. 72480-483. http://isgpb.co.in
Blackwell WH, Powell MJ, 1981. 68524-526.
Blecharczyk A, Skrzypczak G, Pudelko J, 1996. Weed seedbank response to continuous cropping and fertilization. In: Brown H, Cussans GW, Devine MD; Duke SO, Fernandez-Quintanilla C, Helweg A, Labrada RE, Landes M, Kudsk P, Streibig JCP, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. Slagelse, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology, 247-252.
Brenan JPM, 1988. 133.Chenopodiaceae. In: Launert E, ed. Flora Zambeziaca. Volume 9 Part 1. London, UK: Flora Zambeziaca Managing Committee.
Brenan JPM, Akeroyd JR, 1993. 3. Chenopodium L. In: Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO, Edmondson JR, Heywood VH, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, eds. Flora Europaea Volume 1. Psilotaceae to Platanaceae. 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 111-114.
Bridges DC, Anderson RL, 1992. Crop losses due to weeds in the United States. In: Anderson RL, Bauman PA, Gianessi LP, eds. Crop losses due to weeds in the Unites States - 1992. Champaign Illinois, USA: Weed Science Society of America, 1-61.
Bélair G, Benôit DL, 1996. Host suitability of 32 common weeds to Meloidogyne hapla in organic soils of southwestern Quebec. Journal of Nematology, 28(4 Suppl.):643-647; 13 ref.
Chander Parkash, 2012. 8271-74.
Chaudhary SA, Parker C, Kasasian L, 1981. Weeds of Central, Southern and Eastern Arabian Peninsula. Tropical Pest Management, 27(2):181-190.
Chopra RN, Chopra IC, Handa KL, Kapur LD, 1958. Indigenous Drugs of India. Calcutta, India: U. N. Dhur & Sons Private Limited.
Ciancio A, Giudice VL, Bonsignore R, Roccuzzo G, 1992. Root-knot nematodes attacking weeds in Southern Italy. Informatore Fitopatologico, 42(6):55-57
Cimmino, A., Masi, M., Evidente, M., Evidente, A., 2015. 101119-1126. http://www.naturalproduct.us/JournalArchive.asp
Conn JS, Thomas DL, 1987. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in spring barley. Weed Technology, 1(4):312-313
Coquillat M, 1951. Sur les plantes les plus communes a' la surface du globe. Bulletin Mensuel de la Societe Linneenne de Lyon, 20:165-170.
De Waele D, Jordaan EM, Basson S, 1990. Host status of seven weed species and their effects on Ditylenchus destructor infestation on peanut. Journal of Nematology, 22:292-296.
Dyck E, Liebman M, 1995. Crop-weed interference as influenced by a leguminous or synthetic fertilizer nitrogen source: II. Rotation experiments with crimson clover, field corn, and lambsquarters. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 56(2):109-120.
Dyer WT, Thiselton, 1979. Flora of Tropical Africa, Vol. IV. New Delhi, India: A. J. Reprints Agency, 75-79.
Edgecombe WS, 1970. Weeds of Lebanon. Beirut, Lebanon: American University of Beirut.
Everist SL, 1974. Poisonous Plants of Australia. Sydney, Australia: Angus & Robertson.
Frandsen E, Boe D, 1991. Economics of noxious weeds and poisonous plants. In: James LF, Evans JO, Ralphs MH, Child RD, eds. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, USA: Westview Press, 442-458.
Fryer JD, Makepeace RJ, 1977. Weed control handbook. Volume I. Principles, including plant growth regulators. Weed control handbook. Volume I. Principles, including plant growth regulators. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford UK, Ed. 6:xvii + 510 pp.
Gillaspie AGJr, Ghabrial SA, 1998. First report of peanut stunt cucumovirus naturally infecting Desmodium sp. Plant Disease, 82(12):1402.
Glauninger J, Holzner W, 1982. Interference between weeds and crops: A review of literature. In: Holzner W, Numata, eds. Biology and Ecology of Weeds. The Hague, Netherlands: Dr T. Junk Publisher, 149-159.
Glenn S, Phillips WHII, Kalnay P, 1997. Long-term control of perennial broadleaf weeds and triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology, 11(3):436-443; 18 ref.
Gqaza, B. M., Njume, C., Goduka, N. I., George, G., 2013. 5397-102. http://www.ipcbee.com/vol53/019-ICNFS2013-F2005.pdf
Hagood ES Jr, 1989. Control of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology, 3(1):136-142
Haselwood EL, Motter GG, 1966. Handbook of Hawaiian weeds. Hawaii, USA: Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, 479pp.
Hatfield AW, 1971. How to Enjoy your Weeds. New York, USA: Sterling Publishing Co., Inc., 106-111.
Heap IM, 2000. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds (online). WWW page at http://www.weedscience.org/Resistance/resistmodule.asp.
Hewson RT, 1971. Studies on weed competition in some vegetable crops. PhD. Thesis. Uxbridge, UK: Brunel University.
Holm L, Doll J, Holm E, Pancho J, Herberger J, 1997. World Weeds. Natural Histories and Distribution. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Holm LG, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, Plucknett DL, 1991. A Geographic Atlas of World Weeds. Malabar, Florida, USA: Krieger Publishing Company.
Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University Press of Hawaii.
Holt JS, 1992. History of identification of herbicide-resistant weeds. Weed Technology, 6(3):615-620
Holt JS, LeBaron HM, 1990. Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance. Weed Technology, 4(1):141-149
Hooker JD, 1885. Flora of British India. Ist edn. Vol. IV. Kent, UK: L. Reeve & Company Limited.
Horsten PJFM, Kempenaar C, 1994. Spore production by the fungus Ascochyta caulina, a potential mycoherbicide against Chenopodium album. Rapport - DLO-Instituut voor Agrobiologisch en Bodemvruchtbaarheidsonderzoek Wageningen, Netherlands; DLO - Instituut voor Agrobiologisch en Bodemvruchtbaarheidsonderzoek, No. 23:46 pp.
Iffat Siddiqui, Rukhsana Bajwa, Arshad Javaid, 2009. 411437-1438. http://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/pjhtmls/contents.html
Indu Sikarwar, Dey, Y. N., Wanjari, M. M., Ajay Sharma, Gaidhani, S. N., Jadhav, A. D., 2017. 195275-282. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378874116319341
Isely D, 1960. Weed Identification and Control in the North Central States. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press.
Ivens GW, 1968. East African Weeds and their Control. Nairobi, Kenya: Oxford University Press.
Jaiswal VP, 1994. Differential response of weed species to herbicides in potato. Journal of the Indian Potato Association, 21(1-2):157-159.
Johri AK, Govindra Singh, Sharma D, 1992. Nutrient uptake by wheat and associated weeds as influenced by management practices. Tropical Agriculture, 69(4):391-393
Karpagam, K., Rajalakshmi, S., Mariyappan, V., 2010. 27359-364.
Kempenaar C, 1995. Studies on biological control of Chenopodium album by Ascophyta caulina. Den Haag, Netherlands: CIP - Data Konninlijke Bibliotheek.
Kingsbury JM, 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Koblihova H, Frantik T, Kovar P, Dostalek J, Stejskalova H, 1987. Comparison of seasonal particle deposition in various plant stand. Rostlinna Vyroba, 33(1):17-26.
Korsmo E, Torstein V, Fykse H, 1981. Korsmos' Ugras Plansjer. Oslo, Norway: Norsk Landbruk/Landbruks Forlaget.
Kropff MJ, Spitters CJT, 1991. A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weeds. Weed Research (Oxford), 31(2):97-105
Kropff MJ, Spitters CJT, Schneiders BJ, Joenje W, Groot Wde, 1992. An eco-physiological model for interspecific competition, applied to the influence of Chenopodium album L. on sugarbeet. Weed Research (Oxford), 32(6):451-463
Kropff MJ, Weaver SE, Smits MA, 1992. Use of ecophysiological models for crop-weed interference: relations amongst weed density, relative time of weed emergence, relative leaf area, and yield loss. Weed Science, 40(2):296-301
Ksiazek D, 1976. The spread of potato viruses and the chemical control of Colorado beetle. Zesz. Probl. Postepow Nauk Roln., No.174:127-143
Kubat A, Choroszewski P, Pawinska M, 1996. Potato and weed problems in Poland. In: Brown H, Cussans GW, Devine MD; Duke SO, Fernandez-Quintanilla C, Helweg A, Labrada RE, Landes M, Kudsk P, Streibig JCP, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. Slagelse, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology, 1037-1039.
Lapointe A-M, Deschenes J-M, Gervais P, Lemieux C, 1984. Biology of fat hen (Chenopodium album): influence of soil cultivation on emergence and of population density on growth. Canadian Journal of Botany, 62(12):2587-2593
Lapointe A-M, Lemieux C, Deschenes J-M, Gervais P, 1985. Effect of the period of interference of Chenopodium album on the yield of oats and lucerne. Phytoprotection, 66(1):37-45
Lazarides M, Cowley K, Hohnen P, 1997. CSIRO handbook of Australian weeds. CSIRO handbook of Australian weeds., vii + 264 pp.
Lorenz RJ, Dewey SA, 1988. Noxious weeds that are poisonous. The ecology and economic impact of poisonous plants on livestock production [edited by James, L.F.; Ralphs, M.H. and Nielsen, D.B.] Boulder, CO 80301, USA; Westview Press, Inc., Frederick A. Prpger. Publishers, 309-336
Lorenzi H, 1982. Weeds of Brazil, terrestrial and aquatic, parasitic, poisonous and medicinal. (Plantas daninhas de Brasil, terrestres, aquaticas, parasitas, toxicas e medicinais.) Nova Odessa, Brazil: H. Lorenzi, 425 pp.
Lorenzi H, 1984. Manual de Identificacao e Controle de Plantas Danhinas. Odessa, Brazil: H. Lorenzi.
Lorenzi HJ, Jeffery LS(Editors), 1987. Weeds of the United States and their control. New York, USA; Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Ltd., 355 pp.
Maheshwari JK, 1963. The Flora of Delhi. New Delhi, India: CSIR.
Malik RK, Panwar RS, Bhan VM, 1984. Sensitivity of various wheat cultivars to 2, 4-D. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 16(3):197-199.
Malik RK, Panwar RS, Malik RS, 1992. Chemical control of broad-leaf and grassy weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 37(2):324-326
Malik RK, Tsedev D, 1996. Major Weeds of Mongolia. Rome, Italy: FAO Publications.
Mamarot J, Rodriguez A, 1997. Sensibilité des Mauvaises Herbes aux Herbicides. 4th edition. Paris, France: Association de Coordination Technique Agricole.
Mandal RC, 1990. Weeds, weedicides and weed control - principle and practice. Bikaner, India: Agro Botanical Publishers.
Mandák, B., Trávnícek, P., Paštová, L., Korínková, D., 2012. 207530-540. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03672530
Manko YP, Wesselovskyi IV, Gudz VP, 1996. An integrated system of weed control based on weed situation scouting. In: Brown H, Cussans GW, Devine MD; Duke SO, Fernandez-Quintanilla C, Helweg A, Labrada RE, Landes M, Kudsk P, Streibig JCP, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. Slagelse, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology, 1027-1029.
Maurya AN, Ambasht RS, 1973. Significance of seed dimorphism in Alysicarpus monilifer DC. Journal of Ecology, 61:213-217.
McKenzie EHC, Dingley JM, 1996. New plant disease records in New Zealand: miscellaneous fungal pathogens III. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 34(2):263-272; 10 ref.
Mitch LW, 1988. Common lambsquarters. Weed Technology, 2(4):550-552
Monks CD, Wilcut JW, Richburg JS, 1993. Broadleaf weed control in soyabean (Glycine max) with chlorimuron plus acifluorfen or thifensulfuron mixtures. Weed Technology, 7(2):317-321
Moran NA, Whitham TG, 1988. Evolutionary reduction of complex life cycles: loss of host-alternation in Pemphigus (Homoptera: Aphididae). Evolution, 42(4):717-728
Myers MG, Harvey RG, 1993. Triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) control in field corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technology, 7(4):884-889
Ngouajio M, Lemieux C, Leroux GD, 1999. Prediction of corn (Zea mays) yield loss from early observations of the relative leaf area and the relative leaf cover of weeds. Weed Science, 47(3):297-304; 27 ref.
Nielsen DB, Rimbey NR, James LF, 1988. Economic considerations of poisonous plants on livestock. In: James LF, Ralphs MH, Nielsen DB, eds. The Ecology and Economic Impact of Poisonous Plants on Livestock Production. Boulder, USA: Westview Press, 5-15.
Numata M, Yoshizawa N, 1975. Weed flora of Japan. Japan Association for the Advancement of Phyto-Regulators. Tokyo, Japan: Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai.
Ohri D, 2015. 58131-134.
Ozmen, O., Mor, F., Unsal, A., 2003. 4583-84.
Parker C, 1992. Weeds of Bhutan. Weeds of Bhutan., vi + 236 pp.
Parks RJ, Curran WS, Roth GW, Hartwig NL, Calvin DD, 1995. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in corn (Zea mays) with postemergence herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technology, 9(4):728-735; 15 ref.
Partap T, Joshi BD, Galwey NW, 1998. No. 22Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research. 67 pp.
Partap T, Kapoor P, 1985. 14185-199.
Peachey, L. E., Pinchbeck, G. L., Matthews, J. B., Burden, F. A., Mulugeta, G., Scantlebury, C. E., Hodgkinson, J. E., 2015. 21040-52. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03044017
Philp J, 1953. The weed problem in vegetable production. In: Proceedings of the 1st British Weed Control Conference. Farnham, UK: British Crop Protection Council, 18-23.
Prado Rde, Dominguez C, Tena M, 1989. Characterization of triazine-resistant biotypes of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), hairy fleabane (Conyza bonaeriensis), and yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca) found in Spain. Weed Science, 37(1):1-4; 17 ref.
Rahiminejad, M. R., Gornall, R. J., 2004. 24677-87.
Rajput RL, Gautam DS, Verma OP, 1993. Studies on cultural and chemical weed control in mustard (Brassica campestris). Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal, 18(2):1-5
Reinhardt CF, Meissner R, Labuschagne N, 1994. Allelopathic interaction between Chenopodium album L. and certain crop species. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 11(1):45-49
Saghir AR, Markoullis G, 1974. Effects of weed competition and herbicides on yield and quality of potatoes. Proceedings 12th British Weed Control Conference. British Crop Protection Council. London UK, 533-539
Saldanha CJ, 1984. Flora of Karnataka. Magnoliaceae to Fabaceae. New Delhi, India: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.
Saraswat VN, 1993. Major weeds of Indian agriculture - their distribution and ecology. Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of an Indian Society of Weed Science International Symposium, Hisar, India, 18-20 November 1993 Hisar, Haryana, India; Indian Society of Weed Science, Vol. I:35-41
Schmutz ER, Freeman BN, Reed RE, 1968. Livestock-Poisoning Plants of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona, USA: The University of Arizona Press.
Schratt-Ehrendorfer L, 2012. Occurrence of Chenopodium-taxa in Zillertal (Northern Tyrol, Austria). (Zu Vorkommen von Chenopodium-Sippen im Zillertal (Tirol, Österreich).) Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Österreich, 148/149:133-136.
Schroeder D, Mueller-Schaerer H, Stinson CSA, 1993. A European weed survey in 10 major crop systems to identify targets for biological control. Weed Research (Oxford), 33(6):449-458
Schweizer EE, 1983. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Science, 31(1):5-8
Sen DN, 1981. Ecological approaches to Indian weeds. Jodhpur, India; Geobios International.
Shobhana Ramteke, Sahu, B. L., Dahariya, N. S., Patel, K. S., Blazhev, B., Matini, L., 2016. 7996-1004. http://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=67111
Shurtleff JL, Coble HD, 1985. Interference of certain broadleaf weed species in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Science, 33(5):654-657
Sibuga KP, Bandeen JD, 1980. Effects of green foxtail and lamb's-quarters interference in field corn. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 60(4):1419-1425
Sidhu MK, 1991. Reproductive biology of weeds. In: Sidhu MK, ed. Biology of Punjab Weeds - Distribution and Evolutionary Status. Mohali, Punjab, India: Anova Publication.
Singh VK, Bajpai RP, 1992. Crop-weed competition in dwarf wheat under hill zone of Chhattisgarh-MP. Current Research - University of Agricultural Sciences (Bangalore), 21(3):43-44
Sivgami Srinivasan, Sabitha, A., 2012. 49143-149.
Smith HG, Hallsworth PB, 1990. The effects of yellowing viruses on yield of sugar beet in field trials, 1985 and 1987. Annals of Applied Biology, 116(3):503-511.
Solymosi P, Lehoczki E, 1989. Characterization of a triple (atrazine-pyrazon-pyridate) resistant biotype of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.). Journal of Plant Physiology, 4(6):685-690
Solymosi P, Lehoczki E, Laskay G, 1986. Difference in herbicide resistance to various taxonomic populations of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and late-flowering goosefoot (Chenopodium strictum) in Hungary. Weed Science, 34(2):175-180
Srivastava AK, 1967. Ecological studies of Chenopodium album L. Annals of Arid Zone, 6(2):212-214.
Stace C, 1997. New Flora of the British Isles. 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Staniforth DW, Lovely WG, 1964. Losses due to annual weed infestations in soybeans in Iowa. North Central Weed Control Conference Research Report, 21:146.
Stevens M, Smith HG, Hallsworth PB, 1994. The host range of beet yellowing viruses among common arable weed species. Plant Pathology, 43(3):579-588.
Stilwell EK, Sweet RD, 1974. Competition of squash cultivars with weeds. Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society, Philadelphia., Vol. 28:229-233
Stokes, P., Rowley-Conwy, P., 2002. 95-99.
Swanton CJ, Harker KN, Anderson RL, 1993. Crop losses due to weeds in Canada. Weed Technology, 7(2):537-542.
Tackholm V, 1974. Students' Flora of Egypt. 2nd edition. Cairo, Egypt: University of Cairo.
Toole EH, Brown E, 1946. Final results of the Duval buried seed experiment. Journal of Agricultural Research, 72:201-210.
Torner C, Sanchez MJ, Pardo A, Suso ML, Caudevilla ME, Zaragoza C, 1996. Growth evolution of maize in competition with Chenopodium album and Datura stramonium. In: Brown H, Cussans GW, Devine MD; Duke SO, Fernandez-Quintanilla C, Helweg A, Labrada RE, Landes M, Kudsk P, Streibig JCP, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. Slagelse, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology, 215-219.
Torner C, Sanchez del Arco MJ, Pardo A, Suso ML, Caudevilla ME, Zaragoza C, 1995. Growth of maize in competition with Chenopodium album L. and Datura stramonium L. Proceedings of the 1995 Congress of the Spanish Weed Science Society, Huesca, Spain, 14-16 November 1995., 323-328; 10 ref.
Vanhala P, 1996. Response of weed population to flaming. In: Brown H, Cussans GW, Devine MD; Duke SO, Fernandez-Quintanilla C, Helweg A, Labrada RE, Landes M, Kudsk P, Streibig JCP, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. Slagelse, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology, 1115-1120.
Vencill WK, Foy CL, 1988. Distribution of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in Virginia. Weed Science, 36(4):497-499
Villalba, M., Barderas, R., Mas, S., Colás, C., Batanero, E., Rodríguez, R., 2014. 24371-381. http://www.jiaci.org
Vít, P., Krak, K., Trávnícek, P., Douda, J., Lomonosova, M. N., Mandák, B., 2016. 182637-649. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8339
Wang ZR, 1990. Farmland Weeds in China. Beijing, China: Agricultural Publishing House.
Watanabe Y, Hirokawa F, 1975. Influence of weed competition on sugar beet yield. Research Bulletin of the Hokkaido National Agricultural Experiment Station, No. 110:25-34
Watt JM, Breyer-Brandwijk MG, 1962. The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern Africa. Edinburgh and London, UK: E & S Livingstone Ltd.
Wells MJ, Balsinhas AA, Joffe H, Engelbrecht VM, Harding G, Stirton CH, 1986. A catalogue of problem plants in South Africa. Memoirs of the botanical survey of South Africa No 53. Pretoria, South Africa: Botanical Research Institute.
Williams JT, 1963. Biological flora of British Isles: Chenopodium album L. Journal of Ecology, 51:711-725.
Williams JT, 1964. A study of competing ability of Chenopodium album L. Weed Research, 4:283-295.
Williams JT, 1965. A study of the competitive ability of Chenopodium album L. I. Interference between kale and Chenopodium album grown in pure stands and mixtures. Weed Research, 5:283-295.
Wodehouse RP, 1971. Hayfever Plants. New York, USA: Hafner Publishing Company.
Wright RH, 1972. What Good is a Weed? Ecology in Action. New York, USA: Lothrop, Lee and Shep.
Yadav RP, Shrivastava UK, Yadav KS, 1995. Yield and economic analysis of weed-control practices in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 40(1):122-124
Yuan JunWen, Gu LiLi, Chen ShaSha, Xu DongSheng, Lan HaiYan, 2010. 471273-1279.
Zhang HengQing, Fang XiaoDi, Wu JinMei, Du Yang, Tan Kun, Fan QiangJun, Zhu EnWei, 2012. 32632-635. http://bbr.nefu.edu.cn
Vafaee, B. S., Narimani, V., Farokhzad, A., Chasemzadeh, R., 2011. Quantitative evaluation of predominant of weeds in winter wheat and barley fields in Eastern Azerbaijan, Iran.Revista Cientifica UDO Agricola, 11(1) 126-133. http://www.bioline.org.br/pdf?cg11013
Hassannejad, S., Ghafarbi, S. P., 2013. Weed flora survey of Tabriz wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields.Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), 3(9) 118-132. http://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JBES-Vol3No9-p118-132.pdf
Hassannejad, S., Ghafarbi, S. P., 2014. Weed flora survey in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) fields of Shabestar (northwest of Iran).Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60(7) 971-991.
Hassannejad, S., Ghafarbi, S. P., Abbasvand, E., Ghisvandi, B., 2014. Quantifying the effects of altitude and soil texture on weed species distribution in wheat fields of Tabriz, Iran.Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), 5(1) 590-596. http://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/JBES-Vol5No1-p590-596.pdf
Shah, S. M., Asad Ullah, Fazal Hadi, 2014. Ecological characteristics of weed flora in the wheat crop of Mastuj valley, district Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 20(4) 479-487. http://www.wssp.org.pk/vol-20-4-2014/6.%20PJWSR-22-2014.pdf
Ramanuj Patel, Deepika Patel, Pandey, A. K., 2014. First report of Alternaria alternata on Chenopodium album L. from India.Biological Forum, 6(2) 150-152. http://researchtrend.net/bf12/25%20DR%20RAMANUJ%20PATEL.pdf
Fazal Hadi, Muhammad Ibrar, 2015. Ecology of weeds in wheat crops of Kalash valley, district Chitral, Hindukush Range, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 21(3) 425-433. http://www.wssp.org.pk/vol-21-3-2015/11.%20PJWSR-06-2015.pdf
Hwang KiSeon, Eom MinYong, Park SuHyuk, Won OkJae, Lee InYong, Park KeeWoong, 2015. Occurrence and distribution of weed species on horticulture fields in Chungnam province of Korea.Journal of Ecology and Environment, 38(3) 353-360.
Macharia, I., Backhouse, D., Wu, S. B., Ateka, E. M., 2016. Weed species in tomato production and their role as alternate hosts of Tomato spotted wilt virus and its vector Frankliniella occidentalis.Annals of Applied Biology, 169(2) 224-235.
Oh, S. M., Moon, B. C., Kim, C. S., 2007. Current status on influx and habitat of exotic weeds in Korea. In: Proceedings of the 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society (APWSS) Conference, 2-6 October 2007, Colombo, Sri Lanka [Proceedings of the 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society (APWSS) Conference, 2-6 October 2007, Colombo, Sri Lanka.], [ed. by Marambe, B, Sangakkara, U. R., Costa, W. A. J. M. de, Abeysekara, A. S. K.]. Peradeniya, Sri Lanka: Asian Pacific Weed Science Society. 608-613.
Vojnich, V. J., Pölös, E., Baglyas, F., 2017. Weed vegetation of a vineyard on sandy soil.Lucrări Științifice, Universitatea de Științe Agricole Și Medicină Veterinară a Banatului, Timisoara, Seria I, Management Agricol, 19(1) 119-122. http://lsma.ro/index.php/lsma/article/view/1053/pdf
Darabi, S., Jamali, M., Bazrafshan, M., Mahmoudi, S. B., 2015. Detection of Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus (BNYVV) in some common weeds of sugar beet fields in Fars province.Journal of Sugar Beet , 30(2) Pe141-Pe155, En81. http://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/?lang=en
Tahira, J. J., Khan, S. N., 2017. Diversity of weed flora in onion fields of Punjab, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 23(2) 245-253. http://www.wssp.org.pk/resources/images/paper/955QW1498306408.pdf
Ávila-Alistac, N., Ramírez-Rojas, S., Lozoya-Saldaña, H., Rebollar-Alviter, Á., Guzmán-Plazola, R. A., 2017. Alternate hosts of Iris yellow spot virus and trips on onion crops in Morelos and Michoacan, Mexico.Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, 35(2) 242-262. http://www.rmf.smf.org.mx/Vol3522017/RMF_Vol_35_2_2017.pdf
Moskova, T., Dimitrov, G., Tityanov, M., 2018. Distribution and degree of weed growth of amaranth and other weeds in sunflower crops in Plovdiv and Stara Zagora regions.Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans, 21(1) 158-168. http://www.rimsa.eu/images/forage_production_vol_21-1_part_2_2018.pdf
Sehrish Ijaz, Muhammad Mubin, M. Shah Nawaz-ul-Rehman, Khan, A. A., 2020. Molecular analysis of Pedilanthus leaf curl virus and associated satellites infecting Chenopodium album in Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 57(2) 425-432.
Piekarczyk, M., Wenda-Piesik, A., Gałęzewski, L., Kotwica, K., 2019. Weed infestation and yielding of field pea and yellow lupine depending on various doses of herbicide mixtures.Acta Scientiarum Polonorum - Agricultura, 18(1) 21-27. http://www.agricultura.acta.utp.edu.pl/index.php/agricultura/article/view/129/84
Kara, M., Soylu, E. M., Uysal, A., Kurt, Ş., Choi YoungJoon, Soylu, S., 2020. Morphological and molecular characterization of downy mildew disease caused by Peronospora variabilis on Chenopodium album in Turkey.Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 15(10) (12 February 2020).
Sampangi, R. K., Mohan, S. K., Pappu, H. R., 2007. Identification of new alternative weed hosts for Iris yellow spot virus in the Pacific Northwest.Plant Disease, 91(12) 1683.
Mohammadi, A. H., Haghdel, M., Mohammadi-Moghaddam, M., Banihashemi, Z., 2006. Current status of Verticillium wilt disease of pistachio trees in Iran.Acta Horticulturae, No.726631-635. http://www.actahort.org
Shah, G. M., Khan, M. A., 2006. Checklist of noxious weeds of district Mansehra, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 12(3) 213-219. http://wssp.org.pk/
Marwat, K. B., Zahid Hussain, Bakhtiar Gul, Muhammad Saeed, Siraj-ud-Din, 2006. Survey on weed problems in wheat crop in district Mardan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 12(4) 353-358. http://wssp.org.pk/
Kazi, B. R., Buriro, A. H., Kubar, R. A., Jagirani, A. W., 2007. Weed spectrum frequency and density in wheat, (Triticum aestivum L.) under Tandojam conditions.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 13(3/4) 241-246. http://wssp.org.pk/
Tahira, J. J., Khan, S. N., Ruqia Suliman, Waheed Anwar, 2010. Weed flora of Curcuma longa fields of District Kasur, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 16(2) 241-246. http://www.wssp.org.pk/
Demİrcİ, E., Gene, T., 2009. Vegetative compatibility groups of Verticillium dahliae isolates from weeds in potato fields.Journal of Plant Pathology, 91(3) 671-676. http://www.sipav.org/main/jpp/
Bükün, B., 2005. Weed flora changes in cotton growing areas during the last decade after irrigation of Harran plain in Șanliurfa, Turkey.Pakistan Journal of Botany, 37(3) 667-672. http://www.pjbot.org
Rahmatullah Qureshi, Bhatti, G. R., 2001. Determination of weed communities in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields of district Sukkur.Pakistan Journal of Botany, 33(1) 109-115.
Abdul Waheed, Rahmatullah Qureshi, Jakhar, G. S., Hayatullah Tareen, 2009. Weed community dynamics in wheat crop of district Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41(1) 247-254. http://www.pjbot.org
Stobbs, L. W., Greig, N., Weaver, S., Shipp, L., Ferguson, G., 2009. The potential role of native weed species and bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) on the epidemiology of Pepino mosaic virus.Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 31(2) 254-261. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07060660909507599
Ghorbani, S. G. M., Shahraeena, N., Elahinia, S. A., 2010. Distribution and impact of virus associated diseases of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in northern Iran.Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 43(12) 1183-1189.
Fotopoulos, V., Dovas, C. I., Katis, N. I., 2011. Incidence of viruses infecting spinach in Greece, highlighting the importance of weeds as reservoir hosts.Journal of Plant Pathology, 93(2) 389-395. http://sipav.org/main/jpp/index.php/jpp/article/view/1194
Altınok, H. H., 2013. Fusarium species isolated from common weeds in eggplant fields and symptomless hosts of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melongenae in Turkey.Journal of Phytopathology, 161(5) 335-340.
Muhammad Tauseef, Fahad Ihsan, Wajad Nazir, Jahanzaib Farooq, 2012. Weed Flora and importance value index (IVI) of the weeds in cotton crop fields in the region of Khanewal, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 18(3) 319-330. http://www.wssp.org.pk/article.htm
Khan, R. U., Wazir, S. M., Muhammad Subhan, Saad Ullah, Hidayat Ullah, Aysha Farooq, Farheen Jaffar, Shazia, Shah, I. A., Mustafa Kamal, 2012. Weed flora of sugarcane in district Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 18(4) 541-552. http://www.wssp.org.pk/article.htm

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 16 November 2021

Language

English

Authors

Affiliations

CABI
CABI Head Office, Wallingford, UK

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation